I want to believe in God, but he simply cannot exist

I've always wanted to believe in God but I simply can't. I live my life on assumptions based off patterns and mostly provable ideas. There is so much we don't know about the universe but we've made an incredible headway in the last 300 years in what we were able to discover to explain the world around us.

The way I see it, God does not interact with my life. I've never seen him, I've never talked to him. I can't audibly hear him or communicate with him. If he's an all powerful creator, why doesn't he let himself be known if we ask?

This lead to me to the conclusion that A. There is either no god at all or B. If there is a God, we don't matter enough to him that he wants to make himself known.

I've also seen in the West there's a rise of Christianity and it's annoying as frick. They justify their shitty judgements and actions by saying they have god on their side. I wonder if they actually believe or just want power.

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    The christtards on this board simply cannot cope with existential nihilism. The idea of dying and no longer existing, and not having a powerful supernatural parent figure to care for them actually threatens to drive them to insanity, because they’re mentally weak

    Obviously, if you have any critical thinking skills and the ability to be honest with yourself, you’ll come to the conclusion that there’s no god.

    Or atleast no god described in religions. There of course could be a “god” but it might just be some moronic homie running a simulation, or some alien sadist. Obviously no yahweh, allah, no brahma or any other caveman imaginary friend

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      This tbh.
      It would be fricking awesome if such a being existed, but that doesn't seem to be the case at all.
      It would also be fricking awesome if I had a gf or if I was born 7ft, earned 8 figures, and had 120 IQ, but I don't, so, I must make do with the cards I've dealt with. No amount of coping makes god any more real.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Why can’t you get a girlfriend? Don’t say it’s because you’re ugly. Give an actual answer

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Because his self esteem is lower than dirt. He proably doesn't talk to people and can hardly maintain eye contact with them, he's afraid of rejection and failure so he never does anything.
          Buy a prostitute OP.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Bruh you literally just described Moses.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        sarkic

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      lol

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Nietzsche praises Christ you dimwit, he vilifies the Apostles. His hatred of Christianity is as a religious system, not a hatred of Christ himself.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Zzzzzz; Typical homo-atheist propaganda.
      >Yeah, dude there is like no purpose! Like, Christ just won't give me my material wants!
      To say that there is no purpose is to give purpose, congrats you just contradicted yourself. Take a class in Metaphysics. Additionally, how do you, yourself, escape this box of thinking and why should I accept it? Congrats you deny ethics, yet appeal to ethics.
      >A. There is either no god at all or B. If there is a God, we don't matter enough to him that he wants to make himself known.
      How did you come to know that? Congrats, you have zero understanding of epistemology and just appealing to emotion, which you deny...but are using, congrats. Law of Identity? Lol. This is what happens when people don't read BASIC PHILOSOPHY. Stop listening to moronic modern-day psy-op trash. Go to an Orthodox Church, and remove that gay evolutionary paradigm, because it's just determinism. The fault being that your thoughts aren't your own, therefore you're not coming to your own conclusion.
      >But da the same for you
      X =! Not X, Congrats. As now in your paradigm you just stated my worldview is equally as valid to your worldview, yet I don't believe the same thing and can jusify my believes (See TAG).
      >Stop listening to Protestants (heretics)
      >Stop listening to Franco Latin Papist (Heretics)
      Return to Orthodox Christian Church. You're welcome. If you don't want to take it, then you're being a homosexual who enjoys feeling miserable. Not returning to the thread zzzzzz.

      https://i.imgur.com/FHMS4sP.jpeg

      This reality is a simulation where God is creating himself. The technological singularity will create God.

      https://vitrifyher.wordpress.com/2018/11/22/the-case-for-the-physical-existence-of-god/

      What you say is logical. Your observations are admirable and your conclusions are accurate.

      Yet, the question remains: why would an all-powerful creator, whether there is one or not, have to make themself known to you?

      Have you ever seen a black hole with your naked eyes? Can you feel dark matter in your flesh?

      God, if they truly exist, simply may not care.

      I'm gonna be the annoying Anon who quotes everybody AND I'm also going to be the annoying NDE Anon, but does anybody actually read about Near Death Experiences?
      I earnestly never see people bring up NDE; neither the religious, nor the materialists. I find this so fricking strange given that every year around 7 million Americans "talk to God", but then maybe their accounts are inconvenient to both sides?

      At any rate, from the perspective of NDE: God seems to be crippled by their omnipotence. God 'appears' to be all-knowing, all-encompassing, but then the logical outcome of that is to experience everything - a constant and unending literal realities worth of experiences and inputs from all of creation that seem to put God in the position where the only logical decision is non-interference. ?God may not even be sapient in a way we can understand because of this?
      When people die and are brought before God the light given off by the entity seems to be nothing but pure empathy: people are made to know everything good and everything bad, they've done, but in the exact way their friends, families, and victims, felt it. I remember distinctly two men's accounts: one was a military sniper and the other was a man who worked as a bull killer in a slaughter house, they both described 'penance' as the single most excruciating, awful, painful, experience of their lives - to such an extent that they both independently rationalized that it was a suffering only the dead could experience for the living could not withstand it.

      Granted, there's also a minority of people that become "Space Jellyfish". These people never meet God; they describe their 'souls' leaving their body, ascending into space, becoming a small orb of light, and overcome with the urge to swim off into space. Almost as if they were salmon finally entering the ocean.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        NDE's are just hallucinations from brains being deprived of oxygen.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          I wonder if NDEs are just the consciousness being torn into pieces, I mean,
          >they suspect that they might be dying right now
          >they start wondering what it might be like
          >come up with visual scenarios
          >another part of theirs sees these thoughts
          >but because their mind is splitting...
          >they don't realize that those are just their own thoughts

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        the problem, as has been previously explained elsewhere on this site, is that there is an evil forcefield surrounding the planet forcing souls to re-enter terrestrial flesh prisons when they want to escape this hell planet (like tge lucky few jellyfish you describe who almost make it). tge archdemons who co trol the planet use our suffering as their energy source, and hold us captive here against our will. thats why you have to be extremely wary at your time of death, not to fall for their tricks and be hurled back into another earthly body

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I trust NDE's as much as I trust psychedelics. They alter the consciousness and deprive it of objectivity.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >I want to believe in God
      No, you don't.
      https://www.kingjamesbibleonline.org/Bible-Verses-About-Seeking-God/

      Threads like this and the responses also only prove God is real and Jesus is the Son of God anyway. Why do you think only God and Jesus are used as curse words by a wicked and evil world? No other god gets that sort of treatment because they're false and of the world and the world loves his own. I'm sure this is already enough to cause more fedorababy tantrum/spam though. Just criticize any false world religion or atheism and they will inevitably bring up the God of the Bible, because he's real and they know it and they'll cry endlessly over the fact that God already revealed himself to them and they hardened their hearts, professed themselves wise, and turned to abominations like homosexualry (it's all in Romans 1).

      And here's the typical moronic fedoragolem post.

      This tbh.
      It would be fricking awesome if such a being existed, but that doesn't seem to be the case at all.
      It would also be fricking awesome if I had a gf or if I was born 7ft, earned 8 figures, and had 120 IQ, but I don't, so, I must make do with the cards I've dealt with. No amount of coping makes god any more real.

      And the typical circle jerking. Just go back to r/atheism already.

      >simply cannot cope with existential nihilism. The idea of dying and no longer existing
      >No amount of coping makes god any more real.
      Pure projection.

      You can't cope with the fact that you'll be judged for every idle word, every deed done in the body, and even for your thoughts.

      Your ilk fabricated a whole creation myth out of whole cloth that violates countless laws and this creation myth of yours and the blind faith that there is no God its founded upon are the foundations for your religion which you won't even admit is a religion. Just a brainwashed subhuman moronic atheistgolem, obviously a sodomite too with the way you "debate". Your cope is that there's nothing after death and life magically came from nonlife and everything in the entire universe magically exploded from literally nothing; atheists are the dumbest people in the entire world.

      NDE's are just hallucinations from brains being deprived of oxygen.

      >the heckin science explained that away
      I bet you think life came from a rock and that rock came from nothing because it's in the textbooks.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Making facebook boomers look well-adjusted. Keep it up shizo friend.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >You can't cope with the fact that you'll be judged for every idle word, every deed done in the body, and even for your thoughts.
        Only Platonists believe this. You Christisraelites are all antinomian hedonists because "you declare with your mouth, 'Jesus is Lord,' and believe in your heart that God raised him from the dead", so you believe Paul's (the israelites') God will save you regardless.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >Threads like this and the responses also only prove God is real and Jesus is the Son of God anyway.
        Do ex-Muslims pointing out contradictions in the Qur'an also prove that there is no God but God and Muhammad is his prophet?
        >Why do you think only God and Jesus are used as curse words by a wicked and evil world? No other god gets that sort of treatment
        Absolutely false
        >they're false and of the world and the world loves his own
        Why are words for fornication and fecal matter so often used as curses? Aren't we sinners supposed to love such base worldly things?
        It's reasoning like this that makes clear you are talking out of your ass. Additionally, your anger about the subject and demeaning treatment of those you disagree with is in direct defiance of how Christ has instructed you to act, proving your own motivation in this argument is just as worldly as anyone's.

  2. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Zzzzzz; Typical homo-atheist propaganda.
    >Yeah, dude there is like no purpose! Like, Christ just won't give me my material wants!
    To say that there is no purpose is to give purpose, congrats you just contradicted yourself. Take a class in Metaphysics. Additionally, how do you, yourself, escape this box of thinking and why should I accept it? Congrats you deny ethics, yet appeal to ethics.
    >A. There is either no god at all or B. If there is a God, we don't matter enough to him that he wants to make himself known.
    How did you come to know that? Congrats, you have zero understanding of epistemology and just appealing to emotion, which you deny...but are using, congrats. Law of Identity? Lol. This is what happens when people don't read BASIC PHILOSOPHY. Stop listening to moronic modern-day psy-op trash. Go to an Orthodox Church, and remove that gay evolutionary paradigm, because it's just determinism. The fault being that your thoughts aren't your own, therefore you're not coming to your own conclusion.
    >But da the same for you
    X =! Not X, Congrats. As now in your paradigm you just stated my worldview is equally as valid to your worldview, yet I don't believe the same thing and can jusify my believes (See TAG).
    >Stop listening to Protestants (heretics)
    >Stop listening to Franco Latin Papist (Heretics)
    Return to Orthodox Christian Church. You're welcome. If you don't want to take it, then you're being a homosexual who enjoys feeling miserable. Not returning to the thread zzzzzz.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >TAG
      This gets rekt when the discussion of what is a good assumption/axiom comes up. There just isn't any reason to start at "God exists." The only thing you can do is dodge the question and resort to sophistry. Its actually incredibly intellectually dishonest.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >There just isn't any reason to start at "God exists.
        >This gets rekt when the discussion of what is a good assumption/axiom comes up.
        And why should I accept that, along with how do you justify that?

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          It is meta-logical so if I start talking about it you can't retroactively apply logic of a certain worldview to it. Its the place where you flit between sophist and christian. The place of zero. First there is nothing, then there is awareness. Accepting awareness is where you lose "God exists" because you've already laid your foundation and need to lay this to go anywhere at all.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Let me see if I'm understanding your position correctly. You're saying TAG is immune to critics, as it's a way to dodge 'fundamental questions.' Also, that TAG relies on fallacious reasoning, and that starting with 'God exist' is unjustified.

            Furthermore, are you saying 'Accepting awareness is where you lose "God exists" because you've already laid your foundation and need to lay this to go anywhere at all.' Means that accepting awareness, one doesn't need to assume God, along with 'nothing' to 'awareness' challenges 'God exist.'

            Correct me if I'm not understanding your position; However, that makes you're entire position impossible to justify, as it's begging the question how do you know that you're aware? How do you know that we started from nothing? How has awareness arise from nothing?

            Is there such a thing as the True and the False? The Good and the Bad? Also, does language in of itself assume logic?

            Also, not using TAG in a generic nameless God, but the Orthodox Christian Faith.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >Means that accepting awareness, one doesn't need to assume God
            Yes.
            >along with 'nothing' to 'awareness' challenges 'God exist.'
            It doesn't necessarily challenge it but it supercedes it in terms of necessity. Being aware is more fundamental than God exists. And after your aware you have to play by the rules because thats what you experience, for instance you can't fly and moving a rock into a pile of 2 won't ever make 4. This is just the way it is.

            >How do you know that we started from nothing? How has awareness arise from nothing?
            This is that retroactive type of questioning I was talking about. We know we are here we don't know what is before us or if that even makes sense you are reaching beyond a singularity where any kind of logic doesn't even matter.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >This is that retroactive type of questioning I was talking about. We know we are here we don't know what is before us or if that even makes sense you are reaching beyond a singularity where any kind of logic doesn't even matter.
            This is were you're confusing me, because you're asserting this, as you're accepting transcended categories such as time and space, universals, and the past. As NO human being experiences the world in reverse, all experience from beginning, middle and end. Yet, in the same breath denying it, how is knowledge therefore possible? As you wouldn't be making an argument. You're just say 'It is because it is.' Why is it self-evident? Is X the necessary condition of Y? But that line of questioning wouldn't even be possible by your standards, because it would be a 'retroactive type of question?'

            >Being aware is more fundamental than God exists. And after your aware you have to play by the rules because thats what you experience, for instance you can't fly and moving a rock into a pile of 2 won't ever make 4. This is just the way it is.

            How does one know that they are aware? Would that appeal to the 'self,' which again is a transcendental category.

            The TAG argument isn't God exist, therefore God. It's that X is the necessary condition of Y; Y therefore X. If I have an pie, then by necessity I have the necessary conditions of a pie, such as flour, fruit, sugar, heat, and so forth. But as even you said 'This is just the way it is.' Is a self-evident claim with zero justification. Just is isn't an argument.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            In order to understand you have to entertain for a moment the idea of letting go of everything. All your preconceived notions and beliefs have to go. The only thing you are left with is the feelings of cool wind blowing over your skin, shapes and colors in your vision, taste, smell, ect. And then you can start thinking.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            >It's that X is the necessary condition of Y; Y therefore X.
            Why is god a necessary condition for the existence of the world as is and not just, say, a sufficient condition?

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >Orthodox Church
      You VILL kiss ze IDOL und you VILL be HAPPY

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      i hate jay dyer gays so much it's unreal

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >Jay Dyer
        Lol, this is St. Gregory of Nyssa, St. Macrina, St. Basil, St. John of Damascus, Cornelius Van Til (Protestant), James Wood, Fr. Seraphim Rose, etc.

        This has nothing to do with Jay Dyer, you understand that, right? This is standard Orthodoxy argumentation. Just read St. Gregory Palamas Triads or David Bradshaw's Essence/Energy Distinction, or even Metropolitan Hilarion Alfeyev. Better yet, go to College, and this will be one of your required classes, a basic in Philosophy. Are people so slow now that they can't grasp basics anymore? Get off tik tok.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          >nooooo jay dyer isn't the sole reason I'm aware of orthodoggism
          yeah right
          go play ball with the other kids, stop larping on IQfy all summer, it's bad for you

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Rent free.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >I've never seen him, I've never talked to him.
      Have you read the Bible? 1. You will literally die if you behold him. 2. He regularly speaks with prophets who are actually numerous throughout all times, you're just not one of them.
      >If he's an all powerful creator, why doesn't he let himself be known if we ask?
      He literally did. Otherwise, why would you even ask about this particular God you mean among billions of different gods and not about some jeet shit spirit? The latter is a god, too, but you don't even consider the possiblity that he is the one.

      >Like, Christ just won't give me my material wants!
      Satisfying one's material wants is literally his sole reward for worshiping him, it's plainly stated in the Bible several times. God hates the losers.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >you live under the sphere of abrahamic cultural consensus
        >therefore god
        can we go back to the ontological argument, even that isn't as embarrassing as this

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Not him but it's a solid point. The God of Abraham is the only one who can genuinely be said to have a truly global reach. If we ignore India then basically everywhere now it's either that God or no god for your generally culturally mainstream options.

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            Believing something does not make it reality no matter how many people do it.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >You will literally die if you behold him
        Didn't stop him showing a pillar of smoke before the Israelites

        Why are you being dishonest? God provides explicit material evidence of his existence in the OT to the lay people.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      Settle down you're feasing out

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      He didn't do half the things you're claiming he did. You also sound like a massive pseud homosexual banging on about metaphysics and epistemology without producing a coherent argument from either.
      I wonder why that is? Oh because any serious metaphysician isn't going to accept a priori assuming god's existence.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Then how is it possible to have knowledge? I don't care what other Metaphysician think. Why not address the argument yourself. Why rationality needs to be justified, and for one to accept rationality, presupposes ethics. Is Philosophy not a pre-requisite anymore for college? Go to your local college community, and take a course in epistemology. Basic stuff, stop being sensitive and address the argument silly goose, or purchase a book on reading comprehension.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      God hates you, or at the very least doesn’t give the slightest frick about you or the ret of us. If he exists that is.
      There has always been an immense amount of suffering in this world. Why would a benevolent God condemn you to eternal hellfire for simply asking why the world he created is so shit?
      >but humans are shit, not the world
      So why did a benevolent God create such a flawed species?
      I have always struggled to find a reason why anyone would want to worship such a sadistic butthole, if he even exists in the first place

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        He's going to refer you to 10,000 pages of forgotten Orthodox babble. Christians seethe at the questions you're asking because they consider them 'dealt with'. But non-Christians aren't remotely convinced by this and the few answers that managed to puncture the mainstream ('best of all worlds' for instance) were satirized heavily for their stupidity (see Candide).

        The problem is that they're doing philosophy not to find what is true. By their religion, they already claim to know what is true. They're simply finding routes to the truth that give them rhetorical ammunition.
        This always leads them down absurd avenues, like claiming that Descartes' argument was actually good, when it was so obviously bad that modern commentaries on Meditations consider if the latter chapters were included to appease the clergy.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          Free will argument never made any sense to me. What free will do children with genetically inherited diseases have? They were condemned to a existence filled with nothing but pain and misery for no reason whatsoever. This alone should completely destroy any argument that God is a benevolent creature

          • 1 week ago
            Anonymous

            It's best to take 'benevolent' as the kind of thing a peasant would say when kissing the ring of his Lord while asking for a favor. It's just hollow praise. God talks about enacting vengeance upon people which isn't benevolent at all.

  3. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Just because he doesn't show himself to you does not mean he shows himself to no one.

  4. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >This lead to me to the conclusion that A. There is either no god at all or B. If there is a God, we don't matter enough to him that he wants to make himself known.
    You forgot conclusion C: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/YKUhD7--LKw

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      That video is pure pseudoscientific insanity.

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        Nah, really think about it. Since he's the best possible being, his very definition means he has to do anything to the best possible extent of his ability. So if he decided simply "I'll make the world better", he would have to make it infinitely better - a logical impossibility. Instead he had to decide "I'll make sure the world is always getting better", which avoids a problem with infinities, however it means he doesn't directly act unless it's needed to make that statement true. And those instances are quite rare. Hence, his direct action is quite rare.

        He needs YOU to be one of the ones who work to make it better when that's not on the table for Him

  5. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I dont see why a god would want to show himself or interfere in any way
    If something made this universe it would not care that much about lifeform#231198914848924 on planet#94578151815 and how they feel

  6. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Superintelligence exists out there in the multiverse. This superintelligence would be indistinguishable from God.

    https://benthams.substack.com/p/the-anthropic-argument-for-theism

  7. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    This reality is a simulation where God is creating himself. The technological singularity will create God.

    https://vitrifyher.wordpress.com/2018/11/22/the-case-for-the-physical-existence-of-god/

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      conscientiousness on the left made me lol for some reason. can someone please elavorate on this meme? what is "callous altruism"??

  8. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Rene Descartes went even a whole level of meta deeper than your assertion that God predates the social club and social self-replicating organism known as the religion that binds minds to ideas.

    Rene Descartes said:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogito,_ergo_sum

    And therefore the thing that predates God in your little assertion is the fact that you're reading my sentence, you are thinking, and that thinking Predates God.

    What'll really bake your noodle is that the Science is starting to come around to the fact that it's more likely than not that a super-sentient higher-dimensional being exists that oversees the pregnancy and replication of this universe, in the same way your mother oversaw you when your daddy seeded her.

    Not only do we share a common ancestor with each other. We share a common ancestor with the physics engine that is hosting the atoms in your body, and we share a common ancestor with the agency that specially designed this universe from first principles. But it boggles your mind since this entity exists across time and see your beginning and end, like you can see the first or last pages of a book.

    Arguing about the validity of religion is how we Find god and rebind with the source. The same phenomenon is seen to occur when you see plants bending toward the sunlight.

    The light is God. Ever so slowly, new religions are created that are less incorrect about who we are. Who you are. Who I am, and how I created the universe. And how I periodically check up on you, to make sure you are on track.

  9. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    semi-conscious symbolism and mythology is what constitutes 90% of a person's mental processes. The features of modernity like the Internet has shattered that aspect of our psychology. The striving after objectification (which has destroyed subjective symbol-making) means that there is no truly organic imaginative nourishment for the modern mind anymore. The knowing, feeling human subject is dead and all that remains now is the nihilistic technology-driven Hell on Earth that B.F. Skinner warned about.

    Don't get me wrong, i'm not some seething chud. I don't hold any emotional stake in the death of Western civilization because I believe that humanity can still prosper under the aegis of different values and worldviews in the future and it probably will. But birthrates and the corresponding lines that new babies make go up will have to collapse totally before normies began trying to think of a new solution, or a new universal ideology and way of life which lends purpose, symbolism and a reduction of nihilism like Confucianism or belief in the Christian God once did. Mankind will eventually come back in touch with what Goethe said in Faust: "reality depends entirely on symbolic significance, the true symbol being, as Goethe had described it earlier, “the representation of the general through the particular, not, however, as a . . . shadow, but as the revelation of the unfathomable in a moment filled with life.”

    so i guess the best i can tell you is the fact that many generations from now, our descendants will find a way to reverse the Nietzschean Death of God (which really meant the Death of Man and his will to find subjective meaning in life.)
    >Our waiting for God, our godlessness, is partly a search for a language and a style by which we might be enabled to stand before him once again, delighting in his presence. In the time of waiting we have a place to be. It is not before an altar, it is in the world, in the city, with both the needy neighbor and the enemy.

  10. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    What you say is logical. Your observations are admirable and your conclusions are accurate.

    Yet, the question remains: why would an all-powerful creator, whether there is one or not, have to make themself known to you?

    Have you ever seen a black hole with your naked eyes? Can you feel dark matter in your flesh?

    God, if they truly exist, simply may not care.

  11. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    I can understand that. I've on rare occasions felt God's presence in my life, so it's easier for me.

  12. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Steve never sees the player but the player controls his every action

  13. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    He’s literally been proven to exist by go off

  14. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    What certainty has a fish as to the dealings of Nepalese farmers?
    None at all, not even a presumption. I won't defend concepts of gods, but the concept of their absence is equally baseless. We are fish living in our ponds daring to dream what might be or how it could be, when in truth we are unequipped to presume regardless.
    You believe what is practical to your purposes, to sabotage yourself in this proves nothing and causes you alone suffering. That's the point, your views on God reveal more about you than the universe.
    Personally I believe God is in all things, no written god only the essence of the whole and its yearning to be whole again, in that sense God is with you always and he sees you to be as you see yourself, and treats you as you treat yourself. You could interpret this to be lonely but how can one be lonely when forever surrounded by all of your kin, you can't escape it. Cope it may be, but that applies to all written here, to me that's all it needs to be.

  15. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    you're just depressed

  16. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Someone's gonna have to hit that golfball, how else can it start moving? Simple as.

    • 1 week ago
      Anonymous

      >god is some yet unknown natural process

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        I don't know anon, but writing the beginning of reality has always been difficult for me without God

        >In the beginning the universe has always existed but then suddenly it expanded rapidly
        >In the beginning the universe came from nothing but then it decided to explode
        >In the beginning everything just began for no reason

        It's nonsensical madness, I guess you could ask
        >But who created God?
        Well it's easier for me say
        >God always was, and then he created this finite process called reality
        Than
        >The universe always was, and then it decided to expand and contract forever for no reason?

        It's the unmoved mover that does it for me, although I am terrible at explaining it logically

        Also just looking at life itself, why are we here, by accident? Why does an accidental existence seem to have so many deliberate designs ingrained into it, what are the chances of nothing spawning something, how long does that process take.

        Nothing "natural" can ever really explain what a weird fricking thing all of this is to me in a satisfactory manner aside from something as overtly mysterious as God, because a weird reality requires a weird author.

        • 1 week ago
          Anonymous

          What is god? How did it evolve to be so powerful? Where's its kin are?
          What if we are its garbage bin?

      • 1 week ago
        Anonymous

        >blind faith to naturalism (a self-refuting worldview), can't even imagine the concept of an eternal God
        Every time with this too. Atheists are the dumbest people in the entire world. I'd sooner be a Pagan and think Odin created the world than think nothing magically exploded and life came from a rock.

        The only reason the atheistic creation myth is so widely believed is it's tax funded and presented as science to young impressionable kids who don't know to ask questions or think critically, they just recite the evolutionist dogma and deceptions on the tests for a passing grade and go back to videogames/tiktok/porn/socialmedia, and it's just a scientifically impossible and mathematically impossible fairy tale anyway. Not only have their creation myths never been proven nor can they be proven, but they've been proven to be impossible; but people still believe on blind faith, just like they believe on blind faith that God couldn't even exist outside of their knowledge (talk about pride); I guess people still believe in those scam injections too, despite all the data showing they're harmful and maimed/killed people.

        Atheism is basically for npcs who want to "trust the experts" with the experts being democrat sodomite teachers in government schools, Hollywood perverts, and pop-sci talking heads like Neil deGrasse Tyson or Bill Nye or Richard Dawkins. And I can see why so many of them will turn to Catholicism if they decide they want religion, because then it gives them a different set of "experts" to trust and blindly follow like good NPCs. Both groups: the blind leading the blind.

        Making facebook boomers look well-adjusted. Keep it up shizo friend.

        >no arguments
        >has to resort to moronic buzzwords and thought-terminating troll posts
        Thanks for proving that atheists need to be banned from all boards.
        >>>/b/

  17. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    For fricks sake, you moronic atheists are even more annoying than the religious lunatics. At least they bow to something bigger than themselves, you fricking homosexuals all just think you're the absolute pinnacle of logic. Guess what, you're just another dipshit like the rest of us. Nobody cares if your heart is too weak to hold faith in something. Just like nobody cares when some psycho has too few brain cells to realize they haven't magically figured out the absolute, only true religion.

  18. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    Atheists are incapable of debating honestly or even contributing anything of value to any discussion.

    They're the dumbest people in the entire world. I guess that's what happens when you think a rock was your ancestor and that rock came from nothing exploding in the dumb big bang theory. Not a single one of them can think critically, and they've never critically analyzed their own beliefs.

    Worthless subhuman trash, atheists.

  19. 1 week ago
    Anonymous

    >you must choose between believing in the christian god or nothing

    You can always try thinking for yourself you know

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *