Historically, what are usually the consequences of this?

Historically, what are usually the consequences of this?

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    These are usually followed by good times after you start mass executing leftists.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      bot post?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Putin unironically has majority support.

      Hello Ivan. Ran out of troony mugshots and twitter posts?

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Ackbraps status?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      This.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        why are north carolina and kentucky cucked now?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          soilent in the water turning them gay

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Putin unironically has majority support.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      And all it cost him is sending thousands to die or be crippled and having more and more of the population being subjected to ordinance dropping in their neighborhood on a regular basis. With no sign of stopping anytime soon.

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Societal collapse.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >what are usually the consequences of this?
    Probably nothing, considering, according to this same exact graph, it was the same levels in 1990
    What a shit thread

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Radicalization.

      >short term distrust is the same as long one
      >me smart

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        term distrust is the same as long one
        term
        It's below 50% since 70s. That's low.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          >that's low
          Arbitrary classification.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Low = less than average, so <50% is low.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The average isn't 50%.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The average between 100 and 0 is indeed 50

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Anon, how many data points show 100% or 0% approval?

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            That's irrelevant

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            No, it's not. You don't measure averages from theoretical values, but from observed ones.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Even if you were right my original point would still be right (but just a little bit less)

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >a little bit
            10% is not a little bit.
            >Even if you are right
            I am right.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Muh useless protests which are forgotten 2 weeks after and nothing changes.
            >10% is not a little bit.
            it is
            >I am right
            That was hypothetical you're still wrong since 50 is average

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            Way to out yourself as a mathlet.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            It's common sense. It's statistics. Besides my graph includes Neutral so it's different.

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Sociopolitical decomposition with consequences that could go from the surge of fringe political movements that tackle institutional degradation to balkanization.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Historically, what are usually the consequences of this?

    A couple things:
    -The government typically now has to find ways to coerce, or otherwise manufacture consent, whenever it wants to do something because the public is being an uncooperative c**t.
    -CONVERSLY, the government can also feel more enclined to be aggressive and out-of-pocket. "You don't trust me anyway, so whatever. Frick you. I'll be the villain you think I am you little shit."
    -The public themselves gets a lot more interested in autocrats & authoritarian type leaders due to a combination of, "Well at least he's honest" and "we need a BIG STRONG leader to manage this unstrustworthy government" essentially seeing bureaucratic or 'boring' politicians as either complacent and/or conniving.
    -The public has a tendency to grow progressively more apathetic, disinterested, and disengaged with politics. Viewing the government as just this entity that will do whatever it wants regardless of their input.
    -Elected officials, who are elected from the public, can also potentially start adopting a "we're all corrupt, so I may as well be corrupt too."

    It's actually really weird and frustrating because distrust doesn't actually have to be justified or based on reality, it can just be baseless paranoia, but the consequences of distrust are 100% real and can effectively lead to the reality people suspect. It's all about establish or deconstructing expectations.

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Kino incoming

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Trust (to do what)?

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >2001 spike
    LMAO @ amerigolems

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      If you look, it ran up in the 90s (Soviets dead, Clinton economy, dot com bubble). It fell back down during the Bush wars.

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    This is just the internet and normies finally figuring out the government isn't the good guy.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    there's no historical precedent, so we can't really be sure

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *