If 64% of scientists told you that 2+2=5 would you believe them? If not, then what percentage would convince you?

If 64% of scientists told you that 2+2=5 would you believe them? If not, then what percentage would convince you?

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Only anglo homosexual lover make a distinction between sex and gender. Literally still can't answer the simple question "what is a woman" ?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What’s the answer? What is a woman? Two X chromosomes?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Adult human female.
        Now this is where you ask plebbit for help and they tell you to respond with a demand for the definition of female, at which point someone will give you the scientific definition and you'll play some linguistic games and babble on about sexual deformities so you should be able to have a penis and still be a woman. We've seen this tired argument non-stop from you freaks and it's done nothing but make all you claims of hate come true due to your own actions.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Adult human female isn’t an answer. Like you said, female and woman is identical in this case. You just gave me a synonym. Why can’t you answer the question? What is a woman? What is a female?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Cluster of biological traits =, including XX chromosomes, genitals, certain hormones and bone structure, etc. But you already knew this. Do you just enjoy being a homosexual on IQfy?

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    They say 0 is even but does 0/0=1? I rest my case

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      0 is not positive or negative, it is the one in the middle

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is gender the same thing as mathematics?

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Sex (male, female) is binary. Gender (masculine, feminine) is a spectrum. It's fairly simple. I assume most people have seen a masculine woman or a feminine man, they're not exactly uncommon. Sex and gender used to be synonymous but gender took on a new meaning back in like the 90s. It makes sense that we should have a word that covers masculine/feminine when we have one for male/female, because they are different concepts. The supreme court uses the distinction of gender for masculine/feminine since about the 90s too. Even trans activists get the terms sex and gender mixed up all the time which I think just makes things worse when they don't even know the basic terminology of what they're campaigning for

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I assume most people have seen a masculine woman or a feminine man, they're not exactly uncommon
      Non-conformity in this context or any other is not a revolutionary concept.
      >gender took on a new meaning back in like the 90s
      No it didn't. Some crackpot psychologists usurped a word that had meant one thing for centuries and decided to use it for their new batshit theory that no one would have ever given a frick about if they gave it its own word.
      >Even trans activists get the terms sex and gender mixed up all the time which I think just makes things worse when they don't even know the basic terminology of what they're campaigning for
      It's intentional. If they really intended to keep 'sex' and 'gender' as separate things there'd be no reason for the crusade to functionally replace sex with gender in every aspect of society.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Why are you opposed using the word gender to describe masculine/feminine? Words have changed meaning over time countless times, and it's not even changing much at all. And having sex gender to describe male/female but no word to describe masculine/feminine seems inefficient anyway and a kind of weird thing to be opposed to having

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Words have changed meaning over time countless times,
          What was the last common word that changed meanings not organically, but because crackpot social scientists decided they wanted it to mean something else?
          >it's not even changing much at all
          If you don't think there's much difference between a woman and a troony then I don't know what to tell you.
          >no word to describe masculine/feminine
          So what's wrong with "masculine" and "feminine"?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Why do you idolize the instruction of pedophile therapists?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Why are you opposed using the word gender to describe masculine/feminine?
          I think that “gender” (how masculine/feminine someone is) is an irrelevant set of stereotypes. Labeling someone a man/woman based on “gender” rather than sex simply reinforces these regressive stereotypes. Sports and bathrooms should be separated based on sex, not gender, because of the physical differences between males and females.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Sports and bathrooms should be separated based on sex, not gender, because of the physical differences between males and females.
            What physical differences necessitate such a separation?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Here is gender being used to describe masculine/feminine in 1926 too
        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gender#As_a_grammatical_category

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >#As_a_grammatical_category

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >gender took on a new meaning back in like the 90s
      I wonder who was behind that.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Sex (male, female) is binary. Gender (masculine, feminine) is a spectrum

      The average bloke on the side of the road considers sex and gender to be indistinguishable. Synonymous.

      “Um, ackchyually, I think you mean sex, not gender”

      Have fun being called a pretentious homosexual. Stop trying to turn the West into the Philippines.

      Identity isn’t enough for you, you aren’t satisfied with it alone, because deep down you know you’ll never be what you feel like you deserve, so you have to weaponize semantics and redefine/gaslight over basic biology.

      Amazing, but also truly unhinged.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    we need more mathematically fitting terms

    the word spectrum is bad because it implies a continuous gradation

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >British
    >scientists (no field given)
    >say sex is binary*
    >*except in rare cases
    Well, glad we sorted that out.

    >https://www.cbc.ca/news/science/paris-zoo-blob-1.5325747
    >The 'blob,' an organism with no brain but 720 sexes, debuts at Paris zoo

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >>The 'blob,' an organism with no brain but 720 sexes, debuts at Paris zoo
      pic related

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      For species which engage in sexual reproduction (which is almost all of the multi-cellular species), there are two clear sexes. Producers of large gametes are females, producers of small gametes are males.

      Sex is always binary. There's no middle ground between sperm and egg. The only other option is "neuter" in which case you aren't a third sex, you are removed from the sexual selection game entirely by being infertile. There's no third path forward to reproductive fertility.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >For species which engage in sexual reproduction (which is almost all of the multi-cellular species), there are two clear sexes. Producers of large gametes are females, producers of small gametes are males.
        Isogamy exists in algae and fungi. Beyond that plants (debatably depending on whether their gamete producing structures are counted as offspring or not) and fungi can also be hermaphroditic. And plenty of animals are hermaphroditic. Surely you've heard of the cuck snail.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >an organism with no brain but 720 sexes
      It's like tumblr

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >If not, then what percentage would convince you?
    none. truth is not a popularity contest

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >the scientific consensus is only meaningful when it agrees with my preconceived notions

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      found the child abusing israeli psychologist who's desperate to cut off little boys genitals for his own sexual entertainment

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >if the scientific consensus disagrees with my preconceived notions I'll abuse institutional power to harass and blacklist any scientist who disagrees with me until it agrees

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What are your feelings on the Rind, et al. controversy?

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >it's 2024 and the moronic media still don't know the difference between sex and gender

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Reminder that both anime and titty skittles are scientifically proven to cause sterility and brain damage.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        anime is for pedos

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You are a Black person

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The human race is a meme

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    bimodal distribution does not mean fluidity. also, what were biologists voting and did they have equal voting weight es gender studies people?

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Isn’t it amazing, how something even cavemen knew for certain, modern man just cannot fathom?

    Does it not blow your fricking mind?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Objectively the only thing you can know for certain is that you exist and also certain logical systems. And that's assuming you exist, which I can't know for certain.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I don't trust anyone or anything unless I can verify it my self.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Man = male
    Woman = female
    1 + 1= 2

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    uh the problem is they're coming at THE rectangle ... the fricking worm. what do we do?

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Geeks are cowards, news at 11.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Peer pressure is the bane of scientific progress.

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    If you're a man and you were suddenly transported into a body with breasts and a pussy, would your sense of being male be gone?

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Gender is a spectrum, like intelligence
    There is obviously a more desirable place to be on the spectrum

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      You do you, but wouldn't you preferably be off the spectrum?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Among the supermajority of my behaviours, i embody the more typically masculine aspect of them.
        Any sensible, normal person would see me as a male who acts like other males.

        I would however like to be off the autism spectrum

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >I would however like to be off the autism spectrum
          Thank you for picking up what I was putting down.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Autism has become just a polite way for a psychiatrist to say "narcissistic personality disorder" without scaring away business. Back in the 20th century only rich people could afford psychiatrists and autism was a severe condition on par with Down's syndrome, but once everyone was required to have health insurance psychiatrists are now "free" and so they've altered their practices to attract as much trade as possible.
          One group of people thats particularly attracted to the prospect of sitting in an office and talking about themselves to anyone who will listen is people with narcissistic personality disorder and if the doctor tell them what they want to hear, that they're a unique special snowflake, then they'll keep on coming back every week, insuring a steady income for the doctor

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Autism has become just a polite way for a psychiatrist to say "narcissistic personality disorder"
            thats why people who call themselves autistic are constantly on this board and elsewhere talking about themselves.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I would believe it if they were able to make a valid proof that 2+2=5 by the axioms of mathematics and that there exists a valid model for 2+2 equalling 5

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I hate weak dorks so much

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *