How is this any different from "God said "let there be light", and there was light"?

How is this any different from "God said "let there be light", and there was light"?

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    That looks like a condom

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      the universe will continue expanding in a cone until it's long enough to fit the average BBC

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It isn't, and it never happened

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The difference is it's based on evidence and not just completely made up.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >based on evidence
      >not just completely made up.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        cope. The Big Bang theory is based on redshifting of galaxies and the independent finding of microwave background radiation that confirms the predictions of the theory.

        Light couldn't even form at the very beginning of the Big Bang, so conflating the two doesn't even make sense unless your whole knowledge of the theory comes from the OP pic.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          forgot pic

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >your controlled scientific environment sir

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          you should really watch

          https://i.imgur.com/xGHubn2.jpg

          It isn't, and it never happened

          , there are massive insurmountable problems that have lead to it being a closed secret its dead until they can fix it or find something new.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >consoom my fringe schizophrenic media
            Read papers and grow up.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Got a peer-reviewed source? I don't waste time on cranks.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >consoom my fringe schizophrenic media
            Read papers and grow up.

            It's funny that some "random schizo" got so much press and buzz and angry refutations.
            https://iai.tv/articles/the-big-bang-bust-up-auid-2253
            https://medium.com/@glennborchardt/eric-lerner-on-the-big-bang-never-happened-f9617e7a3778
            https://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/lerner_errors.html
            https://science.thewire.in/the-sciences/eric-lerner-big-bang-jwst/

            Why does one little schizo rustle so many jimmies hmmm?
            It never happened.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >random schizo gets debunked
            >REE THE GLOWIES JUST WANT TO BURY AND DISPARAGE THE TRUTH
            >random schizo doesnt get debunked
            >REE THE GLOWIES ARE AFRAID TO FACE THE TRUTH
            you guys are like pigeons shitting on the chessboard thinking that means you won

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            For a random schizo he has hundreds of articles seething and coping against him.
            It's very common knowledge that there is a crisis in cosmology and that the big bang is dead in the water.
            What people shit on him for is his alternative, that he's a plasma cosmology guy.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >redshifting of galaxies
          Cosmological redshift is quantized, it is not a marker of recessional velocity. Hubble's hypothesis was wrong. See Halton Arp.
          > the independent finding of microwave background radiation
          The CMB is a result of the emissivity of water in the Earth's atmosphere, and the monopole has never been detected at L2. See Pierre-Marie Robitaille.

          You should practice real skepticism, rather than blindly believe things you are told.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >See Pierre-Marie Robitaille.
            You're an idiot and you have no idea what you're talking about

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >The Big Bang theory is based
          never type this again

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      lmao

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        to be fair, Einstein knew better than anyone his theory did not unify electromagnetism with gravity. If Tesla had known how I wish he would have left the math behind because this quote just comes off as bitterness since he didn't solve the riddle either.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Big Bang theory false but my 3-6-9 universe theory true
        Balkanoid intellectuals at work

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Seething

          Is Quoting random Tesla quotes peak dunning kruger? It probably is

          >random
          >dunning kruger
          Peak reddit

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Is Quoting random Tesla quotes peak dunning kruger? It probably is

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    because physicists don't claim to know why it happened, they just see that it did happen. Christians say they know why it happened and who caused it. That is the difference.

    Also it is not clear at all the bible was talking about the big bang. Saying the bible is talking about the big bang is not justifiable, imo.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >How is this any different
    Hebrew Bible was written after the Hellenic israelites got in contact with the Greeks.

    So, the question you are asking is: "how is this any different from Plato?"

    And here the answer becomes clear: Plato had a thing about "And it was Good" being a necessary component. Because platonic idealism and eternal Eidos/Form schematics.
    Otherwise, it would have been a mere natural-philosophy cosmology.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's interesting how you manage to shoehorn this fringe theory into every religious discusssion.
      You're far from the worst poster on religion, as low a bar as that is, but I find it funny.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It isn't, it was literally a theory developed by a Catholic priest/physicist.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The sheer number of fedoras who don't know the Big Bang man was a priest is comical.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >priest man discovers thing therefore god real

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Who cares? The validity and correctness of a scientific theory have nothing to do with the scientist's side job.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's even funnier when you realize that the name "Big Bang" was given as a way to discredit his theory by the atheists of the time.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        So? Monotheism wasn't an original invention of the christcucks

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        we know anon, we just don't care. His faith does not matter in his scientific contribution

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How is it any different from buddhist texts describing the universe as "expanding"? You have a million blind people throwing darts at a target, eventually one of them will hit it

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah beside the fact that it doesn't involve god and that the bible doesn't describe the big bang they are totally the same

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It isn't, that's why atheists feared the big bang theory and mocked it for years

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >How is this any different from "God said "let there be light", and there was light"?
    Because of this, you idiot:
    >Misconceptions about what the big bang theory explains:
    >One of the most common misconceptions about the Big Bang model is that it fully explains the origin of the universe. However, the Big Bang model does not describe how energy, time, and space were caused, but rather it describes the emergence of the present universe from an ultra-dense and high-temperature initial state.[139] It is misleading to visualize the Big Bang by comparing its size to everyday objects. When the size of the universe at Big Bang is described, it refers to the size of the observable universe, and not the entire universe.[140]

    >Another common misconception is that the Big Bang must be understood as the expansion of space and not in terms of the contents of space exploding apart. In fact, either description can be accurate. The expansion of space (implied by the FLRW metric) is only a mathematical convention, corresponding to a choice of coordinates on spacetime. There is no generally covariant sense in which space expands.[141]

    >The recession speeds associated with Hubble's law are not velocities in a relativistic sense (for example, they are not related to the spatial components of 4-velocities). Therefore, it is not remarkable that according to Hubble's law, galaxies farther than the Hubble distance recede faster than the speed of light. Such recession speeds do not correspond to faster-than-light travel.

    >Many popular accounts attribute the cosmological redshift to the expansion of space. This can be misleading because the expansion of space is only a coordinate choice. The most natural interpretation of the cosmological redshift is that it is a Doppler shift.[93]

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    So the big bang theory dosen't explain anything about how the universe was actually created.
    You are a moron, if you can't see the difference between that, and Genesis clear universal cosmologcal origin.
    Which the big bang theory literally dosen't even explain, it's literally not even the actual point of the theory.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    So are the electric universe guys actually the same as the christian fundamentalists now?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >the electric universe guys actually the same as the christian fundamentalists now
      if christian fundamentalists are "extremely based" then yes, yes we're the same now

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Step 1. God create the universe with a purpose, if not then it was accident
    2. God made a mistake and cause a lot of human suffering, if not then all the suffering is just an accident
    3. God corrected the mistake and we can trust him, if not then you can't trust anything and are doomed with no purpose
    4. God sent a messenger who was his own creation, created as a man to tell us that he loves us and to have faith, if not then either all this is meaningless mistake, or God made a huge mistake and gave up on us.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *