I am fricking scared

Why did people say this dress was white or black?
It was blue and brown. It always was.
Why were people arguing if it was white or black when it was neither?
There never was any reasonable explanation.
I'm going insane.

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If you think the question was about the colour values of the jaypeg and not the actual dress itself you may have a mental disability
    It might just be high-functioning autism though, you can live with that easily

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      BRO IT WAS NOT.
      IT WASN'T.
      THEY LITERALLY SAW IT AS WHITE/BLACK.
      THERE IS SO MUCH VIDEO EVIDENCE FROM THAT ERA PROVING IT.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Are you all right? The dress IS blue and black.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It doesn't matter what it is in real life.
          The dress in the picture is light blue and brown.
          People saw it as dark blue/black or white/gold.
          Some would even have their perspective shift to one or the other after looking at it a couple times.
          There was NEVER a real explanation as to why people couldn't just see the real colors in the fricking image.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            what makes you think the colors on the image represent a real dress?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >It doesn't matter what it is in real life.
            That is what the question was. You do have a mental disability. The obtained results do not prove what you think they do because you do not understand how they were produced.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >That is what the question was
            NO IT WASN'T.
            THEY REALLY DID SEE IT LIKE THAT.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      youve made me realize that i mustve always been autistic thanks anon

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It might have looked different in person, i dont know how a camera could change colour that much but the other explainations are even more stupid

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's the lighting, not the camera

      >That is what the question was
      NO IT WASN'T.
      THEY REALLY DID SEE IT LIKE THAT.

      No, they did not. That is a flawed assumption on your part because you misunderstand the question. Other people understood the question and answered what colour they thought the actual dress was in real life based on the image in front of them. The question is "what colour is the dress" and not "what colour is this jpeg"
      If this is really bothering you then print out some papers with those hex values, no dress, put them in front of people in a well-lit room, and ask them what colour they see. The vast majority will tell you blue/violet/purple and brown/gold (the rest may be colourblind). There. You've disproved your hypothesis.
      It's like pic related. A and B have the exact same colour value. But if you ask people what colours they are, they'll say one is white and the other is black.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        NO YOU DUMBFRICK.
        THE QUESTION WASN'T
        >"What do you think this might look like under normal lighting conditions?"
        IT WAS WHAT COLOR IS THE DRESS. LOOK AT ANY VIDEO FROM THAT ERA.
        THEY LITERALLY SAW IT THAT WAY.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >IT WAS WHAT COLOR IS THE DRESS.
          Yes. Normal people understand that as "what is the actual colour of this dress when it is not subject to an optical illusion"
          For frick's sake how do you function? If saw someone in this dress walking along the street late at night, passing street lights, and someone asked you what colour it was, would you answer "pitch black - now black and blue - now pitch black again - now black and blue - now pitch black again" etc. as the person crossed from light into darkness and back again? No, of course not. Normal people understand colour as an intrinsic property of an object that may APPEAR to be diffferent under specific lighting conditions, but does not change in actuality.
          The question is asking, therefore, what is the intrinsic property of colour that the dress has.

          If you're interpreting "I see white and gold" as "my eyes are literally receiving visual stimuli that objectively correspond to a wavelength that is assigned to white and gold on the visual spectrum of light" then you are more autistic than I thought. What they are saying is that they perceive those to be the actual colours. It is, fundamentally, a question about interpretation.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            ha, your eyes are autistic and tricked by the RGB flutter of the screen. Imagine being so genetically inferior.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            why are you trying to redefine language you fricking israelite?
            millions of people wouldn't have shared this if it was a moronic hypothetical like you are trying to gaslight

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            https://i.imgur.com/r9I4lnX.png

            >Noooo you don't get it she just mean she can't hypothetically imagine the dress under neutral lighting conditions in real life as anything resembling blue! That's what she means! Stop questioning it goy!!!!

            https://i.imgur.com/zmlKcst.png

            >It HYPOTHETICALLY fried his eyes!!! He didn't mean it changed colors in the literal sense you schizo frick!!!!!!!!

            https://i.imgur.com/Wnt1l2A.png

            WHEN THEY SAY THEY SEE THOSE COLORS THEY DON'T MEAN THEY SEE THOSE COLORS!

            Okay, I take it back, you're clearly not (just) austistic, you're a schizophrenic

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            RIP this guy's eyes because language is always literal and true

            their eyes are seeing hypothetical colors chud

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Your reading comprehension is abysmal.
            >aaaah I failed to comprehend this question in the same way as the majority of the neurotypical population and now their answers make no sense to me! I'm being gaslit by israelites! Save me Black personman!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            read what the people are typing you stupid fricking Black person
            when the image first came out we asked our grandmother, not in English language, "what color is this?" it's the most literal sense of the words and she just said it's white and gold

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Your point? That your grandmother is a mentally ill israelite?
            Tracks with the statistic that women and the elderly were more likely to view the dress as white and gold

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Noooo you don't get it she just mean she can't hypothetically imagine the dress under neutral lighting conditions in real life as anything resembling blue! That's what she means! Stop questioning it goy!!!!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >It HYPOTHETICALLY fried his eyes!!! He didn't mean it changed colors in the literal sense you schizo frick!!!!!!!!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            RIP this guy's eyes because language is always literal and true

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And for israelites everything is relative.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I guess anti-Semitism is correlated ith brain problems huh

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            WHEN THEY SAY THEY SEE THOSE COLORS THEY DON'T MEAN THEY SEE THOSE COLORS!

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >WHY DO PEOPLE SEE A PIPE???
    ok René

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The fact that the background is blown the frick out like a nuke is going off exposure wise should give you a hint that the colors aren't accurate and your brain should account for that if it works right, meaning that you should be able to tell that it's blue and black

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    These are the same people that would later make you imagine an apple or argue about inner monologue.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The question was always what color was it in person, not the literal colors in the jpg moron

  7. 1 month ago
    bodhi

    because white can look blue when it is in shade on bright day. It isnt that they cant tell it is blue, it is that they think it is an optical illusion

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It is an optical illusion. That's the whole point. Optical illusions exist whether you're aware of them or not, and are often more effective when you aren't.

    • 1 month ago
      bodhi

      >it is that they think it is an optical illusion
      created by the camera btw, as it is behind the dress which is blocking out the very bright sun in front of it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What makes you decide that the sun is "in front" of the dress and the camera behind, when it is far more natural to speak from the perspective of the camera?

        literally the exact opposite btw, many times in life my mother and I have argued over what color things are

        I am referring to the actual statistics posted earlier ITT that showed that women and the elderly are more likely to see white and gold. Also, what a dumb thing to repeatedly argue with your mother about.
        What a specimen you are lol

        • 1 month ago
          bodhi

          wtf are you on about? You can see in the photo that the camera angle is in the back facing up with a bright sun in front of it

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You realise "back" and "front" are relative? Jesus what fresh autism is this lmao

          • 1 month ago
            bodhi

            you are legitimately fricking moronic my guy. unfathomable levels of idiocy on display

        • 1 month ago
          bodhi

          you can see that the front of the image is out of focus and that this red object has obviously been "dulled" and in reality is a much brighter red than is being shown here. You can clearly see this camera is distorting the colors. Or maybe you cant see because you are fricking stupid and details about reality escape your 80IQ mind which is why you are always being called out for distorting reality as a schizo fricktard, because you do not perceive context

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Not even sure which side you're trying to argue for at this point. Do you even know? You referred to OPs hex codes, you're referencing the real dress, you refuse to look up the actual colour of the real dress... what are you arguing, at this point, that the answer is to the question "what colour is the dress"?
            >you are always being called out for distorting reality as a schizo fricktard
            ? Coming from you, to an anonymous poster?

  8. 1 month ago
    bodhi

    it is white and gold btw

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The original dress has been confirmed to be black and blue, you can easily confirm this on google.
      Statistically speaking you are an elderly woman.

      • 1 month ago
        bodhi

        there is nothing black on that dress, you are delusional

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Schizophrenic fascist declares reality delusional in favour of his own actual delusion
          It's like poetry

          • 1 month ago
            bodhi

            stfu schzio and snort some mustard gas

          • 1 month ago
            bodhi

            the dude literally has the hex codes of the colors on the image btw you moronic fricking schizo

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That you agree with OP only proves that he's a schizophrenic autist. They should do a followup study where they correlate the answer with mental health.

      • 1 month ago
        bodhi

        literally the exact opposite btw, many times in life my mother and I have argued over what color things are

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Colors are subjective.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Interesting. Framed like this I can see it, kinda like the chessboard one.
      Not able to perceive any illusion in the original one though, I've always just seen the brown and blue straight up.
      And there's also the question of how groups of people can see it differently.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        the 11% who see the brown and blue
        we are the ubermensch archons of a new world order
        the only real people
        this image was a test by the matrix operators to clue us in on who are the npcs and who are real human beings

        • 1 month ago
          bodhi

          literally the exact opposite, if you say blue it is because you missed the context of the photo showing the camera is distorting the colors. You said what you saw rather than being able to intuit that what you are seeing is not the real color. You failed the matrix test homosexual

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That is how people on the spectrum often perceive themselves.

            you do not have souls
            you are computer algorithms

          • 1 month ago
            bodhi

            This is how they keep you trapped in the matrix. You are unable to perceive what is below the surface and attack the chads who can see the true essence of reality beyond the illusion.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            then why are 90% of respondents using your answers

          • 1 month ago
            bodhi

            you failed and got everyone killed, game over homosexual

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          That is how people on the spectrum often perceive themselves.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >And there's also the question of how groups of people can see it differently.

        Experience.
        Like, when are you most likely to see a dress on display? Probably in the city in a display window. Most people would look at the image and think "Oh, this dress must be under intense, incandescent yellow showroom lights. The yellowness is dulling the deep blue into a dull cool gray, and making the black velvet laces shimmer with a brassy color".
        However, if you are in the demographic that goes to a lot of outdoor markets and saw the picture, you would think, "Oh, this dress must be outdoors in the shade on a clear day. The blue reflection of the sky is making the white parts into a dull cool gray, and dulls the gold lace into a brassy color"
        I wouldn't be surprised if people from the country saw it as white and gold

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >I wouldn't be surprised if people from the country saw it as white and gold
          That would be an interesting angle to examine. The research mentioned by the OP just sorts them by age and gender.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          In that case the really interesting thing is that women were more likely to see white and gold. They are a lot less likely to be colour blind and more likely to spend time staring at shop windows. You'd think they would be able to adjust to the lighting conditions.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You guys are legit fricked in the head when somebody asks "what color is this?" and shows you an image they aren't asking you to deduce what it might look like in real life under different lighting conditions.
      There are thousands of accounts of people where they state clearly that they perceive the image in front of them as being white and gold like in pic related .
      Just fricking go and ask somebody IRL who sees it like that to clarify.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >You guys are legit fricked in the head when somebody asks "what color is this?" and shows you an image they aren't asking you to deduce what it might look like in real life under different lighting conditions.
        That is precisely what they're asking. It's definitely the question people are answering, anyway. If you think it isn't, what do -you- think is going on? The image is an infohazard hypnotising people to see different wavelengths? There is no natural explanation for what you seem to think is happening here. Yet if you assume you simply misinterpreted it, the answer is so straightforward.

        The Dress 2.0 is going to be interesting to neurolinguists isn't it

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >what do -you- think is going on?
          Look at that

          https://i.imgur.com/9bCf1Dj.png

          Colors are subjective.

          image. That is what is happening. The color is objectively brown and blue yet I'm perceiving it as white and gold/black and dark blue.
          There is something with the background of the original dress image that is triggering that type of reaction in people's brains.
          >why
          "There is no scientific consensus on why the dress elicits such discordant perceptions.[31]"

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >The color is objectively brown and blue yet I'm perceiving it as white and gold/black and dark blue.
            Okay, so what is still unclear about this?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What is this response even meant to convey

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's a question. I'm asking you what is still mystifying you about this situation. It's pretty clear isn't it? Some people interpret it as a dark dress overexposed by stark lighting, others as a backlit white dress in the shade. The part where like, whoa, dude, neither of those are objectively the hue of the picture itself, that's not really very interesting, artists have known this for centuries.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I do not interpret it. I literally see it that way in that

            https://i.imgur.com/9bCf1Dj.png

            Colors are subjective.

            image.
            I could not tell those were the same color without a digital sample tool.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, that's how this optical illusion works. But it is, in fact, a matter of interpretation. You're interpreting context cues.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I don't understand what you're even trying to argue.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Well, likewise, friend. I've literally told you already how it works and that's also what the picture shows. White dress in the dark and blue dress in the light can be represented by the same hue. Whether your brain interprets that hue as representing white or blue depends on the surrounding context. The reason the original image proved so divisive is that there is little to go on in terms of context.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's not a conscious interpreting process.
            When people look at the original dress image and say they see white and gold they mean it. They literally cannot tell the image is actually brown and blue without machine assistance.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            No, this is where I think you're making an error in interpreting their answers. They mean they perceive the dress to be white and gold. If you pressed them about the hue of the image itself, I am 100% confident that practically all of them would admit that it's brown and light blue. Like I said, this is a skill that pretty much every artist trains. To register what you actually see and not what your brain thinks it sees.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That is simply not true.
            >Source:
            Just look at these

            https://i.imgur.com/r9I4lnX.png

            >Noooo you don't get it she just mean she can't hypothetically imagine the dress under neutral lighting conditions in real life as anything resembling blue! That's what she means! Stop questioning it goy!!!!

            https://i.imgur.com/zmlKcst.png

            >It HYPOTHETICALLY fried his eyes!!! He didn't mean it changed colors in the literal sense you schizo frick!!!!!!!!

            https://i.imgur.com/Wnt1l2A.png

            WHEN THEY SAY THEY SEE THOSE COLORS THEY DON'T MEAN THEY SEE THOSE COLORS!

            posts.
            It could not be stated more clearly.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            If you interpret these posts as talking about their perception of the dress itself they still make perfect sense. Conversely, if we interpret them to be about the picture, it makes no sense at all. So there's really only one valid interpretation.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Please go and find someone who responded white and gold to the query and have them clarify.
            You will see they are not making it up.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not saying they're making it up. I'm saying they're talking about their perception of the dress. They may lack the vocabulary to properly express what is happening but that doesn't mean we have to assume a nonsensical alternative. After all, the whole point of an optical illusion is that perception is flawed.
            So when they say things like "I don't see blue" they mean "I can't imagine the dress being blue" and when they say "the dress changed colour" they mean "my perception of the actual colour of the dress has changed".

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That is not what is happening.
            Go and find someone who sees white and gold and press them on it down to the semantic level.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You do it, if you think there's something weird going on. I'm perfectly satisfied with my explanation. I don't know why it's so hard for you to accept.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's already been done.
            It isn't a conscious process.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I never claimed it was a conscious process. Just that it was a matter of perception. Your image explains the same (and also speaks of people "assuming" all without ascribing conscious, deliberate action to anyone). Their brain is compensating for what it interprets the lighting conditions to be.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The cognitive dissonance in your argumentation far surpasses the one caused by the dress. Scientists should study you instead.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm sure the cognitive dissonance resides entirely in your perception as well, that is, you are misinterpreting me as badly as you are everyone else. The problem rests with you. I have been entirely consistent and any perceived contradiction lies with your flawed assumptions.

            The question doesn't make sense. It's not processed as a sampling of the absolute vs some sort of relative sensory overlay. I see it as white and gold. If I sample the pixels themselves it's whiteish blue and brown, basically white and gold.

            >I see it as white and gold.
            What does that mean? What do you mean by "see"? What, precisely, are you talking about? The colour of the dress?
            >If I sample the pixels themselves it's whiteish blue and brown, basically white and gold.
            Are you adjusting for the perceived colour of the dress?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >What, precisely, are you talking about?
            I look at the dress and perceive it as shadowed white and gold, against a background with high contrast.

            >Are you adjusting for the perceived colour of the dress?
            I'm taking the color picker tool, setting it to take a 3x3 average, and sampling regions that are representative of the whole. Then looking at the result.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >I look at the dress and perceive it as shadowed white and gold, against a background with high contrast.
            Exactly. So you're talking about your perception of the dress in context, not the objective colour wavelengths, which are blue and brown to you.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They're white-blue and gold-brown. The base color is still perceived as white and gold.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >The base color is still perceived as white and gold.
            By which you mean the colour of the dress?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's irrelevant. There is no dress. It's a grid of colored phosphors with a backlight that my brain turns into a scene and infers depth from. It remains the same whether I process it as a flat grid, or a 3D scene with objects.

            Pic related is faintly blue, but just looks like white in a shadow or with diffuse blue light elsewhere in the scene.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Pic related is faintly blue
            Yes.
            >looks like white in a shadow
            Which is objectively blue. Your brain is just trying to provide context.

            It does look very white in those scraps you cut from the picture.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm right here. See:

            It never becomes blue and black for me. I can force it, just like the spinning ballerina illusuions, but it defaults to white and gold.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            All right, so, when you say you see white and gold, do you mean that you perceive the dress to be made of white and gold fabric, or that the pixels of the image themselves are white and gold?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The question doesn't make sense. It's not processed as a sampling of the absolute vs some sort of relative sensory overlay. I see it as white and gold. If I sample the pixels themselves it's whiteish blue and brown, basically white and gold.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      woah..

  10. 1 month ago
    bodhi

    interesting enough I was watching this channel earlier about how laundry was done in the colonies

    and they used blue cobalt as a bleach. The reason given was because white is not a color, it is the absence of color and white tends to try to become yellow over time and to counter it you use blue to make it white again.

  11. 1 month ago
    bodhi

    it around 16:00 btw where she starts discussing the cobalt

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    bro you think photos capture reality?

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is some idiot larping as bodhi itt because he's making even less sense than usual

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    how the frick do you people turn even the fricking dress meme into a schizo frickfest

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      schizos love babbling on about their perception and how the bugs in their walls are better than everyone elses

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The actual dress photographed under ideal conditions

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The optical illusion in action.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      doesnt matter what it looked like originally
      under those lighting conditions translated to image form its brown
      your screen is literally emitting brown color and you cant see it
      you cannot perceive reality

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I can see it (obviously), but that's not the question. No one cared about that. Again, see

        https://i.imgur.com/oLzUznF.jpg

        >WHY DO PEOPLE SEE A PIPE???
        ok René

        . See

        https://i.imgur.com/Eb6cfbw.png

        It's the lighting, not the camera
        [...]
        No, they did not. That is a flawed assumption on your part because you misunderstand the question. Other people understood the question and answered what colour they thought the actual dress was in real life based on the image in front of them. The question is "what colour is the dress" and not "what colour is this jpeg"
        If this is really bothering you then print out some papers with those hex values, no dress, put them in front of people in a well-lit room, and ask them what colour they see. The vast majority will tell you blue/violet/purple and brown/gold (the rest may be colourblind). There. You've disproved your hypothesis.
        It's like pic related. A and B have the exact same colour value. But if you ask people what colours they are, they'll say one is white and the other is black.

        . You're answering the wrong question and that is the ONLY reason your answer isn't in alignment with mine.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What colour is the dress? That is the question. Not "what colour is your screen emitting right now?" What. Colour. Is. The. Dress. Normal people understand a photograph to be a representation of an object in real life, and it is the real-life object that the confusion is about. Everone is receiving the same visual input of light blue and brpwn and that is precisely WHY the confusion arises; because those hues can be interpreted as representing different REAL LIFE colours depending on how one interprets the lighting conditions.

        That you misinterpreted the question is one thing but the wild rationalisation of the conflicting data is really something else.

        • 1 month ago
          bodhi

          If you know the color is being distorted then guessing thee actual color is just that .... a guess .... you schizo fricktard

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Gee, maybe that is why people gave different answers? Yet by framing it as "a guess" you are ignoring the fact that you do have information. You have information that the colour is being distorted, you have visual information about the dress, and you can use these to deduce the real colour. The interesting part about the optical illusion is the difficulty some people had reconciling the various inputs. But a "guess" would be to ask you what colour shirt am I wearing. What we are dealing with here is an optical illusion. To throw your hands up and claim the answer is therefore unknowable is asinine, especially considering the majority of people got it right. That's better than random chance. If people were making random guesses, why didn't we see, say, orange and yellow among the answers?

            How is it that every time you open your mouth you reveal a completely warped perception of the world down to the smallest details?

          • 1 month ago
            bodhi
          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            tl;dr it's not a guess moron

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          ur actually so fricking stupid dude just stop

          • 1 month ago
            bodhi

            he isnt stupid, he is a cluster B NPD. He will never admit to being wrong or saying stupid shit, he can never be wrong and will fight you to the death with the most absurd mental gymnastics you can conceive of.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            A quick search through the archives reveals that you make this accusation at the drop of a hat. Now, which is the more likely explanation? You're surrounded by narcissists on all sides? Or you just pull a DARVO whenever someone disagrees with you?

            The namegay who spends days on end telling people he's better than them, it's always the ones you least expect

          • 1 month ago
            bodhi

            >surrounded
            it is only one moron, you, you are just always trying to act like you are more than one person

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Well, the same archive search also reveals that you've definitely been saying this to other people as well, not that you'd ever admit that your judgement is less than infallible... the irony is that you've constructed this amalgam of anons in your head into one person who is obsessed with you, but really it looks like you're obsessed with this person. Who does not exist.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            stfu schizo, eat a bullet and do the world a favor

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You forgot your name

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            yah I post on other boards too little homosexual

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >He will never admit to being wrong or saying stupid shit
            You said the dress was white and gold btw

          • 1 month ago
            bodhi

            well I take that back, he is also stupid, but that isnt the main problem here. people can be stupid and be wrong but not aggressively moronic. NPDs are aggressively moronic, they are not only stupid, they cannot learn to stop being stupid

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            he isnt stupid, he is a cluster B NPD. He will never admit to being wrong or saying stupid shit, he can never be wrong and will fight you to the death with the most absurd mental gymnastics you can conceive of.

            well I take that back, he is also stupid, but that isnt the main problem here. people can be stupid and be wrong but not aggressively moronic. NPDs are aggressively moronic, they are not only stupid, they cannot learn to stop being stupid

            >The alliance of autistic schizos

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Does anyone have a video of a beautiful woman putting on and taking off this dress?

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    BEHOLD

    A PURPLE WOMAN

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Perfect color for fellatio

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    if you're trying to draw a connection between phenomena and some material reality, you already failed

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Nice science board we got here

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I thought about this too and couldn't figured it out until read about some experiments which are done by a real genius (Goethe) in which he concluded it with a theory of colors.
    His theory is the only way which I could've explained it and made sense to me.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      So... are you gonna explain it?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Just go read about Goethe's Color theory. It's better that way. My explanation would be not relatable in a discussion in here

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It was a psyop. They were testing those conformity / peer pressure effects in an openm setting. This allowed them to add susceptibility to peer pressure to the psych profiles they were already gathering via DARPA Lifelog.

    The conformity experiments basically just put a normal person in with a bunch of actors. Eventually they get to a point where the actors are giving answers that are obviously false, and they see what it takes to get the normalo guy to go along with it. To submit to the group.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Probably also some occult symbolism shit too. Gold and silver vs black and blue. Sun and moon vs darkness and the sea, don't know.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Which number is definitely blue & black?
    Which number is definitely gold & white?

    key: yellow level

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It never becomes blue and black for me. I can force it, just like the spinning ballerina illusuions, but it defaults to white and gold.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I still can't comprehend how people saw white and gold.

      All of these look obviously and clearly blue and black, except the last two where the nuke in the background obscures the blue to the point that it could have been green or teal instead or something. Still, if i had to guess, I'd guess blue in that last pic as well.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It's white and gold.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The interesting thing about the dress, to me, isn't the optical illusion itself or how it breaks down along demographic lines. That's obscure trivia for psychologists and neurologists. What's interesting here is how there is a straightforward interpretation and actual verifiable facts, and people just dismiss those in favour of spontaneously generating weird conspiracy theories and choose to die on the dumbest hills.
    Consider the implications. When people can be this obstinately wrong about trivial shit that is easily googled, how do they fare with the harder questions that really matter, the big questions of life, questions of morality and ethics, purpose and meaning, etc.? Or, more practically speaking, economics, governance, society?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This except for I'm looking down on the world from far above, including you.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You're precisely who I'm talking about

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I know, that's why I replied. I'm a superset.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Colors aren't real

    Only light is real

    Humans can't handle the truth

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I knew I was right about the dress

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    blackpill
    >it was just 200 iq AD campaign for the dress manufacturer

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >300 IQ pill
      >It was a higher being working through humans who did as they were told thinking they just came up with a marketing campaign

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    normal people interpret the question "what color is the dress" to refer to the dress itself and not to the picture of the dress. pictures can reliably convey color but, just as in real life (not pictures), lighting levels much be taken into account. people who replied blue/black correctly interpreted the question and correctly used the ambient lighting in the picture to deduce the true (real life) color of the dress. people who answered white/gold correctly interpreted the question but failed to use the ambient lighting correctly - correlation with older people and women might suggest the ability to effectively use that information requires more advanced abstract/fluid intelligence. people who interpreted it to mean pixel RGB values misunderstood the question entirely and likely have the least abstract/fluid intelligence.

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >le gigabrainiactard
    no one asked what colors you see in the pic, otherwise everyone would be right, but what color the dress actually *is*.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    I just saw the thread at the top of first page with your comment, dumbass
    sage

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    poor people monitors

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I swear, this is a misunderstanding of the same type that leads people in aphantasia threads to ask "wait, when you imagine things you're actually seeing them in front of you with your eyes???"

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the 5head reasoning is so stupid. yes obviously the picture is skewed but healthy brains can discern some of that and can tell the exact color of the dress. ??????? who made this

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You'd think it's the sort of misunderstanding that's easily cleared up but he refuses to accept that there was a misunderstanding in the first place

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Everybody insisting on a single variant is ultra dumb and shouldn't post here. It's completely obvious that whether the light is hitting the dress or whether it's in the shadows is completely ambiguous from the perspective. Y'all a bunch of midwit plebs.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The following statements are correct:
      >The colour of the dress is ambiguous from the image
      >The actual dress has been confirmed to be blue and black
      >The objective colours of the image itself are easily verified and were never in dispute

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Are you brainlet? It's simply the Subjectivity of color perception, human eye perception of color depends heavily on the context in which the perceived object is presented. Just like how we can see color when the shades of light is darker we contextualize the image, that's why some people see it back and some people see it white, it depends how they contextualize the image in their brain

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Apparently people see greens, yellows, and oranges with this pic
    I just see red, pink, white, and grey.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *