How swarthy were the bellbeakers exactly?

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    who gave those peoples a steppe yDNA? What happened to the med native G2a?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      farmer/steppe mixed folx

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why should med identify with the farmers when we're closer geneticamly to beakers? At least for west meds
      In Greeks this isn't even a problem since they're all J2

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You're a Latinx from South America, what is this "we" shit?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Corsican-like bellbeakers

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Steppe

      Churka-Uralics unrelated to modern North Europeans. Better question why were Nordic people in France replaced by Med BVLLS?
      Distance to: France_BellBeaker
      0.02687495 Norwegian
      0.02927201 Danish
      0.02935273 Swedish
      0.03217898 Icelandic
      0.03264095 Dutch
      0.03283195 Irish
      0.03338793 Scottish
      0.03344385 Orcadian
      0.03346918 Shetlandic
      0.03467601 German_Hamburg
      0.03535105 Welsh
      0.03611438 English

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They had blonde hair

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      True Romans were swarthy as frick. Almost Cypriot tier.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Romans are even darker than Iron Age Sicilians. Truly a swarthy bunch.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The blond blue eyed sicilian is woman, the red haired greek is J2a, the blond greek is G2 and the dark-skinned greek is R1b lol

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the ones that i highlighted as outliers are outliers yes, the others aren't
          overal real romans were 25-30% blue eyed

          No

          https://i.imgur.com/Y2J32fD.jpeg

          The blond blue eyed sicilian is woman, the red haired greek is J2a, the blond greek is G2 and the dark-skinned greek is R1b lol

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            that doesn't include samples from lazio

            None of the samples are from Rome or the Republic.

            stop coping troon, those IA_Lazio samples are from rome and close to rome during and a bit before the roman republic, they're latins and are considered latins
            and this

            https://i.imgur.com/XVdxiQO.jpeg

            True Romans were swarthy as frick. Almost Cypriot tier.

            trash that you keep spamming is talking about those same samples too since it's from the same study but includes the outliers

            latins were 25-30% blue eyed on average

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >those IA_Lazio samples are from rome
            None of them are from Rome, moron.
            >a bit before the roman republic
            Centuries before, brainlet.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >None of them are from Rome, moron.
            some of them are form rome or very close to rome
            >Centuries before, brainlet.
            no, many are only 100 years before the republic, and that's a meaningless arbitrary date, they represent the local population that would have looked the same 100 years later except for the migrants hence why researches have correctly labeled them as representative of latins
            we won't talk about this anymore, the latins were 25-30% blue eyed when you remove the outleirs

            and again this quotes is talking about the same samples but with the outliers included

            https://i.imgur.com/XVdxiQO.jpeg

            True Romans were swarthy as frick. Almost Cypriot tier.

            so if you think they're not representative of real original romans you should be the first to stop posting this garbage

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Latins were like yamnaya

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            And about the first italics?
            What happened?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Where did the early italics go? Nowhere.

            Luca Toni: Apennines of Modena, Emilia Romagna

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Tvis man is genetically too eastern shifted to be italic

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            30% latins were eastern shifted

            https://i.imgur.com/UpYmiTA.png

            that includes outliers
            with outliers excluded 25-30% of romans were light eyed

            stop posting this garbage

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >And about the first italics?
            the first italics? as in the genetically northern european guys that brought the r1b haplogroups in italy?
            they mixed with the local farmer women

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >some of them are form rome
            None of them are "form" Rome, you dumbass moron.
            >many
            Most are several centuries earlier, complete moron.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            that doesn't include samples from lazio

            [...]
            stop coping troon, those IA_Lazio samples are from rome and close to rome during and a bit before the roman republic, they're latins and are considered latins
            and this [...] trash that you keep spamming is talking about those same samples too since it's from the same study but includes the outliers

            latins were 25-30% blue eyed on average

            the ones that i highlighted as outliers are outliers yes, the others aren't
            overal real romans were 25-30% blue eyed

            >They are all outliers
            >Please consider only these 7 samples from Latium Vetus with 20% Blue eyes and ignore all the other 60 samples from Etruria and Latium with only 3% of Blue eyes

            This dude's head is about to explode

            Imagine when this study finally gets peer-reviewed, so I can finally spam it all over Wikipedia and the rest of the internet. Not even the fake collection of blonde haired Roman Emperors from the apecity will save them.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that includes outliers
        with outliers excluded 25-30% of romans were light eyed

        stop posting this garbage

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Those are all outliers.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the ones that i highlighted as outliers are outliers yes, the others aren't
            overal real romans were 25-30% blue eyed

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            None of the samples are from Rome or the Republic.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You lost, again

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            he won actually, you haven't been able to make a single point against him

            >muh sample size
            literally same samplesize as the 10% blue eyed claim but with no outliers

            https://i.imgur.com/UpYmiTA.png

            that includes outliers
            with outliers excluded 25-30% of romans were light eyed

            stop posting this garbage

            it seems that when you remove the outliers the amount of blue eyed people jumps from 10% to 30%

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            i can't wait for it to be peer reviewed so i can post it when people post the same 7 samples + 3 outliers and tell them that they're including mena admixed outliers

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          is it true that daunians are mostly blue eyed
          latins, piceni and daunians were truly a light bunch

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            seems to be the case

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >latins, piceni and daunians

            Latins are pure Italics while Picenes and Daunians are half Italic and half Illyrian.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No, mostly dark

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Bell Beakers were Brown?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yes

          https://i.imgur.com/UpYmiTA.png

          that includes outliers
          with outliers excluded 25-30% of romans were light eyed

          stop posting this garbage

          the ones that i highlighted as outliers are outliers yes, the others aren't
          overal real romans were 25-30% blue eyed

          Shitty sample size. Etruscans were more steppe than latins and they have 3% blue eyes with good sample size

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            > Etruscans were more steppe than latins and they have 3% blue eyes with good sample size
            irrelevant, piceni and daunians were even more steppe and they have 30-40% blue eyes

            don't post this trash quote

            https://i.imgur.com/XVdxiQO.jpeg

            True Romans were swarthy as frick. Almost Cypriot tier.

            anymore if you don't like getting destroyed

            https://i.imgur.com/WRC26Bc.jpeg

            [...]
            [...]
            >They are all outliers
            >Please consider only these 7 samples from Latium Vetus with 20% Blue eyes and ignore all the other 60 samples from Etruria and Latium with only 3% of Blue eyes

            This dude's head is about to explode

            Imagine when this study finally gets peer-reviewed, so I can finally spam it all over Wikipedia and the rest of the internet. Not even the fake collection of blonde haired Roman Emperors from the apecity will save them.

            >Imagine when this study finally gets peer-reviewed
            this

            https://i.imgur.com/UpYmiTA.png

            that includes outliers
            with outliers excluded 25-30% of romans were light eyed

            stop posting this garbage

            is from the same study of this quote

            https://i.imgur.com/XVdxiQO.jpeg

            True Romans were swarthy as frick. Almost Cypriot tier.

            you actual troon
            when you post this

            https://i.imgur.com/XVdxiQO.jpeg

            True Romans were swarthy as frick. Almost Cypriot tier.

            you're posting those 7 samples + 3 outliers

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            he won actually, you haven't been able to make a single point against him

            >muh sample size
            literally same samplesize as the 10% blue eyed claim but with no outliers

            [...]
            it seems that when you remove the outliers the amount of blue eyed people jumps from 10% to 30%

            i can't wait for it to be peer reviewed so i can post it when people post the same 7 samples + 3 outliers and tell them that they're including mena admixed outliers

            Piceni were illyrian mutts and resemble north italians. Actual italics and etruscans resemble iberians and were darker. 7 samples is poor size.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Piceni were illyrian mutts and resemble north italians.
            irrelevant they were mostly italic and spoke an indo european language like the latins and unlike the etruscans
            stop coping troony, you have literally 0 excuses to post that quote about those 7 samples + 3 outliers and complain about me posting the same 7 samples while excluding the 3 outleirs
            i notice you never address the fact that this quote

            https://i.imgur.com/XVdxiQO.jpeg

            True Romans were swarthy as frick. Almost Cypriot tier.

            is talking about the same 7 samples + 3 outliers
            the latins were 25-30% blue eyed

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Bell beaker folk from the lower Rhine are literally the most prominent pre-AS ancestors of the British.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *