How does the government justify altering historical temperature data in order to create the false appearance of global warming when the actual tempera...

How does the government justify altering historical temperature data in order to create the false appearance of global warming when the actual temperature data shows a cooling trend over the past 100 years?
Details in this 2 minute video

?t=5

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    money

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    These boomer conspiracy videos are always the most anti-climactic shit ever.
    I'm on the edge of my seat here for two minutes waiting for grandpa over here to explain what the NOAA adjusted temperature scale is and he just, never does. You're just meant to automatically assume that it's le bad.

    • 1 month ago
      Sage

      Only good post ITT

      Sage

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Why does unseasonably inclimate weather require 97% consensus? Why doesn't E=mc^2 require consense, or the distance to the sun?
      The science is a political entity pretending like it isn't.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Why doesn't E=mc^2 require consense, or the distance to the sun?
        You can find plenty of crackpots who reject special relativity and heliocentrism.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Ah, but where is the meta-analysis giving us 97% consensus in Newton's Laws? The science is jumping through hoops for weather indeterminacy with such studies. Is consensus science or isn't it?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Well, there isn't much money in denying special relativity. Climate change however...

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >ITS A CONSPIRACY!!!
            https://www.healthcentral.com/condition/schizophrenia/paranoid-schizophrenia

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            moron take

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          general relativity has been observationally disproved on several occasions

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >general relativity
            Its not a real scientific theory because even though it is regularly disproved, it still remains as an accept fact.
            Scientific theories are disprovable by the discovery of contradictory evidence, GR is not.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Scientific theories are disprovable by the discovery of contradictory evidence, GR is not.
            Google Gravity Probe B. It's the most direct test of general relativity ever performed.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Pure pilpul, Leonard Schiff is a cousin of Adam Schiff and a descendant of Rothschild operative Jacob Schiff

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >i have this one data point that suggests my pet theory is correct, that means its OK for me to ignore all the data which proves that the theory is wrong
            that fallacy is not science, that form of willful ignorance is just a common cope

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >that form of willful ignorance is just a common cope
            far too common

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Good quote, but his theory that people don't just ignore contradictory data has been disproved by the Einstein cultists

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            his naïve, idealistic view of how things work was in line with his naïve, idealistic views of politics, which is why he was a devout communist.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >which is why he was a devout communist.
            he was a communist because thats what his ~~*bosses*~~ told him to be. his fame and prestige was created by his fellow hebrews in the media rather than earned on merit, so he wasn't his own man.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If he had been able to create anything of genuine value and use in his decades long career in physics then he wouldn't have been beholden to the media for his claim to fame.
            Edison, Tesla, Benz, Flemming and the Wright brothers all earned their fame and respect meritoriously because their work produced tangible benefit for humanity.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >government
    there's some 195 governments. Which one?

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    What government website can I look up this data that they are manipulating. You know the us government post all the data they gather even the methodology from their satistical calculations.

    Or are you just making shit up because you’re a conspiracy theorist?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I come to IQfy because I'm positive that any information that isn't from the government is wrong
      why are you even here?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm here to get angry at anyone who posts information that contradicts government narratives

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous
  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They wouldn't need to do that if global warming was real

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >GISP 2 Ice core
    >Data starts in 1855
    >Graph says years before 2000

    Why are you lying OP? why is there a constant shill campaign on this board of activists using fraudulent graphs and data to create heterodox climate narratives?

    Are you getting paid to do this or do you do it for free?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Funny that you talk about who is getting paid, when grants directly pay for scientists to find connections to mild weather indeterminacy.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >No u!
        Pathetic.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How many climate change threads do we need?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I'm thinking 6 threads is sufficient. If there aren't 6 threads up at all times there's something wrong.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    years
    >Climate
    Why why why why why why why
    Is it like this

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Good video

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >How does the government justify altering historical temperature data in order to create the false appearance of global warming
    Greedily and megalomaniacally

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Government alter data all the time because normies keep licking their boots.
    Just keep paying your carbon tax, mkay?

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    My g*d you are taking it out of context
    Now delete the graph chud

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *