>confuses bits and bytes

>knows this and says they are the same anyway
Why is she so fricking stupid?

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    who cares. the whole metrics of bits is as awful as the imperial system with a mix of various bases and prefixes. you get her statement which is important.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >one unit is literally 1/8th the size of the other
      >who cares
      moron detected
      Her statement is fricking wrong

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Not that guy, but I reiterate that you are moronic.
        The paper is about a technique to improve storage density by over six orders of magnitude.
        The conversion from bits to bytes represents less than a single order of magnitude.
        You are an autist who says "ACKCHUALLY the price is $39.95, not $40" when discussing the your Ritalin copay.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >$39.95
          Anon the price would be $5.00 not $40.00 and that's still a big difference even if it's like the difference between the two prices in Vietnamese Dongs instead of USD.

    • 1 month ago
      bodhi

      It is the way it is because it is binary moron, you are fricking stupid

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's solely in base 2 you dense moron

        you'd probably be one of those homie's to say 2+2=5 because of advance calculus schizophrenia.

        stupid software "engineers" i guess.
        where is the base 2 in the si units? but wait, we can randomly divide by 8 to get a new unit. or we take 1024 as base for a completely new prefix to enhance the confusion. also, we are going to use everything interchangably.

        • 1 month ago
          bodhi

          I cant tell if you are trolling or actually this moronic. You have no idea how binary systems work do you?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            okay, enlighten me why this is a consistent system.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous
          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            1 byte consists of 8 bits. A bit is either an 1 or a 0.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's solely in base 2 you dense moron

      you'd probably be one of those homie's to say 2+2=5 because of advance calculus schizophrenia.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Not that guy, but I reiterate that you are moronic.
      The paper is about a technique to improve storage density by over six orders of magnitude.
      The conversion from bits to bytes represents less than a single order of magnitude.
      You are an autist who says "ACKCHUALLY the price is $39.95, not $40" when discussing the your Ritalin copay.

      It's indeed autistic to care if she was off by 8, like thinking she's crap because she missed dotting an i or crossing a t. That's not a big deal and it's moronic to care about, just pedantic nitpicking.
      What made me think she's not so great is when I was seeing what she had to say about one of the recent papers about the "second law of infodynamics" around 1:30 here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IngBEkg61_E

      She glosses over it by saying "it doesn't say anything new that isn't already true about the second law of thermodynamics" but seems to miss the big point that the theory says information entropy naturally decreases instead of increases for an entire system, the exact opposite of physical entropy.

      https://pubs.aip.org/aip/adv/article/13/10/105308/2915332/The-second-law-of-infodynamics-and-its

      The author (Vopson) combines information entropy with physical entropy to define a new total entropy of a system. The "implies simulation theory" looks like headline grabbing crap, but Vopson has a couple other papers where he applies the theory and shows how it explains things like why symmetries in shapes and life are common throughout nature (more symmetrical objects have less possible configurations / less information entropy), and this will apply to even closed systems. He says this still won't violate the second law about total entropy, because while information entropy will decrease the physical entropy of the system will increase more.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    You are moronic.
    The paper claimed the technique can potentially store exabits of memory.
    Even a single exabit is 125 petabytes.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    you can store at least one human there. if not more.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    And how fast does it read and write?

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    uses uv-c or what?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    obvious bug-person, why would you listen to anything it says

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It looks like she had cosmetic surgeries in her youth which makes her look asian now.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    it's time to buy an ad, Sabine. You've posted every one of your videos here for months

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Divide a petabyte by 8 and... it's still fricking huge

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      640K should be enough for anybody
      t. not Bill Gates but a common line of thought at the time

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/fYQenAU.jpg

      >knows this and says they are the same anyway
      Why is she so fricking stupid?

      for anyone wondering
      exabytes of memeory
      read write speed of a few kilobytes
      its physically engraving the bits INSIDE super hard glass using lasers like a bubble gram
      even if it were at modern hard disk speeds it would take decades to fully encode, and would also not be able to change the data

      the main use it to densely store data for millennia where other physical media would fail

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What if I break the glass with a hammer though

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          thats not the point, books will rot, ssds will lose memory without power, vhs tapes will lose their magnetism, stone tablets cant store much information and are very heavy to carry around
          glass is hardy and will not degrade much on its own

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    sloppy wet sabine mommy pusy

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What bothers me is that this route was pursued decades ago and the guy unceremoniously died and the work was "lost".

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I thought she did as well, but she didn't.
    She said "bits are not bytes".
    As in what they have now is not that great but in the paper that promised many times order of magnitude (bit is just 1/8 of byte) possible improvements.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      scientists in the field of devices talk about bits because that's what you have to store in order to store bytes
      as you said and as was said here

      Not that guy, but I reiterate that you are moronic.
      The paper is about a technique to improve storage density by over six orders of magnitude.
      The conversion from bits to bytes represents less than a single order of magnitude.
      You are an autist who says "ACKCHUALLY the price is $39.95, not $40" when discussing the your Ritalin copay.

      no one cares if you divide the storage by 8 after you multiplied it by 1,000,000

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the frick is that phenotype

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Why is she so fricking stupid?
    Is she? While it might a jarring mistake, it's rather attribute related to yt channels that pack things into 8 minute long content, going against trend of 45 min. rants/drooling over specific topic

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Use the binary prefixes: kibi, mebi, gibi etc.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Sabine destroying Stringgers again

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    her videos have really taken a nose dive in quality in the past 3 months

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *