Are there any books on females in warfare? Has there ever been actual real female warriors historically?

Are there any books on females in warfare? Has there ever been actual real female warriors historically? It seems half of it has been an invention of the late 20th/21st century. Sure I know there have been women that have killed men. But I mean are there really any historical documents of women being formidable forces in battle not just some b***h who appeared in combat in nameroll but an actual force to be reconned with. And I want pre 20th century history. No Soviet b***hes sitting around sniping krauts.

Just so much cringe fiction these a days with women acting essentially like men. I'm curious if there is a slither of truth to it.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    There were some women warriors. But an entire army? Don’t think so

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Le Roman de Silence by Heldris of Cornwall. It's from the 13th century chud. Have you also never heard of The Amazons? Start with the Greeks chuddy.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I mean actual facts not mythology leftoid chud

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Chuddies say this and then read the Iliad and go THIS WAS REAL,

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Your bait is sad and pathetic. Reevaluate your life if this is what you spend it on.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >asks for books about females in warfare
            >gets given books about females in warfare
            >NOOOO NOT LIKE THAT
            Your bait is sad and pathetic. Reevaluate your life if this is what you spend it on.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            > Your bait is sad and pathetic
            Nice projection, chuddy boy. I bet you wewuzz in other threads.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Amazons are FACTS. Otherwise you invalidate all Roman and Greek historians, chuddy.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_in_war

    Also see the "Further reading" section.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Can you not read the OP? I said women as a factual formidable force. Surfing through all of that would take me hours and the vast majority would just be Berlin 45' last resort shit.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Surfing through all of that would take me hours
        Don't be a sissy boy. You asked - you get your answer, research.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Please stop shitting up this thread with double replies and so on. Your mental illness only hurts this board.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >can you not read?
        >the vast majority would be Berlin 45
        None of the links are about the 20th century dumbass. You can't read and you're just doing the whole chuddy, "NOOOOOOOO NOT LIKE THAT" thing.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I’m a chud and I hate women because they don’t give me pussy! Please entertain my crypto-incel off topic thread.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    yeah

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      we're talking about active combat here not figureheads

      jesus why is this so hard for you simps to understand

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT LIKE THAT

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        you should've been more specific. well probably not then since in the old days women were valued for being able to create life and war was very common in europe. maybe in china though as they've always had lots of people, go ask a chinaman at your college.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          I think I was pretty fricking clear in the OP the intention.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            > Are there any books on females in warfare? Has there ever been actual real female warriors historically?
            >here are some examples
            >THAT DOESN’T COUNT

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The OP's intention was to find out of there is a sliver of truth to back up modern depictions of women in combat, like Brianne of Tarth in GRRM fantasy series. He's been given multiple sources that provide a sliver of truth. But every time he has cried out "NOOOOOOOOOOO NOT LIKE THAT". So he moves the goalpost to instead of finding a sliver of truth to giving a multiply cited, peer-reviewed, historical document about an entire battalion of female soldiers than decimated a male army.

            OP is chud and should kill himself for such a dishonest thread.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            I said "historical documents". The amazons are a mythology. Joan of Arc was not an active warrior slaying men. Please stop pretending to be genuine when you aren't.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Mate, you are just stupid. Women weren't a formidable force because they are physically weaker than men, what is proven by modern sport, for example. But there were small exceptions, like those black women, who sold their men in slavery (that recent movie, whatever). If you want to find those exceptions, you should research.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Has there ever been actual real female warriors historically?
    A few. Some Queens, some pirates. Joan of Arc, Tomoe Gozen are probably the most famous. There was an Indian warrior who lost her leg in battle and had a prosthetic, which I think was actually the first recorded instance of a prosthetic. Chevalier d'Éon was a trans man, born a woman. Jeanne de Clisson was hardcore and became a pirate against the crown when they executed her husband. The most successful pirate in history was a prostitute named Cheng I Sao, also known as Madame Ching, who had a fleet of hundreds of ships and thousands of pirates.

    Actually finding books about these people, is, of course, nearly fricking impossible. I've tried.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      NO. NOT. LIKE. THAT. I. SAID. THEY. MUST. BE. A. ONE. HUNDRED. THOUSAND. STRONG. ARMY. OF. WOMEN. WHO. KILLED. LITERALLY. MILLIONS. OF. MEN.
      NO. NOT. LIKE. THAT.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Among them was a very particular and numerous branch of nations of a very pure essence, at least by the time they arrived in Europe. This important circumstance is guaranteed by the documents; I am talking about the Sarmatians.

    They descended, said the Greeks of Pontus, from an alliance between the Sakas and the Ama-zones, in other words, the mothers of the Aces or the Aryans (1).

    The Sarmatians, like all other peoples of the family, saw themselves as brothers in the most distant lands. More of their nations lived north of the Paropamise, while others, known to the geographers of the celestial Empire as Suth, Suthle, Alasma and Jan-thsai, came, in the 2nd century BC, to occupy some of the Eastern cantons of the Caspian Sea (2). The Iranians competed many times with these swarms of...411 .... warriors, and the excessive fear they had of their opinionated martiality had perpetuated itself in their Bactrian and Sogdian traditions. It is from their that Firdousi made them pass into his poem (1').

    Asia, Asia, is the land of the Aryans. Sak or hak means to honor.
    Lassen et Westergaard, p. 25.- Ket means in modern Persian voice honorable.
    (1) The word mother is, in Sanscrit, amaba. This is a shorter dialectical form.
    (2) T. II, p. 330
    (1') The three sons of of Feridounn are Iredj, Tour and Khawer. These are personifications of the three white branches of Persia, of the Iran, properly said, then of interior Asia, then of the Western regions of the world. The parenthood within the groups is thus rigorously recognized. One will not lack to find in the term Khawer a completely natural transcription of the term Yavana. This is another testimony of the antiquity of the terms used by Firdousi. - See t, II, pgs. 168, note. - Schaffarik, Slawisch. Alterth., t. I, p. 350-351.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO NOT LIKE THAT.
      WHY CAN'T YOU moronS UNDERSTAND WHAT I AM ASKING FOR??????

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    imagine one deranged leftist shiting up an entire thread because of his own strange complexes. Sad and pathetic best to ignore.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    imagine one deranged rightoid throwing a hissy fit every time someone gives him evidence against his own strange complexes. Sad and pathetic.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Females of the Samurai class would get military instruction (with weapons considered appropriate for women because of their reach/leveraging strength: naginata and yumi) and would see some actual fighting in edge cases (defending the clan's holds, so essentially when things were going badly).

    You also have the Dahomey amazons, acting as a personal guard for their king, with the idea that they were more loyal/less likely to stage a coup than men. They did see fighting and were somewhat effective but nothing special.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They killed a million of white sissy men, tremble.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This girl killed more people than you, OP. How do you feel about it?

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    https://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Herodotus/4E*.html

Comments are closed.