How does this happen. Most advanced fighter jet. >F35 crashes

How does this happen

Most advanced fighter jet
>F35 crashes

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >planes crash
    wtf

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Coping merimutt

      Don't u have to worship Zion right about now

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's over for the Western world order, multipolarity has been established

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the F35 is a globally sourced aircraft. all Partners in the orogram get a piece of the action. this means there are Polish and turkish suppliers as well as AUS/NZ.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Qantas never crashed

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes? A plane crashing is pretty unexpected. Would a car crash if it were the only fricking thing on the road? It's not like the plane was trying to avoid other planes, pedestrians, and stay in the lanes all at the same time.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        if the engine of a car dies, it doesn't fall out the sky.
        if the electrical and/or hydraulic systems of a car fail, it doesn't stall in the air and/or become uncontrollable then fall out of the sky
        not rocket surgery

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Something happened.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >US military tech is so advanced that's why we deserve billions of dollars annua- ACKKKKKKK!!!!

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Tom Cruise pushing mach 14.5

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i can't believe we got this junk instead of gripen

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Single engine fighter jets crash all the time, the F-16 was called the windowmaker and the F-104 the germans lost like 80% of them in crashes

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Starfighter had severe issues with pitch at low speeds due to tiny wings. It was built for GAS GAS GAS. It did that really well.

      >Most advanced fighter jet
      The most advanced fighter jet is the F-22, despite being older.
      The F-35 has always been a garbage project.

      It was meant to save costs, by creating this purposefully-inferior but cheaper, multirole plane that could fill every niche (as opposed to the F-22 which is only for air superiority). But Lockheed went grossly overbudget, the project suffered a shitton of delays, and they basically broke every promise they made. Not only is it inferior to the F-22 (which was somewhat expected), it's hot garbage and not cheap like it was promised, either.

      It's a bad idea that should have been canned. F-22 production, the most beautiful plane ever made, was was cut short to introduce this garbage.

      t. Flight Sim fan and plane autist

      >he most advanced fighter jet is the F-22
      Not sold for export should tell you everything you need to know. Pity HiLo ethos became "spenno F-22" and "not cheap in fact gut wrenchingly expensive F-35".
      The F-35 is a MRA. Part of the problem was designing something to do every potential role. Acquisition is hard. Like really hard. You're trying to think 30 years in the future with technologies that don't exist, a moving landscape of requirements, and snake oil salespeople.
      The F-35 really suffered from the latter. It is the very epitome of how sick defense has become.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        f-35 was only more expensive because they fronted the cost to replace the majority of the F-16 fleet.
        cost per airframe is cheap as shit relative to any new airframe that entered production in the last three decades.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    because stealth jets trade off stable flight for the geometry require to scatter radar. this requires dependence on advanced-fly-by-wire systems to maintain stable flight. remember the F-117? Well, if the computer crashes then the surfaces on these planes produce terrible flight characteristics. Also, some have single engine VTOL

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      killer blue-screens

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dude, all fighter jets since the F16 have unstable flight characteristics and require FBW to be able to even fly the damn thing. Being unstable makes the aircraft more maneuverable as you aren't constantly fighting the aircraft to be at wings level, but with the added caveat that the plane is trying to kill you if you so much as move the stick without constant adjustment making the pilot's life hell without the assistance of a computer to do what the pilot wants. Even then stable designs like commercial airliners (mostly Airbus) use FBW because it simplifies the pilot's life.
      And if you haven't noticed, but the B2, B21, F22, F35 are very smooth rather than angular like the F-117

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They were using C instead of Rust, so the in-flight computer segfaulted. (Would not be a problem with Rust)

    • 4 weeks ago
      baritone

      still would have crashed with an error instead of recovering it and continuing

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because it's written in C.

      >ADA cucks seething and malding
      Face it, ADA lost

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      actually the stealth planes are made by either Northrop or Lockheed. Boeing makes no fighters or bombers

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Boeing makes no fighters or bombers
        You might want to check again.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        boeing has a joint merger with mcdonald-douglas who has always made all of the navy's f18s

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          boeing should merge with mcdonalds. That's about their level now.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why are Americans this Black person stupid
    >how trillion dollar company make mistake
    >how expensive plane boom
    >rich man smartest

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I FRICKING LOVE CORRUPTION!

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Diversity is our strength.

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    thats what happens with closed-source non-free proprietary botnet software

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They should just fixate on a mig-21 design and never change anything except upgrade packages until 2050. Only BVR matters now, mig-21with upgrades is enough, grow up.

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Because it's written in C.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      And

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i am more curious about chinese stealth tankers https://youtu.be/MiKLmYN2WJY?t=92

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >most advanced fighter jet
    >least advanced fighter pilot

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Most advanced fighter jet
    The most advanced fighter jet is the F-22, despite being older.
    The F-35 has always been a garbage project.

    It was meant to save costs, by creating this purposefully-inferior but cheaper, multirole plane that could fill every niche (as opposed to the F-22 which is only for air superiority). But Lockheed went grossly overbudget, the project suffered a shitton of delays, and they basically broke every promise they made. Not only is it inferior to the F-22 (which was somewhat expected), it's hot garbage and not cheap like it was promised, either.

    It's a bad idea that should have been canned. F-22 production, the most beautiful plane ever made, was was cut short to introduce this garbage.

    t. Flight Sim fan and plane autist

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Wrong, F-35 is more advanced then the current F-22. F-22's only advantage is speed, maneuverability which matters in air superiority which is what F-22 was designed around. F-22 was designed to be a SU-27 killer and hopefully still outclass what USSR might have answered with if it never collapsed. No, the current SU-57 is not that answer.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I believe the F22 is also much stealthier than the F35. The F22 is also more survivable due to twin engines.

        Really the only thing better about the F35 is more modern avionics.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I believe the F22 is also much stealthier than the F35
          Nope, F-35 wins in stealth if it doesn't carry external pylons.
          > The F22 is also more survivable due to twin engines.
          Not a big deal anymore. Engines are much more reliable and if you craft has taken enough damage that one engine is down. You are already toast and are unlikely egress out of hostile airspace. The whole twin engines thing is more of Navy thing anyway.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >F-35 wins in stealth
            pretty sure youre wrong

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >extracted landing gear while measuring stealth
            kek

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            hope thats a joke

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            those are RCS averages for the F-22 and F-35. F-35 is terrible in average calculations due to the engine exhaust configuration

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >su-57
            >rcs 0.1
            yeah sure, nato trannies can also keep posting the same render version with missiles hanging from it all around, still doesn't make it any truer

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            this was actually taken from publicly available sukhoi patent information.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            sure it was

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://archive.org/details/ru-2502643-c-9.ru.en

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Woodscrews
            Nvidia? Is that you?!

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            most aircraft use similar bolts, it's just more that they aren't countersunk flush.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i remember

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >the reported rcs is based on the image
            ok moron

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >F-22's only advantage is speed, maneuverability which matters in air superiority which is what F-22 was designed around
        Yes, the F-22 is older but superior (for the air superiority role). Exactly what I was saying. Obviously I'm not comparing other roles. Since the F-22 never intended to fill those niches.

        But it's clear the idea of a one-size-fits-all plane was moronic.
        It's inferior to the F-22 on the air superiority role. And I bet it's inferior to what you would have had if you had developed dedicated successors for the A-10, F-16, F-18, etc. for CAS, light attack, naval aircraft, etc, etc.

        The supposed benefit of the F-35 (cheaper than dedicated planes because of their modularity and multirole nature) hasn't materialized. And the delays have forced the USAF and related branches to extend the life of F-16s, come up with stopgap measures like the F-15EX, etc.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >come up with stopgap measures like the F-15EX,
          That was actually from early termination of F-22 production and aging F-15 airframes that no direct replacements while NGDF is only in the drawing boards. F-35 had nothing to do with decision.
          F-35 was meant to be a F-16, F/A-18 and F-117 replacement for future near-peer conflicts and it fulfills that role. The whole VOTL requirement is what really threw the JSF program into such disarray on top of pork spending and earmarking which are their own things.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Blame the muhreeeeens for that shit.
            That and poorgay nations.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this. The F35 is the exact same size as the F16, but weighs twice as much. It is slower and less agile.

      Like sure its good for what it is, but it is less enjoyable to fly and slower than an F16. The F22 doesnt have this problem

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Research proved that very little combat takes place at high speeds. What matters is alpha strike and being undetected on approach.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Like sure its good for what it is, but it is less enjoyable to fly and slower than an F16.
        F-35 is just as fast when both have loadouts. F-16 is just much more nimble but it doesn't matter in the era of BVR combat and accurate AA systems that makes dogfighting of Vietnam war and earlier obsolete. That's why F-35 is stealthy in the first place.
        F-16 would be dead before it can even merge with F-35. Both platforms are products of their era.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the most beautiful plane ever made
      was amazing but out of date for military needs (developed during the 1980s, first test flight 1990 or so).

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't know my dude, export of F-22 is still banned while the F-35 is freely available to NATO nations. I guess they know something you don't.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          > dumb frick moron doesn't know shit
          f22 was designed only for american use. f35 project was sold to other nations. the american f35 is not exactly the same as f35s sold to other nations. not difficult to understand, dumbfrick. stick to playing your gay flight sim and leave the history to straight white men that can read.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >f22 was designed only for american use.
            Point is, if the plane was obsolete, those export restrictions would have vanished a long time ago.

            >f35 project was sold to other nations
            It was co-developed with other nations, the US does not “sell the F-35”. If you are pretending to correct people at least do it right.

            >the american f35 is not exactly the same as f35s sold to other nations
            The only F-35C hardware that is exclusive to America is related to its capacity to launch from carrier catapults, and that’s just because the only other nation with a catapult on their carrier is France, who has their own solution with the Rafale and isn't interested in the F-35. As such, most F-35s have more or less the same capabilities, they differ on their weapon loadouts, MDFs, and the needs and capabilities of each country, but there aren’t any “secret components” that the US can leave out as the US doesn't do most of the actual production.

            The ultimate goal of the F-35 program is for all partners to have aircraft with the same capabilities, which is unlike the F-22 which is a purely American program. (The only correct statement that you managed to include in your fit of your ragetyping)

            >not difficult to understand, dumbfrick. stick to playing your gay flight sim and leave the history to straight white men that can read.
            kek, stay mad that I, a hobby autist, know more than you. Or at least I am better at posting, maybe it's your rageposting that isn't doing you any favors.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          We also don't have the means to make the F-22 currently, as a line restart would cost >$7 billion in 2014 dollars. all the tooling was allegedly saved, but who knows how well. the other big issue with restarting defense contracts like this is that a lot of the subassemblies and machined parts are outsourced to a bazillion small machine shops (so the final manufacturer can do things cheaper, and so the program gets so embedded in small businesses in multiple US states that elected officials are scared to can it) so getting them back on contract would be a royal pain, ignoring the hundreds that went bust or got eating in M&A activities.
          If F-22 production wasn't ended early, they'd probably start exporting them when/if the NGAD gets delivered.
          t. worked for stinky aerospace manufacturer

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's honestly insane how niche some of those small companies are. Shame they do get bought out though.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            honestly the most painful buyouts are the medium sized ones as they generally have pretty large catalogs of parts and usually lose some level of ability to manufacture all of their legacy items.
            eaton, precision castparts, honeywell and collins are particularly atrocious in the amount of companies they've consumed, and are generally horrible to work with.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Very interesting point unlike the post above you.
            Makes sense anon.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          F-22 was more sophisticated and used more secret tech, that doesn't make it better though. dog fighting days are over. sorry. advanced vectoring capabilities are pretty useless when you have optical tracking from space

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            nah, the sensor suite is far less impressive, as are the datalink and computers.
            a lot of the planned features of the F-22 were canned like side look radar, upgraded data link and head mounted cueing. all the mounts and electrical ports for the side look radar are still in the cheeks of the plane, it's just missing the actual radar panels.
            Lockheed and the USAF have submitted multiple proposals to have the F-35 computers, systems and avionics put in the F-22. however the proposal was most recently shot down due to the fact Congress determined the upgrade would be a "major airframe modification" due to the fact a substantial amount of ballast would be required to offset the weight shifts due to how much smaller and lighter the F-35 computers are.

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    TODAY I will remind them

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Remind of what, actual competence vs Black folk that don't know what they are doing?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      F35 is bloated

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It is because USMC were so obsessive with Harrier and want a next-generation fighter to have some kind of VTOF. F-35 would have simpler and cheaper if wasn't hamstrung around this requirement.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The pilot was an FNG: Fricking New Guy

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Most advanced != Most reliable

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Technological development should have stopped right here.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It did and were still coping by calling things fifth and sixth generation.

      It hasn't really changed much but we need to justify the Trillions we give to Israel.

  22. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    When airplanes lose lift, they crash.

  23. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    eating -> eaten

  24. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it was the pajeets or something

  25. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How much 5-star hotel accomodations for illegals did this cost?

  26. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    s

  27. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Do you want to save your PR? Give the Raider a public test drive. Everyone wants to see that monster.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      UUUOOOOOOHHH RAIDER-CHAN EROTIC

  28. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Reports on other fighters crashing don't snowball.
    People have a hate boner for that thing.

  29. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wen Boeing brand stealth fighter? It's like we aren't even trying

  30. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    probably forgot to bless that one

  31. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You will only find the real answer on /misc/.

  32. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >plane crashes
    >instantly spray it and the immediate suerounding in toxic forever chemicals

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you may not know this but the planes are full of them too

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *