How did Germans lose at Stalingrad against an enemy that didn't even have guns?

How did Germans lose at Stalingrad against an enemy that didn't even have guns?

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Schizophrenic Conspiracy Theorist Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Germans had no coats

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why didn't they kill the Russians and take their coats?

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Either the Germans did not think of it or, they thought the Russians are smelly and did not want subhuman coats.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        Russian coats were of different color, idiot

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Just draw big swastikas on them if you are worried about friendly fire.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        If you shoot a man you also shoot the coat. A coat with a hole is worthless.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Wear two coats

          • 3 months ago
            Anonymous

            What if both coats have holes in the same spot?
            The Germans also ran out of fuel and horses.

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          >A coat with a hole is worthless.
          Then where do your arms go?

        • 3 months ago
          Anonymous

          Shoot them in the head. No hole in the coat unless it's a hoody.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Germans lost to Russians because of the cold
      >Aztecs lost to the Spanish because the Spanish are superior
      which is it?

  2. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Russia's military strategy has always been attritioning and man waving.

    Germans weren't prepared for either.

  3. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I count at least three guns in that pic OP. Also the flagpole could potentially be used as a weapon if you hit someone over the head with it. Also teeth can bite.

  4. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    This bait was already stale a decade ago.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      it wasn't bait

  5. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Seriously though, how do you lose to an army using guns that look like picrel.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      They thought they were superhumans and that the inferior Russian weaponry wouldn't do them any harm.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Don't care. Still kino + Rachel Weisz has gorgeous breasts

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Maxim guns are great though. They can fire reliably for so many rounds and for so far that it's actually a viable indirect fire platform.

  6. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    moron Hitler thought he can keep supply lines extended as hell in big plain steppe

  7. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Soviets showed them their grocery stores full of food.

  8. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Fake.

  9. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I think these ancient army sizes were inflated by history. Stalingrad was probably like 200 germans vs 300 russians, which is pretty close to a 1v1. With those odds, it was really anyone's fight.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      You joke but this is a legitimate fear of mine. This must be how holocausters feel when their numbers get shifted.

  10. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The Germans had guns, but no logistics, the only railway track leading to stalingrad was built to carry a super cannon to bombard the town.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Why didn't they shoot the supplies to their troops like they do at sporting events with t-shirts

  11. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Soviets had God on their side.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous
  12. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Why do people think the Soviets had no guns?

    Didn't they have any from the last World War?

  13. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    The combined kino of Sacred War playing full blast and thousands of Soviet Soldiers yelling URA while charging to certain death was too much for the Germans to handled and they surrendered, recognizing they’ve been mogged completely in the propaganda department.

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      You mean the Germans ran out of bullets?

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      Sacred war sucks
      Sorry

  14. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I mean look at how far the german supply lines into the ussr were stretched
    yet hitler ordered his caucasus forces to hold then they got surrounded like a bunch of morons

  15. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    skill issue

  16. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Romanians were defending their flanks

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      And Hungarians. And Italians. All three sucked massive amounts of dick

  17. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    Because Germans don't know how supply and logistics work.

  18. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    I can't tell if this is a bait thread or not.

  19. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    because germans are dowright moronic on intelligence gathering.

  20. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    play Avalon hill's stalingrad on dos. You will not take that city in a operational level wargame

    • 3 months ago
      Anonymous

      If you have sufficient elan, you can.

      • 3 months ago
        Anonymous

        this isn't one of those morono paradox grand strat games where the AI plays at a cognitive level lower than a 10 year old child

  21. 3 months ago
    Anonymous

    They had more people than the germans had bullets

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *