It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |

Skip to content
# Can you solve this

###

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |

yea I could

What's a party?

Do your own graph 101 homework shiteater.

who hurt you

no

It's at least 8

did you even try?

LLMs can't count or reason you idiot, especially not gemini

still interested if someone can get past 8 or prove wrong

Sorry, but I'll have to inform your school that you tried to cheat using IQfy.

it isn't the 1900s anymore just have gpt do your homework for you rajeet

5

It's contradictory. If you have 4 people out of which two know each other , then you can take a subset of 3 that includes those two people and contradict the statement about 3 people which says that in any 3 people group there must be two people who don't know each other. Assuming knowing each other is an equivalence relation.

Nah. Imagine A and B know each other, but nobody knows C or D. The subset of that is A, B, and C in which A and B know each other, but B and C (or A and C) do not. As long as there is one unconnected node, the constraint that 2 people don't know each other is satisfied.

Knowing each other is not transitive. Take a person A to know each other with person B and person C but person B does not know each other with person C

Why not ask an AI?

another proof that AI is completely moronic

did you even try thinking for a sec?

ai is moronic and the only people being replaced by it are homosexuals like you

its the same solution as the old "what's the bus driver's name?" riddle.

Four? For 5 people , it means at least three people know each other, otherwise, cond 2 is not valid. but that means if you take all these 3 people, cond1 is not valid. For 4 people you have one person who knows all people and all people know him, but nobody else knows anyone else

why not infinite people? ignoring the fact that you can't shove infinite people into a house

Prove it

i don't know man, but the conditions are not difficult to achieve. i don't think I'm getting this right.

see picrel, you can pretty much go on forever. i didn't even drew all the relationships because most of them are irrelevant

you violate condition 2, as you can pick 4 people that all dont know each other

i still don't get it. You sure its well redacted?

oh nvm, i get it now

not technology

>at least two who don't know each other

Maximum number is current human population minus 2. moronic question

Condition one basically means that the graph can't contain any triangles.

I can't figure out condition two right now, I thought I had something but maybe not

I understand the conditions like this:

For any selection of three people, at least two of them don't know each other.

For any selection of four people, at least two of them know each other.

I don't understand the question.

just ask chatgpt

Currently not good at math but trying to get better, doubt this is the correct answer but it was fun to think and work through.

Whats the answer?

The answer is 7. The maximum people at the party is 7. Anything else is incorrect. You're welcome. No I'm not explaining that math to you, do your own damn homework.

I thought it was 7 give the numbers mentioned but then felt unsure and went with 24