Boeing

What's going on with them?

Why can't they make good planes anymore? An incident every week with them.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    A new policy, it's called DIE or something

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      All Americans must DIE?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Diversity Inclusion Equity. They want out of their way to recruit mentally ill people too.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    purely socioeconomic factors

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Anybody who says it's the indians are fricking moronic homosexuals who know nothing about security clearance like

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's psyops aimed at the Chinese and Russians because Boeing is contracted to make US 6th generation NGAD fighters.
    This will make them think it's not a threat.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >if you kill your own people and lose hundreds of billions in market share... you WIN

      Holy based!

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        We kill our people all the time

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          trvthnvke, we are pawns for the elites

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Kennedy turned them down stupid

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah, it went really well for him afterwards.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            how many presidents didn't turn them down? Kennedy was murdered btw

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >You see, it's actually a GOOD thing we have people in the government wanting to commit atrocities against their own citizens because this one time the president asked them not to do it

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            LeMay wished nothing wrong ; go to Chicago, and you'll wish to nuke the city too.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah and then they put him down.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah i'm sure it wont be a total failure like the f-35

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        the f-35 is incredibly expensive but it is the most deadly thing in the air. It's also designed to work with the entire system; it's not designed to dogfight, it's designed to destroy everything within 100 miles before visual contact.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >stealth doesn't work in the rain
          yeah great waste of money

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Damn that's crazy when did boeing start making engines and breeding large flocks of birdstrike-ready avians

          Why even bother trying to explain high level concepts to the moron tourists that populate this board

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >ameritard marketing slogans designed to embezzle public funds
            >high level concepts

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >catchy greentext slogans designed to sway others into being as moronic as him
            Nice

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            American """military tech""" is getting destroyed all over the globe by 90 IQ thirdies with can openers. Every American intervention ends up in failure. And yet here you are, the eternal American golem, sharting out marketing gimmicks word for word trying to justify being tax cattle for the ZOG.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Sure thing bud, go back to your echo chamber on /misc/

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's morally ok to damage or destroy American bodies because they contain no sentience. Maybe if we can wean them off of goyslop they can at least be of use to humanity for organ harvesting.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Burger organs infused with corn syrup, McGrease and estrogen.

            No thankyou.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >it is the most deadly thing in the air
          that would be f-15, silly anon.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The F35 can shoot an F15 down before it shows up on the F15s radar.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            i will believe it when i see it. :^)

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You will never fly or work radar on either.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            neither will (You)

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >IQfy is just moronic as all the normie sites
            this isn't Boeing's problem or fault, you're just freaking out because of their other recent frickups and now every single thing that happens with any Boeing airplane is potential clickbait for your dumb ass to share.

            the f-35 is incredibly expensive but it is the most deadly thing in the air. It's also designed to work with the entire system; it's not designed to dogfight, it's designed to destroy everything within 100 miles before visual contact.

            Yeah i'm sure it wont be a total failure like the f-35

            The F35 can shoot an F15 down before it shows up on the F15s radar.

            F-22 is still the greatest air superiority fighter. No idea where you two are getting this shit from, not that the F-15 and F-35 aren't also incredibly deadly but there's a reason NGAD is specifically a F-22 replacement, a reason F-22s cannot be sold and are only used by the US while the F-15 and F-35 are both sold abroad, and a reason the US is hesitant to use the F-22 and show off all of its capabilities. If shit ever truly goes breasts up then the F-22 (and eventually, NGAD) is there to make sure we have complete air dominance.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            see

            [...]
            go back to your containment board >>>/k/

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            just read up on the NGAD stuff and it seems interesting
            do you know what's supposed to set it apart from the f-22? the wikipedia article said "there may be two variants of NGAD: one with long range and payload for the Indo-Pacific and one more oriented to the relatively short ranges between possible battle areas in Europe," but i'm not really sure that that means

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            probably not much that isn't already mentioned in the wikipedia article. As you noted, range is a concern (iirc the F-22 was designed more for European operations and may not have the range for SEA operations). I would assume things like 3D thrust vectoring would be an important consideration, especially since (as I understand it) it would allow for the elimination of more control surfaces which can give a smaller radar cross-section for stealth. There's also "fluidic thrust vectoring" which would potentially give similar benefits as picrel but with a much simpler, maintainable design.
            >Now being researched, Fluidic Thrust Vectoring (FTV) diverts thrust via secondary fluidic injections.[15] Tests show that air forced into a jet engine exhaust stream can deflect thrust up to 15 degrees. Such nozzles are desirable for their lower mass and cost (up to 50% less), inertia (for faster, stronger control response), complexity (mechanically simpler, fewer or no moving parts or surfaces, less maintenance), and radar cross section for stealth. This will likely be used in many unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs), and 6th generation fighter aircraft.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            2D thrust vectoring is all you need. Yaw is barely used at high speeds. NGAD is not designed with close in dogfighting in mind.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >you're just freaking out because of their other recent frickups
            They literally forgot to install bolts in their airplanes. "What is going on" is a very legitimate question to ask here and being weary that this could be another Boeing frickup seems not too implausible.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Wasn't it that they fricked up the maintenance of said bolts?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The plane was practically brand new. What maintenance would there be to do?

            The actual fault lies with QC in any case, if your inspection can't catch this, you shouldn't be allowed to make toasters, much less passenger jets.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Damn that's crazy when did boeing start making engines and breeding large flocks of birdstrike-ready avians

          Why even bother trying to explain high level concepts to the moron tourists that populate this board

          go back to your containment board >>>/k/

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          you gotta remember these people were programmed by decades of its boondoggle agitprop and can't accommodate to new situations quickly

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          F-35 isn't that expensive at all. F-35A flyaway cost is under $70 million per unit currently. For comparison an F/A-18E is ~$65mil and an F-15E is ~$90m.
          people meme price because the DoD paid upfront for 1700 of them. For comparison the F-16s they are replacing with the 35A still cost $63mil EA for new (block 72) airframes.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >NGAD
      not give a damn ?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Next Generation Air Dominatrix

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          kinky

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Fricking flat design!

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    A big part of it is that they simply don't want you flying.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    When they absorbed mcdonnall dogass all the dogass board corpos and accountants ingratiated themselves into boeing and the culture changed from engineers designing good products that sell as a virtue of being good to cost cutting and budget min/maxing to squeeze profits at the cost of quality.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I want to absorb some mc-donalds tonight as well

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Boeing is fricking up a lot recently, but this one isn't on them, they don't make or design the engines, the ones on that 747 are from GE. If anything they did a good job designing a plane that lands just fine even after one the engines 41% itself.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      There's actually an entire story about GE's downfall too that I had something of a front row seat for from friends and family that worked there.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What can I say, the west is falling apart and the chinks will eventually dominante everything, learning mandarin isn't even going to help because they are more racist than us, we're to them like Black folk and jeets are to us

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Are jeets to blame or other issues?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Was that also due to MBAs and DEI?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Was that also due to MBAs
          Jeff Immelt was a dogshit CEO for GE and he made a ton of bad decisions so the answer to your question is yes.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Engine failure
    Shit like that happens all the time and is barely reported on. It's only because there was a big failure that the media is suddenly jumping on things that would barely get a glance usually.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      /thread
      U homosexuals should check avherald.com to see how common this shit is, also boeing doesn't make jet engines, ge, rr or trent does

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Not long until they kill one of their own diplomats.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      to bad it didn't kill him kek

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Anon, glowies will be knocking on your door soon. Open up.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Good thing i'm still in school 😉

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    competency crisis.
    When you hire people based on how non-European and non-straight they are instead of how competent they are, you end up with more and more infrastructure failures. This is by design, and is being pushed for by people who harbor a long-standing generational hatred against Europeans.
    See also the train derailments starting in East Palestine and like half a dozen other places after that.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Oh fug the schizos are here

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >"suffering engine failure" in sarcasm quotes
    >"Nooo, nooo nooo NOO nooo Federal Aviation Administration, it isn't a fire it's just... levitation"

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Must be nice for Boeing to have the entire aurora borealis completely localized in their engines,

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.palladiummag.com/2023/06/01/complex-systems-wont-survive-the-competence-crisis/

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      basically Black folk kill people in a convoluted way

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Damn... if only these breaks worked!

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      your fricked command of the english language introduced some irony.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >why do the Democrats keep sabotaging planes?
    Because only green billionaires should be flying on their green jets.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Okay so hear me out, these guys are pedophiles. You know, that kind that shows up in power all over.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They've been wanting to get out of commercial business for a long time because it doesn't represent the same return on investment as lucrative government military contracts. However, they're on the stock market and don't want to panic their investors, so its important to maintain the illusion that they're trying, and not just shit can the entire civilian fleet so that they can focus on making AWACS aircraft parts and such for all of the nations gearing up in the wake of the Ukraine War.

    Simple as. Its controlled demolition of a very specific part of the company that its deliberately looking to sideline so they can focus on bigger things. Boeing has been barking up this tree for years, its been a long, slow process of showing failures and refusing to fix them. All so that they can finally throw their hands up and go 'Welp, we tried! Guess its over now.'

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Why can't they make good planes anymore?
    Clowns & monkeys is all that's left.
    It's the future of America.
    Watch the movie Idiocracy.... because we're living in it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      America has been sucked dry by israelites and it is going to be turned into a mutt-troony global army. It already is actually.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    There was a racist on the plane

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Boeing doesn't make engines

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    first Boeing now GE
    it's over us aerospace
    almost like outsourcing all manufacturing and insourcing brownies just leads to inferior results

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Competency crisis.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    meanwhile
    https://news.slashdot.org/story/24/01/19/0857255/airbus-is-pulling-ahead-as-boeings-troubles-mount

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >What's going on
    It's pretty basic
    IQ decline (for almost everyone)
    Mass immigration (amplifying the IQ decline)
    A certain group of people pushing for racial diversity rather than competency.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nonsense. IQ decline is minimal and only relevant if you look at population wide trends. Boeing absolutely is a company which could keep a highly intelligent staff, but they obviously do not.
      It is a deliberate choice to outsource engineering, no matter how important, to low skill/wage subcontractors.

      The entire management was essentially begging for this to happen.

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The F-35 program had a rocky start but it developed into one of the most successful fighter plane programs in history. It’s now at, what, 1000 airframes built? It’s so wildly successful that economy of scale makes it CHEAPER than previous-gen aircraft.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      see

      F-35 isn't that expensive at all. F-35A flyaway cost is under $70 million per unit currently. For comparison an F/A-18E is ~$65mil and an F-15E is ~$90m.
      people meme price because the DoD paid upfront for 1700 of them. For comparison the F-16s they are replacing with the 35A still cost $63mil EA for new (block 72) airframes.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's summed up into turbo capitalistic woke hellscape, simple as, they hire the cheapest and most """diverse"""" and incompetent workers and cut corners at every turn, simple as.
    This is something most probably won't happen to airbus because for all their faults, the EU is a regulatory hell which wouldn't allow them to make such garbage products, and the fact that the EU is propping it up like hell so there's no room for failure in the plans.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >anti-white is white capitalism
      /pol/tard moment

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What are you even speaking about?
        And which part of my comment did contain any of that shit?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >turbo capitalistic woke
          have a nice day poltard

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >What's going on with them?

    They didn't do the needful

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >What's going on with them?

    They transitioned from an engineering to a management company. If you aren't in aerospace you don't realize how hard and gatekept everything thing is. Boeing has a duopoly position in a market where customers are thinking about what they should order now so that it is delivered in a decade (that is why you don't see their stock move, even though their planes are literally falling apart in the air).

    It is literally just a company which is falling apart on all levels. The Max had manufacturing, engineering, QC disasters now, Boeing can not build a plane. Still it is not punished by the market, because they *will* sell their planes. Customers have no options.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    its not the plane maker, its the airpline maintenance crew thats to blame.

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What competent engineer goes into aero? It pays like shit and hours suck.

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's the "competency crisis" or rather the mandating for marginalization of white men in fields critically reliant on meritocracy. Resulting in air traffic near-collisions and planes falling out of the sky as the new normal.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    no fricking way it happened again

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >i wonder why something failed on plane with probably like 130,000 hours and 35,000 cycles
    must be these DEI people i constantly hear about

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, inspection frickup here, likely Black or food involvement.
      Boeing not at fault obviously.

Comments are closed.