>atheists: There is no proof or reason to believe in God.

>atheists: There is no proof or reason to believe in God.
There is no reason to believe this opinion.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    holy shit who cares
    what the frick do you idiots still have to argue about you are all insane talking about the same asinine nonsense over and over making no sense forgetting what you're even talking about
    no wonder they killed socrates

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is no reason to believe in the Bible or follow a Bronze age mythology cult either, even if we were to agree that an abstract God exists.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >There is no reason to believe in this opinion either.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i don't think you know the meaning of reason or believe

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >unicorn-denialists: There is no proof or reason to believe in unicorns
    There is no reason to believe this opinion.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      But we already know unicorns don't exist though.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        But we already know God don't exist though.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Did God tell you so?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Did unicorns tell you that they don't exist?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            God did.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Unicorns told me God doesn't exist.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            But God is something which is all powerful and all sovereign so what you're really saying is that something which is all Power and all sovereign is not all Power and all sovereign?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The unicorn is all powerful and all sovereign more than your God.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Well if you're appealing to something which is all powerful and all sovereign then you're not really arguing against me but conceding.
            Only you have to prove those extra properties of the unicorns are necessary.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No wrong. The Unicorn told him he doesn't need to prove anything.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How do you know that? Maybe we just haven't found them yet.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          God reveled it to me by general revelation.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        how? absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >how
          I don't know how I know, just that God made me know.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That's not an opinion.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why do so many modern atheists assume other atheists are like them?

    For example they assume atheism has a symbol analogous to the Cross, Crescent, or Yin Yang.

    Or that they're on a team.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The view holds unless some Christian proves their god exists

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      To prove something means it cannot be wrong, otherwise it's not proven, meaning proof is knowledge.
      But until an atheist can know anything to begin with, we are stuck dealing with their opinions about what they think is real or not and their convictions.
      And we simply have no interest to participate in entertaining your delusions beyond reminding you that you're deluded.
      But me reminding you that you're deluded shouldn't make you even more deluded. I do have proof of God like the Alpha argument and I want to it to you. But as a presupp, I want the subject to be about your delusions.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You are literally unintelligible. Everyone can instantly tell you cannot compose proper English, and when they respond to what they think you are trying to say, you reward them by failing to comprehend their arguments, purely because you have don’t have fluency in English. Why do you insist on trying to have intellectual discussions in a language you can’t speak? You have been spamming this board for months and your English isn’t any better. Why should anyone take you seriously when you are too stupid to learn English?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          My bad.

          To prove something means it cannot be wrong, otherwise it's not proven, meaning proof is knowledge.
          But until an atheist can know anything to begin with, we are stuck dealing with their opinions about what they think is real or not and their convictions.
          And we simply have no interest to participate in entertaining your delusions beyond reminding you that you're deluded.
          But me reminding you that you're deluded shouldn't make you even more deluded. I do have proof of God like the Alpha argument and I want to show it to you. But as a presupp, I don't want to grant privileged access to reality to atheists, I want the subject to be about your delusions.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >To prove something means it cannot be wrong, otherwise it's not proven, meaning proof is knowledge
        Yes so prevent your proof and knowledge that your god is real.
        If I were you, I might start with what proof convinced me, and probably add the best case I can possibly think of if those aren’t the same two pieces of information.
        So get cracking buddy.
        Also
        >we
        Man you might be the only Christian poster left. You’re here every day, often pretty much all day, posting the exact same arguments and points.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You did not read, did you?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You post it all day every day anon. I’ve read it multiple times.
            It’s just your excuse to not post proof, probably because you don’t have any.
            Literally pre-supposing that Christianity is true, a completely unnecessary action when you actually believe something defensible.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You post it all day every day anon. I’ve read it multiple times.
            You just contradicted your self when you demonstrated otherwise.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            *yourself
            Im phone gayging so please excuse the spellings.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You falsely assume that just because you post something that it’s coherent, makes sense and is true. I figured out Christians had no proof while I was Christian btw.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >While I was Christian
            No such thing. I can kind of guess the kind "Christian" you probably were.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So let’s looks at your process
            A. If you don’t believe in Christianity you are not allowed to think or make arguments.

            B. Even if the person you’re talking to was Christian and that’s when he realized Christianity was false, the plan is just to deny that he ever was Christian.

            You literally just start with the position that you’re correct and pretend anything to the contrary doesn’t exist and isn’t true.
            It’s genuinely childish behavior. You are now stuck in Christianity and you’ve locked yourself in with zero possibility of escape. Outright built yourself a mind prison and threw away the key.
            You gave up having a girlfriend you sleep with for this bullshit lmao

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You literally just start with the position that you’re correct and pretend anything to the contrary doesn’t exist and isn’t true.
            I think that there is a word for this.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, pre-suppositional apologetics. I think some people here including op are dazzled by the multi-syllabic word and sort of miss the fact that it’s lower order thinking at the tier of the neighborhood kid who changed the rules of games while playing when he was losing to ensure he won.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its a dumb take fs, theres more to lose if u dont believe compared to when u do

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *