Do you prefer man being evil, or nature being evil?

Do you prefer man being evil, or nature being evil?

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Hysto

    Some men are evil cause they’re stupid, the rest because they got abused so bad they’d trade their souls for a modicum of power.
    -Hysto, tripcode user of IQfy, Literature.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nature cannot be evil. Men can be, though I'm sure even the most evil of men will try to justify their nature including their endless greed.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Men are part of nature, if they can be evil therefore nature can be evil. Checkmate, treehugger.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nature, because its truth must have the ultimate means to dispel evil.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I 'prefer' neither, I think I understand what you're asking but you worded it in a very unclear way.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Neither. I prefer the author being evil.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I prefer nature as Good-Evil (the Mother that loves and then drowns her babies) and man as Pure Nature.

    Artifice is an illusion. We are Nature. She is working through us but she also is us. Hence why we are so god damned Good-Evil.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Men being evil. Philip K. Dick captures that pretty well.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    nature needs to be indifferent
    anyone that writes nature as explicitly evil and out to get their characters just comes off like a malicious butthole that hates their characters

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's evil? Murder and stuff? As far as I can tell the common factor is the decay of organized structures, then what serves decay is evil.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's all inconsequential.

    However, one's concept or perception of evil stems entirely from their ideology of interconnectedness across all thought schools, which when graphed from least to most connected forms a bell curve where those at either end would be considered the most evil.

    To even suggest nature is evil is more laughable than suggesting evil truly exists at all in the first place.

    A star creates light, but of course the star itself is not light. A collapsed star forms an event horizon, but of course the collapsed star itself is not the event horizon. Both are stars--one creating radiant light, the other impenetrable dark. Neither are what either create, yet both can be what either is. That is nature.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Most men are evil. Most of nature(life) is evil in the sense that it will give you endless pain without reason.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Evil is a made up human idea.
    A lion is not evil for eating a zebra but the zebra, if it had cope, would call the lion evil.
    Humans are natural creatures, part of the natural world.
    Evil is a cope for victims of successful people.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Humans are natural creatures, part of the natural world
      yeah, no.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Why?
        Most of our behaviors as just more complex primate behaviors and we share most of their DNA.
        Are you an "aliens did it" homosexual or a "space daddy did it" homosexual?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Humans are the only creature on Earth that do not live in symbiosis with their environment, rather we manipulate, change and destroy the natural world for our own benefit. That's pretty unnatural if you ask me.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Beavers frick shit up.
            Invasive species destroy ecosystems when they migrate
            There are ancient fossilized ant colonies.
            Every element of nature is at war with every other element including its own species... even plants are constantly trying to frick each other up.
            ?? Tf are you on about?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's so fun trying to conversate with 17 yr old.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Better than someone who just insults people when they get completely served and have no points to justify their moronic, normie tier opinion.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >normie tier opinion
            god you reek of 17 yrs old.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            You're the one insisting that humans are disgusting and filthy aberrations because we don't live up to some juvenile idea of how you think we should be.
            If anyone has the mind of a child in this discussion it's you.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Also ask cats, dogs, cows, sheep, wheat plants, fruit trees and poultry about symbiosis, lol.
            Every one of them exists in symbiosis with us today.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >cats, dogs, cows, sheep, wheat plants, fruit trees and poultry
            things that were domesticated and utilize when we lived in nature.
            see how cows and chickens are raised today off gruel and injected with hormones and tell me that's natural

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Natural is not synonymous with good. There are parasites that take over host organisms completely torturing them to death and that's totally natural.
            We're intelligent apes, it's very natural thst we would work to optimize our food supplies.
            Your assertion follows only if one accepts that humans are unnatural, thus its circular logic (ie: we're unnatural because we're unnatural)

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            set your chihuahua free in a forest and see how long the moron lasts.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Dude you just demonstrated my point for me...
            In nature, chihuahua dies.
            In symbiosis with me, it lives and is pampered.
            Thus another example of humans living in symbiosis with other living beings.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Man created the Chihuahua after years of selective breeding, man created a creature that without it's guiding hand would die in the natural world. That's pretty fricking evil.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Remove fish evolved to help clean sharks, without sharks remora fish wouldn't exist.
            What is your point?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Man created the Chihuahua after years of selective breeding, man created a creature that without it's guiding hand would die in the natural world. That's pretty fricking evil.

            The chihuahua is not an example of designer breeds that wouldn’t exist in the wild, chihuahuas did exist in the wild and filled an ecological niche similar to meerkats

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Humans are the only creature on Earth that do not live in symbiosis with their environment
            First photosynthetic organisms completely changed the atmosphere composition, dropping temperature to subzero globally and fully annihilating entire fricking biosphere except for several geothermal pockets. Yeast will produce alcohol until they poison themselves with it and die. Eucalyptus trees cause forest-fires so their fireresistant seeds have fertile soil and no competition. Symbiose my ass, nothing in nature cares about the nature, it's a war of everything against everything without a Geneva convention.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Not to mention statistics suggest that humans are the only creatures that will reduce their birthrate in the absence environmental pressures as opposed to Malthusian ideas that we will be like out of control bunnies.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        You're an idiot.

        Humans are the only creature on Earth that do not live in symbiosis with their environment, rather we manipulate, change and destroy the natural world for our own benefit. That's pretty unnatural if you ask me.

        What you're talking about is a virus, or disease or infection. And in many ways, yes humanity has become unfavorable towards the environment which hosts us. But you wouldn't say H1N1 is unnatural. You wouldn't say cordyceps are unnatural. You wouldn't say the bubonic plague, the black death, is unnatural. The order of Nature is beyond anybody's scope, especially the broader you attempt to view the horizon.

        Outgrow you're childish mentality that detrimental equals unnatural. You'll only hurt yourself if you cannot let go of illogical idealisms just because they're pretty.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        you are so fricking dumb that i almost pity you, please give up the ghost asap.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Evil is a negation of things

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Humans have one thing that separates them from other Animals and that's a conscience. Even with that conscience man commits atrocities to each other and their home. Yeah, we're fricking evil, man.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Nature has to be considered the base of evil. Evil in man must be defined by subjection to the ills of nature, hunger, the weather, etc.

    For example women are evil because a society run by women would be less competent at sheltering and feeding people.

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Evil depends on the perspective. The one that destroys or inflicts suffering is seen as evil by the ones being destroyed or suffering. So Nature is evil, but also loving, since it destroys old to create new, inflicts suffering to force growth. And by extension, man is a part of nature and lives in it, so we are evil too, but also loving. We also can create and grow.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    neither, i think man is good, higher than the animal, orders nature etc. but nature in itself is beautiful, just not fricking animals. i think what you mean by nature is an animal. human animals is a stupid phrase, as human beings, bestowed with the capacity for language, created the concepts of both human and animals. so there's a certain evil intention in the phrase human animal, and by nature you just mean evil, and by man you also mean evil. i bet you worship evil women, you homosexual incel c**t

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wars are generative. The process makes life more adaptable. If the definition of evil is about decay then hedonism is worse than murder.

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Evil is a social construct, moron.
    I prefer having good life conditions, not living in the wilderness like a primate, thank you.

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Recently enjoyed True Detective season 1 and I think it did a great job with the idea of evil in men and nature. The evil of a few men caused a great deal of pain and suffering for lots of children and because of that pain some of the children became cruel and animalistic and killed people. One of the detectives Rust Cohle believes that humanity is evil to its core and we should deny our biological urge to reproduce and walk hand I'm hand to extinction. But the detectives grow a lot over the 17 years that they know each other and they're both shown to be good men despite all the horrible things they see or do. So by the end Rust thinks that the world is still evil but good men can make it less evil and maybe eventually create a good world.

Comments are closed.