At what point does high IQ make you a completely retarded NPC?

At what point does high IQ make you a completely moronic NPC?

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    With IQ above 130 your mutational load is extremely high. You'd be unstable in many ways, so it really depends on what kind of environment you had growing up. If you were properly socialized you'll do fine, if not you'll suffer a lot.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Mutational load? I'm being told that's a population-level characteristic. Anyway what's the link to IQ

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >With IQ above 130 your mutational load is extremely high.
      What does this mean?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        lol it's just some nonsense from some homosexual high school senior who took an IQ test online. Mutational load is an oncology term used to describe the mutation frequency of a malignant tumor.

        This board has an extreme high mutational load, ever since this board became a flat out IQ topic board.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          why did it even become an IQ topic board? I mean, yeah the entire internet is filled with a buncha gays boasting about anything. so if its a sci board you bet your ass its gonna be about their big brains and relevant scientific topics
          it's extremely cringey but at the same time you gotta see it for what it is. people having low self esteem needing some objective metric to prove their worth

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Very good post

            IQ is whatever really, it don't measure intelligence as reliably as they think it does.
            In-fact it measures a host of other things as well, if anything its not useful besides finding out if kids have some intellectual disability or if they 2E. Most nobel-prize winners dont have "high IQ" as IQ test are unreliable as hell, once the scores pass 1-2 deviations.

            I don't think objectively trying to measure ones self worth from having above high IQ means much, its a copium, as you said "prove their self worth" in a sense.,All people cope some cope with IQ scores. To some it becomes the center of their lives. It becomes there identity, as people do with money, fame, looks, new products, diagnosis, profession, status, etc its all just copium.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Indeed, IQ is only somewhat indicative of fluid intelligence if it's measured unprepared, like giving an out-of-the-blue test to kids in school. Some will just be naturally better pattern recognizers and problem solvers. But you can practice it like you can practice anything, and like Langan did to prove his superiority.
            If he was that smart he would have understood the futility of such an endeavor.
            His texts don't indicate any exceptional intelligence; they're very dilettantic, unstructured, unfocused, full of swipes at the "establishment" and misunderstandings born of not having studied a field properly, just having cherrypicked exciting factoids - a highly intelligent person would at least be able to figure out how to organize and present his ideas, wouldn't he? Those ideas, from what I can tell, are mostly a rehashing of some mystical tropes with a pinch of cybernetics, and no added value. Why not just read Plotinus and Norbert Wiener?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        if you've had a bunch of low chance mutations that allow you extreme intelligence i guess it's also likely those mutations just so happen to frick you up in other ways

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Got some mutational loads for your holes

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Being smart is not a bad thing you fricking glowtard

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Most high IQ people are NPCs. That's why they slot into academia so easily and excel at the institutional academic curriculum designed by npcs for NPC minds. The truly intelligent non NPC does terribly at school or drops out and becomes successful through their own efforts

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >academia
      >high IQ
      This isn't the 1950s.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The truly intelligent non NPC does terribly at school or drops out and becomes successful
      Okay I did everything right! Why am I still living with my mom at age 32? Why do I have no skills? Why can't I drive a car?

      I followed your methods anon, why am I still such a loser!!

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        because youre moronic

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        did you read the last bit?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You've obviously been waiting for the opportunity to learn to drive stick, before corrupting your skills and perceptions with the NPC transmission.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Can you tell me the name of this high iq gentleman ? He looks like he plays darts or bowling competitions.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I believe his name was Robert Paulson.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Christopher langan

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    IQ stops measuring intelligence at around the 99th percentile

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Its not the high IQ that fricks him
    He hasn't bothered to learn what research really is or how to do it
    Its probably his ego, he thinks he's above learning what actually scientists/mathematicians do
    His CMTU bullshit is just random pseudo philosophy

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I've looked into his CMTU; I don't understand it, but it's that maybe I'm just a moron. Didn't he proclaim that 9/11 was an attempt to stop the world from learning about CMTU? He seems like a grift, to be honest. The rest that he asserts is just low-hanging fruit.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Even if you read far more clear-cut summaries from people who claim to understand it, there are many logical holes in it. It's just someone who claims they finally understand how the meta physics of the universe and all things works, but it's just nonsense.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Its not the high IQ that fricks him
      This is only partially true. It's his high IQ combined with being born and raised in the boonies and never getting into any major intellectual field/organization. Imagine being 8 and thinking you know everything and are the smartest person in the world, and then literally never being proven wrong. He's probably never had a serious conversation with anyone within a standard deviation of his intelligence. Short of being proven objectively wrong by future developments, why would you ever reevaluate your own thoughts about religion, politics, science, technology, or really anything if you think that everyone else (and by extension their work/thoughts/insight) is intellectually inferior?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ask me how i know you can't understand the CTMU well enough to criticize it.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    75+

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Very hard for anyone above 130 to have a normal life.
    It will begin to be almost impossible to socialize with the average IQ people.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Other people can be trivially manipulated like they were vidya NPCs
      >This is somehow a bad thing
      If they're so inconsequential as to not even seem to be sapient beings then why not just exploit maxx the frick out of them?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Unfortunately (or fortunately, from a species perspective) increasing IQ dramatically decreases criminality, dishonesty, violence, and other antisocial tendencies. Higher IQ persons have an extremely robust theory of mind and typically find it difficult to act unethically despite the fact they are the least likely to face consequences for such actions.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So, they just sit around and be lonely and depressed?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Pretty much it.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When you have a master's degree and still got vaccinated for covid.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm always reminded of this Terry Davis clip when I hear him talk
      He clearly has nothing of value to say, so he tries to baffle you with bullshit
      Low IQ people (see the comments of the CMTU video) are blown away by it

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nah you're just a fricking idiot.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Are you moronic? He has schizophrenia. To judge him like that is indicative of a serious handicap, so that’s why I am asking you if you are literally moronic. Now I am imagining a physiological moron typing on his keyboard judging schizophrenic rants as though they come from sound minds. And now I’m the idiot judging a fricking literal moron because he posted something moronic! Wow!

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That isn't a schizophrenic rant, that's a completely sane opinion.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you don't understand this it means you're below 150 IQ. CTMU is legit but obviously if you're not intelligent you won't get it

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's more a mental illness thing than an IQ thing. It's just that mental illnesses are more common on the 130+ end.

    Source: Am ~136 IQ, as measured by 2 proctored tests (1 year apart) and one unproctored. I come off like a literal drooling autistic moron when spoken to. I can't articulately express my thoughts without significant thought beforehand. I speak to few people. I become extremely emotional over trivial things. I am certain that I have some kind of disorder, but I don't care to investigate which.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      reply

      https://i.imgur.com/RndXa2A.jpg

      "nah you're good, I have similar problems. You just see and feel more than everyone else. You can't articulate it because it would take hours to do so, and many more hours to condense it so normal people could understand. In short, you don't share the same language with average people the way they share between themselves.

      To them, words are symbols that have one given meaning. To you, one word can have hundreds of different meanings, depending on who you talk to, in what context, in what tone, etc. You're lost in the complexity of the world, while everyone else lives in a fabrication of reality, of categorical thinking, because they would not function if they could not lean on this highly flawed thinking style, as well as a way to navigate the world.

      You're lucky but also incredibly unlucky. What you see and what you feel are yours alone, and few if no one will understand you, let alone want to befriend you.

      "You're the monkey with two eyes, while everyone else has one. Suffering is all you will have and all you will get. People will unnecessarily beseech upon you suffering as they do to others without realizing they are; they simply cannot understand, while you desperately try to stop it, but to them it seems like a temper tantrum or some sort of disorder" (lol).

      From one two-eyed monkey to another, enjoy hell, as I have and many others before you."

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    "nah you're good, I have similar problems. You just see and feel more than everyone else. You can't articulate it because it would take hours to do so, and many more hours to condense it so normal people could understand. In short, you don't share the same language with average people the way they share between themselves.

    To them, words are symbols that have one given meaning. To you, one word can have hundreds of different meanings, depending on who you talk to, in what context, in what tone, etc. You're lost in the complexity of the world, while everyone else lives in a fabrication of reality, of categorical thinking, because they would not function if they could not lean on this highly flawed thinking style, as well as a way to navigate the world.

    You're lucky but also incredibly unlucky. What you see and what you feel are yours alone, and few if no one will understand you, let alone want to befriend you.

    "You're the monkey with two eyes, while everyone else has one. Suffering is all you will have and all you will get. People will unnecessarily beseech upon you suffering as they do to others without realizing they are; they simply cannot understand, while you desperately try to stop it, but to them it seems like a temper tantrum or some sort of disorder" (lol).

    From one two-eyed monkey to another, enjoy hell, as I have and many others before you."

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >You can't articulate it because it would take hours to do so, and many more hours to condense it so normal people could understand.
      No I think to the contrary, it seems natural to condense it for the intelligent person, but stupid people won't understand you if you do that.
      >To them, words are symbols that have one given meaning.
      They do. It's what mqkes communication possible.
      >To you, one word can have hundreds of different meanings, depending on who you talk to, in what context, in what tone, etc.
      Stupid people can't zero on the single, unique meaning that makes unambiguous communication possible. Not even other people like you understand you, because they see different meanings in the words than you do. You see complexity everywhere because you can't figure the simple explanation.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >No I think to the contrary, it seems natural to condense it for the intelligent person, but stupid people won't understand you if you do that.

        Condensing is scary, regardless of intelligence, simply because of generalization, and categorization. By talking in length your able to show that the thing your talking about not necessarily belong to one thing but is interconnected with many, breaking down the illusion, that is in place. There is a reason that quick messages this is good this is bad is so captivating for the masses because they want others to tell them what to think say and believe.. A easy distorted view of reality. Because its simple, even tho its completely and utter wrong.

        >They do. It's what makes communication possible.

        I should have phrased it differently, I forgot to create a parallel to drawing and symbolic drawings simplifying reality. as a way to show words themself also ends up simplifying reality and by doing so also distorts it,
        "the longer one speak the more clear the picture of reality becomes, the same could be said for drawing as well. hence the similarities. But to do so one would need an almost infinite large vocabulary.

        >Stupid people can't zero on the single, unique meaning that makes unambiguous communication possible. Not even other people like you understand you, because they see different meanings in the words than you do. You see complexity everywhere because you can't figure the simple explanation.

        yes your correct, one is truly alone. But the more you know the more you know you don't know, therefor the simple explanation is only sufficient in getting a distorted elementary understanding of something. Its not able to properly convey the truth as it shows itself to oneself.
        The simple explanation can not be taken as the absolute truth, but yet people do, and destruction follows.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I mean the problem is that when dumb people learn language, they fail to find the unique meaning (ignoring now homophobes and such for simplicity) that unites its usage acroas different contexts, instead they memorize its use in each context anew. Which means they struggle to communicate outside familiar contexts, as their vocabulary is lacking for that context, or, they may use a common word in a bizarrely specific meaning with no indication that that is what they meant, because that is the meaning they learned for that particular context, which also may also not be indicated. (how am I supposed to know that "two pencils" was a underground metal band from communist east germany??)

          They also don't seem to be able to learn compounding and word derivation in languages that allow it, and again learn each complete word as a unique vocabulary item.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Thanks for the clarification.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Cult of Passion

            My magic powers gave my cool shit but it also made other things way harder, like learning new languages.

            I can read plain English way high deminsionally and mathematically but learning more than a few foreign words every few months is taxing for me.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >it only means the one thing, it can't refer to every possible it

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I want to call you a moron like the literal moron I just responded, but I am going to refrain from directly calling you a moron as well because I feel like you’re just asshurt from what the anon you are replying said, and so you aren’t attacking his ideas, you are just trying to attack him. Pathetic, yes. moronic? Not.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No. The only thing that bothers me is that some people genuinely do think you're a genius just because you can talk two hours about how to open a drawer.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Are you seething? O _ O BROOOO HES SEETHINGGGG WITH RAGE THAT HE moronO HAHA

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You can't just laugh at something that isn't worth ridicule without suffering the consequences again. It will happen again.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I seriously hope this entire post was you joking.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why should he be joking?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          it just sounds like someone mocking certain types of people, the ''tfw too smart for life'' types.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Okay so what is he specifically addressing within his post? The problem with n-words is that they don’t afford the honesty of a post so long as they can crucify the poster. Pretentiousness exists only as abstract and perceived failure to explain acceptably, regardless of the foundations that are attempted to be expressed. Arguably this is why most highly intelligent people fail, that they are seen as pretentious by the intellectually lower than them, simply because they cannot deliver the information within an accepted generalized threshold that the lower limited requires, but which simultaneously bastardizes the sincerity of which is required to be understood. You view his post as made by a gay asswad, but if the gay asswad has given you useful or insightful knowledge, it’s in your best interest to try and see if it contains such validity, which isn’t about validating the poster himself but being able to be open minded and lucid and in control. You’re literally embracing cattle behavior because you personalize the statements, instead of deconstruction and reconstitution.

            In all odds he’s just romanticizing his post because he holds sentiment to the ideas fueling it. What is wrong with this when you can simply distill everything you read into its most base purities; not by semantic authoritative stranglehold upon expression, but from intent, context, and sincerity? These derive reflection and introspectively develop your own being greater than what you were.

            His post literally goes over this, just in a homosexual gay way. Now you’ve got two gay gay posts explaining this to you, from two different anons. Will there be a third?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm just skeptical, he claims he's smart, too smart for the people around him, who btw are really stupid ofc, I've heard that one countless times. He says he's so intelligent it causes him to see and feel too much but he isn't intelligent enough to focus and articulate his feelings. He's so intelligent but he can't wield language in a way that can get across to "normal people". Is that because normal people are so stupid? Or are there techniques that can be used to get across to them that he hasn't employed?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Like all things with words and their definitions, there is the fundamental inspiration that facilitates our reasons to desire communication, which is that of to be understood. But understanding does not demand linearity from a receiver, nor from the transmitter. That the poster might have been able to formulate better methods of articulation if he was perhaps more intelligent, or just even more thoughtful is always possible. And it is also possible that the observer to this communication could synthesize qualities of merit regardless of the original intent, upon novelties that which are adjacent or perpendicular to the original thought. Yet lament upon the literal demands limitation, by judging the ideas intertwined with the author you lose a part of that nakedness and transparency which is only available when approaching it with sincerity. By creating a portal to personification, you detriment the ideals of the ideas with hierarchal qualification - appeal to authority - demands of conformity. How can you find higher truth by always demanding obedience to whim?

            All of this romanticization aside, I believe it is better to deny authorship altogether, though if we were to extrospect upon why he did what he did, and who he might really be, behind what he pretends to be; when writing, a flow occurs, and it is coarse for some, and fluid with others. And in that time of invoking expression, it is created as is, willed by an intent. Sometimes it lacks within one context, and sometimes it’s revelatory in another. But at all times, it is still expression. You can assume, and you can compare, and who knows what you will really decide upon when it comes time to assigning a value to him? It will still always be a separate conduit, and that in itself has merit I suppose, but what truly matters is not him, me, or you: but the ideas. You have what he said, deny the ideas a personhood, and you’re free to realize near everything.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I had no intension in mocking anyone, the person I originally replied to had some difficulties in communication, and this is one way to look at why such a thing might happen. Its speculative at best, and they draw parallels to my own experiences. The smartest person I meet had down-syndrome.
            He would often break up fights in school, who knows why, he would often say "Everyone should be nice to one another" the sincerity in his words, the tone of his voice, his demeanor, have stuck with me for more than 20 year. Why do you think that is? Most people always made fun of this guy, I did as well. Yet now I believe he was the person that truly understood the most at that time, yet it might just be me going off trying to find meaning where none is to be had.

            as this poster pointed out

            Okay so what is he specifically addressing within his post? The problem with n-words is that they don’t afford the honesty of a post so long as they can crucify the poster. Pretentiousness exists only as abstract and perceived failure to explain acceptably, regardless of the foundations that are attempted to be expressed. Arguably this is why most highly intelligent people fail, that they are seen as pretentious by the intellectually lower than them, simply because they cannot deliver the information within an accepted generalized threshold that the lower limited requires, but which simultaneously bastardizes the sincerity of which is required to be understood. You view his post as made by a gay asswad, but if the gay asswad has given you useful or insightful knowledge, it’s in your best interest to try and see if it contains such validity, which isn’t about validating the poster himself but being able to be open minded and lucid and in control. You’re literally embracing cattle behavior because you personalize the statements, instead of deconstruction and reconstitution.

            In all odds he’s just romanticizing his post because he holds sentiment to the ideas fueling it. What is wrong with this when you can simply distill everything you read into its most base purities; not by semantic authoritative stranglehold upon expression, but from intent, context, and sincerity? These derive reflection and introspectively develop your own being greater than what you were.

            His post literally goes over this, just in a homosexual gay way. Now you’ve got two gay gay posts explaining this to you, from two different anons. Will there be a third?

            Like all things with words and their definitions, there is the fundamental inspiration that facilitates our reasons to desire communication, which is that of to be understood. But understanding does not demand linearity from a receiver, nor from the transmitter. That the poster might have been able to formulate better methods of articulation if he was perhaps more intelligent, or just even more thoughtful is always possible. And it is also possible that the observer to this communication could synthesize qualities of merit regardless of the original intent, upon novelties that which are adjacent or perpendicular to the original thought. Yet lament upon the literal demands limitation, by judging the ideas intertwined with the author you lose a part of that nakedness and transparency which is only available when approaching it with sincerity. By creating a portal to personification, you detriment the ideals of the ideas with hierarchal qualification - appeal to authority - demands of conformity. How can you find higher truth by always demanding obedience to whim?

            All of this romanticization aside, I believe it is better to deny authorship altogether, though if we were to extrospect upon why he did what he did, and who he might really be, behind what he pretends to be; when writing, a flow occurs, and it is coarse for some, and fluid with others. And in that time of invoking expression, it is created as is, willed by an intent. Sometimes it lacks within one context, and sometimes it’s revelatory in another. But at all times, it is still expression. You can assume, and you can compare, and who knows what you will really decide upon when it comes time to assigning a value to him? It will still always be a separate conduit, and that in itself has merit I suppose, but what truly matters is not him, me, or you: but the ideas. You have what he said, deny the ideas a personhood, and you’re free to realize near everything.

            You want something concrete and you want to put me in a box, you want and give me a specific value, while the essence of my post seems, if not utterly irrelevant.Perhaps I shouldn't aligned with the poster I replied to, in the way I did. But by aligning with the poster, he might feel understood, and less alone and frustrated, that others experience similar problems. Even unveil new avenues for overcoming communication barriers. Barriers that far to often present themself during communication, Yet I failed even at this.

            As things stands now, perhaps not replying to this post

            It's more a mental illness thing than an IQ thing. It's just that mental illnesses are more common on the 130+ end.

            Source: Am ~136 IQ, as measured by 2 proctored tests (1 year apart) and one unproctored. I come off like a literal drooling autistic moron when spoken to. I can't articulately express my thoughts without significant thought beforehand. I speak to few people. I become extremely emotional over trivial things. I am certain that I have some kind of disorder, but I don't care to investigate which.

            would have been for the best. Because now the discussion is not about the context of my reply, but about me; why is that? If only I knew things would have turned out like this, I would never have replied in the first place. Now I am just left with regret, that my reply might have inadvertently negatively effected this thread, and many of the posters within it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Most people always made fun of this guy, I did as well. Yet now I believe he was the person that truly understood the most at that time, yet it might just be me going off trying to find meaning where none is to be had.
            Downies are spiritually highly developed people, though their neocortical functioning is limited and they can't always make themselves understood via complex formulations and arguments. But their conscioussness, which is a sub-cortical function, is pretty advanced.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The smartest person I meet had down-syndrome.
            I don't believe you.

            >Most people always made fun of this guy, I did as well. Yet now I believe he was the person that truly understood the most at that time, yet it might just be me going off trying to find meaning where none is to be had.
            Downies are spiritually highly developed people, though their neocortical functioning is limited and they can't always make themselves understood via complex formulations and arguments. But their conscioussness, which is a sub-cortical function, is pretty advanced.

            The cerebellum is actually hit much harder.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Garbage in garbage out.
    IQ has never been the sole factor of whether someone turns out to be a moronic NPC.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Cult of Passion

      Everyone is an NPC to an extent.

      Schizo-turbo-autist is a type of NPC, on some real of his understanding of existence it becomes "about a hundred dollars".
      [winces and shakes head]

      Wretched plight.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >God tier IQ
    >Bouncer
    >waste his time trying to "figure it all out"1 instead of contributing in a particular field

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Midwits.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Low IQ: misinformed, aiming at making factually correct statement
      Average IQ: factually correct, aiming at factually correct statement
      High IQ: personal opinion, aiming at expressing subjective statement that totally disregards facts
      How is this not just an evolved version of "feels > reals"?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that meme was made by a midwit. Frankenstein's monster was still a monster because he killed like 10 people including a couple kids because people thought he was ugly

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    shut it down

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    where is chris at? normally he would show up by now. guess he's still sucking himself off in the youtube comments section

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    At no points does high IQ make you a completely moronic NPC.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anon

      TBF an IQ above 85 probably does make you a moronic NPC. People below 85 IQ are li'erally too 'tarded and are automatically player characters.

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Allow me explain you what high IQ is really like. My IQ is around 2.5SD above average, so on a 15SD system it's around 138, and on a 24SD system it's 160.

    Basically life is easy for me. I never had to try at school. I was never the best in my class, but I never studied for anything and always got As. At University I did hardest subject - Physics - and scraped through without ever going to lectures or studying. In my job as a programmer, I have excelled. I've been promoted 4 times in 4 years (typical promotion cadence is once every 2-3 years at my job). I work maybe 3 hours a day from home, I'm known and respected as "someone who knows what they're talking about" across the company. I have almost absolute freedom, as long as I get my work done. I earn 4x what typical person my age earns. I spend the rest of my life doing hard physical activity, because otherwise life is too easy.

    On the social front, I'd say I'm fairly typical - I have a group of friends, I've had multiple girlfriends and since I was 18 I've spent ~60% of my time in a relationship of some sort. It has not hindered me whatsoever.

    The main way in which I'm moronic is I cannot motivate myself to try. If I could, I think I could be millionaire in 2 years. But I cannot - my life is too comfortable and easy, which does come with some sense of meaninglessness.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      visit a country where you don't know the language and force yourself to live there for a month if you want a sense of difficulty

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Barkon

    You have only scored RQ(i.e. fake IQ; moron quotient).

    Yep.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Barkon

    When it's RQ.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Barkon

    I went back.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >128 IQ
    How over is it for me? Serious answers. This score shattered me completely

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dont stay mad midwit. Your post doesn't even make sense.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if you make a thread about something that doesn't appeal to the cadre of insectoid autists on IQfy they throw a hysterical tantrum. I think it may have something to do with the mutation load. Their dysfunctional autistic brains function so that they are decent at one single thing but get floored by complexity in inadjacent fields. As a defensive mechanism they shout and scream until the bad thing leaves their screen. I suspect this board has the worst genetics outside /misc/ and porn-oriented boards.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Gaxj

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *