My metaphysics?
CRITICAL.
My idealism?
TRANSCENDENTAL.
My moral imperatives?
CATEGORICAL.
My reason?
BOUNDED.
My dogmatic slumber?
AWAKENED.
My analytic knowledge?
A PRIORI.
My walks?
DAILY.
My perceptions?
APPEARANCES.
My ideas?
NOUMENA.
My religion?
RATIONAL.
His synthetic knowledge? ALSO a priori (somehow)
When does he even talk about analytic a priori knowledge...?
>MY Ideas?
>Noumena!
This is also wrong. Kant uses the term "Idea" in a very specific sense.
nvm I guess a priori analytic knowledge technically makes sense in that it's apodictic. Even though insofar as it's basically just definitions it relies on you learning words.
He talks about the impossibility of Analytic a posteriori knowledge, I think that was the point.
Also, from the IEP:
Kant calls the basic concepts of metaphysical inquiry “ideas.” Unlike concepts of the understanding, which correspond to possible objects that can be given in experience, ideas are concepts of reason, and they do not correspond to possible objects of experience. The three most important ideas with which Kant is concerned in the Transcendental Dialectic are the soul, the world (considered as a totality), and God. The peculiar thing about these ideas of reason is that reason is led by its very structure to posit objects corresponding to these ideas. It cannot help but do this because reason’s job is to unify cognitions into a systematic whole, and it finds that it needs these ideas of the soul, the world, and God, in order to complete this systematic unification. Kant refers to reason’s inescapable tendency to posit unexperienceable and hence unknowable objects corresponding to these ideas as “transcendental illusion.”
I still wouldn't call those "noumena" although I confused "idea" with "regulating principle". The lines are kind of blurred though cause God and the World at least are nothing more than an objectification of the regulative principle of reason.
>impossibility of analytic a posteriori
Refuted by WVO Quine (pbuh)
Billions must Quine
Genuinely though, he's completely massive in decimating the remnants of logical positivism, probably one of the best post-Wittgensteinian philosophers of language
What was Quine's ontology?
Realist
Platonic realist? Naive realist? What kind of realist?
Indirect.
Kant even retort...
I am unsympathetic to your music taste
Redditor detected
https://x.com/Logo_Daedalus/status/1528151739508981760
I don't go on reddit or x. You are projecting.
Millions now living will never Quine!
complete misunderstanding of Kant
>muh outdated german enlightenment thinker can never be wrong otherwise I wasted my life studying
Behold, the power of continental reasoning
cope
My God?
MY OWN MIND
it's funny how borzois have turned their narcissism into some grotesque source of morality and religion lol
>borzois
?
>trust the synthetic a priori, goyim
>my ancient schools of thought
>reframed and flattened to fit within the spirit of my time
>my words
>too many
>my boner
>tucked in
cut off the last bit and you can apply that post to all the germans.
The poor man's DROWNING!