>destroys your faith in humanity forever

>destroys your faith in humanity forever

Pssh.. nothing personnel

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A book for the most self-obsessed and pathetic tier of IQfy pseud.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Isn't this that south african moron that Jordan Peterson (zog israelite moron that he is) eternally btfo'd in a debate?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No that’s an American horror writer first non fiction book. His writings have been praised by the South African academic you’re referring to.

      Also it was Sam Harris who debated the academic (David Benatar), Ligotti has never appeared in a debat to my knowledge. (Or even a video, but I would be curious to see one if I’m wrong)

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You don't need to debate Benatar, you just need to ask him why he hasn't killed himself

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Lmao Benatar in his book (The Human Predicament shows that those who say what you just said are fricking moronic and he shows it throughout the entire fricking book.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Peterson too thoughbeit https://youtu.be/vsyZcKUP_-k?
        Must be a libtard channel since the comments act like he comprehensively lost even though the antinatalist got his ass handed to him.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Explain how Peterson won the debate without sound angry

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Ha didn’t knew that, thanks.
          Well it’s a pretty usual bias to think that the side you were rooting for has won the debate. It’s an antinatalist Chanel, would be different on a Peterson Chanel.

          Also I don’t think antinatalists are liberal. They are not conservative either but I feel they are in a more broader spectrum politically that does not fit neatly in such boxes.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Anti-Natalism in the form of Benatar is derived from enlightenment rationalism through and through so it's safe to say it is Liberal in the capital L sense, kind of.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            A lot of ideology could fall under that umbrella then. I don’t know if you’re the anon I was responding to, but the use of "libtard" refer to a specific idpol that is not that broad.

            So yes from the enlightenment but not that much close to the current political description of someone who would identify as liberal.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Anti natalism is only allowed to be discussed in liberal circles but the logical conclusion of the ideology itself seems incompatible with liberalism.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I get that you're still clinging to nuance but antinatalism is clearly aligned with the (climate change white people stop having babies I'm mentally ill gay and trans haha I'm a genetic dead end we should increase the non white population and exterminate the white population) crowd, over the conservatard crowd.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >antinatalisme
            >we should increase the population

            We should make the captcha harder, the brain dead are able to solve them.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            as if I only want to populate the universe with the humans of today, lol. Think.

            Kek morons.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >NOOOO HUMANS WILL NEVER IMPROVE STOP TRYING JUST END IT ALLLLLL
            humans of the future will make you look like a monkey. This hurts your ego

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You have shockingly misunderstood my posts.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tldr
    >Destroys Le your faith In humanity
    OP has to tell me beforehand how does one loses one has never possessed

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >literally talks about how pessimists and optimists will never be able to understand each other
    >aka he isnt going to destroy the faith of anyone that still had any before reading the book
    You never read it.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Has this person visited Houston and looked around at the creatures that inhabit that armpit?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        could have said this 2,000,000 years ago when we were still living in trees. What an embarrassing lack of perspective

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Black folk and associated ethnics clearly represent a lower form of being, as evidenced by the state of regions they inhabit. Saying that humanity should expand, without consideration as to the *quality* of human we choose to proliferate, is incredibly shortsighted and could lead to an incredibly ugly and dysgenic universe..
          >ALL THEY NEED IS A BIT OF TIME YOU IDIOT WHERE'S YOU'RE PERSPECTIVE?!?!

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            as if I only want to populate the universe with the humans of today, lol. Think.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's not very good

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Having faith in humanity before
    OH NO NO NO HAHAHA
    I would rather have faith in a fricking fly

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This book is shilled daily on this board
    Tom
    No one cares about your gay book or your made up disease
    Go away

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I didn't need to read to that book in order to realize how fricked up humanity was. The book, and reading Schopenhauer, had already confirmed it for me.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *