>Hey guys. >The first humans came from Africa, and native Americans were the first humans in the Americas.

>Hey guys
>The first humans came from Africa, and native Americans were the first humans in the Americas.
>(no, don't look up Graecopithecus or the Cerutti mastodon site)
>haha k bye

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Garceopithecus isn't homosexual Sapiens and people already theorized that the ancestors of Chimps and modern humans left Africa and then came back

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the ancestors of Chimps and modern humans
      My grandpa ain't no monkey

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Garceopithecus isn't homosexual Sapiens
      "Out of Africa" doesn't apply (only) to homosexual Sapiens, but at the earliest to homosexual Erectus, and Graecopithecus predates homosexual Erectus by 5 million years.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Out of Africa most certainly does apply only to homosexual Sapiens.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          No it doesn't. homosexual Erectus supposedly had an "out of Africa" as well.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            'out of africa' is a specific theory and relates on the homosexual sapien migration. that is were the term originates, please don't misuse it. thanks.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Several expansions of populations of archaic humans (genus Homo) out of Africa and throughout Eurasia took place in the course of the Lower Paleolithic, and into the beginning Middle Paleolithic, between about 2.1 million and 0.2 million years ago (Ma). These expansions are collectively known as Out of Africa

            Graecopithecus was not homosexual Sapien

            Were talking about the origin of Humans, not predecessors of humans

            The official classification includes the distinction between "archaic humans" and "modern humans".
            The former includes all the homos

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Graecopithecus was not homosexual Sapien

        Were talking about the origin of Humans, not predecessors of humans

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >people already theorized that the ancestors of Chimps and modern humans left Africa and then came back
      kek so there's an "Out of Europe" theory that predates "Out of Africa"?
      So all black people were once white?

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I've followed this guy for a long time and once I had a long comment section argument with him in which I called him a cuck and a loser for excusing why sub saharan africa is undeveloped.

    Anyway respect the guy for responding and engaging and not blocking me. A true scholar, a pothead and asian woman admirer.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lol I can immediately tell when a poster is from IQfy

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Graecopithecus

    You mean an ape that was either at the very bottom of the hominin tree before evolving bipedalism or an ape that's equally as related to chimpanzees as it was to us? That ape? Can't fricking stand you idiots.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >ape
      Graecopithecus is officially classifieds a Homo, i.e. an archaic human.

      >before evolving bipedalism
      Graecopithecus is considered to have been bipedal.

      >Several expansions of populations of archaic humans (genus Homo) out of Africa and throughout Eurasia took place in the course of the Lower Paleolithic, and into the beginning Middle Paleolithic, between about 2.1 million and 0.2 million years ago (Ma). These expansions are collectively known as Out of Africa

      [...]
      The official classification includes the distinction between "archaic humans" and "modern humans".
      The former includes all the homos

      >The former includes all the homos
      *except homosexual Sapiens, naturally.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No. Graecopithecus was Hominidae. Not Homo. An entirely different Genus called “Graecopithecus”, of which it was the only known species.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Graecopithecus was Hominidae. Not Homo.
          Well technically it's a Hominin with shared ancestry with homosexual but no shared ancestry with Chimps, according to the most modern research.

          No.

          Graecopithecus is the only member of the “Graecopithecus” genus.

          The three genuses under Hominidae are: Homo, Graecopithecus, and Pan. homosexual and Pan branched off from the common ancestor much later than Graecopithecus did.

          >homosexual and Pan branched off from the common ancestor much later than Graecopithecus did.
          See above, Graecopithecus was found to have shared ancestry with homosexual but no shared ancestry with Chimps, according to the most modern research.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >equally as related to chimpanzees as it was to us
      Graecopithecus is officially the closest thing to a "missing link", i.e. the first known common ancestor to all Homos after the divergence from Chimpansees.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No.

        Graecopithecus is the only member of the “Graecopithecus” genus.

        The three genuses under Hominidae are: Homo, Graecopithecus, and Pan. homosexual and Pan branched off from the common ancestor much later than Graecopithecus did.

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    None of this is controversial

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >look at this screenshot of this wall of text
        Very compelling

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Now explain why those early Eurasians have Y-DNA and mtDNA derived from African ones.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [makes an awkward sexual joke]

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    While you are trolling I do enjoy his reddit takes on smaller issues of academic consensus so much because on a lot of issues you can tell he doesn't totally buy into it, and it is enjoyable watching the little worm tap-dance. He's a terrible liar and it comes off very insincere, but he does have a deep desire to be taken seriously.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Welp, looks like Mitakeumi is headed to dead rikishi storage.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *