I can't believe this kind of horror movie level of gruesomeness and butchery is considered "practicing medicine" in the current year.

I can't believe this kind of horror movie level of gruesomeness and butchery is considered "practicing medicine" in the current year.

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

Black Rifle Cuck Company, Conservative Humor Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    what are the evolutuonary advantages of removing yourself from the gene pool?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      to the individual none, but if you look at it through a sociological lens, self castration is in essence natures way of culling the mentally ill. This isnt unique to humans and there are many cases of depressed/ stresses animals that self mutilate or eat their young. Its natures way of adapting to an extremely stressful environment. Those that can manage live and reproduce, those that cannot kill themselves or their young

      >example off the top of my head, Holstein cows are terrible at mothering and will stomp their calves out in an instant

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >Holstein cows are terrible at mothering and will stomp their calves out in an instant
        I've never had that experience with them, usually they still have quite strong mothering instincts but I imagine it varies between bloodlines

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        The way sharks reproduce is just brutal but it removes the step of requiring parent or even weaklings to remove themselves and it just makes the strongest one even stronger.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >can't tell Aboriginals they haven't been in Australia forever because it goes against their beliefs
      >literally encouraged to force Christian students to learn the big bang, evolution, and that God doesn't exist according to science

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        your faith is weak if it can't withstand the simplest of inquiries
        and untested faith is no faith at all

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Leftism rightism bullshit.
      As if people on the right don't get offended at the idea of evolution in the first place if many at all even pursue post secondary education

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It is altruism. Their bodies see themselves as a virus to the gene pool and attacks itself in an attempt to improve the gene pool.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Aboriginals DO look like a different species, after all. Let them claim they evolved independently, I don't mind them self-confirming they're subhuman freaks.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      see attached pic

      if your genes mutated to be progressive liberal then it's an evolutionary advanage to avoid reproducing so that the rest will survive

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      some sort of kin selection mechanism. Supposedly Inuits top themselves alot as they get older because there's an advantage in the natural Inuit habitat to killing yourself when you get old, i.e more food for your younger relations.

      But this troony stuff is just a result of communist driven destruction of civilization, itself a product of dysgenics.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >this troony stuff is just a result of communist driven destruction of civilization
        lmao, this is nonsense, btw. You think Marx and Lenin were pro-troony?

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >I can't believe this kind of horror movie level of gruesomeness and butchery is considered "practicing medicine" in the current year.
    Wait until you hear about how spine surgery is conducted

    >noooooooo my back hurts
    >please doctor, scoop out my intestines so you can access my spine from the front
    >i don't care that there's a 40% chance i'll be permanently paralyzed
    >i don't care that there's a 60% chance major nerve and muscles in my abdomen will be permanently damaged, causing severe lifelong chronic pain

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Meanwhile, at the insurance company:
      >what do you MEAN you won't approve my spine surgery unless I attempt physical therapy and medication-based management?
      >I don't care that I could improve my condition without dangerous surgery that's likely to worsen my condition or that the alternatives are literally 1000x cheaper, JUST PAY FOR MY EASY FIX!

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    LMAO, those frickers have no credibility at all, they are now below witch doctors.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Anyone willing to live with the consequences should be able to add or take away whatever the frick they want from their body.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      It's been shown time and again that no one is ever truly able to deal with the consequences of mutilating themselves to such an extreme degree. It's easy to say you don't want or need a certain body part until it's actually missing and can never be restored. Quite literally you don't know what you have until it's gone.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >It's been shown time and again that no one is ever truly able to deal with the consequences of mutilating themselves to such an extreme degree
        Gender surgeries have the lowest regret rate of any surgery there is. People miss tumors more than genitals.

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Great, so you have complete follow-up data on 100% of people who have undergone gender-affirming surgery from the NHS Tavistock clinic?
          Oh wait they didn't collect that data and refused to gather it when asked. Why would they so that?

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          See, the thing is, all the trannies in all those surveys that were included in the meta-study you're referring to are "old school" trannies. They're trannies that at all decided/realised that they were trannies and went on these medical pathways. There has been a profound change in the demographic profile AND age of incidence of dysphoria in the large increase in gender identity patients. The current "crop" of trans people aged 16-25 that are in the eye of the hurricane regarding this social storm are not represented in this data, in other words. Things have changed on the ground socially. You might as well use social attitudes about gay marriage from the 90s to make some argument about how contemporary gays behave.
          Picrel, the table of studies from the metastudy you're quoting. Look at the average age that people underwent treatment. Look at the follow-up times. Half a year. A year and a half. Two years. Hardly a lifelong endorsement with no regrets felt at differential points in life.
          A young woman who undergoes a double mastectomy for gender reasons may have no regrets and then, years later, become a mother and find missing the option of breastfeeding traumatic.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            The followup for vaginoplasty and vulvoplasty is what, 7 months? Just enough time for the afterglow and the gaslighting friends to abandon you as the problems begin to mount up.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            turns out that not even your family will support you if your room smells like piss, shit, and decaying flesh

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          False, Gender surgeries have the highest regret rate of any surgery there is.

          • 2 months ago
            Anonymous

            also the highest rate of post surgical suicide

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >It's been shown time and again that no one is ever truly able to deal with the consequences of mutilating themselves to such an extreme degree.
        why go on the internet and tell easily disprovable lies?

  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    You can do whatever you want to your own body.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      I agree, the government should have no power over what you do with your property. Remove all environmental laws.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        Your own body is sovereign; other people's health is not. You can't (or shouldn't be able to, rather) be able to exercise your will over the commons without popular consensus.
        i.e., one guy with a big factory making acid rain on everyone who lives nearby is extending his ownership past the limits of his property.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        >I agree
        Ok.
        >the government should have no power over what you do with your property
        What does that have to do with the post you replied to?

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *