>free will is an illusion. >causality is an illusion. >selflessness is an illusion

>free will is an illusion
>causality is an illusion
>selflessness is an illusion
>selfishness is an illusion
>self is an illusion
>objective morality is an illusion
>objective truth is an illusjon
>math is an illusion
>God is an illusion
at last I see…

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >free will is an illusion
    I agree, but you ought to just roll with it.
    >causality is an illusion
    In terms of the physical world, no; human interaction, sure.
    >selflessness is an illusion
    >selfishness is an illusion
    >self is an illusion
    These all go together. It depends on how you characterize self.
    >objective morality is an illusion
    Most definitely, but again, you'll do well if you act as if it isn't
    >objective truth is an illusjon
    In pedantic way yes, but debatable
    >math is an illusion
    Math is not an illusion but a set of rules.
    >God is an illusion
    No duh.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      is an illusion
      >In terms of the physical world, no;
      especially there. we made concepts to give the illusion of causality when you conceptually reduce things in the environment but there are no "things"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >causality isn't an illusion
      he lacks the critical information

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I agree, but you ought to just roll with it.
      like you have a choice dumbass

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Based

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >absolute measure
      This reveals Nietzsche as a worthless charlatan. Anybody with even a schoolboy's knowledge of Euclidean geometry would know that in mathematics there is no such thing as absolute measure. The number 1 does not represent some absolute measure but the whole of an arbitrarily chosen measure. It is the concept of wholeness, not absolute measure. This is so basic --- I stress -- that it is one of the first things you would learn when studying Euclidean geometry. This is why Nietzsche will always be the philosopher of midwits and teenagers, not serious intellectuals.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Yes every time I see someone using statistics they not only give the population and collection date, but a list of further confounding errors
        Lel no, people should learn that all of that is just often pragmatically useful but not in a any sense right, but the idea that everyone has learnt and internalised that is patently false.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This is just absurd. Practically no mathematician or statistician is walking around thinking that numbers and calculations are an epistemological impossibility / human invention like Nietzsche argued.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You left out grammar

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    define 'is'

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      define define

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        no

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Damn you got him

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I love Nietzsche, but mostly just for his writings on the Greeks. After reading Will to Power, which is more interested in psychologizing and philosophy, I lost interest. Not because I disagree with him, but because I am already not very Logo centric and can abandon logos pretty easily, which most of his work hints at.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can't abandon logos lmao. Writing down your thoughts into any coherent statement implies logos. In fact, if you suspected that logos was not there then you would throw a fit in frustration akin to how your hand retracts when near a flame. Its not up to you.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    wrong
    true
    true
    true
    depends
    depends
    depends
    true
    depends

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Unless you have tackled with the works of the celestial Emperor, you've seen nothing.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      *blocks you're path*

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Math and numerology is the only thing that isn't an illusion

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Ah but are illusions an illusion?

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No shit. The human mind is literally incapable of faithfully determining any sort of base reality of its existence. But you don't have to be a horse fricking edgelord like Nietzsche to come to that conclusion since the esoterics already figured that out decades before Nietzsche did.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Good thing we had that covered back then, because if we didn't there could have been a nasty eugenics episode where we thought our science was better than nature. Relieved to know we all know better

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What are you babbling about moron

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Esoteric knowledge

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >decades before
      time is an illusion tho

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's funny how according to atheists, everything is an illusion, but certainly not atheism 🙂

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      is the emptiness of an empty glass an illusion of the lack of liquid?

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    So...
    Buddhism?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Buddhism doesn't deny free will or causality

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Yes. Everything we know is an illusion
    >I will now go have sex with a horse

    lol this guy was a fricking clown

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >In an age of disintegration that mixes races indiscriminately, human beings have in their bodies the heritage of multiple origins, that is, opposite, and often not merely opposite, drives and value standards that fight each other and rarely permit each other any rest.

    Should I keep going?

    Beyond Good & Evil, Verse 200.

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >>>In terms of the physical world, no;
    >>>Math is not an illusion but a set of rules.

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >at last I see…
    No you don't as evidenced by the fact you think you do

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    how do math gays solve their interpersonal problems

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Divide and conquer

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nothing is true, everything is permitted.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This isn't really relevant to his points. Are you trying to debate him?

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Did anyone take Stirner to heart more than Nietzsche did?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *