Do you think EU forcing removable batteries in smartphones will make them lose their water resistance?

Do you think EU forcing removable batteries in smartphones will make them lose their water resistance?

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Probably but considering I don't use my phone underwater I'd rather have the removable battery than underwater compatibility

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >They are using his phone underwater.
      Fricking third worlder.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        good morning sir your English is very smiling today

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah, speech recognition sucks. Doesn't it?
          kek

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Not necessarily, but even if it does, it's worth it.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    fricking galaxy s5 was waterproof and had a removable battery

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    we had water resistant phones with removable batteries

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As said, we had water resistant phones with removable batteries.
      The Galaxy S5 had IP67 (30 minutes under water), a headphone jack, a microSD slot, and a removable battery, while being 8.1 mm thin.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Not to mention that people generally use protective cases around their phones. If the back cover is removable and water resistant it's going to be even more water resistant inside some TPU phone case. Also it probably won't pop open when dropped. There's really no reason they have to be glued. You can put your phone inside a clear plastic bag if you really need to go underwater with it for a long period of time.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And its size was perfect. No one ever asked for giant smartphones.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I had the S5, was a great phone, took it to the beach once and trolled other beach goers by "accidentally" dropping my phone in the ocean a few times, was before most phones were water resistant so I got some good reactions.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Henjin no Salad Bowl
    Is this show worth watching? Looks delightfully cute and funny from that cap.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes, it's very cute, but be ready for some episodes not focusing on this cute kid and focusing on the homeless hag instead.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        tranime looks so fricking soulless

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          anime website, troony lover

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Oh, yeah? Show a modern soulful western animation.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >animation
            grow up

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The world of animation includes far more than just children's cartoons. I fail to see any reason why an adult cannot appreciate it.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            it's pointless, he's an indoctrinated tool and bot, not an actual person

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The world of animation includes far more than just children's cartoons
            prove it pedo

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Grow. The frick. Up.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          [...]

          Hello newfriends (:

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >peoples' word use never change
            butthurt tranime poltard spotted

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Tehe, you newfriends are so cute.
            Maybe in a few years you'll be able to post without sticking out so much (:
            See you in a decade friend!

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          [...]

          >peoples' word use never change
          butthurt tranime poltard spotted

          >anime imageboard opens
          >animegays are autists
          >great autism, great things
          >fricking normies with no personality come in after laughing at memes from IQfy's autists
          >tiktok/9gag/reddit/twittergays steal the content for likes/updoots/money
          >keep posting here that they hate anime yet they keep coming here
          >think they're the real population of IQfy while they're just no better than Black folk
          I don't care how long you've been here, if you hate anime AS A WHOLE and keep seething about it then you're a newbie.
          If you hate all cartoons altogether then you're just a moron.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >normies
            you're one of them

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Seems like he adopted the correct board culture quickly enough.
            You on the other hand...

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You need to go back.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That poster should unironically agree with you if he were honest. It's a low quality LN adaptation, which gives fanservice only to older characters he doesn't like. Look here

          I don't like it when e-girl anime focuses too much on hags. This was supposed to be Sara's show.

          he literally says what I say about him.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            A lot of anime sucks indeed but people talking about "tranime" don't watch them to begin with, they know nothing about it.
            OP's anime is certainly part of the large percentage of fanservice anime stuff, I agree. But there are way too many posts of gays disregarding posts with anything remotely anime in them; they can frick off.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You don't fully understand my post. While I don't agree with people who use the word "tranime" I'm just saying that OP is dishonest cancer too. In fact, knowing OP, I prefer tranime posters to him. At least they're not dishonest liars.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oh, my bad. I agree.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Oh, my bad. I agree.

            Keep in mind you're talking to an obsessed stalker.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            We're all insane in one way or another anon.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You're only admitting that I know OP and that it's always the same person I "stalk." I'm not a stalker, I just noticed how he posts. I simply point out facts about him when I see him posting.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          manga is soulful on the other hand, because the artist can actually put effort into what he draws

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I thought you liked hags. Or are you not 24?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't like it when e-girl anime focuses too much on hags. This was supposed to be Sara's show.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I don't like it when e-girl anime focuses too much on hags.
            But you like anime which almost exclusively focuses on hags.
            Why is it that you love over 30 year old prostitutes, but anime adults make you butthurt sometimes?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not butthurt.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >acts butthurt
            >I-I swear I'm not butthurt!!111
            This is what it looks like.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know who this is, but I'd make her butt hurt

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            A character from a hag anime.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What's wrong with fricking adult women?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He's extremely elitist about e-girlcon, the definition of e-girl, calls legal e-girls hag e-girls all the time (in a very negative and serious way, not jokingly like IQfy does), called himself the greatest e-girlcon ever, spammed the ironic e-girlcon meme, spammed MAP flag with anime girls edits, and he's still complaining about "hags" in his anime, like Livia in Henjin, who is only 20. It's extremely dishonest to post all this but to frick 30 year old prostitutes at the same time in real life.
            He's a hypocrite and poser.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            At least he has sex.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >normalgay status symbol
            He has to pay for being able to frick unattractive women. Even normalgays will think of him as a loser.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Normalgays frick prostitutes all the time, anon.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I don't know why you focus so much on this bit. If anything it shows that your boyfriend is a normalgay.
            The 3DPD meme is real.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >in a very negative and serious way, not jokingly like IQfy does
            You're moronic
            It's terminal

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What is your problem with that? It's literally true. IQfy will call anything hag, but if he calls a character a hag you can be sure he hates the character.
            I've never seen him posting how he likes Livia, even though she's younger and more attractive than his real life prostitutes.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't like it when e-girl anime focuses too much on hags. This was supposed to be Sara's show.

        The e-girl is a secondary character. Salad Bowl is Livia's show.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It shouldn't be.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >butthurt

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He's not wrong though.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Come on, why are you talking about yourself in third person, you lying dishonest frick.

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hope so, we need to remove tech illiterate safeties as much as possible.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Will it? My watch has a replaceable battery and is water resistant

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >dive computer able to handle several hundred ft of sea water and has a user-replacabke battery
    >"but can we make phones handle a bit of rain?"
    i fricking hate you morons.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    there's no telling if manufacturers will sabotage their own devices in rebellion, it would mean you have to buy a new one sooner so I can see it happening

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >bunch of manufacturers sabotages their own devices
      >they lose a frickton of customers that will buy phones made by competitors
      i love capatalism.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you forget that the deal is not quality but marketing.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    1) My brother had a samsung galaxy 3 with a removable battery, it was waterproof.
    2) If you can't take a bath or swim in a pool without being 15 minutes away from a glowing screen you're a dumb homosexual.

    Waterproofing and anti-scratch stuff are useful if you're working under bad weather like my previous shit trade job dealing with heavy machinery, which is not the case for 99% of IQfy.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The Moto G3 had a removable battery and a very tight battery lid that even had sensors. Android could read them and tell you it wasn't properly closed, warning you that it would lose water resistance until it formed a full seal.
    The whole muh water resistance cope for nonremovable batteries is a israelite lie.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    None of my phones were waterproof.
    They never fell in water.
    But their battery always degraded until they became useless.
    Removable battery > Waterproof. But even then I'm fairly sure you can have a waterproof phone with a removable battery so it's a non-issue.
    The EU does something right (for once!) and yet IQfy still complains. Fricking Black folk.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Another way in which old phones become useless is website bloat. I hope and pray the EU introduces strict limits on how much resources a page is allowed to use, preferably banning most javascipt. Something to dream of.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Be European union
      >Force apple to use usb-c
      >Force them to open up IOS
      >Make GDPR
      >people say the only thing you've done right is force removable batteries

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Only Americans seethe about USB-C, Europeans love it.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No, it will just make them butthuge. Also what does it even mean, 99% of smartphone batteries ARE removable.

          Instead of shit like that they should focus on genuine designed e-waste like Apple Pencil or all the wireless headphones when it's indeed impossible to change the battery without breaking the thing apart.

          I seethe over them not doing it sooner. Also removal of power bricks for tablets was pretty stupid.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Directive on Copyright in the Digital Single Market
        >Article 13
        I'm still very bitter about that.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        GDPR was moronic.
        >Big Tech still spies on you and steals your data, but now you also have banner spam.
        >The small Mom & Pop website gets UN Police at their door to extradite them to Brussels for not having an obnoxious GDPR banner.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I got my first mobile in 1997 and I have never dropped one, let alone dropped one in water.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      seems reasonable: stops them putting gimped batteries in. but personally I'd rather they enforced replaceability AND durability.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >To qualify for this exemption, manufacturers must either make batteries available to end users for 5 years after end of production
      >Meet battery durability thresholds
      Seems kind of pointless then, doesn't apple offer batteries for more than 5 years?

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Oldgay here.
    Nokia's had replaceable batteries and bad weather was never an issue.

    Yeah don't drop them in the toilet, and if you want to take them in the pool to take creep shots just use a watertight case.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The phone will lose some of its water resistance of course, because you can't do better than good old glue.
    But as other anons pointed out, there are watches and phones that have both and probably work fine, so it's a question of when, not if.
    I still think it's memetech for morons. And I work in a swimming pool.

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They will likely use seals with a little adhesive. In factory the seals get shut tight. Only after you replace the battery and reuse the old seals, water resistance gets fricked (screws on the corners don't provide even pressure).

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just gluing your processed glass sandwich together and calling it a day is probably easier to mass produce on the cheap but honestly I don't really see any technical reason why removable batteries would have to mean no water resistance. The battery itself should be water resistant and it really needs only ~3 metal contacts to interface with the phone circuitry. I dunno would the 5 volts of the battery cause a short if merged in water though?

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    not only that. now that the batteries are replaceable they don't need to have so much quality. just buy another battery in 6 months of use.

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >water resistance
    there is none to begin with, plus you can make some device that can wrap around the edges of the phone and boom there your problem is gone, hell, before this pozzed shit there were bags you would put your phone in that let you use the touch screen under water and they were fricking good.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >why yes, I brought a condom … for my phone

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No. The samsung active phones were water resistant and had removable batteries.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Android 11 was the last good one

    whats the point of having removable battery if all seperate batteries are chinese fakes?

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why is eu schizophrenic? A totalitarian communist dictatorship doing something sensible?

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is not a single phone that is water resistant.

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'd rather have removable USB ports. Those are the most common point of failure I've experienced. My 8 year old phone's battery is fine, but the port is fricked. Sometimes I'll put it on charge overnight then when I wake up the phone will be on 3%.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >bros casually dropping the fact that he's using a phone from 2016 and no one seems to notice

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It does everything I need it to, why would I get a new one? Does the fact that I'm lurking on an old Thinkpad make you mad too?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          get the frick out of my website

          sorry that you are too poor to afford a phone made this decade I guess

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You are beyond stupid.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            bump

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >the port is fricked. Sometimes I'll put it on charge overnight then when I wake up the phone will be on 3%.
          >why would I get a new one?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Still works consoomer homosexual.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        get the frick out of my website

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sony and Samsung did build water resistant phones with headphone jacks 10 years ago. Maybe they can hire some boomers to do it again.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Have you tried not getting your phone wet?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I never owned a water resistant phone myself. Never destroyed a phone by liquid.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why are boomers so good at engineering?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm still using my oldass Xcover 4 from 2017, and it's shock and water proof, with a headphone jack + removable battery.

        Hell, my ancient Nokia survived a trip to the bottom of a lake and back.

        Because they actually got passion AND schooling for it.

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    no

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    If you enjoy sex with your 30 year old prostitutes in real life, you should absolutely love the Livia fanservicve, instead of being butthurt at it.
    You're a moron.

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Why do you samegay so hard? It's obvious and it only makes you look like a fricking moron.

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Removable batteries have no effect on whether or not the device can be made waterproof. It's not like there aren't already a million holes in and out of it anyway.

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don't care. Never encountered the need for water resistance. Fatties with grease fingers deserve getting their phones damaged.

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >smartphones will make them lose their water resistance?
    NO.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *