Come home white man

>perfect balance of stability with up to date packages
>most secure 'just works' distro in terms of CVE's in the past 20 years (Debian, Arch and Ubuntu have had magnitudes more CVE's than Fedora)
>minimal bloat
>easiest distro to install
are you using fedora or did you get filtered by the name like too many others?

>INB4 dnf is slow though
sudo dnf install dnf5 (which will soon replace dnf)

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Come home white man
    Sacks and denies promotions for the whites, whilst getting NOI tier people to give the HR department courses.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Ubunto is superior for webshitting

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Fedora's the distro I most stuck around with because it does "just work," but it's a really lackluster kind of "just works."
    It's basically GNOME the distro, not just in the sense that GNOME is the main version of Fedora, but that development somehow follows the same stupid pattern where devs do the bare minimum to call it a release, and then hype it up to be the greatest thing ever to happen to Linux. They're Red Hat projects, so it's so be expected, they supposedly cater to the community yet are hand-made for Enterprise use.
    Fedora's nothing more than RHEL with more up to date packages, even with the community developing it, the Red Hat sponsor is still noticeable for an end user.
    I'll probably continue using both GNOME and Fedora, but it frankly upsets me imagining their potential. Debian and Arch are both better distributions at the things they specialize in, Fedora is utterly mediocre at everything.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The immutable-base Fedora desktops are actually really good: Silverblue if you like GNOME, Kinoite if you like KDE, Sericea if you like Sway (yes, really!). Slap on a few layered rpm-ostree packages like rpmfusion, ffmpeg, and Vim or Emacs, and you can do everything else with Flatpaks, containers, or standalone binaries. Emacs in particular lets you use a docker, podman, or toolbox container as a remote dev environment with TRAMP, keeping your host system clean of dev packages. Hell, it also allows using a container in a Kubernetes pod as a remote dev environment these days.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        found home on silverblue, everything just works!

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I use Kinoite, it just works

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I use Onyx (silverblue budgie)

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >NSA Kernel
    >Beta testing for RedHat

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >CIA Linux
      Glow elsewhere. Also systemd kek

      tf you mean cia linux? somebody explain pls

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >kernel updates break your OS
    >uses like 1.8g after boot on idle
    >no quality of life addons like ubuntu's unity bar for GNOME
    >SELinux ruins gaming performance and causes countless bugs
    >is a globo distro but doesn't even install codecs for you

    Fedora is terrible! I've tried it on many occasions and it's always awful please stop shilling it

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >CIA Linux
    Glow elsewhere. Also systemd kek

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Debian: employed tier
    >Ubuntu: normies tier
    >Arch/Gentoo: troony tier
    >Everything else: mental illness tier

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes tier.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Debian's moronic boomer tier. If you're employed you use fedora or rhel

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        If you're employed you need something stable and unchanging. Fedora is the opposite of that. RHEL is good tho.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          in no sense of the word is fedora unstable. you'd have to be fricking moronic to think otherwise

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://wiki.debian.org/DebianStability
            >This is what Debian's Stable name means: that, once released, the operating system remains relatively unchanging over time.
            You don't know what "stable" means

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yeah and that's all well and good if you don't intend on using any new software for the next 2 years. Want to use something new? have fun dealing with dependency hell.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You deleted System32 recently, didn't you?.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      haven't seen a single person that doesn't use ubuntu or mint

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm sticking with Gentoo

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    As much as I want to like Fedora, they really do need to fix the fricking package manager shit. It's basically guaranteed oom if I try and run dnf update on a 1GiB machine with all the package repos enabled.
    Otherwise, yes, fedora is the least shit distro by a lot.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Zorin.They really need your money.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the documentation is shit doebeit
    'pensuse mogs fedora

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    worst distro ever made

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >have to enable special non free repos to get basic functionality
    i don't care that I have to do that but I care that your ideology stands above my comfort

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    balance of stability with up to date packages
    if you mean unstable and yet surprisingly not really up to date either, then yes.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not white doe

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I just love being white and Fedora user. Don't you love it too?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yes

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What's the point unironically? If you use fedora (a basic b***h safe corpo product focused on modernslop like gnome) then why not just use a mac or windows that are just that but have a much larger budget, much larger teams working on them, and have generally much more software available for them. What's the usecase for boring corposlop like Fedora/OpenSuse/Ubuntu??? I can completely understand the use case for Arch or Debian, but these just seem like bloat?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I don't want to use proprietary software, but I want something that just works and don't have ancient software.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      that's kind of like saying "if you're willing to frick your wife, why not frick a troony with aids?".

      its not the same thing, ones an open source system you can customize to your liking, the other is a locked down piece of glorified spywear

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Fedora's repositories are among the largest out there AND with quite recent versions without the bleeding edge approarch. That's a reason some use it over Arch and Debian. OpenSUSE uses btrfs + snapshots by default, a reliable approarch to the rolling release model. It also utilizes yast which is cool for those things you tinker with once in a while. It too has large repos as well. There are real reasons to use all these popular distros. Your buzzwords don't mean anything.

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Brazilian distribution cannot be a White-man-distro at all. Only EU distros are White.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *