GOD DOESN'T EXIST

Go on, prove that this hypothetical sky wizard exists. I'll wait.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Go outside look around do you really think all this shit could exist without a creator? The existence of the supernatural proves God exist. If you don’t believe me look up demonic possessions and hauntings on YouTube multiple eyewitness confirm they’ve seen things like people levitating shit like that.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Fpwp, delete your IQfy account you vulgar normie shitwit

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Go outside look around do you really think all this shit could exist without a creator?
      Who created the israelite in the sky?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Go outside look around do you really think all this shit could exist without a creator?
      This doesn't mean God exists. It just means that you think God exists.
      >The existence of the supernatural proves God exist
      I've never seen good evidence of anything supernatural. But even if supernatural things did exist, that wouldn't prove that God exists.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >If you don’t believe me look up demonic possessio
      Links

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the creator doesn't give a frick what happens, it doesn't have feelings, morals, or even a fathomable form or agenda as you fools ought it to. church does nothing to appease it, abrahamism is just more human shit, beauty and marvel are only in your head

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >the creator doesn't give a frick what happens
        A creator, in the purest sense, is not guaranteed to lack feelings. Humans create, and they do not lack feelings. So creators, and thus, "the creator", does not lack feelings. Perhaps you mean to distinguish the natural creator, from the supernatural creator.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >go outside
      >feces on the ground
      >flies flying around the feces

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I go outside and I see an unfair world filled with pain and misery but also beauty and luck. It makes sense and doesn't at the same time. The gnostics were right, your " god" isn't the real god but rather a moronic spiteful being that shat out this imperfect universe and demands we love him for it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm almost convinced this has to be trolling, but it's probably sincere.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      > be God
      > invent cosmos
      > make beings in my image
      > deem them masters of all physical domain, under my supervision of course
      > limit them to one rock in a galaxy
      > lmao you homosexuals will never see all of my creation. You will be content with your grain of sand on the beach.

      What a cheeky c**t. God should kill himself.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Still waiting

      >Go outside look around do you really think you would have a concept of it without defining it? The existence of the conceptual reality proves that Conception exists. If you don’t believe me, look up demonic possessions and hauntings on YouTube. Multiple eyewitness confirm they’ve seen things like people levitating, and other shit like that.
      Obviously people don't levitate, so the only way this can manifest on YouTube is if someone is conceiving of it. This Conception, is God. Something that does not exist, has been created. Conception leads to birth. That is why it is described as the father, the son, and the holy spirit.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It’s 2024 and there is still no proof of the supernatural Sad!

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Something something trannies something something bestiality

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I can close my eyes and stop my ears and prove the existence of god
    Wow cool bro, please do it and never stop

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    im raised orthodox israeli and this sky wizard, sky man shit baffles me.
    Is this actually a thing in christianty? God is a man in the sky or something?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No. It's an Atheist strawman.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yeh but what is based on? jesus?

        I remember when I was little and first saw on the simpsons, "God" depicted as a man , like an actual person walking around, with a robe and beard and stuff. Is this actually a thing?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          God is classically depicted as a bearded Moses type figure

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Renaissance art.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Jupiter is such a chad that people just kept drawing/painting/sculpting him. And they're going to keep doing it. Forever.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's not a strawman at all. God was depicted in art as a man in the sky - see the OP pic. And Christians say "our father, who art in heaven" or whatever. And heaven is above us.

        In summary, God is:
        >male
        >has magical powers
        >lives in heaven, which is above us
        So he's a sky wizard (lives above us, is male, has magical powers).

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Except basically no one thinks that God the Father is some bearded man in the sky. It is an inaccurate description purposely meant to sound absurd. That makes it a strawman.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            thats actually in the bible, as an orthodox israelite, the notion of actually taking that literally is still oompletely absurd to me, theres totally contradictory forms also attributed to God like a young warrior with ruddy skin and dark locks...none of ths is meant literally . The more I learn about chrsitanity the more I realise the christian cocneption of God is like, almost completely alien and foreing to judaism, like, the first thing that coems to my mind, if I try to think fo some image that would repesent God woud be some kind of point, up in the high distance . God in judaism isn't actually a personal being in the sense that he himself is person or personal...its that he created personal being (human) and have a relationship with them, in and of himself he's compeltely and totally impersonal and incompehensible to human mind, beyond all form and time and space

            Do chrsitians really beleive God is three people? lol . This is not God, this is like something from greek relgiion or someting

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            According to Christians, God is:
            >male
            >has magical powers
            >lives in heaven, which is above us
            So he's a sky wizard (lives above us, is male, has magical powers).

            Therefore, it's not a strawman.

            yeh we have the word shemayim in hebrew which means sky....but we understood that does not like, mean the sky implicitly . All the bible is in a poetic form of the hebrew language and its drilled into our heads as an orthodox principle of faith that its all in human language....do christians actually read the bible like its a book cover to cover and take it as face value?
            lol
            you're not supposed to do that

            >do christians actually read the bible like its a book cover to cover and take it as face value?
            Yes. That's why they believe that Noah's ark was real. And they believe evolution is fake, because humans were really created by God in the garden of Eden, etc.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Yes. That's why they believe that Noah's ark was real. And they believe evolution is fake, because humans were really created by God in the garden of Eden, etc.
            well I can tell you the ultra-orthodox strains do ten to take that literally as well, tho its still nt given s much iimportance and emphasis as it is in fundematnlist christiniaty;

            when I talk about not taking literally its more about any description of God in the bible, in human language let alone concrete anthropomoprhic distinction, actually ultra-rothdox like hasidic strongly emphasise this the most, that none of its literal, God is like , really vn beyond existence and non-existance

            I'm just modern orthodox but still, barely ny resemblance to the concept of God I was raised with to christiantiy

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'd sooner point you to somethiing like, brahman or para-shiva of hinduism or adi buddha of mahayan buddhism , as analogue to understand God of Judaism, then the christian cocneption of God, which is just like taking the bible and turing into idolatry, as far as I can tell (treating the human language as if its, actually literal descrition of God in any sense)

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Eden and evolution don’t contradict, there were simply indigenous people outside the garden.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >According to Christians, God is:
            >>male
            >>has magical powers
            in heaven, which is above us
            >So he's a sky wizard (lives above us, is male, has magical powers).
            ah, I see, to the religous israelite God's got no gender at all actually, the gender attribution is just metaphorical/ poetic/ linguistic , in fact, even in the bible itself he's got the female attribute, the shekinah, Gods indwelling presence in nature

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >male
            God is refereed to as male, but as he lacks a corporeal form and no gender differentiation in his "species" because he is the only member of it, he doesn't actually have a gender.
            >has magical powers
            Depends on how you define magic.
            >lives in heaven, which is above us
            Metaphorically
            >So he's a sky wizard
            Referring to God as a wizard is stretching the definition of what a wizard is to the point the word loses all meaning.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >define magic
            A fiction that describes a hidden reality.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Then it doesn't count, as God is real.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's our explanation of some ultimate reality. Ultimate reality is hidden from us, so our explanation is a fiction, describing a hidden, and ultimate, reality. Sure, the hidden reality is real. There is an explanation to the magic trick, but we will never be smart enough to know how the trick ultimately works, because it's a magic trick with an infinite amount of detail. So, whenever we seek to understand the ultimate underlying reality, it's always some sort of fiction, or only parts of the actual event. Even if it is useful, and correlated with our future states, its not perfect, but it doesn't have to be perfect to save us.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >God is real

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Prove that God is real.

            If you claim you owned a Lamborghini, and I said "prove it", then you could prove it to me by showing me a timestamped photo of the Lamborghini, maybe with ownership documents, etc.

            Okay, well then show me a photo of God. In my mind, anything that exists can be detected with our senses in some way. If we can't detect something with our senses (even with the use of instruments, like the Large Hadron Collider for subatomic particles), then I don't think we have any reasons to believe that it exists.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            We might be able to deduce it logically.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No you cannot, because you are starting at the conclusion (namely, that god exists). Meanwhile in a conversation with adults you start with a provable observation and then go to debate and lastly to conclusions.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not a theist but you assume that all knowledge is empirical. You lose mathematics and most of philosophy if you are a hardcore empiricist.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Math is provable, if you add 1 apple to another apple you have 2 apples. Replacing the apples with abstract numbers does not make it unprovable. Taking the idea that adding numbers together creates a bigger number we can also calculate giant math problems. Even if we don't have 20 apples, we can extrapolate from adding 1 and 1 together that 10 and 10 makes 20.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            cont:
            Most philosophy is garbage anyway, mystics seething at the fact they can't force other people how to live. Aristotle and Rand is all you need, because they confirm the simple fact that A=A.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Aristotle
            Do we need Plato to understand Aristotle, or can we ignore his dialogues with Socrates?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Aristotle's idea of 1 objective reality might seem unnecessary if you don't understand how it is a refutation of Plato's world of forms. So a working knowledge of Plato will help but you don't need to know anything extensive.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How is it that plato means "broad" and Aristotle means "best of all", and Galileo of Galilee means "Orbit Man from Orbit town"? Are these even real people, or did the meaning of the names come from the teachings of the men? Or is this all a coincidence? Also, how many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie roll pop?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >How is it that plato means "broad" and Aristotle means "best of all", and Galileo of Galilee means "Orbit Man from Orbit town"?
            Because you touch yourself at night.
            > Are these even real people, or did the meaning of the names come from the teachings of the men?
            They existed according to the recorded history of the time. Whether them existing has any influence over whether or not we should believe in their ideas is not relevant. We can pick the good ideas and discard the rest. That's what so great about ideas, they transcend individuals or race/religion/cultures.
            >Also, how many licks does it take to get to the center of a tootsie roll pop?
            About 5, yes I eat the pussy like a madman.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Whether them existing has any influence over whether or not we should believe in their ideas is not relevant
            Then why do people obsess about the existence of God so much?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Because people need him to exist to satisfy their own emotional needs.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Math is ultimately abstractive
            >1 apple
            "One unit" of "Apple"
            "Apples" do not exist per say, we define what apples are through our limited, discrimatory, biased & abstractive perception. No two apples are the same, merely similar arrangments of plant matter.
            How can you prove "units" exist when everything is mass and waves? All physics remain approximative at best, arbitrarily decided on our perception.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            An apple is an apple, it is in itself a self contained fruit. We can demonstrate that math works because if we apply it to physics and chemistry we can fly a giant hunk of metal from new zealand to italy. Math is a way for us to conceptualize the world around us to make it easier to do calculations that turn into usable shit.

            How do you get the number pi from empirical observation? There are no perfect circles or infinite series in nature.
            Your position sounds lime nominalism, some people hold that view but I find it far from obvious.

            If we apply PI to for instance, the amount of material needed to make a basketball, we can calculate the circumference and therefore how much rubber is needed. The reason PI exists and is used is because it works. This also related to things like plumbing. It might seem weird to you that such an irrational number seems useful, but it's because simple shapes are easier to work with for plumbers/architects/even rocket scientists.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Apples is a mere a agreed upon tag for plant matter of similar nature and similar origin.

            Math is a mere useful tool, we work with approximatives. The more we reduce the less we can define, that is what the limits of quantum physics show us.

            But all of that isn't intuitive, we are biologically wired to see and think in abstractions.
            We can't see in blur so we assume borders, arbitrary & vulgar approximations necessary for us to navigate the world with our limited perception, not that unlimited perception can even be a thing.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Just drawing a circle or having a ball doesn't really give you pi though, just a very crude approximation. If you use measuring tape to measure the radius and circumference of the circle, then divide them you would always get a rational number, you need abstract mathematics for pi being irrational to show and matter.
            Well, some people are nominalists so I'm not saying your position is completely implausible or anything. I still think that there is other knowledge than empirical but I don't find the abstract arguments for theism that convincing either.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How do you get the number pi from empirical observation? There are no perfect circles or infinite series in nature.
            Your position sounds lime nominalism, some people hold that view but I find it far from obvious.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Is Jesus male or not? Is Jesus God or not?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Noah's ark was real. And they believe evolution is fake
            because it is

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          yeh we have the word shemayim in hebrew which means sky....but we understood that does not like, mean the sky implicitly . All the bible is in a poetic form of the hebrew language and its drilled into our heads as an orthodox principle of faith that its all in human language....do christians actually read the bible like its a book cover to cover and take it as face value?
          lol
          you're not supposed to do that

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >atheist strawman
        Like 90% of all laymen believe in some form of the old sky wizard dad. Theologians do not however but does it matter when the majority of your believers do?

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Everything that exists must have cause

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Firstly, we don't know if that's the case. Perhaps the laws of physics are different when you get to the earliest points in time. But secondly, even if your statement turned out to be true, that wouldn't prove God. In fact maybe there is an infinite regress of causation, or circular causation, or something. Or even if there is a God, maybe he's nothing like what Christians think. Maybe Jesus was not the son of God.

      Eden and evolution don’t contradict, there were simply indigenous people outside the garden.

      The whole point of Eden is that Adam and Eve were the first humans, if you take it literally, right?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What caused God?

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just to give you guys and example and caution against reading the bible soo literally and back to back like a normal book.

    Somehwere on youube, if its still up, there's a video of a deist guy who reads out the conquest narratives word for word, ends up throwing the book across the room in self righteous outrage....

    he's absorbing too much gevurah (seveirity) from the torah by reading it contiiously like that, sort of back to back, its like sending an electric shock to the emotional center of your brain. Yeh your gonna toss that book across the room because its like frying your brain basially but unlik say with drugs where your brain is fried acrooss the whole life ; its gonna happen just in the contect of the torah, you might think you're tossing it away but actually its like its jumping away from you or tossing you away

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the whole bible is coomposed of interladen with various powerful emotional energies which are actually representing underlying metaphyiscal / spiritual energies. you take in too mmuch at one time, of one energy, is gonna be totally unbalanced and blow your ciruits, buts not that, okay you read that whole thing to get a balanced reception across the whole text, bible is so ridiculsouy long, you need a scholar to portion it out for you over a whole year, which is what is done in synagogue.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah it makes sense that someone reading a book that describes and endorses genocide would become outraged, it's not because it has some kind of unique properties.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Yeah it makes sense that someone reading a book that describes and endorses genocide
        that was kinda my point, but its not endorsing genocide. Its suppoed to be evil, thats why its a fate that falls on evil nations . Similar to the concept of karma

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fear the Lord, you his holy people,
    for those who fear him lack nothing.
    The lions may grow weak and hungry,
    but those who seek the Lord lack no good thing.
    Come, my children, listen to me;
    I will teach you the fear of the Lord.
    Whoever of you loves life
    and desires to see many good days,
    keep your tongue from evil
    and your lips from telling lies.
    Turn from evil and do good;
    seek peace and pursue it.

    The eyes of the Lord are on the righteous,
    and his ears are attentive to their cry;
    but the face of the Lord is against those who do evil,
    to blot out their name from the earth.

    The righteous cry out, and the Lord hears them;
    he delivers them from all their troubles.
    The Lord is close to the brokenhearted
    and saves those who are crushed in spirit.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why are Athiests and Theists like this? This arguing is moronic.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Places like this are like the containment unit in Ghostbusters. It's a place for argumentative spirits to be distracted. They stick to eachother, and stay out of the real world.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Places like this are like the containment unit in Ghostbusters. It's a place for argumentative spirits to be distracted. They stick to eachother, and stay out of the real world.

      This

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What's the enlightened position? Both positions are wrong? Agnosticism is the way?

      I guess you can say that we simply don't know yet if there's a God or not, so maybe the discussion is pointless. That does make sense.

      Maybe it's like if we argue about whether there's life on other planets in the universe. Maybe there's no point arguing about it, instead we should wait for scientists to investigate it.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's what people with opinions and time on their hands do. if you don't like argumentation why do you exchange with us?

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Believe it or not, but there is not a single verse in the entire Bible that specifically calls the israelites or the tribe of Judah God’s chosen people. This misconception comes from the fact that the israelites of today have declared themselves to be Israel and not the house of Judah, as the Scriptures rightfully call them.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Kalam Cosmological Argument is strong evidence that God exists.
    How do you argue against it?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I dismiss the claim that whatever begins to exist has a cause of its existence without evidence as it was not advanced with any evidence.
      Then, I deny that humans can tell the difference between something that began to exist without being caused and something that did not, or identify members of either category.
      Stitched up

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Give me an example of something that begins to exist without a cause.
        Is that the only example you can give me?
        Do certain things appear to come into existence from causes? If not give me a break lmao

        Nothing starts to exist, everything is transformative and what we call "things" are mere human perception and arbitrary distinction to suit our needs.

        If what you're saying is true (and even if it's not) then I take what you wrote to prove my claim because it suits my "need" (if "needs" even "exist" in the world you described from your perspective).

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          > Give me an example of something that begins to exist without a cause.

          positrons

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I take what you wrote to prove my claim because it suits my "need"
          Ok, lol
          people can't force you to change your mind

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nothing starts to exist, everything is transformative and what we call "things" are mere human perception and arbitrary distinction to suit our needs.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Assuming the kalam cosmological holds true, how would you go from there to the Christian God or Islamic God etc.

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >prove that this hypothetical sky wizard exists
    What do you mean by "exist"? If I imagine something, does the thing I am imagining exist? How can I imagine something that does not exist?

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn’t, but Spinoza God must exist by definition. At that point it’s semantics.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the universe appeared out of nothingness
    only a sky wizzard can do this.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    God DO exist, but he's not the israelite god.
    It's me

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Food for thought is all I'll bring :
    You are living meat that walks and talks.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >they're made out of meat

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You know, the reason so many people are becoming Trad Cath/Ortho bros is because they see posts like this and hear this rhetoric all their lives. Then, they actually read anything from the Church Fathers, or read Church history, and realize just how biased the modern r/atheism is. I think posts like this actually do nothing but preach to the choir, and also radicalize people who are on the fence into becoming Christian.

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Go on, prove that this hypothetical sky wizard exists. I'll wait.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Still waiting

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    To have faith is to expicitly NOT use reason. Reason is the only advantage we have as humans over chimpanzees, for we do not have gigantic muscles or claws and can't run 40 miles per hour or swing through the trees.
    You can be very proud of your faith, but realize you are being proud of giving up your only weapon on the planet.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    christcucks BTFO'd as usual

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >hypothetical sky wizard
    What an infantile way to describe God.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I thought it apt for an infantile fantasy

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >you're infantile... because I say so

        What infantile responses.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Still refusing to explain why? That might be indicative of something methinks.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          OP's question is already asked and answered here

          To have faith is to expicitly NOT use reason. Reason is the only advantage we have as humans over chimpanzees, for we do not have gigantic muscles or claws and can't run 40 miles per hour or swing through the trees.
          You can be very proud of your faith, but realize you are being proud of giving up your only weapon on the planet.

          .
          Any further ad hominem will be replied to in kind. Black person.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >you're infantile... because I say so

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The word God is connected to a large cloud (or tree) of logic, and it's purpose appears to be a way of defining the primary objective of a culture. If you don't have a mental framework built around this word, then saying he does not exist is pretty meaningless. However, telling someone who has defined God as "the driving force / objective thing to achive", will have them arguing with you, because life does not choose to "not-exist". To a believer (someone who uses this word based on its intended semantics) God exists, because we choose to exist. If you are not a believer (you don't assign value to this word), then God does not exist, because you have decided that meaningless things should not exist. If you want God to exist, redefine it. No one can force you to redefine a word through "proof". You have to choose to define it the way the people who use it define it. If you don't accept (or at least try to understand) the definitions of the people you are talking to (believe what they say) then you can never follow their logic. Faith is not "blind following". Faith is the idea of not arguing semantics.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >just believe and stop arguing goy

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I didn't say to stop arguing.
        I said that if you don't use the same semantics as the person that you are with, then you are not arguing. Instead, you are talking to yourself. Like an ouroboros. This is a bad practice, because it isolates angels, and they become demonic.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We’ll prove it to you easy

    https://discord.gg/cqnKZte6zW

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Uh christbro you weren't supposed to reveal that we're discordgays...

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    God is proven by the impossibility of the contrary

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Prove impossibility of the contrary.

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Atheists believe the universe always existed in some form and that it goes on forever, ironic that concepts like eternity and infinity are believed in the realm of science, how could the universe have existed forever? “Oh it could be beyond our ability to understand” it’s funny they can’t explain the universe and its origin without saying basically what religion says, they even say humans are star dust like the Bible says the physical human body came from the dust of the earth

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >how could the universe have existed forever
      Because the contrary, it was created out of the blue with or without some magic being, is nonsensical.
      An endless transformation isn't that difficult to grasp rationally

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So it had no beginning it just always existed how and why

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >how
          Through various transformative means the earliest we know of being the "Big Bang" cosmic expansion.
          >why
          There is no why to be asked, category mistake. No one is pulling strings & cables in the backstage

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    nice bait

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When you die, there will be a black void where you will have time to regret what you have said, but it will be too late.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >think
      >be
      Death specifically ends those things

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >you will be tortured forever >:-)
      >I'm praying for you 🙂

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >a black void
      Yes, that's what there is after death for everyone.

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Good created proof
    You can't prove something without god

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unicorns created imagination
      You can't imagine God without unicorns

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Synchronicity.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *