After hundreds of years of watch making, they still cannot make a 100% accurate mechanical watch. Why?

After hundreds of years of watch making, they still cannot make a 100% accurate mechanical watch. Why? Is it a law of physics that dictates it is impossible to achieve maybe?

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Please respond

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Because the geometry is not perfect and the reality is not perfect.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Time is a human construct. It doesn't exist in nature.

      Not gona lie this is some deep shit

      Please tell me more

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Time is unique to human perception. Have you ever noticed how a dog will greet its owner exactly the same whether he is gone for the day, or simply went out to get the mail? It's because the animal has no sense of time. Only humans do.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >It's because the animal has no sense of time. Only humans do.
          This Black person obviously never got woken up by a cat on a weekend

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Luv me GA2100

            My dog bugs me for food everyday within the same half-hour

            >It's because the animal has no sense of time. Only humans do.
            My dog knows when it's 5 o'clock. She comes looking for me between 4:55 and 5:05 because that's when I feed her. I've even given her more or less food in the morning to see if it was some sort of hunger thing. Nope, 5 o'clock exactly and she is all up in my shit every day.

            Most all animals have a sense of time. It is called the circadian rhythm. Dogs do that - and not really the same way- because they have no object permanence and a lower intellect. They don't know whether when a person leaves if they will ever be back.

            It's called the sun and the moon. Let me guess, you need more?

            Wrong.

            [...]
            Cope. Animals change behaviors with the seasons.

            My dog is smarter than you, for sure

            Being able to perceive rhythm is not the same as having a sense of time. The older I get, the more I realize that the Bene Gesserit were right. About everything.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Anon, if I spend the whole day away from my dog, instead of greeting me happily like usual, she will cry like a b***h, piss herself, piss on the ground then piss on me

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You just described my dream gf

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Luv me GA2100

          My dog bugs me for food everyday within the same half-hour

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >It's because the animal has no sense of time. Only humans do.
          My dog knows when it's 5 o'clock. She comes looking for me between 4:55 and 5:05 because that's when I feed her. I've even given her more or less food in the morning to see if it was some sort of hunger thing. Nope, 5 o'clock exactly and she is all up in my shit every day.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Most all animals have a sense of time. It is called the circadian rhythm. Dogs do that - and not really the same way- because they have no object permanence and a lower intellect. They don't know whether when a person leaves if they will ever be back.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          My dog is smarter than you, for sure

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Objective time is a meme and before "accurate" clocks were invented, time used to be relative and flexible. Days and nights change length during the year, midday depends on your exact location and your biological cycles change with the seasons.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        reality changes, time is a measure of changes in relation to each other. Our planet's spin and orbit in relation to the sun is changing slow enough that we have made devices like watches, that will pretty accurately read 12:00 at noon during the equinoxes each year. Having a watch synchronized to our day and year cycle is not proof of objective time though. It is only proof that we can build devices that within a single lifetime pretty accurately replicate a change cycles period. If the whole universe went faster or slower for a day our watches would still be accurate. Our watches aren't actually accurate though, they all drift from each other, their source, and from our solar cycle over time, because they are all made up of different particles in different locations

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Time is a human construct. It doesn't exist in nature.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      time crystal

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's called the sun and the moon. Let me guess, you need more?

      Wrong.

      Time is unique to human perception. Have you ever noticed how a dog will greet its owner exactly the same whether he is gone for the day, or simply went out to get the mail? It's because the animal has no sense of time. Only humans do.

      Cope. Animals change behaviors with the seasons.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Clocks are a human construct
      The time system is a human construct
      The units of time are a human construct

      Actual time itself is much more fundamental than "nature", does space not exist either.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Time is a human construct.
      We got some middle school philosophy up in here!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      ”Nature" is itself a human construct.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Is it a law of physics that dictates it is impossible to achieve maybe?
    Effectively, yes. You would need completely lossless 100% efficient motion, parts that never wear, and an endless perfectly consistent power source. None of this is happening.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Sad

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Does it need to be 100% accurate? Supposedly modern quartz watches can reach up to +-1 second per year accuracy, at that point it only needs to be tuned whenever you change the battery.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I was talking about mechanical watches

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        99% of mechanical watches could be swapped to quartz and no one would notice.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          This honestly. The watch elitism is one of the most bizarre things in this clown world. Imagine being a snob because you have springs in your watch.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I love mechanical watches and those who think quartz is worse are fricking moronic. I mostly wear quartz watches because they're objectively better.
            Watch snobs think their mechanical watch made entirely by machines mostly in china have a "soul" that quartz watches don't and it's hilarious.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          They would notice it's not losing much accuracy

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You can use quartz then but make it wrong so that it is slightly fast or slow.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          dont mechanical watches have a ticking sound?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You can make a quartz watch tick. Not that I would, ticking drives me up the wall.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          TICK
          TICK
          TICK
          TICK
          TICK

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Bullshit. Show me a quartz watch that is as smooth as a 36000.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Most quartz watches only tick once every second, it would be quite obvious

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >once every second
            32 768 times every second

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      he said mechanical not poorgay quartz
      for me, its the sekio 5. they used to be $60 4 years ago but now they're $150
      but they're chink level quality and mine loses 40 seconds a day so needs to be reset once every 3 days to be accurate

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Be moron
        >pay stupid amounts of money for a wristwatch that is outperformed by pic related
        >brag

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I paid $60 for mine because im a boomer, paying $150 is gay. besides everybody uses their phone to tell the time, my job requires me to have a non digital secondary watch piece per federal law so I choose mechanical over quartz

          to each their own, if I cared enough about it I'd take this chink shit to a watch maker and have them time it correctly but it takes 5 seconds to reset it once a week

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            meh

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That Seiko 5 field watch costs about $150 - $200.....

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            wristlet

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            based
            I let my brain and income do the heavy lifting

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >my job requires me to have a non digital secondary watch piece per federal law
            What job?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            most federal jobs require a wrist time piece, what they choose is up to them. some do it for status, others utility, others because its a stupid fricking rule
            its not a gs8 secret

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What is the point of that law?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            At no time did you say non digital here
            Why are you lying

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I had a seiko5 which was neat but I replaced it for exactly that reason, losing like 5 minutes per week was annoying as frick to me. I'll sometimes take it hiking because accurate time is not critical and I don't care if I break it.

        I got a Seiko solar quartz for work and have had zero regrets. I haven't had to adjust the time since I bought it in 2021.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          okay ive sobered up let me clarify

          I bought it years and years ago, I just like it. if I need an accurate time I check my phone (like 95% of people) but for a round about I'll glance at it

          >poorgay quartz
          >mine loses 40 seconds a day so needs to be reset once every 3 days to be accurate
          Then why tf did you buy a mechanical moron? To show off your rich while buying a device that doesn't work properly?

          it was $60 back then hardly richgay, i just wanted to try out a mechanical watch. I figured it would have broke by now but its still kicking. I definitely wouldnt pay the $150-$200 price tag they now sell for

          What is the point of that law?

          i shouldnt have said law, its a rule. they dont want people on their phones so they require watches. if you ever notice all cops are wearing watches (usually gayshocks), same reason. (not a cop)

          >poorgay quartz
          >still mogs your "superior" mechanical
          what a fricking moron. you sound like a homosexual. do you wear a bowtie too?

          I like the face aesthetic and ticking noise. anything is better than mechanical for accurate time unless you spend richgay level money for a good mechanical

          At no time did you say non digital here
          Why are you lying

          I meant smart watch, my job doesnt allow those. digital/mechanical is fine
          its a rule not law

          now as for the "rule" mine requires it but its not really enforced by anyone. now if a manager wants a time and initial on some paperwork and you whip out your phone to check you'll get a side eye look but nothing happens, if you're wearing a apple watch you'll get told to take it off. as for why not smart watches, they want us working not texting hence why they want us to use quartz/mechanical

          tl;dr
          next time you see a glowBlack person or anyone who works for the state or fed govt, check and see if they're wearing a watch

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >usually gayshocks
            What's wrong with gshocks?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >poorgay quartz
        >mine loses 40 seconds a day so needs to be reset once every 3 days to be accurate
        Then why tf did you buy a mechanical moron? To show off your rich while buying a device that doesn't work properly?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >poorgay quartz
        >still mogs your "superior" mechanical
        what a fricking moron. you sound like a homosexual. do you wear a bowtie too?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          how did you know?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        So regulate it yourself moron. It takes 5 minutes and a toothpick. I've gotten +2 seconds per day accuracy out of my Seiko. I reset it maybe every couple weeks

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Be moron
      >pay stupid amounts of money for a wristwatch that is outperformed by pic related
      >brag

      I paid $60 for mine because im a boomer, paying $150 is gay. besides everybody uses their phone to tell the time, my job requires me to have a non digital secondary watch piece per federal law so I choose mechanical over quartz

      to each their own, if I cared enough about it I'd take this chink shit to a watch maker and have them time it correctly but it takes 5 seconds to reset it once a week

      You c**ts should stop being poor and get yourself a good wist watch.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Guy should've gotten a hair transplant and a gym membership to lose weight instead of wasting his money on overpriced watches

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    umm actually atomic watches exist

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Umm ackshually those are radios you fricking moron

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >he doesn't carry an atomic optical clock with him and a dewar of LN2

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Is it a law of physics that dictates it is impossible to achieve maybe?
    Yes moron it's called friction

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Hey moron there are a lot more factors at play like gravity

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Mind blown

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >number€
      >not
      >€number
      Dropped

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        euros aren't dollars, the symbol goes after the numbers. €number would be incorrect.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Cope

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Hello yes I'll buy the dollar 29 product
            americans are moronic

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    because mechanical watch are no longer tools they are just a statue symbol.
    You want precision ? buy a quartz or smartwatch

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    A Patek Phillipe is always 100% accurate, it’s the flow of time in the rest of the universe that’s wrong

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I bought a cheap Casio quartz watch to tell the time without looking at my phone. It has been extremely useful. Watches as an accessory are not quite fitting of being called cringe, but you must be wearing a Seiko.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    you don't need time

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    My mechanical watch runs 0.71s fast per day. That's an error of 0.0008%. Only 21 seconds a month.
    A well adjusted Rolex or Omega might run slightly better but the error is already so low. You only get better accuracy when you switch to quartz or a Seiko spring drive. You only get better accuracy than these watches if you go with radio or GPS adjusted watches. And only better than that with your own atomic rubidium or strontium watch.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Forgot to add that the limiting factor of a mechanical watch is friction. The more parts you have that cause friction the less accurate your watch gets. That one reason why most bearings are made from ruby, less friction also means less wear. Then there is gravity affecting the balance. The balance only oscillates with 4 or 5 hz or so. Which is also less accurate that a Quartz doing 1000s of oscillations. So yes it's a physical limitation.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Regardless of how much you reduce friction it is foolish to own a watch because there is a free time-piece with zero friction: the sun. Just look at where it is in the sky to tell the time. If it’s not in the sky it’s time to relax. That is how we do business in Ghana.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Oh dear, the sun is past the mid point, I'm late for my daily warlord standup

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Probably the best answer, it's the moving parts and oscillations that are the issue.
        Mechanical: typically 5,6, max 10Hz
        Quartz: typically 32768 Hz (as in even the cheapest Casios, ofc I have the f91w and flex my precision on the Rolex wearing colleague, but he mogs me with the aesthetic of his date just).
        There's also the citizen calibre 0100 with a ~8000000Hz oscillation, accurate at around ± 1 sec per year.
        Tbh mechanical watches are kinda cool, but isn't the mechanism in quartz cooler?
        You got a small crystal fork, hitting it with electricity, it oscillates incredibly fast, and then when it sends the electrical signal back the tiny computer on your wrist uses the data to tell the time with amazing precision. And this magical crystal tech has basically been perfected allowing even the peasant to have a precise timekeeping method. And if it's digital: no moving parts, great battery efficiency, super nice complications such as chronometer, alarm; even has a tiny light so you can tell time in the dark.
        In short, ofc I want a Rolex to mog people around me, I'm only human, but you'll never convince me quartz isn't cool as frick.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Rolex to mog people
          lmao @ people who think a rolex is something to be proud of
          also stop using the word "mog" you sound like a Black person

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Proud
            I never said that; I'd buy it only if I had so much money with nothing better to spend it on (which is like millions), it is just luxury after all
            >stop using the word "mog" you sound like a Black person
            It's just a bit of tomfoolery on an online forum, relax

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >millions
            rolex watches aren't even expensive anon.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Even a few grand is a lot to drop on something like a watch. There's no real reason to own one unless you have a high paying client-facing job or are just plain rich.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Maybe I haven't explained it correctly:
            My current salary is about 12000€, and I have a couple of watches, the casioak, the f91w, and a neat dress watch Casio I was gifted. The combined price of the casioak and f91w is under 200€, so it was 1/60 of my salary.
            By comparison, a Rolex costs at least several thousand euros; e.g. oyster perpetual 34mm black dial, one of the simplest if not the simplest model: 6000€
            So, for me to go "hey, I feel like getting a new watch" and get a Rolex without having to worry about having enough money for other, actually important things, my salary would need to be at least 60*6000€ = 360000 euros.
            I really don't believe saving up for some trinket is worth it. If I have money to throw, sure. But even though I like watches, I don't see myself collecting them and planning how to buy the next one and making a budget around it.
            So, while I did overestimate by saying millions, I believe you get what I mean now. I'm not saying my way is "the right way" to approach spending, I just believe there should be priorities, and luxury like watches and israeliteelery and other trinkets are at the bottom of my list.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            they have inexpensive models, but i heard they don't just sell them to everyone. they want you to make an appointment months in advance and prove that you want to buy it to use it, not to sell it. the best way to prove this is...
            to already own a rolex watch.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It is indeed pretty cool what quartz watches manage on such a small scale. Still I believe that the craftsmanship of a mechanical piece is a bit more cool given that you get insane accuracy for a piece only driven by springs and levers.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            True, that is very impressive by itself. The technology of a spring mechanism able to keep time while being worn or out of balance, unlike old grandfather clocks which needed to be stationary.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Local atomic timekeeping won't be more accurate than gps lmao

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yes it is. Sending the time signal to the satellite and to the watch causes a delay. There is also a time difference when you are near a heavy object like the earth. Which gps satellites account for.
        Typing this out right now the time sent to the watch might actually be already compensated by the satellite, although I don't believe it's accurate down to the ns.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Sending the time signal to the satellite and to the watch causes a delay.
          yeah no shit dumbass that's how GPS works in the first place. not all atomic clocks are as accurate, and a portable one certainly won't be as accurate as one in a satellite - which by the way also gets corrected for the little deviation it does have, unlike your local clock.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          What do you even mean by accurate down to the ns? Synchronisation to UTC? Coherence of your 100MHz output, I.e. frequency stability? Allan deviation?

          But anyway GNSS will far exceed any compact local clock (e.g. CSAC through to rack mounted caesium beam standards and the like). The point of The local clock is to offer holdover when you don't have a GNSS fix.

          And you can synchronise GNSS time back to UTC since you know the ephemera and have estimates for ionospheric delay; it will certainly provide closer synchronisation than the watch. Note also that all miniature atomic clocks have significant temperature sensitivity

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why do I care? My Rolex does fine. It’s basically israeliteellery anyway.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You can't make anything 100% accurate. The world isn't pure mathematical items.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >The world isn't pure mathematical items.
      Source?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        My own experience. I'm a mathematician, i'm super smart in maths, and I'm a fricking moron when it comes to the real world.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    get a better watch

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What's the point of these mechanical or even quartz watches anymore? There are cheap smart watches that have a lot of extra features and can sync to atomic clocks. Some Garmin are even solar powered and no worries of battery life anymore.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      those "extra features" make the watch worse.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        How so? You can disable them or simply not use them. I generally use sleep tracking and exercise.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You don't need to charge them every day and throw away every couple years because the non-replaceable battery died.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        My 3 year old cheap ass mi band lasts 4 weeks on single charge. If it dies someday, I'd get a new one for a few bucks. Some other bands have solar panels in the screen and they charge automatically.
        Getting expensive watches also increases your chances of getting mugged by Black folk.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >non-replaceable battery
        Not a thing on a my TicWatch

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          nobody cares about your women repellent

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      A watch is to quickly tell the time, if you need dumb gadgets you have a phone.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Stagnation is the root cause. Mechanical watches ar emade to look expensive, not to be precise. So then comes physicists in on the game, people like Oechslin, and start using parts made of silicon using well establishged semiconductor tech such as photoresist and reactive etching. Suddenly things become precise.
    There is more to du such as proper tribological qork, using not just Silicon but also Alumina.

    And friction is not the reason, it would be trivial to compensate for that. Varying friction, on the other hand, is a problem. That is what tourbillons are for.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's called entropy
    have a nice day

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >entropy
      I don't think that word means what you think that word means.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't even know where I'd wear a nice watch.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      on your wrist

      dont mechanical watches have a ticking sound?

      not really unless you really put it against your ear. many cheap quartz watches have a much louder tick sound.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Spend thousands on a watch
    >Can't use it to tell time because there's no actual display and counting the marks takes too long
    I will never understand mechanical watch homosexuals

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      More like
      >make a thread about watch accuracy
      >reading the watch face requires rounding to 5 minute increments anyway

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That 1s delay a day is well worth 100k bro, you are just poor lol

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This topic seems to trigger a lot of people

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      so much so that the comfy watch threads we used to have on this board were shitted up to death.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    even the most "perfect" atomic clock is still rated on it's time drift.
    measuring time is extremely simple: count the repetitions of a process that takes a known amount of time.
    but then you get heat, friction, atomically imperfect mechanisms, variations in velocity from earths rotation or just walking, jerks causing variation in spring tension or increasing the distance of a gears motion due to temporary mis alignment
    and then there's the problem of timekeeping systems being particularly cumbersome: clocks are meant to measure human events which are based on non-uniform celestial motions. the drag on spacetime itself from massive objects affects timekeeping devices, even atomic clocks that measure vibrations of a cesium atom.
    time measurement is an impossibly difficult problem, and it's rather amazing any of these devices work at all

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    mechanical watches are inaccurate because their power delivery is variable. there is no good way to take potential energy of a spring are take exactly the needed amount of out it. I think hydraulic watches would be Bette as time keeping pieces.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      there's plenty of ways to do exactly that, from the fusée and chain to the remontoir d'égalité.
      >hydraulic watches
      what do you mean by that?

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The Sun is almost five times larger than the distance between these mirrors.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Uhhhh, it's actually not that big, I can cover it with my thumb when I'm ouside

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That's because you are fat.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          just how big is your fricking thumb?????

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Soon, perhaps in years, we will have 3D printers capable of fine and smooth details, and people can make their own watches with useful complications.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    my Grand Seiko doesnt have this problem, sorry OP

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I wouldn't count it as a mechanical watch though, spring-drive's more of a hybrid movement/module

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        wrong gay

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Could you be any more stupid? It uses a spring to move the hands and power the quartz IC. The quartz IC regulates the movement of the hands. Screenshot from the video you linked. Cumguzzler.
          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spring_Drive
          >The glide wheel in turn powers a reference quartz crystal and accompanying integrated circuit which controls an electromagnetic brake which then regulates the rotational speed of the glide wheel itself.

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Why do people buy expensive watches? Contrary to popular belief, they aren’t investment vehicles so what gives?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Contrary to popular belief, they aren’t investment vehicles so what gives?
      They were up to very recently. The mass executions of Chinese oligarchs and corrupt officials mighht have had a few things to do with it - they preferred visible wealth and made the Swiss make 45 mm watches.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Money laundering. It's easier to get on a plane wearing a 50,000$ watch than carrying 50,000$ in cash.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Why?
    Perfection is impossible.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What's the point of making a mechanical watch that never loses a single second if its still going to be wrong since earth gains and loses seconds per year when there's events powerful enough to disturb its movement. A powerful enough earthquake can make earth gain or lose a second a year.
    https://www.space.com/7988-chile-earthquake-shortened-days-earth.html
    https://www.space.com/11115-japan-earthquake-shortened-earth-days.html

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      exactly

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    oil dries up.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    my watch bother me when my hands are resting on the keyboard so I wear it on my right hand like a tard
    (F-91w btw)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *