Dating app I'm thinking of developing

This site would be geared towards more shy people and encourage women to actually reply or skip users, instead of just ignoring them.
Two main features:
1. queue of intros
>When you message someone for the first time, they won't see it immediately, you are put on a line
>User then have to read the intros one-by-one (they only see how many people are in the queue, but can't see what they are saying)
>In order move the queue along and see the rest, user has to skip or reply to intros (in which creates a regular conversation)
>If the intro is not read in 48 hours, it expires
>Users can only be in 5 queues at the same time

2. avatars
>The user is forced to upload two pictures, a) a profile view of their head, b) a non-picture of themself
>a) will get auto-obfuscated and made look like a coin
>b) is a spiritual representation of the user, it could be a favorite food, meme, anime, pet, etc
>two are displayed next to each other

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I didn't read any of that but make sure trannies are segregated from normal people.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the reason women are leaving men on read is because they enjoy doing it. the guy's messages become a trophy for them to collect & inflate the woman's ego to insane proportions. how is the demographic distribution of your site going to look when it is even less attractive to use than your established competitors?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      trying to make a dating app fair for men will never work because of this

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Anne is definitely 120+ kg, also weird idea anon hope it goes well

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How are you doing to protect against swarms of AI bot girlfriends that target real users with pig butchering scams?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I ask users to report them, so I can ban them

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        CI chat bots can talk to users for days and then ask users to move to a different messenger to scam them.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >the most convolved shit that only makes sense in OP's head
    Damn, I'm glad to know that my business is always safe from you autists

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dunno about it, sounds like a humiliation ritual to me.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Also, when a woman sees your intro, she also sees how many hours you waited in queue for them
      They also reply/skip percentage, which depicts what ratio of user's intros get skipped

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why should I artificially change my personality when I can just go on Pornhub and jerk to millions of different women in hd and vr? Dating is obsolete unless you want to go through a humiliation ritual.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Getting you to believe what you just wrote is the real humiliation ritual.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >shy people and encourage women to actually reply or skip users, instead of just ignoring them

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The only guys who would even prefer something like this aren't the type of guys that women would be interested in.
    Why would any woman join this nonsense full of men they don't want, when they could just use the popular apps and be almost certain to match with at least decent dudes (no matter how unattractive they are themselves, thanks to how most guys are thirsty dogs)?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >yes, let me use the app full of thirsty dogs who will hit anything that moves, but won't actually date me
      moron

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >but won't actually date me
        have you ever meet a single woman?
        i haven't

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        All men are thirsty dogs. Some can afford to be picky, but others can't, so they'll be ok with women far below their level. This is how it's always worked, even before the internet.

        >but won't actually date me
        You made this part up

        Also, are you really implying that women don't want to use Tinder, Bumble, and other normal apps? Are you moronic? It's not like we're talking about hypothetical apps here lmao.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Tinder is canonically a hookup app, amd most women would never use it for that reason. Bumble only has a slightly better reuptation.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            A lot of people still use it for relationships or even just friendships.
            Besides, the ones I named are just an example. You can replace them with whichever popular dating app you want.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how about all you frickin programmers and developers put all that wasted effort into making AI girlfriends real and we can just reproduce via sperm banks in effectively a matriarchal women-raise-all-kids deal while guys just frick maid robots. how about that? huh? cringe fricking loser chop chop quit making that gay shit and start making this gay shit

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The better your site, the less users you'll have in the long run
    Also, you're forgetting that online dating is mathematically fricked, there's too many "shy boys :(" and too few "strong goth chicks" or whatever guys want nowadays

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >forced to upload profile view
    that's racist discrimination considering only whites have a good profile view

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    let's call it Trilicious

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Would work, but my take would be "Courting Vault"

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Alternatively I could do it without the obfuscation, but it might scare people

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is demented for normal people but I could see it being appealing to freaks who believe they have an alter ego or something. Like furries and their fursonas, trannies and their anime girl avatars, nice guys and their twisted fricking psychopath side, etc.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    "Dating" (hookup) apps face the some problem as nightclubs do. Women are the product, men are the buyers.

    Nightclubs do EVERYTHING to get women into them. EVERYTHING. Free drink nights, free entry, free photoshoots. Everything. Why? Because a bunch of horny arab/jeet morons will come to try to frick those women and spend $80 for a shot of vodka and that more than pays for all the free shit the clubs offer women.

    You'll face a similar problem with your dating app. Without women, the app is useless. So you need women. But how do you get women to use a "dating" app. Normal guys? Shy guys? Unfortunately anon, all women (yes all women) have a social circle, even the shyest woman you know has a group of friends. And among those friends are at least one normal guy, one shy guy, one average man, etc.

    Many women will go ahead and pair off with their average friend. But then that's it. She has a man, she doesn't need the app. But some women look at their average male friends, their average male coworkers, and think "nah, I don't want to settle for normal guys I need a RICH, TALL, HUNG, GIGACHAD millionaire."

    But that woman, being an average pauper herself has no social access to rich handsome men... unless, there's an app... and so the women go to the apps when the chads are. The handsome men, the rich men. And yes handsome/rich guys use the existing "dating" (hookup) apps like an free brothel app.

    This makes "online dating" borderline impossible for most men. Average/above average men who'd easily pull within their social circle/class might find themselves with few or zero matches on these existing apps, because the women there simply aren't looking for normal men (which they already have access to), they go there to hunt a whale.

    So keep all of that in mind. If your app doesn't have gigachads, women won't use it. And if women don't use it, incels won't use it.

    But best of luck, I hope you make it work. I like it when fellow anons are successful

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Free drink nights, free entry, free photoshoots.
      Aren't those discrimination and thus illegal?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        its not illegal for a business to discriminate against its customers
        buy any cakes lately?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Men actually sued Bumble for discriminating against them, and Bumble settled for 3 mil

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Possibly. Interestingly, though in decline, heterosexual nightclubs are still able to turn a profit.

        The business model ultimately boils down to exploiting alcohol addiction. Women become addicted to alcohol but know they can go there to get it for free. So they go, which attracts horny losers, which in turn are price gouged for the club to turn a profit.

        Homosexual night clubs have all but gone the way of the dodo, with only a few left in the world. Why? Because homosexuals have a symmetrical sexual desire and their hookup apps (grinder, etc) are actually effective because both men are looking for a quick frick. This decimates the gayclub scene because gay men can just buy their own booze much cheaper (if they so desire) and then meetup and frick via apps.

        Straight clubs are only about sex from the man's perspective. For women it's about the free alcohol. Men are then drawn in by the promise of drunk girls lowering their standards for him. Making the straight club a still viable, but shrinking niche.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          "Dating" (hookup) apps face the some problem as nightclubs do. Women are the product, men are the buyers.

          Nightclubs do EVERYTHING to get women into them. EVERYTHING. Free drink nights, free entry, free photoshoots. Everything. Why? Because a bunch of horny arab/jeet morons will come to try to frick those women and spend $80 for a shot of vodka and that more than pays for all the free shit the clubs offer women.

          You'll face a similar problem with your dating app. Without women, the app is useless. So you need women. But how do you get women to use a "dating" app. Normal guys? Shy guys? Unfortunately anon, all women (yes all women) have a social circle, even the shyest woman you know has a group of friends. And among those friends are at least one normal guy, one shy guy, one average man, etc.

          Many women will go ahead and pair off with their average friend. But then that's it. She has a man, she doesn't need the app. But some women look at their average male friends, their average male coworkers, and think "nah, I don't want to settle for normal guys I need a RICH, TALL, HUNG, GIGACHAD millionaire."

          But that woman, being an average pauper herself has no social access to rich handsome men... unless, there's an app... and so the women go to the apps when the chads are. The handsome men, the rich men. And yes handsome/rich guys use the existing "dating" (hookup) apps like an free brothel app.

          This makes "online dating" borderline impossible for most men. Average/above average men who'd easily pull within their social circle/class might find themselves with few or zero matches on these existing apps, because the women there simply aren't looking for normal men (which they already have access to), they go there to hunt a whale.

          So keep all of that in mind. If your app doesn't have gigachads, women won't use it. And if women don't use it, incels won't use it.

          But best of luck, I hope you make it work. I like it when fellow anons are successful

          https://i.imgur.com/ptvk20u.png

          This site would be geared towards more shy people and encourage women to actually reply or skip users, instead of just ignoring them.
          Two main features:
          1. queue of intros
          >When you message someone for the first time, they won't see it immediately, you are put on a line
          >User then have to read the intros one-by-one (they only see how many people are in the queue, but can't see what they are saying)
          >In order move the queue along and see the rest, user has to skip or reply to intros (in which creates a regular conversation)
          >If the intro is not read in 48 hours, it expires
          >Users can only be in 5 queues at the same time

          2. avatars
          >The user is forced to upload two pictures, a) a profile view of their head, b) a non-picture of themself
          >a) will get auto-obfuscated and made look like a coin
          >b) is a spiritual representation of the user, it could be a favorite food, meme, anime, pet, etc
          >two are displayed next to each other

          Maybe an app like this should focus less on dating and more on building the club. Male clubs are dissapearing (anything from fraternity's to bowling) and shared interests are now exclusively online. The thing that draws women are the exception. They may want a man with money as one priority, but then are geared towards men who have any influence at all in their own social sphere. That's what the average man needs is anything that gives them social proof at all. Any type of male organization ultimately gets infiltrated by women and the more prestige it has the more sought after it is. But the app could focus on dudes building a sphere based on any interest (regardless if those interests do or don't attract sexual attention from the opposite sex)

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no woman would use that shit so it would become hookup site for gays

    oh and btw
    betty is fat
    anne is a troony
    sam is a sperg
    maria is mentally ill

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >hookup site for gays
      I could live with that

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >No mention of anti-bot/anti-prostitution measure.
    Your project is doomed to fail already.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >as if it's ever going to reach a big enough userbase to be interesting to botters

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *