Arguments for Atheism

What are these guys talking about there are tonnes of good arguments for atheism
>there is the argument from...well that one kinda sucks
>there is also the...well that one doesn't even make sense
>I'm sure they like exist though we just haven't discovered them yet

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    - God doesn't exist
    - Religions are false and exploitative i.e. cults
    - scriptures are all myths, tales & fables
    - We don't need to worship a deity to begin with

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      can you give me the arguments? The first one would be enough obviously so what is it?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I gave you four of them

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Give the argument let's start with the first one?
          >God doesn't exist

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Doesn't even know what an argument is, absolute state of atheists

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They're self evident

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            - God is real
            - Jesus Christ died for your sins
            - Scripture is the inerrant word of God
            - You should repent and believe the Gospel
            these four are self evident btw

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >these are self evident
            How? And before you call me a hypocrite I'm not the same anon who posted the earlier assertions, I also want him to tell me how

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            he is claiming they are self evident for the sake of argument, and just like you he doesn't believe anything is self evident when asserted and it all requires an argument

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >can you give me the arguments?
        Blacks.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Here's an argument for atheism. Where is the proof of God? God has never been proven. It is very likely that God is simply a fictional invention.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The proof of God is that without Him you can't prove anything.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No. God doesn't exist.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            God exists

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >da proof of god is god
            The average theist IQ is really remarkable

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        1 For every mind there is a brain
        2 If God real, he is a mind without a brain
        P Therfor, God not real

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >For every mind there is a brain
          Proof?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            since we have never seen a mind without a brain, we are justified to think this is a rule, and it's up to you to provide a counterexample.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >since we have never seen a mind without a brain, we are justified to think this is a rule
            No, that does not follow. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Ironically for how much I see atheists ignorantly misuse the term, this is a genuine case of survivorship bias, as you are arbitrarily excluding any data which fails the success condition of being witnessed by you. If you relied less on dead senses and more on reason you would realize how absurd this is, of course you have never seen a mind without a brain, you have never "seen" anything but the material plane of existence.
            >it's up to you to provide a counterexample.
            God

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
            yes it is. stop parroting bullshit soundbites.
            >you have never seen anything but the material plane of existence
            there is no other plane of existence.
            >god as counterexample
            you try to establish the reality of your myth by asserting that it is true? that's not just circular, it's rotating on the spot.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >yes it is
            So I have evidence that you don't exist?
            >stop parroting bullshit soundbites
            It's not "bullshit", it is a recognition that we do not possess omniscience.
            >there is no other plane of existence.
            What makes you believe this?
            >you try to establish the reality of your myth by asserting that it is true?
            This is moving the goalposts. We were not discussing the existence of God, but the existence of minds without brains.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            well, if you think being completely incoherent is epic trolling, then you win. now frick off.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            God bless.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            God does not exist.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Now say that without crying.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            God does not exist.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's an inductive argument
            You are of course free to reject of accept the premise
            It's not going to be a forceful argument against people who presuppose that disembodied minds, like ghosts or gods exist

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      -Scriptures are all proven myths tales and fables
      There isn't a single magic claim or miracle that isn't obviously and provable to be false. From Genesis to Jesus passing by Noah's ark & Jonah.
      -religious are false & exploitative
      None of the claims of their scripture are true, they nonetheless seek control and monetary value in individuals they manage to fool, indoctrinate & condition into. Cult leaders from the papacy to your local priest.
      -We don't need to worship a deity to begin with
      We have our own agency as individuals and each others as peers to guide us through our life within society. We don't need a unecessary third party, if something is wrong with either us or others we should simply seek to resolve those issues by reviewing each others' interests and seeking reasonable & fair common grounds.
      -God simply doesn't exist
      With today's understanding of cosmology, there is simply no place or basis for the "intelligent design" hypothesis. Everything is transformative, complexification is cumulative. There is no "creation" only an earlier state. There is no gaps left where it wouldn't be vulgarly shoehorned into.
      And we do not need a lie no matter how "useful". Only human prospects.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Jordan Peterson converts to Christianity
    >Becomes a rabid Zionist who worships israelites, more loyal to Israel than his native country of Canada despite not even being israeli
    Not really an argument for atheism but against Christianity.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      A public figure “converting” late in life is normally disingenuous and for monetary gain.
      They can be very articulate and seem genuine. This is because they’re good a public speaking as a skill lol

      See: Saint Augustine.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      He isn't even Christian. He eventually denis he is if asked

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The best and only argument for atheism is that the entire world isn't and hasn't been under the fist of an overt supernatural Theological autocracy with one God granted ruler who is immortal from ancient history to now. The second supplemental one is that no religion has ever shown someone live far longer than the average human lifespan with proof and widespread knowledge of it, nor does it have any groups of people who are expected to be granted this. If any deity existed, with the way they're described in all these holy books, we would have at least one claim of some King or Emperor from the past living a more than normal life, and doing supernatural shit so undeniable even his enemies admitted to it, but they don't exist. The basic consequences to an all powerful God or series of God's favoring people in the mortal world doesn't exist either, no one accumulated power using this Gods will and took over the world because ummm... Reasons. Often these Gods don't even know about the rest of the world outside of some random shithole that only became relevant later because of luck and circumstances which have nothing to do with its outright intervention.

    It's like the God figure can only be supernatural and proven when everyone who could remember it is long dead, and it only acts specifically in ways so that it can't be proven to be a 100% real and natural fact like a tornado, and eclipse, or a meteor. This is the most obvious sign of a scam in human history and yet morons constantly fall for it while pretending to be intellectual because they're willing to accept clear bullshit.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the entire world isn't and hasn't been under the fist of an overt supernatural Theological autocracy
      Yes it is.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >If the sign is something indistinguishable from basic reality with nothing different from what animals living in shit perceive I can claim that it's extraordinary proof despite all these claims coming with completely different explanations across religions!
        No it isn't. Overt has a meaning my friend.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Natural laws are the hand of God. You see God active in your life all around you every day.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Natural laws are fictions

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This is why you are convicted by the rise of the sun.

            No you don't, and if they are that implies a level of power and will which would be breaking those natural laws in a clearly inhuman and supernatural manner to achieve the goals it supposedly has like it did in the past of all these religions.

            Miracles do happen today. Every time a hard hearted unbeliever like yourself submits to the Lordship of Jesus Christ, he is supernaturally changed to a new creation, for he would never repent if nature were allowed to run its course.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Everyday miracles(completely natural things) are different from what I'm describing. Please understand that aggressive shitposting is not a replacement for genuine conversation.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >aggressive shitposting is not a replacement for genuine conversation
            Indeed

          • 4 weeks ago
            Schizoidberg

            Nothing supernatural about changing your mind.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No you don't, and if they are that implies a level of power and will which would be breaking those natural laws in a clearly inhuman and supernatural manner to achieve the goals it supposedly has like it did in the past of all these religions.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >things are pretty, therefore God

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          A God of nature would not like deserts

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Beauty would not exist in pure chaos

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >God if you're real, show me no sign
        >*same stuff happens*
        Why is he like this?

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Read Nietzsche if you're actually interested in atheism.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    God created arguments
    You can't make an argument without god

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Leprechauns created rainbows
      You can't see God without Leprechauns

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Behold, a Christian "miracle".
    A guy gets Lost in the Woods, naturally, people the state pays for such incidentes, do their work and eventually the person is found.
    Miracle.

    Apparently, to a Christian, a miracle is people doing their Jobs.

    Now I Will explain Sorcery, with a few bits of Blood and an effigy and certain technique, a guy makes his illness go away or get better, no doctors involved.

    This isn't a miracle, It IS Sorcery, and altough he wasnt even involved, It is a thing of Satan. And sin and evil.
    And the people which know how to screw the powerful and rich with Sorcery are all evil witches that should be burnt.
    Unlike me, their obedient slave the Christian larper.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://exapologist.blogspot.com/2022/06/120-or-so-arguments-for-atheism.html?m=1

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're all shit

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you want people to believe in a god you believe in then you should prove it. If not stop bothering other people.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    > it is impossible to prove or disprove the existence of a higher power.
    > different religions built different cultures based on specific behaviors.
    > some of those cultures thrived like the west, others did not.
    > it is a historical fact that western culture has led to incredible social growth over the centuries and that is thanks to mass belief in god.
    > however that still cannot prove or disprove the existence of a higher power or excuse the tribalism simultaneously pushed in the name of sad god.

    Okay, how’s that?

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Schizoidberg

    Atheist doesn't need an arguement. There's no good reason to believe in something for which there is no evidence. There are all sorts of things you too didn't believe in until you experienced it yourself. At some point in your life, you saw the color magenta for the first time. Until then, you did not believe in magenta

    People didn't use to believe okapi exist, but now you can see them in zoos, in real life, so people do believe in okapis now. See how that work? I don't believe in X. I see an X. Now I believe in X.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You would be right if humans were born tabula rasa (we're not).

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >God real cuz my feelings

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          who are you quoting, lil bro?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why you write Gojira wrong? Dishonorabu.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/eIkIwnR.gif

        who are you quoting, lil bro?

        The joke is that blacks are Christian

      • 4 weeks ago
        Schizoidberg

        Humans aren't born tabula rasa, but they also aren't born believing in God.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Christianity is an evidence based religion, atheism isn't. Give me an argument for atheism

      I think one of the best arguments against the Christian god, is that the story shoots itself in the foot in the beginning, Genesis 1. Evolution completely negates original sin because Adam and Eve didn't exist, and if original sin doesn't exist then Jesus' sacrifice on the cross is moot. I respect young earth creationist to some extent (even in all their craziness) because they are being honest with the implications of evolution. I do not understand theistic evolutionists.

      I have read many arguments and justification for why a Christian can believe in evolution and they all fall flat. I have heard Christians doubt what Paul says in Romans 5, and they will even reject that Jesus believed in a literal Adam, even though he spoke of him and his genealogies tie him all the way back to Adam. I have heard many bring up early church fathers like Augustine and claim they did not believe in a literal creation account, but they most certainly did. They may have wrote things where their understanding deviated from the standard script, like Augustine believing creation happened instantaneously, but he was going to die on the hill that is young earth creationism. There are other takes as well but they require a such a bending and injecting of a new narrative that it misconstrues what the authors of the creation account were trying to say. Overall, the default position up until the 19th century for your mainline Christian sects was that the creation story was to be taken literally.

      In summary the idea of evolution and original sin is contradictory and there isn't a good way to justify.

      even atheists believe in the concept of original sin though...

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Christianity is an evidence based religion,
        except the evidence does not exist.
        >atheism isn't.
        that's correct, atheism isn't a religion.
        >Give me an argument for atheism
        it is enough that religions are fairy tales with no support. atheism is just the recognition of this fact. but for some reason you ignored me here

        god wants everyone to worship him.
        he is omnipotent
        therefore I should be worshipping him
        but I am an atheist
        therefore stupid fairy tale.

        also, go away with muh free will. OMNIPOTENT. could have created free will without drawbacks (such as in heaven), or a world where free will is bad and being a robot is good or any number of solutions I cannot even think of.

        , not that I expect anything better from christians
        >even atheists believe in the concept of original sin though...
        you are really unhinged, did you know that?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Explain to me how atheists believe in original sin. Original sin is a core doctrinal point for Christians, so I am not sure how you can have it outside of Christianity nor do I understand the need for it outside of Christianity. Again from my core argument one cannot have original sin and evolution.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So life is perfect, your family, neighbourhood, town, country? If not then you believe in original sin conceptually

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Wrong. Low IQ.
            Problems are caused by a multitude of factors, none of them being characters from ancient myth

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Problems are caused by a multitude of factors
            Yes this is what is meant by original sin

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Original sin is essentially a supernatural curse on people by a god. That’s not the same as streets not being paved well

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You don't understand
            >sun and stars
            >god did it
            >potholes
            >god did it (deserved tho)
            this is the entirety of christkek philosophy

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That is a massive leap in logic. Just because things aren't perfect, which is entirely subjective, doesn't mean original sin exists. Why do things even need to be perfect? Once again going back to the original argument, evolution explains how we got to where we are today and it is basically through natural selection of which death is a key component, so right out of the gate this is problematic for original sin.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        not even israelites believe in that garbage

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Did you start believing you need to perceive something with your senses to believe in it because you perceived that with your senses?

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    god wants everyone to worship him.
    he is omnipotent
    therefore I should be worshipping him
    but I am an atheist
    therefore stupid fairy tale.

    also, go away with muh free will. OMNIPOTENT. could have created free will without drawbacks (such as in heaven), or a world where free will is bad and being a robot is good or any number of solutions I cannot even think of.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This isn't an argument you haven't even defined worship of given a logical reason why you would ignore an omnipotent being

      >Christianity is an evidence based religion,
      except the evidence does not exist.
      >atheism isn't.
      that's correct, atheism isn't a religion.
      >Give me an argument for atheism
      it is enough that religions are fairy tales with no support. atheism is just the recognition of this fact. but for some reason you ignored me here [...] , not that I expect anything better from christians
      >even atheists believe in the concept of original sin though...
      you are really unhinged, did you know that?

      >except the evidence does not exist.
      kek, opinion disregarded

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you argue in a manifestly underage manner.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think one of the best arguments against the Christian god, is that the story shoots itself in the foot in the beginning, Genesis 1. Evolution completely negates original sin because Adam and Eve didn't exist, and if original sin doesn't exist then Jesus' sacrifice on the cross is moot. I respect young earth creationist to some extent (even in all their craziness) because they are being honest with the implications of evolution. I do not understand theistic evolutionists.

    I have read many arguments and justification for why a Christian can believe in evolution and they all fall flat. I have heard Christians doubt what Paul says in Romans 5, and they will even reject that Jesus believed in a literal Adam, even though he spoke of him and his genealogies tie him all the way back to Adam. I have heard many bring up early church fathers like Augustine and claim they did not believe in a literal creation account, but they most certainly did. They may have wrote things where their understanding deviated from the standard script, like Augustine believing creation happened instantaneously, but he was going to die on the hill that is young earth creationism. There are other takes as well but they require a such a bending and injecting of a new narrative that it misconstrues what the authors of the creation account were trying to say. Overall, the default position up until the 19th century for your mainline Christian sects was that the creation story was to be taken literally.

    In summary the idea of evolution and original sin is contradictory and there isn't a good way to justify.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I like Graham Oppy's "best argument" because it makes theists seethe. Same with his argument from naturalism.
    He has a knack for looking at arguments which people naturally come up with on their own and which they use to justify some sort of naive lacktheism, and rewriting them to work as valid philosophical arguments for actual atheism.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >because it makes theists seethe
      There's the atheist's motive. Not truth.

      >Christianity is an evidence based religion,
      except the evidence does not exist.
      >atheism isn't.
      that's correct, atheism isn't a religion.
      >Give me an argument for atheism
      it is enough that religions are fairy tales with no support. atheism is just the recognition of this fact. but for some reason you ignored me here [...] , not that I expect anything better from christians
      >even atheists believe in the concept of original sin though...
      you are really unhinged, did you know that?

      >except the evidence does not exist.
      While there certainly is superabundant evidence of the Christian faith, it would be more accurate to say evidence is a Christianity-based concept than that Christianity is an evidence-based religion.
      >it is enough that religions are fairy tales with no support
      This is actually a logical fallacy called appeal to ridicule. It's easy to mock anything as a "fairy tale", but it does not prove anything false. I don't believe in that fairy tale globe!
      >atheism is just the recognition of this fact
      Atheism refers to a worldview which is indistinguishable from Epicureanism.
      >you ignored me here
      You are in error because the secret will of God is different from the declared will of God. The Lord has predestined everything whatsoever comes to pass, and nothing happens which is beyond His power, in order to bring about the best possible ending to the world and the greatest good. At the same time He has made known His character through His holy law and given us the duty to be perfect in life, and we have no excuse for our sins.
      >not that I expect anything better from christians
      Christians have no duty to explain anything to you sir, the world does not revolve around you, you should be grateful that God even permits you to breathe.
      >you are really unhinged
      He said while noticeably seething

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >There's the atheist's motive. Not truth.
        I said that I like it because it makes theists seethe, not that it's true because it makes theists seethe. I also think the arguments are pretty good, but the fact that they make you seethe is why I like them.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Reinforcing the point

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Not really. It is not the case that I am an atheist because it makes you seethe. It is not the case that I think particular arguments are successful because they make you seethe.
            It is the case that there are some arguments which I think are quite strong, and I also happen to like them because they make you seethe. However, the fact that I like them or that they make you seethe don't have any impact on my assessment of the arguments' strength.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >The Lord has predestined everything whatsoever comes to pass, and nothing happens which is beyond His power, in order to bring about the best possible ending to the world and the greatest good.
        calvinists are sadists

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The only argument you need for atheism is "there's no proof for religion so I choose not to believe in it." You could go further but you don't need to.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Have my gold kind stranger!

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Here's your (You) now come back with your argument

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        My argument is I'm a Christian and even I find your thread to be worthless

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Atheism even having a name is a misnomer and is superfluous.
    It just used to require a label because everyone was religious back in the day.
    Now that secularism is normal it’s basically not needed. We don’t have a word for people who don’t believe in dragons either.
    What you should be doing if you want to convince people to believe in religion is to prove dragons and gods exist.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can be a religious and an atheist

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I go to church and pray, don't I? Despite believing there's no God
        That's religious behavior

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    My argument for atheism is this: it requires the most courage to believe that our conscious existence will cease upon death, and the most sincere respect for life to remain kind to others while possessing such a belief, rendering atheism the most aesthetic of all dispositions.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      literally the most cowardly position to take. You are just afraid of life after death

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        "Life after death" doesn't intuitively come first, so no. It's the theist who fears death and then invents "life after death" as a cope.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Sounds like projection as I said, you are the one afraid of responsibility and divine judgement. The theist is content either way

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Is the theist actually content with the second death and final annihilation, or are you just saying that because you don't want people to make fun of your belief in an eternal pleasure land for all who believe a rabbi walked on water?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Embracing death and being liberated through this courage was the first mark of the stronger type and what made one a master on Earth. It was the one fearful of death who voluntarily entered servitude out of comfort. The fantasy of the afterlife came from people who couldn't deal with death and transformation.

            >divine judgment
            You have just deferred responsibility onto another, like a slave. Your duty to your God is your pacifier. The stronger type knows judgment is his sole responsibility.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The fantasy of the afterlife came from people who couldn't deal with death and transformation.
            Surely anon knows that just about every tribe and civilization on earth until recently had some sort of afterlife in mind?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No animal on Earth has a fear of death as intensely as the human animal does.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Atheism is outdated because NDEs are seriously irrefutable proof that heaven really is awaiting us all because (1) people see things during their NDEs when they are out of their bodies that they should not be able to under the assumption that the brain creates consciousness, and (2) anyone can have an NDE and everyone is convinced by it: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U00ibBGZp7o

    So every atheist or materialist or agnostic would be too if they had an NDE, so pic related is literally irrefutable proof of life after death. As one NDEr pointed out:

    >"I'm still trying to fit it in with this dream that I'm walking around in, in this world. The reality of the experience is undeniable. This world that we live in, this game that we play called life is almost a phantom in comparison to the reality of that."

    If NDEs were hallucinations then extreme atheists and neuroscientists who had NDEs would agree that they were halluinations after having them. But the opposite happens as NDEs convince every skeptic when they have a really deep NDE themselves.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >NDEs
      It's just the nervous system, like dreams

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You're arguing with a bot
        https://desuarchive.org/his/search/filename/1680375125305771.png/

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >people see things during their NDEs when they are out of their bodies that they should not be able to under the assumption that the brain creates consciousness
      This is scientifically testable, and it has been tested, and it's bullshit.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >le ebin bait))
    kys and stop posting

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No arguments? I accept your concession

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    best arguments for atheism:
    >relying completely on external entities means giving up all your personal power and will, makes you not much different from an automaton
    >for all you know "gods" could be manipulative aliens or demons, why would you give your trust to them without any reservation?
    >do the gods seem trustworthy? are you certain they have humanity's best interests at heart?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That isn't an argument for atheism at all

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      literal low IQ schizoid babble

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you're too inbred to entertain things you don't already believe

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >another fedora thread
    Thanks for your contribution

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *