>best greek philosopher. >name literally means "best of all"

>best greek philosopher
>name literally means "best of all"
who writes this shit?

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Plato mogs

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nope, it's impossible to understand philosophy and history and then to read something like de interpretatione and not understand that Aristotle is a transcendent genius. plus cicero said Aristotle's dialogues were better than Plato so you only think plato mogs because you're a pleb who can only detect drama and Ari's dialogues don't survive.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Only because he is an idealistic cuck and also because of the rise of monotheism; which wholeheartedly adopted his ideas. Aristotle on the other hand is an analytical genius whose appreciation it took a little while to notice. I'd say both are equally important but that Plato's influences have done more harm than good. Chasing ideals is probably the most destructive human beings have ever been and we have only mitigated our own destruction through Aristotle's analysis, be it scientific or literary. Plato is the delusion while Aristotle brings us back to reality. Its funny that Plato only took from Socrates what we shouldn't do and extrapolated that to what he thinks we should do, while Aristotle hearkened back to Socrates by questioning whether Plato's prescriptions were any different from Socrates' warnings.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Plato's name, Aristokles, also meant "best of all"

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    this dood thought flies have four legs loool

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >"what! did the man fron antiquity not have knowledge that was beyond his reach due to the technological limitations of his time!!?? what a hack!"

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You can catch a fly and count the fricking legs. Hell, you can pick up a dead fly and count the legs. It's just lazy. And that is why

        Nope, it's impossible to understand philosophy and history and then to read something like de interpretatione and not understand that Aristotle is a transcendent genius. plus cicero said Aristotle's dialogues were better than Plato so you only think plato mogs because you're a pleb who can only detect drama and Ari's dialogues don't survive.

        PLATO MOGS

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >it's just lazy
          how many of your beliefs do you check yourself?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm just never wrong.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            so, zero

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            All of the ones I publish.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Russell was such a hack I still don't get why people take him seriously. He has actually aged much worse than Aristotle, even while being more than two thousand years younger.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Also, his hateboner for Aristotle and Aquinas was just ridiculous. And his 'flying teapot' argument is basically question begging--it presupposes a positivist concept of God that's pretty much impossible to proof because a 'positivist God' wouldn't even be God.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Youre right but his argument is still the rational one

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, it's rational in the sense that a deceptive subterfuge is more convincing than an intelectually honest but weak argument. It's a smart move to make with people who don't think about their positivist premises that much.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No it is the rational answer because it involves evidence based thinking
            >deceptive subterfuge is more convincing than an intelectually honest but weak argument
            you are on the philosophy board, the best arguments to make wont be found here

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Where is Russel's empirical evidence for the logical categories that he discusses? Not Everything uses the same kind of evidence. If he were consistent with his teapot argument it would discredit his entire project

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            If you based your assessment of male and female anatomy on the amount of teeth on the average male and female at any given time, you'd also think that men are supposed to have more teeth than women. Because men generally have more of their teeth than women. Women tend to have worse dental hygiene thanks to quirks of their sex. So everybody "dunking" on Aristotle for "not making the right observations" is triply Black person-moronic because 1) the observations, at least at a surface level prove Aristotle right; 2) they never made their own observations to try to counter Aristotle (they just assumed it would all work out; and 3) they grossly underestimate the difficulty in understanding what the "form" of something is, especially in the light of evolutionary genetics (which Aristotle couldn't have possibly known back then).

            Don't be a Black person-moron. Read your Aristotle and ascend above one of the greatest minds to have ever lived.

            Also stop doing that stupid "durrr flies have 6 legs, not 4 legs and 2 arms" shit. It doesn't make you look intelligent at all. If that's the best you got, you're huffing nuclear copioid fumes.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          "yeah, dude, just go ahead and chase insects like a moron (and be careful enough to kill them while leaving their bodies intact, or lucky enough to find an intact body laying somewhere) so your whole metaphysical system is seen as valid by stuck-up autists from ~2300 years in the future"

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >listen up homosexuals
            >if you study hard you can do this
            >*snatches fly out of mid air*
            you know damn well he would've done it

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He probably thought the front legs were hands of some sort from how flies rub them and tenderize things with then a bit. Which is actually a very imaginative description of what flies do and their identity.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the greek miracle is called a miracle for a reason

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Aristotle

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Greek philosophers didn't exist. They're a myth.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *