every other windows was bad?

how true it is?

Windows 2.0 - great when compared to competition (there is no competition)
Windows 3.0 - bad because OS/2 wins in features
Windows 3.1 - getting better
Windows 4.0 (NT) - useless for home use
Windows 95 - great for home, bad for office
Windows 98 - the same as 95 with some extras
Windows 5.0 (Win2000) - great
Windows 5.1 (XP) - great for all the reasons
Windows 6.0 (Vista) - bad
Windows 6.1 (7) - great
Windows 6.2 (8.0) - bad
Windows 6.3 (8.1) - bad
Windows 6.4 (10) - great
Windows 6.66 (11) - bad

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Dunno, I'm pretty young. I do have fond memories of XP and 7 tho. Not so much of Win8. I use Win10 at work, it's passable. Win11 (not pictured) is cancer. Also, I played around with a 98 machine and found it familiar coming from my XP background, so I guess it's a good OS overall.
    Seems the chart is quite accurate.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    there's literally no difference between any of them. do you even know why you said good or bad for any of them besides MUH START MENU which is irrelevant?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      WXP was great but had a few flaws, even when it was released it was mildly criticized, so it was great but not God tier.
      I'm still rocking W7 to this very day.

      If you ever used Vista you'd know they're not the same at all.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >If you ever used Vista you'd know they're not the same at all.
        notice how winbabies can never give a single detail of why MUH BAD or MUH GOOD besides MUH GUI? ever notice this? i noticed

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Windows 7 and Vista after Service pack 1 are barely different at all.

        You just ran Vista on weaker hardware. 7 felt great because hardware had caught up to Vista's requirements, and 7 wasn't associated with everyone's experience running Vista on weak hardware.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        vista walked so 7 could run

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Absolute nonsense. In reality, windows improved each version until it reached peak with win2k, and then it was a downward slope to hell thereafter.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Best post, Win2k was Win7 before Win7, and Win7 wasn't quite as good because it introduced both stability after the Vista debacle and troony admin shit under the guise of "progress". All the normies jumped from suffering for years on 98 to XP (and they didn't jump at first, it took well into the 2ks for '98 to die out, remember XP was a shitfest at launch, which fed into the rebirth of the Apple hipstercult) For this reason Win2k is almost exclusive to the chosen few who aren't normie shit, and we must cherish this gift until our final segfault.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Windows peaked with 7. Vista is 7 with shit tons of bugs. Before that XP was the best. 2000 is just lite XP. Probably 8 is the worst. 10 is bad and 11 is slightly worse.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Windows 5.0 (Win2000) - great
    you weren't alive back then.

    >Windows 6.0 (Vista) - bad
    this one was actual boomer poorgay cope. vista was great on release, IF you had a good machine. the service packs really helped it out.
    the problem is that boomers thought they could slap vista in some beige shitbox and it magically works
    like no shit your piece of shit 8 year old cpu isnt as good as a xeon

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Windows 5.0 (Win2000) - great
      >you weren't alive back then.

      why couldnt I started to use Win2000 out of curiosity on the year 2010 only to find out how great it is

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >vista was great on release
      Vista was the first product where MS made it clear they wanted to become Apple. It was the first consumer-oriented version of their OS that tried to limit options for software and restrict the user to really low privilege levels and dictate how software meant to run on their OS was designed rather than just providing infrastructure. Software was expected to never modify or store anything outside of %APPDATA%. Virtualization of other storage broke compatibility with tons of existing software and caused users to lose data all over the place. It was a preview of everything turning into dumbed-down locked-down garbage before smartphones were introduced to the drooling masses to normalize that.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        but you COULD still get around everything and it was still compatible with most software unlike 7 which will just not run stuff now

        vista is much better than people give it credit for and it has some of the most soulful sfx. the chime is really good.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >most soulful sfx. the chime is really good.
          You seem to care about cosmetic appearance and noises a lot more than things that actually matter. You know where you belong.

          XP was the last decent Microsoft OS. Whatever evil spirit is guides that company now took over after that.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            why wouldn't you be concerned with appearance and noises? those are function features that let you get feedback when using it
            i know where i belong at the fricking top you sniveling drooling monkey moron

            was that some type of fricking "own" in your mind? subhuman ape doesn't even realize the beauty of appealing to the common man to make a functional device for all.. pity...

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Software was expected to never modify or store anything outside of %APPDATA%
        linux troons think having shit strewn all over the filesystem is a good thing

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >vista was great on release
      Vista RTM was a buggy unstable trainwreck with tons of issues and incompatibilities, regardless of what hardware you had. It became okay after SP1 and pretty good with SP2.
      Vista was never as bad as Windows Me though, they should switch places in OP image
      Windows XP RTM wasn't much better either, it also had lots of issues. When they place it in god tier category it's usually zoomers who only used XP SP2/SP3.

      Windows 7 was pretty good from the start because it's basically a rebranded Vista SP3 with a new coat of paint.

      Windows 8/8.1 are the most underrated consumer Windows ever, moronic start screen aside. With classic shell or some other start menu replacement, Win8 is great tier and 8.1 is god tier. The problem is that most users including IQfy userbase just turned 360 degrees and moonwalked the frick away the instant they saw the start screen and never actually used the OS.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        amen

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >rushed and somewhat buggy RTM
        >lacking drivers from third parties
        >UAC is actually a great feature but most software is made with XP in mind resulting in it popping up sometimes whenever you click anything in a program
        >artificially low hardware requirements, "Vista Capable" was a single core CPU with 512MB
        It was the perfect shitstorm. In reality the OS alone is only maybe 25% to blame for the total complaints about it, the rest is Microsoft stupidity and bad drivers.
        By Service Pack 2 it was a truly good OS, as good as 7, the biggest difference is the taskbar. That "extended kernel" just proves it, with basic DLL redirection it can run the vast majority of programs 7 can.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >this one was actual boomer poorgay cope
      Hallo fellow LTT viewer! Have an updoot!

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        do you not remember the viral video of that old boomer guy installing vista and having issues?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      you weren't even alive for vista moron lmao

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Vista was a fricking disaster dude, both home users and industrial deployments all skipped it.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Because they were moronic
        Any more questions?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Says the zoomer/young millennial who doesn't know shit but what people said at the time. I used Vista 64-bit from the beta up until the Windows 7 beta was available. It was 100% just as solid of an OS as Windows 7. Every single Vista complaint was caused by people upgrading outdated computers and trying to use old obscure devices. There were no major changes to Windows 7, the difference was that 7 came out 3 years later, and by then much of that shitty old hardware had been scrapped.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Windows 5.0 (Win2000) - great
      The rest of what you said was correct

      >vista was great on release, IF you had a good machine.
      Go back to sleep Dave, no one wants to watch your videos about Microsoft from 30 years ago.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >the problem is that boomers thought they could slap vista in some beige shitbox and it magically works
      Because, in many cases, they were told that it would work.
      https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2008/03/the-vista-capable-debacle-intel-pushes-microsoft-bends/

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fake nostalgia
    They were all shit except XP SP2 which was at least decent

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I still miss 7 which I left when upgrading my CPU. 10 is passable, especially after you debloat it a bit, but it still feels schizophrenic. Windows 7 was the last version that felt like a cohesive system without different half-baked features (or utter non-features only meant to gather data from you to sell) pre-installed or appearing randomly after updates. I'm not saying W7 didn't have its share of shit moments, but it felt nice.
    10 does have some good QoL features like the history clipboard that I would miss if I for some fricking reason decided to ditch it.
    I'm not sure what I'm going to do once 10 reaches end-of-life and software starts dropping its support, 11 looks like utter shit. Then again, 10 looked like utter shit as well, compounded by the upgrade nagging and forced update overlays that were memed to hell back when it was new.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >how true it is?

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Only absolute fricking Black person morons think 7 was the best and Vista was the worse. They were almost identical operating systems.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yup, these are zoomer opinions from watching yt vids kek. Vista was actually a great os, all they did was change the ui for 7 because it got a bad rep from morons updating their unsupported hardware.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        That and companies like Acer selling cheap ass laptops that were "vista compatible" i.e. they took a laptop spec'd for XP, with a single core Athlon and half as much ram as it needs, and they slapped Vista 32-bit on it.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          partly microsoft's fault too.
          they were offering completely free upgrades

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Xp in s is an easy way to spot a newbie zoomer that either didn’t use xp or was too young to remember it.
    t. windows user since 95, both at home and in professional environments

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's a meme because people cherry pick releases to fit their opinion, most notably 8.1 is included inconsistently, also OP ignored Windows ME and I've never seen anyone else put Windows NT in their lists besides this guy.

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If there was a skin for win11 that made it look like 7, 99.9% of IQfy wouldn't be able to tell the difference and would say it's great

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      w11 is kinda cool

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The UI is more consistent and modern, but it's also more buggy. I have all kinds of issues with windows that randomly get stuck and you can no longer move them until you close and re-open. File explorer will randomly display a non-empty folder as being completely empty until you refresh it. Oh, and the picture viewer is still leaky as hell and will consume literally >32GB ram but that's a bug that has been around since at least Windows 8.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Also the docked laptops at work with external monitors randomly forget previous monitor arrangements when you undock them and redock them, AND the monitor arrangements are a pain in the ass to set up for some reason and rarely show the settings I actually want. I want the laptop screen off and both external monitors side by side when I redock laptops, but they'll randomly start expanding from the laptop screen to one external monitor, or turn the laptop screen off but only one external monitor on, it's a shit show.

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    lol windows 7 was shit
    the fact that it came as a fix to the flaming shitheap that was windows vista only left the impression that it was good
    and
    >windows 10
    >good
    LMAO

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Windows 95 - great for home, bad for office
    It wasn't great for home, Mac was better by leagues, but it was usable.
    >Windows 98 - the same as 95 with some extras
    Yep
    >Windows 5.0 (Win2000) - great
    Went from usable to being on par with Macs from the time
    >Windows 5.1 (XP) - great for all the reasons
    This is when Windows started being the best OS on the market. Very solid OS.
    >Windows 6.0 (Vista) - bad
    Less reliable than XP with features that no one wanted that broke the OS
    >Windows 6.1 (7) - great
    Keeps the features that no one wanted, but it's actually reliable again.
    >Windows 6.2 (8.0) - bad
    More features that no one wanted, many that broke the OS.
    >Windows 6.3 (8.1) - bad
    Kept the features that no one wanted but the OS was less broken.
    >Windows 6.4 (10) - great
    More features that no one wanted

    Also 11 is more features that no one wanted.

    Microsoft just needs to focus on making the OS stable and fast, instead of adding all of the bloat. The only reason to upgrade is security updates.

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    98 is 95 but slower and worse. "extras" could be replaced
    Theres no way 10 is even decent unless you count Steam support, demonstrating youre a moron

  16. 2 months ago
    lowercase sage

    To all who say Windows 98 was any good: take off your nostalgia glasses. It was disaster that would spontaneously crash after 2^32 milliseconds (about seven weeks) because M$ cannot fix memory leaks. (Windows 98 SE, on the other hand, was quite good.)

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Windows 9x didn't even have full memory isolation. Literally any buggy program could crash and wipe out the whole OS. BSOD was a daily occurrence.

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Real chads were on 2000

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    i had to use windows xp in university a while ago because the ancient programs we were using to program a PLC only existed for that.
    xp is awful to use. it has SOVL and a very distinguished look, but there's a lot of small things you get used to in any modern OS that did not exist back then which makes small tasks really irritating
    >ex: cant drag a window to the top of the screen to maximize it
    win7 has both SOVL, isn't (as) filled with spyware like win10, and is modern enough to not lack anything. it's a true S tier

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >we've already reached the point where we think windows 10 is great

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It's just a meme, might seem true at the first glance but doesn't hold upon closer inspection.

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Windows 6.2 (8.0) - bad
    >Windows 6.3 (8.1) - bad
    >Windows 6.4 (10) - great
    >Windows 6.66 (11) - bad
    lol

  22. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I just wanna say that I find Win ME to be remembered unfairly badly, it survived like three or four years of clueless teen me without ever shitting the bed.

    Conversely I find Win XP to be remembered unfairly well, I had to wipe and reinstall it on like an annual basis which I didn't mind at the time but in hindsight doesn't paint the best picture.

    I also can't remember why everyone including me hated Vista so much, in retrospect it's pretty similar to Win 7. Was it just too different from the oh so beloved Win XP? Was it simply the ramped up system requirements and incapable prebuilts it ended up on?

    GOAT however is Win 7 of course, so much so that I still use it almost 13 years after installing it for the first time.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Conversely I find Win XP to be remembered unfairly well, I had to wipe and reinstall it on like an annual basis
      Windows XP RTM was pretty bad, very unstable and buggy. Lots of people downgraded back to 98 SE or 2000 after first trying it for some time and only went back after SP2 was released. But most zoomers on this board only remember XP SP2 or SP3 because these are the only builds they ever used.

      >I also can't remember why everyone including me hated Vista so much, in retrospect it's pretty similar to Win 7.
      >GOAT however is Win 7 of course
      Like Windows XP, Vista RTM was very buggy and unstable but became pretty good with SP2.
      Windows 7 is a rebranded Vista SP3 with a new desktop theme, of course they're similar, and that's why 7 RTM was way more polished than your typical first Windows build

  23. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Windows 95 - great for home, bad for office
    >Windows 98 - the same as 95 with some extras
    Windows 98 SE was great, MUCH better than 95 or 98.
    >Windows 6.0 (Vista) - bad
    Actually Visa (Ultimate) was pretty good if you had the hardware for it. It came with my new laptop, used it for a while, then I installed XP on it out of spite, but it turned out it was indeed lacking compared to Vista, so I reinstalled that.
    Windows 11 is the worst ever, it's even worse than Windows 8.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Actually Visa (Ultimate) was pretty good if you had the hardware for it. It came with my new laptop, used it for a while, then I installed XP on it out of spite, but it turned out it was indeed lacking compared to Vista, so I reinstalled that.
      Same, except I switched to Ubuntu for like a year for the only time in my life.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I had already been over with my Linux phase by then. I had installed shit like Debian and Ubuntu before and try to use them for a while, but I went back to XP and 98.

  24. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >S
    Empty
    >A
    Empty
    >B
    Empty
    >C
    Empty
    >D
    Empty
    >F
    Empty
    >Absolutely proprietary
    Windows 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 3.1, 3.11, NT4, 95, 98, 98 SE, ME, 2000, XP, 7, 8, 8.1, 10, 11

  25. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >God Tier
    3.11, 95
    >Great
    98, 2000
    >Good
    7
    >Shit
    the rest

    • 2 months ago
      lowercase sage

      >3.11
      Anon, 16 bit versions of Windows were using so called cooperative multitasking. What does it mean? In theory, processes were passing CPU time to eaxh other. In practice, one badly written program could clog entire CPU and hang entire system.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        yeah but it had SOVL

  26. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    whoever decided that green color is bad and red good was some next level moron...

  27. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Windows 6.0 (Vista) - bad
    Only if your hardware sucked.

  28. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >windows 95 good
    be honest, you never actually used it.

  29. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Overall Sovl and Performance
    >MS-DOS 6.22
    >Windows 3.1
    >Windows 95 Plus edition
    >Windows 98 SE
    >Windows XP Pro SP3
    >Windows 7 Ultimate

    Special mention
    >Windows Me (krashtacular but still was sovl)
    >Windows 2000 (got a much treasured pirated copy at the time but moved to XP when it came out)

  30. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    vista was good you homosexual

  31. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Win 10 great
    >Has ads
    >Has candy crush redgedit keys if you don't bloatware remove tool
    >Sometimes reinstalls those apps you removed on updates

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I guess I'm spoiled in my Win 10 usage by a corporate IT managed workstation with all the consumer bullshit removed to begin with (Pro?), and even with that in mind I don't like Win 10.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        I bet they are still on the regedit though

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Windows 10 Enterprise LTSC doesn't have any of that bloat.

  32. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    How do I make w11 better?
    I've already make right click better without the "see more" bullshit, what else?

  33. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Windows 3.11 for Workgroups was kino af.

  34. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Windows 2.0 - great when compared to competition (there is no competition)
    How is there no competition? The Mac Plus was released a month later with System 3.
    What about Amiga Workbench 1.1 released the same month? There's two competitors.

  35. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I installed Vista after it got SP2 and it was straight up and upgrade from XP. No idea why it gets such a bad rep.
    Try not to be a very early adopter when it comes to software such as OS

  36. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    95/98 were great. XP/2000 killed PC. Vista/7 is bloated shit but doesn't crash as much. The rest are abominations that forfiet your soul.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      95/98 had stability problems, in particular with faulty drivers and VXDs.
      If you hit "Extract USB" twice, you would get the BSOD. But they ran games fine.
      In 2k/XP a faulty driver or program couldn't hang the PC.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        NTA but
        >Extract USB
        95 and 98 didn't even have native USB support. (if it's mass storage you're mentioning)
        Only WinME had native USB support.

  37. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    windows xp was a shithole
    w7 was good
    vista is the same as w7
    w95 was a buggy mess
    w98 a bit better
    w2000 was shit
    wme was shit
    w8,w8.1,w10,w11 malware, spyware

  38. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >anyone who dares to go against the misinformation that vista was "teh worst os of all tiemz!!" lures out the luddites
    like pottery.
    every time.

  39. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    god tier: 7
    great: 8.1, 10
    good: xp, 98, 95, 2000
    eh: 8
    shit: vista, me

  40. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Any one who thinks windows 10 was good is delusional. Trashcan tier

  41. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    windows xp was ugly as shit and wasn't usable at all until at least SP2
    there was nothing wrong with vista if you had a modern PC rather than some pre-2000s nightmare
    windows 8 had the best search and gaming/laptop performance of any windows before and since and they removed both in 8.1 making it a strict downgrade
    windows 10 fricking sucked butthole, forcing LGBT and cortana and shit down your throat while removing more and more features. there was never a good version of windows 10.

    and fun fact, windows 95 was the last time microsoft ever did a proper study into human-computer interaction for UI/UX design. they never got it right again until windows 8 and then people complained so they ended up where we are today, the worst of both worlds.

    this list sucks and is based on nothing but rose tinted glasses from people who never used anything pre-windows 7 seriously.
    heres how it should be in order from best to worst:
    >98
    >8
    >95
    >7
    >vista
    >nt
    >xp
    >8.1
    >3.1
    >2000/me
    >MSDOS
    >10
    >11

    t. used every one of those commericially, administratively and personally.

  42. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    every widows bad

  43. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    I'm surprised you put Vista at the bottom, I remember always being fond of the OS.

  44. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    only 7 and 98se were good. windows 10 was acceptable. the rest were total garbage

  45. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >how true it is?
    Good morning sar!

  46. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Zoomies calling w7 a "rebranded vista" ITT

    clueless lmao

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      explain it then poorgay

  47. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    What's so good about Windows 7 again?

  48. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    XP>7>8.1>10>11

  49. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Windows vista is underrated

  50. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Windows 6.3 (8.1) - bad
    What was wrong with it?

  51. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    most windows versions sucked at launch,
    >Frick windows 95, my 386 runs like shit.
    >Frick windows NT 4.0, 9x programs dont work and it eats up my ram.
    >Frick windows 98, I dont want internet explorer integration.
    >Frick windows ME, it crashes all the time.
    >Frick windows XP, my pentium 3 runs worse.
    >Frick windows vista, my pentium 4 runs like shit and it eats up my ram.
    >Frick windows 8, I dont want a tablet UI.
    >Frick windows 10, my pc was forcefully updated to it.
    >Frick windows 11, its just 10 but worse.
    2000 didnt have perfect compatibility but it and 7 came out at the right time considering the hardware of the era

  52. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Vista is ten times better than 10 lol what is this shitty ranking

  53. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >memberberries
    XP and 7 were shit compared to 10

    Can't even remember when I last had something even remotely like a bluescreen from Win 10 onwards

  54. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Windows 10
    >Great
    So you've never used Windows 10 or you have shit memory

  55. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Windows 6.4 (10) - great

  56. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >win2k anything but god tier
    you fricked up OP. win2k is peak windows. absolute Microsoft perfection.

  57. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >95 good
    >98 bad
    >98se good
    >me good if you had working drivers
    >2000 good
    >xp bad turned good
    >vista good but popular to hate on + OEM's fricked people over
    >7 good
    >8 bad
    >8.1 good but popular to hate on
    >10 bad turned decent
    >11 bad

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >8.0 bad
      >8.1 good
      what the frick is the meme all it added was a start button that still takes you to the start screen and some other small changes,

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Even stranger are some folks who think 8.0 good, 8.1 bad.
        I don't get it either, 8.1 is basically 8.0 SP1. I find 8 the most underrated Windows ever and I think both were very good. 8.1 was better since it polished some rough edges of 8.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        8.1 polished and fixed most of the issues.
        Replace the start menu and you have a better version of Win7.

  58. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Putting 7 at god tier and vista at shit tier is peak comedy.

  59. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ITT: muh start menu!!!!!!!! muh wallpaper!!!!!!

    nothing else in windows between versions is different. windows morons are the stupidest computer users there are. no one stupider, except nixos pedos

  60. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Win 2000 Prof not GOD TIER
    Just have a nice day OP

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah. From gaming standpoint You could play every game from early 90's till late 00's. Win 2000 Professional SP3 was perfection.

  61. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    god-tier: NT 4.0.

    Great: Windows 2000, XP (>SP2), Windows 7.

    Shit: Everything else.

  62. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    windows 8.1 was good but no one used it

  63. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    microsoft hasnt done anything since 2009
    for any of their software, really

  64. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >W7
    >god tier
    >W10
    >great

  65. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    ME belongs in shit tier, and 11 if it where here I'd put it in good tier. Just cause it's just win 10 but slightly worse UI wise.

  66. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    XP was bad but turned good
    Vista was decent but fricked over by OEM's and drivers
    8.1 was good
    Windows 10 is decent

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *