chrome disables manifest v2

AHAHAHHAHA
https://blog.chromium.org/2024/05/manifest-v2-phase-out-begins.html?m=1

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Time to go back to Firefox, LOL!

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I never left

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      JUST FRICKING PUT TAB GROUPS ALREADY AAAAAAAAAAAAAA
      YOU Black folk EVERY OTHER BROWSER HAS THEM DON'T FORCE ME TO USE EDGE

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Just use an extension or something, I dunno. I have 5 tabs open at most before I start maniacally closing them. Like, you can just middle click a tab to close it, you lazy bum.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Just use an extension or something
          I have tried multiple and they are all garbage

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Tab group extensions for Firefox all total garbage, Vivaldi and Chrome have god tier tab grouping and I will refuse to use Firefox until they give us something that's on par

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        pretty sure they will add them in one of the next few updates, and I read that they will also add vertical tabs

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >pretty sure they will add them in one of the next few updates
          I've been told that for more than a year

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why can't they implement the ability to export tabs instead to a text file including each tab's history? Would've been a lot more useful than bookmarking all tabs.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      go back? you left?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/SV7210H.png

      AHAHAHHAHA
      https://blog.chromium.org/2024/05/manifest-v2-phase-out-begins.html?m=1

      And I was thinking of coming back to chromium. Firefox has been behaving erratically and crashes my tabs now.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Didn't Firefox get rid of their CEO after he donated to anti-gay groups?
      Don't think I want to support that tbh.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That sounds very relevant while picking a web browser.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It shows a company's priorities, yes, homosexual.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If your hatred of gays is so deep-seated, it mostly shows your closeted wiener-sucking fantasies. Also a CEO has to keep a corporate image, regardless of what they believe.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So if someone hates Nazis that means they deep down want to frick Nazis and Trump? Huh?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nazi isn't a sexual preference. Also you're letting your infatuation with gay shit influencing your web browser of choice, of all things.
            You sound like you have a dick in your mouth right now.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So if you hate paedophiles and wish they were all dead that means deep down you want to fiddle kids? Huh?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        shalom rabbi, time to watch those ads!

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who could have possibly imagined that allowing an ad corporation to hold a monopoly on internet browsers would end up biting us all in the ass haha.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Too bad for them that Firefox as a project did not die and they could not wait long enough for it to die before doing this.

      I've been using firefox as my porn browser for years now. I am very used to it and I will not be inconvenienced at all. I'm just happy that Google makes the choice for me.
      Now I am waiting for windows to force me to use Linux too. That change however will inconvenience me somewhat.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Too bad for them that Firefox as a project did not die and they could not wait long enough for it to die before doing this.

        Google is one of the main investors in the Mozilla foundation. I'll let you figure out why.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It dont matter, what matters is 99% of firefox money goes towards promoting troony ideology.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They pay so that Firefox continues to use Google as the default search engine. Same way they pay apple billions to keep google as default in safari.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's basically Mozilla's main source of income.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I have zero doubt that if Google did not pay up, Microsoft would offer some amount of cash to set Bing as default.
            I don't think Google likes that idea.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >They pay so that Firefox continues to use Google as the default search engine.
            Wrong. I mean, what you say is true, but the reason is to have a controlled monopoly. If mozzarella foundation were to go away, Google would find themselves in Microsoft's shoes in the 90s.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Firefox will remove manifest v2 in the name of safety.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >will
          >would
          >might
          Rope Black person.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            They'll except some bribe money from Google and give all the leadership a raise again like in 2020.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            except what?

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Firefox already supports v3 with non-standard extras from v2 so the adblockers don't get fricked.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's ok anon. Remember when they told everybody that they had "don't be evil" as their policy? There's absolutely no way that they would be lying about that.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Microsoft got taken to court for way less than this.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >monopoly
      that quote from the princess bride that implies you are using words you do not understand in an attempt to appear knowledgeable

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And then chrome cucks will defend this instead of just using Firefox forks because "muh controlled opposition"

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this is why I don't use any web browsers

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      holy shit stallman

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this is why I don't use any web browsers

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_IceCat

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    thank god. you Black folk have been crying since 2021. maybe now you’ll shut up.

    waiting for the marketshare stats the next couple of months for you to see how much people really don’t give a shit about mozilla.

    remember the numbers. remember this post.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >thanks but I'm still goy Black personcattle
      weird flex but ok

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >see how much people really don’t give a shit about mozilla.
      You mean learned helplessness and the desktop Chrome userbase grew in the first place thanks to a multitude of techy types recommending and installing Chrome and ublock because of ublock. It will take time for the word of mouth recommendations to shift and then time for the general public to cycle through their old PCs and get recommended Firefox with their new setup. Additionally Microsoft never built the same monopolistic integrations in IE that Google has with Chrome so many people will probably feel afraid they could lose their data and documents from switching.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what is it with chrome users and going out of their way to b***h about how much they hate google but then turn around and pisscry out their buttholes when someone suggests they use something else
      you frickers are worse than windows users

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't give a frick what the morons all use, I'll use whatever browser I want.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Imagine rawdogging the internet in 2024 with your chrome herpesdick browser.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    good thing brave has built in adblock that isn't affected by this.
    firefox trannies will be in for a rude awakening once firefox drops it soon too kek.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is this why ungoogled chromium started to shit itself on cloudflare on IQfy for me since yesterday? I don't see how it would affect fork, but at the same time I'm suspecting problem not being on my part since I'm getting cloudflare or CORS errors on my wi-fi, but not on mobile internet.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I've been running into Cloudflare issues consistently for the past few weeks, but I use Librewolf (Firefox fork). I think it has to do with fingerprint protection and/or third party blockers.
      Shit sucks though. I have to switch to a separate, non-hardened browser almost daily to do certain things.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >still uses chromium
    >le shill lion
    >crypto scam that is kyc
    You are no better

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >still uses chromium
      yes, just werks and better than firefox in every metric.
      >crypto scam that is kyc
      the crypto that's not even enabled by default? sure thing alice.
      And it has to be kyc because it's federal fricking law and a requirement for legal crypto markets. No one that gives a shit about buying cp like you is using brave's crypto.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    not a probleme for me, I've switched to uBlock Origin Lite light years ago

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Switched to actual literal uhide years ago
      And you're admitting to this.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what about IQfy-x?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That's offered as a userscript as well. So as long as violent/grease/tampermonkey works, it should be fine.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >So as long as violent/grease/tampermonkey works,
          It's gonna take extra work to install these in mv3 iirc.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          violent/grease/tampermonkey don't work.
          only tampermonkey has a manifest v3 beta and had to break some functions.
          https://github.com/Tampermonkey/tampermonkey/issues/644#issuecomment-2094925643

          questionable if some giant unmaintained user script like IQfy-x will be fine.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > However, there are some limitations:
            > - GM_webRequest and @webRequest are not available (yet?)
            > - the best replacement for Injection Mode Instant is Content Script API set to UserScripts API Dynamic
            IQfy X doesn't use those, it should be fine?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      100% this. I added uBO Lite to Edge last year and it's lightning fast and haven't seen any ads.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    back to firefox i go i noticed its improved on android at least on 13 so ill go back

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >the goal of Manifest V3 is to protect existing functionality while improving the security, privacy
    >at the same time it nukes every adblocker
    lol
    lmao even

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    [...]
    >still uses chromium
    >le shill lion
    >crypto scam that is kyc
    You are no better

    good thing brave has built in adblock that isn't affected by this.
    firefox trannies will be in for a rude awakening once firefox drops it soon too kek.

    >still uses chromium
    yes, just werks and better than firefox in every metric.
    >crypto scam that is kyc
    the crypto that's not even enabled by default? sure thing alice.
    And it has to be kyc because it's federal fricking law and a requirement for legal crypto markets. No one that gives a shit about buying cp like you is using brave's crypto.

    >Brave
    I'm so glad the built-in OPTIONAL crypto shit filters out the normie cattles. Can't have these societal filth defile the browser that can also play YT videos in the background.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I'm an enlightened free thinker because I installed (and promote free of charge) literal scamware on my system
      Wow, what a rebel.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You need to be 18+ to post here kid

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You need to have basic cognitive skills to operate a computer, corky.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Weak reply
            Epic fail kid

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >has official gentoo repo
      >no ebuilds without crypto stuff
      >only binary packages available
      Totally not shady, go frick yourself israelite

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the source code is public fricktard, go fork it and remove whatever you want. The license allows for it.
        No one gives a shit because the "bloat" is all disabled by default.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          If the source code is public, why the frick do they not post ebuilds where everything compiles on your end? All other browsers, including normal and ungoogled chromium don't have this shit and just let you compile without specific features you don't want to have.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            because they're a company and still want to nudge you towards using the crypto stuff if you ever want to later.
            You can argue it's unethical, but I find it generous enough that they had the decency to have it turned off by default and still released it under a license that let's anyone strip what they don't want themselves and then distribute that.
            Don't the librewolf nigs harden firefox themselves manually as well? You would basically have to do the same thing but removing the bloat again for each update.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Librewolf ebuilds still use the same USE flags as normal Firefox ebuilds do. The only difference is patchset on top.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          *intentionally doesnt put invasive features behind compile time flags*
          heh, just go through the 8 million lines of code and remove them yourself
          malware alert

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Someone did that and they sued them

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Source. inb4 its reusing the name, claiming its official, using official services, etc.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Google is your friend

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Next you'll say you're vaxxed

            lmao

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Concession accepted

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The mass die-offs will start any day now. Aaaany day.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you've said this many times and then refuse to provide the source.
            I already googled it and can't find it, post it or you're a lying tard.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Its literally like the third result on google for "brave browser fork sue"

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            give me a link lmao I literally don't see anything related to any lawsuits or takedowns

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I won't use it because of the shilling you were paid to do for it. Good things that respect their users don't need to do that.

      thank god. you Black folk have been crying since 2021. maybe now you’ll shut up.

      waiting for the marketshare stats the next couple of months for you to see how much people really don’t give a shit about mozilla.

      remember the numbers. remember this post.

      [...]
      it will never come. Black folk been fear mongering since 2019.
      adblockers will still work. normies won't move

      furryfox on sucidie watch

      >proud of being stupid cattle
      >thinks the fact that there's a lot of stupid cattle means not being stupid cattle is some kind of own
      Milking time

      the source code is public fricktard, go fork it and remove whatever you want. The license allows for it.
      No one gives a shit because the "bloat" is all disabled by default.

      >freedom means 1 guy versus a corporation, assuming the guy has exactly the skills required and unlimited free time

      Why does it matter how many people are using Firefox? All that matters is that it works.

      Because at some point it's going the same way Opera did. It's just going to be another Chrome skin.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >if i cry hard enough the police will let me go

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Baiting

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Do you cum when your dad fists you?

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    CHRO-MAGNONS BTFO

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Shit, linked the wrong post, LOL!
    https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBlock-issues/discussions/2977#discussioncomment-8134456

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wait so it can still block page content it just can’t prevent the requests from being filtered? Am i missing where this will still work just fine?

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    hilarious

    [...]

    seething street shitter

    thank god. you Black folk have been crying since 2021. maybe now you’ll shut up.

    waiting for the marketshare stats the next couple of months for you to see how much people really don’t give a shit about mozilla.

    remember the numbers. remember this post.

    >you Black folk have been crying since 2021
    only Black folk that have been crying are street shitters working for google and using their garbage software written by actual Black folk. do the fricking needful, rajeesh.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why don't we make our browser IQfy?
    Is it really that hard?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yes
      it's a lot of work and you need a lot of people doing a lot of work or it ends up like palememe: hardly functional

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        still weird that nobody has done it
        people do all sorts of hard stuff
        I mean it can't be harder than linux itself can it?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      IQfy browser is called LadyBird and is part of the SerenityOS project, which was created by /ourguy/ Andreas King

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      We had Netrunner. We even had moon-man logos developed for it by IQfy's resident logo designers. Ladybird is the second IQfy browser.

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >want censorship and troony ideology
    I want this and I use librewolf

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Mozilla changes its license and shuts off support for chuddy forks

      🙂

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Previous versions cannot have a licence change, if that happens, Librewolf will fork from the last commit where was in effect the old licence.
        And by the way, this will never happen, Mozilla is full of FOSStards, they will always have an open licence.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Full of left leaning FOSStards that will gladly and unanimously change Mozilla's Firefox license to put a stop to wrong thinkers and dissidents.

          Also without Mozilla's support and contributions all the forks will eventually become like Palemoon aka. abandonware.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >chudless fox
        sounds good to me

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just use floorp.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    99% of people here doesn't even browse anywhere relevant outside IQfy
    losing ubo won't mean shit to you

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What's the usecase for adblock?

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is it over?

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Lol I've been hearing so much from people on the internet saying "lol Chrome sux use Firefox instead" but Firefox's user share is still declining. Most remaining Firefox users are aging Millennials who started using it when Internet Explorer 6 was shit. The next generation of zoomers and alpha's grew up with Chromebooks and phones and never left their Chrome hug box.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why does it matter how many people are using Firefox? All that matters is that it works.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because Firefox still uses its own rendering engine instead of blink. If its market share gets too low web developers will feel it's not worth the effort, especially if Firefox users are mostly ad blocking users. Microsoft was already forced to give up EdgeHTML and Opera gave up Presto. If Firefox dies it's only Webkit and Chromium left, and testing on Webkit requires buying a Mac or using Linux.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          https://news.microsoft.com/1997/03/04/bill-gates-outlines-microsofts-educational-initiatives-for-india/

          it was always the plan to do the needful. when they funneled you into cs degrees and charged you for certs, it was just to grift you.

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why does firefox css break everytime I open a new thread bros, it flashes default IQfy look before showing applied css

    I thought Firefox was the best browser, chrome doesn't do that

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They are making the change in the Beta version first in June 3.
    Then in a few months it'll be pushed to the main program. Probably around August.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/SV7210H.png

      AHAHAHHAHA
      https://blog.chromium.org/2024/05/manifest-v2-phase-out-begins.html?m=1

      it will never come. Black folk been fear mongering since 2019.
      adblockers will still work. normies won't move

      furryfox on sucidie watch

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Chrome or Edge? I will NOT swap to Firefox

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Edge have been overall better since release
      Microsoft is the lesser of two evils compared to Google

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Edge is better than Chrome, but you're better off using ungoogled chromium.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They both will be affected by mv2 depreciation

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    normies won't care, marketshare won't change whatsoever

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hope they get sued for billions for this extremely anti-competitive measures

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you'll never see a penny

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Its not a competition issue. Its a antiusability issue. But they'll argue its to clean up the browser resource hog and nonsense as a means to deflect/rationalize it.

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I have Brave rewards turned on. Brave News, Brave notifications, and Brave new tab sponsored images, all with Brave ads, are activated. I'm really enjoying the BAT tokens that I'm collecting. Being Brave isn't just a way of life, it's also allowed me to be apart of a new paradigm shift for the internet. Without the Brave Browser, I would be preyed upon and defenseless. I now understand what being Brave truly means.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      lel

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Prefacing with that I'm extremely moronic. If extensions or whatever is build on v2 cannot work with v3, what is stopping people from just building a new UBO in v3?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      v3 does not have features that are required for good adblock.
      You can make adblock with v3, but it will be more trivial to bypass them now in a way where adblocks can't fight back.

      The cat and mouse game ends. Though I doubt Google will start making all their ads visible trough adblocks built with v3 until year or two later.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        most routers now have basic adblocking features, or you can put a Pi-Hole or use adguard

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Which routers anon?

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >this thread
    Why would anyone browse IQfy and defend Chrome? Or any other gayMAN Black personcattle product? (Winblows, iOS, Google, etc)

    Are you guys shills?
    >no I just like my browser spying on me
    OK so you are shills. Only explanation possible.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      There's some weird google defense force on the board at all times, I don't know if they're paid or just idiots, but even dare mention how the quality of google's search has declined recently and they crawl out of the woodwork instantly to do damage control.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I feel like the people hating on Firefox usually are hung up about the political related shit. It's dumb.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Chrome just has more features and renders properly but is still more restricted than other browsers. I can't get over Firefox's crappy <canvas> memory usage limitations.

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the best and only way to kill google is to fragment the internet again

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'll say it as many times as it's needed. If your browser leaves a unique fingerprint then it's not worth using. Test:
    https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/
    If your browser can't block ads and trackers without assistance from things like DNS sinkholes (more important for traveling anons/phone users), then it is not worth using. Test:
    https://d3ward.github.io/toolz/adblock
    Brave accomplishes both of these tasks and I have yet to see anyone put their results from these tests forward with a different browser. All I see is pissing and moaning about brave, but no meaningful alternatives. As a side note, relay browsers like Tor do not apply to this metric since that's a different use-case than a daily driver browser, but good for you if you like/have to run through 3 relays every time.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pretty much this, Brave dominates all privacy tests.

      Your shitty little librecuck or hardened firefox fork can't even past half of these tests.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This shuts down browser wars every time. No one wants to admit this favorite browser is still a piece of shit that can still be fingerprinted (aside from Brave and some Firefox configurations). It hurts some anons' pride even further that brave is chromium based.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'll say it as many times as it's needed. If your browser leaves a unique fingerprint then it's not worth using. Test:
        https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/
        If your browser can't block ads and trackers without assistance from things like DNS sinkholes (more important for traveling anons/phone users), then it is not worth using. Test:
        https://d3ward.github.io/toolz/adblock
        Brave accomplishes both of these tasks and I have yet to see anyone put their results from these tests forward with a different browser. All I see is pissing and moaning about brave, but no meaningful alternatives. As a side note, relay browsers like Tor do not apply to this metric since that's a different use-case than a daily driver browser, but good for you if you like/have to run through 3 relays every time.

        Mullvad passes this test too. It's the only other one that does.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This shuts down browser wars every time. No one wants to admit this favorite browser is still a piece of shit that can still be fingerprinted (aside from Brave and some Firefox configurations). It hurts some anons' pride even further that brave is chromium based.

        crypto grifters need to start buying ads

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Brave cucks are so pathetic lmao. I imagine them shilling their shitty browser, watching ads everyday since like 2015, and just hoarding their crypto waiting for the day when it will "moon".

          "Anyday now anons, my $23 USD worth of BAT will turn into a million!"
          kek such a pathetic cult.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Okay post your results from this

            I'll say it as many times as it's needed. If your browser leaves a unique fingerprint then it's not worth using. Test:
            https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/
            If your browser can't block ads and trackers without assistance from things like DNS sinkholes (more important for traveling anons/phone users), then it is not worth using. Test:
            https://d3ward.github.io/toolz/adblock
            Brave accomplishes both of these tasks and I have yet to see anyone put their results from these tests forward with a different browser. All I see is pissing and moaning about brave, but no meaningful alternatives. As a side note, relay browsers like Tor do not apply to this metric since that's a different use-case than a daily driver browser, but good for you if you like/have to run through 3 relays every time.

            Let me see what hardened Firefox can do

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sure. Perfect score and I don't need to run a cryptoscam on my desktop.

            What's your BAT fetching on the market these days little homie? lmao

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why don't you show us a full screenshot you homosexual, how do you expect this to be an epic own when you don't show jack shit

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Holy frick you are annoying, kid.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Doesn't matter anyway, Brave does this for me out of the box 😉

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Mullvad works out of the box too.
            Enjoy your cryptoscam :^)

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >crypto
            I don't know what you mean, I turned that off in 2021 and never saw anything about since.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How did you configure Firefox to protect from fingerprinting? I've never seen a "yes" answer in that block before, only the status of the fingerprinting and how unique/random it is.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That test was run using Mullvad. But you should be able to replicate those results in Firefox with the proper settings. After all Mullvad is just a Firefox fork with custom settings.
            Here is a guide to hardening Firefox:
            https://pastebin.com/iMh3rxHi
            (Or just download Mullvad Browser)

            that's not how the site looks if your browser protects you from fingerprinting. this image is faked.

            Cope shill lion moron. I guess I score better than you and your shit cryptoscam browser huh? You've never seen what a perfect score looks like before?

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            that's not how the site looks if your browser protects you from fingerprinting. this image is faked.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You need to stop sucking wiener

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >bravesissy can't stop thinking about sucking wiener
            This shit is funny.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Enjoy your AIDS

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Waterfox on android

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >. If your browser leaves a unique fingerprint then it's not worth using
      Not leaving a fingerprint, is still a fingerprint, moron. The more obscure a setup you use, the more you stick out like a sore thumb from the normies that use Google Chrome.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You are digitally illiterate

        kek u guys are so 2012, still worrying about canvas fp. how about TLS and TCP fingerprints?
        https://blog.foxio.io/ja4t-tcp-fingerprinting

        >you should stop worrying about browser fingerprinting all together because other methods of fingering exist
        This is the most moronic post in this thread, bar none.

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Vivaldi 🙂

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    not my problem

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not my problem.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Ok. Post results from

      I'll say it as many times as it's needed. If your browser leaves a unique fingerprint then it's not worth using. Test:
      https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/
      If your browser can't block ads and trackers without assistance from things like DNS sinkholes (more important for traveling anons/phone users), then it is not worth using. Test:
      https://d3ward.github.io/toolz/adblock
      Brave accomplishes both of these tasks and I have yet to see anyone put their results from these tests forward with a different browser. All I see is pissing and moaning about brave, but no meaningful alternatives. As a side note, relay browsers like Tor do not apply to this metric since that's a different use-case than a daily driver browser, but good for you if you like/have to run through 3 relays every time.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How do I fix it

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Idk. I use brave

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Brave

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Brave

          Mullvad browser or get some properly customized Firefox settings. No need to download the cryptominer browser.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'll say it as many times as it's needed. If your browser leaves a unique fingerprint then it's not worth using. Test:
        https://coveryourtracks.eff.org/
        If your browser can't block ads and trackers without assistance from things like DNS sinkholes (more important for traveling anons/phone users), then it is not worth using. Test:
        https://d3ward.github.io/toolz/adblock
        Brave accomplishes both of these tasks and I have yet to see anyone put their results from these tests forward with a different browser. All I see is pissing and moaning about brave, but no meaningful alternatives. As a side note, relay browsers like Tor do not apply to this metric since that's a different use-case than a daily driver browser, but good for you if you like/have to run through 3 relays every time.

        Mullvad chads (Tor/Firefox based) can't stop winning.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The bottom answer should be "Yes". Disable js anon.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I won't.
            Otherwise websites become unusable.
            One in ~60 browsers have my same fingerprint, that's good enough.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Test fails, test fails, site hits ad blocker rule and fails.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Nice tbh

          Waterfox on android

          >100%
          You love to see it

  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    lmaoing at this desperate brave shilling itt
    no i will not download your cryptominer, stupid cryptoisraelite
    >he unironically believes it's """"""""""optional""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""

  38. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >Stop using Chrome and use Cryptochrome instead!
    Eat shit you sneaky heeb.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what browser should I use?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You didn't list a browser

  39. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why has nobody made a browser with both Gecko and Blink?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Something like that actually exist. For more than... 15 years? But with gecko(Firefox) WebKit (Safari) and Trident (Internet explorer)
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunascape

  40. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Manifest v3 is better in every way.
    Now if only they would phase out JavaScript.

  41. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    But the Odin project recommends chrome so I can’t leave

  42. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Oh look, another fear mongering campaign for the developerwagies

  43. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I use both firefox and brave (and a few others), but I wonder how long can they realistically support v2 when it's been ditched by chromium.

  44. 2 weeks ago
    Αnonymous

    I haven't been to IQfy in a decade.
    What the frick is manifest v2? Is this anything like a rigged rdrand?

  45. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Any chromium based browsers other than brave that will keep manifest v2 support? And will ublock origin even continue to support manifest v2 if no major chromium fork continues to use it anyway?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Chrome -> Will get rid of v2 progressively
      Brave -> will keep v2 and host its own webstore when chrome will disable v2 extensions.
      Edge -> same as chrome
      Chromium -> same as chrome
      Vivaldi -> same as chrome

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >other than brave
      Brave is not keeping manifest v2 support.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/20059

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >2021
          They already changed their tune, they don't know how or if they'll support manifest V2 extensions if chrome removes them from their store. Having their own store would cause expenditures they cannot afford.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Guess we'll know in June 2025.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >cause expenditures they cannot afford.
            They will just pay for it in BAT.

  46. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I'm a communist and I use brave

    • 2 weeks ago
      Αnonymous

      [...]

      >using a cucked chromium variant is better than using firecuck
      This feels even more hollow than Republicans vs Democrats. 🙁
      >inb4 I'm accused of being an edge supporter
      >inb4 I'm accused of being an Opera (chromium variant) supporter.
      >inb4 I'm accused of being a Maxthon (china botnet) supporter.
      If there's one thing you can't call me, it's a supporter.

  47. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Google, a top 5 corporation, pays pajeets and trannies to shill its products on an obscure imageboard with 15k posts per day
    I find that hard to believe

  48. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Safari or Vivaldi work just fine.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      safari extensions are even more limited than manifest v3 extensions. you can't even have ublock origin lite:
      https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/issues/52#issuecomment-1609737365

  49. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >muh Manifest V2 will adblockers!
    Correction: It will only kill uBlock Origin, because Adguard and AdBlock Plus have their MV3 extensions ready with both cosmetic filters and their own element picker. (something that Gorhill refuses to implement in uBo Lite due to alleged "API limitations" that have been proved false)

    When will you morons learn that Gorhill is a hack and a cultist that has been maliciously lying and sabotaging uBlock Origin Lite to push people to switch browsers?
    He doesn't want to remake uBo Origin in MV3 (for free) which is why he has been going on a crusade to demonize MV3 for "killing adblockers" (despite every other MV3 adblocker in the store working just fine) and publishing a half-assed version to scare his userbase away from using Chrome.

  50. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    So the things they should have prioritized 10 years ago instead of pocket.
    better late than never.

  51. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >1995 - 2003 Internet Explorer
    >2003 - 2004 Firebird
    >2004 - 2014 Firefox
    >2014 - 2024 Chrome
    >2024 - ? Firefox

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Using firefox after 2011

  52. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    daily reminder that Chrome fullscreen video is laggy for me for years and it works flawlessly on firefox

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      keep me updated

  53. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    But what will this actually mean in reality?
    Don't all the major adblockers already have v3 compliant versions?
    Please explain like I am moronic.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's already over, anon. Don't worry your pretty little head about it. Go outside and play with the butterflies while you still can.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      An advertising company is in charge of deciding what adblockers can and can't do. Figure it out.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      currently:
      >you install ublock origin
      >UO works by using lists that tell it where ads are coming from, so it can block them
      >(it works like this because that way UO itself is neat and tidy, and small in size)

      now:
      >you install ublock origin
      >UO is not allowed to look at adblock lists on the internet
      >(because what if it downloaded a virus?? or downloaded all your credit cards and sent them to chinese organ traffickers??)
      >adblock lists have to be built-in to UO instead

      ...so now UO and its adblock list have to fit inside the size limit for chrome extensions, and every time a new ad is found, you need to update UO so its adblock list is up to date.

      imagine if you had to update the youtube app on your phone every time someone posted a new video. that's how moronic this is. google will profit, though, so they don't care and they'll make it happen

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >chrome extensions
        >chrome
        I found the problem

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          yes, that's relevant when talking about google fricking with their web browser in the name of 'more money for us, frick you'

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ublock origin lite is 7.7MB.
        no one cares if you have to download 7.7MB every few days.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          ok, but that's something different to ublock origin.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >ok, but that's something different to ublock origin.
            that's questionable:
            https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)#if-i-install-ubol-will-i-see-a-difference-with-ubo

            also, ublock origin for firefox and chrome are already different:
            https://github.com/gorhill/uBlock/wiki/uBlock-Origin-works-best-on-Firefox

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i'm not sure what you're trying to argue. because at the moment, you install UBO and then subscribe to filter lists. the coming change is that the filter lists are built-in to UBO, so UBO needs to change every time the ads do. this also means that UBO on Chrome is going to have to fit into the Chrome extension file size limit, which may be smaller than the sizes of the filter lists you're currently subscribed to - thus, poorer adblocking. which is the purpose of this change, because google don't care about user experience, they care about them profiting from serving ads at you.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            bullshit.
            your alleged issue does not exist.
            https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)#is-the-limit-on-maximum-number-of-dnr-rules-an-issue

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The default ruleset in uBOL hovers around 17K when using Optimal or Complete mode (less in Basic mode).
            please explain how this is better than the status quo

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://github.com/uBlockOrigin/uBOL-home/wiki/Frequently-asked-questions-(FAQ)#what-are-the-upsides-of-an-mv3-based-content-blocker
            >For Chromium-based browsers specifically, MV3-based content blockers will properly filter at browser launch, which is not the case for MV2-based content blockers. Note though that this is not an issue for Firefox MV2-based content blockers, see uBlock Origin works best on Firefox / Browser launch.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i don't care about that

  54. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    kek u guys are so 2012, still worrying about canvas fp. how about TLS and TCP fingerprints?
    https://blog.foxio.io/ja4t-tcp-fingerprinting

  55. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  56. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    bottom line, you're not going to convince me that built-in ad lists are better than the current method of subscribing to filter lists. this is not an invitation to debate, don't bother trying.

  57. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    brave will still allow manifest v2 extensions to run
    firefox too
    they've had to keep pushing manifest v3 back because no one really wants it except for google
    it's completely pointless
    if manifest v2 was so bad they would've just killed it but they didn't because manifest v3 is completely unnecessary except to protect ads

  58. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >THIS TIME IT WILL HAPPEN FOR REAL GUYS
    It's never going to happen. Nothing ever happens. Watch them delay it once again

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nah, it's happening now, starting June 3.
      Will start in the beta and dev channels and work its way to stable over the course of this year.
      There's zero benefit to manifest v3, it sucks in every way.
      In manifest v3 the service workers are supposed to sleep after a couple of minutes but this was changed because they got lots of complaints and finally listened to sense and have made it so that if something is going on they won't go to sleep.
      What was the point in pushing this shit so heavily for so long if it hurts functionality?
      The devs won't listen to reason until they get blasted for a long time.

  59. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    there is a fork of ublock for manifest v3, so i dont care

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it kinda works but it's been cucked heavily
      the creator acknowledges this

  60. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I maintain a couple of extensions with 4 digits user bases that I haven't ported to MV3 yet. I don't think the extensions can even be ported since they use "unsafe features". I'm really not looking forward to the flood of issues on my repos.

  61. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    And?
    I use Firefox usually so don't really care, but "uBlock Origin Lite" is MV3 and will be enough for 95% of people on chrome.

  62. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    stock chrome with auto updates disabled, ublock and pi-hole with firebog.net lists added is all you need.

    >but muh fingerprinting
    by using brave you are already printed at NSA dipshits. All that shit above can be installed by idiots and isn't a sting op.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *