Can you solve this

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    yea I could

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's a party?

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Do your own graph 101 homework shiteater.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      who hurt you

      5

      no

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        It's at least 8

        did you even try?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous
          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            LLMs can't count or reason you idiot, especially not gemini

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          still interested if someone can get past 8 or prove wrong

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sorry, but I'll have to inform your school that you tried to cheat using IQfy.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    it isn't the 1900s anymore just have gpt do your homework for you rajeet

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    5

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's contradictory. If you have 4 people out of which two know each other , then you can take a subset of 3 that includes those two people and contradict the statement about 3 people which says that in any 3 people group there must be two people who don't know each other. Assuming knowing each other is an equivalence relation.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Nah. Imagine A and B know each other, but nobody knows C or D. The subset of that is A, B, and C in which A and B know each other, but B and C (or A and C) do not. As long as there is one unconnected node, the constraint that 2 people don't know each other is satisfied.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Knowing each other is not transitive. Take a person A to know each other with person B and person C but person B does not know each other with person C

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why not ask an AI?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      another proof that AI is completely moronic

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      did you even try thinking for a sec?
      ai is moronic and the only people being replaced by it are homosexuals like you

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    its the same solution as the old "what's the bus driver's name?" riddle.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Four? For 5 people , it means at least three people know each other, otherwise, cond 2 is not valid. but that means if you take all these 3 people, cond1 is not valid. For 4 people you have one person who knows all people and all people know him, but nobody else knows anyone else

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    why not infinite people? ignoring the fact that you can't shove infinite people into a house

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Prove it

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        i don't know man, but the conditions are not difficult to achieve. i don't think I'm getting this right.
        see picrel, you can pretty much go on forever. i didn't even drew all the relationships because most of them are irrelevant

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          you violate condition 2, as you can pick 4 people that all dont know each other

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            i still don't get it. You sure its well redacted?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            i still don't get it. You sure its well redacted?

            oh nvm, i get it now

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    not technology

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >at least two who don't know each other
    Maximum number is current human population minus 2. moronic question

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Condition one basically means that the graph can't contain any triangles.
    I can't figure out condition two right now, I thought I had something but maybe not

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I understand the conditions like this:

    For any selection of three people, at least two of them don't know each other.
    For any selection of four people, at least two of them know each other.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I don't understand the question.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    just ask chatgpt

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Currently not good at math but trying to get better, doubt this is the correct answer but it was fun to think and work through.
    Whats the answer?

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    The answer is 7. The maximum people at the party is 7. Anything else is incorrect. You're welcome. No I'm not explaining that math to you, do your own damn homework.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I thought it was 7 give the numbers mentioned but then felt unsure and went with 24

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *