Ignoring theism and that eternal debate.

Ignoring theism and that eternal debate.

If homosexuality is not an affront to nature why does it require the intervention of modern medicine and technology to not result in disease and death in homo-sapiens?

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >If being straight is not an affront to nature why does it require the intervention of modern medicine and technology to not result in STDs and death in homo-sapiens?
    that's how moronic you are

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      its more like, homosexual psychology is completely fricked in that it always leads them to catch AIDS.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      So you believe that a non-promiscuous heterosexual couple is exposed at the same probability of a non-promiscuous homosexual couple to disease?

      C'mon now.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I believe OPs argument about the nature of homosexuality based on disease is a bad argument. I believe you moving the goalpost is also evidence that you're not here in good faith

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Ceteris paribus is bad faith and disingenuous

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Straight sex doesn’t lead nearly to the amount of epidemics that gay sex has caused in an attempt to parody straight sex. Maybe if every since heterosexual couple practiced anal sex it would but even then straights don’t frick as much as gays do.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It's weird how atheists say "trust the science" but get freaked out over government statistics.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    the first reported case of AIDS was 40 years ago, so gay sex before AIDs somehow (monkey fricking?) got introduced into the population would have led to sickness and death, no?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >would have
      would not have*

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yet it tends to be the breeders that keep making the AIDS babies.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Almost all cases of HIV are homosexual or sharing IV drug needles like heroin.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >homosexual
        homosexual redpill movie

        https://rumble.com/v4uomzo

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    what does "affront to nature" mean?
    you people use terms that have no meaning
    Is it an "affront to nature" when we cut down a forest to plant a field?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      affronted; affronting; affronts
      Synonyms of affront
      transitive verb

      1
      a
      : to insult especially to the face by behavior or language
      He was affronted by her rudeness.
      b
      : to cause offense to
      laws that affront society
      2
      a
      : to face in defiance : CONFRONT
      affront death
      b
      obsolete : to encounter face-to-face
      3
      : to appear directly before

      When excercised "naturally" disease is he natural result of homosexuality.

      I understand you might be upset by the mention of natural consequences, but I am not the one who decided male on male anal penetration should lead to disease and death without technological intervention.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        so you're saying when nature gets insulted it gives people disease?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Yeah when you insult the warning label on a bottle of bleach and drink it there tends to be negative consequences.

          Good job on that dumbass attempt on making an argument.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            it was a question

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You're such a fricking moron, holy shit

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It means 'I'm a christtard and I've run out of religious copes'

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The onus is yours.
    How do you can proof that homosexuality is somehow unatural?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The natural consequence is disease and death.

      Even with modern technological intervention and all powers globally forcing acceptance under penalty of social ostracism and unemployability, homosexuals still lead the charge in disease, drug abuse, and domestic violence.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >The natural consequence is disease and death.
        ...so being alive is an affront to nature? We all die after all

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          It is embarrassing that in your mind this was supposed to be a smart response.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It's a fair response anon, where do you draw the line as to what constitutes something something that leads to death within a natural context?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Eating food has the natural consequence of making a person healthy and fulfilling their nutritional needs, though this is not true 100% of the time and under circumstances food may make a person sick.

            There are people who would like to believe that eating food that is contaminated with feces is still a natural and unavoidable consequence.

            There are people that believe that specifically seeking and voluntarily seeking food covered in feces is equivalent to the first scenario.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            How is homosexuality equivalent to eating feces?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Ceteris paribus

            They dont make PREP ads for heterosexual white people.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I will said it again mister;
        Which is your evidence that support the claim of "antinatural homosexuality"?
        By your own logic: cancer is antinatural, dyslexia, Hepatitis, Mononucleosis and etc.
        You can see friend, all this illness are somehow antinatural?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Homosexuality is a behaviour. A behaviour that explicitly brings about disease on its practitioners.

          You are grasping at straws.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Actually, i have evidences that homosexuality natural and even beneficial in SOME cases.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >i stayed outside in the rain and now i have a cold
    >I must've insulted nature

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I engaged in a behaviour that had a natural consequence

      >obviously the disease I am now dying from is a validation of how totally natural that behaviour is

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        So walking outside in the rain is an affront to nature?

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's an affront to nature to go to the supermarket during flu season
    that's obvious since you might get the flu

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    does he know that you can get VDs from women?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Is it a natural consequence of a non-promiscuous celibate relationship?

      Does pushing shit into your urethra with your boyfriend lead to the same or higher rate if disease?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Is it a natural consequence of a non-promiscuous celibate relationship?
        Yes, it absolutely can be

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >can

          Great argument

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        So now non marriage sex is an affront to nature as well?
        Does "nature" have an opinion on eating shellfish or observing the sabbath?
        Maybe "nature" could send his son to get sacrificed to himself?

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah.
    OP is much scared of the debate.
    Last chance OP.
    Do you want to see my sources? I can destroy you

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What debate.

      Ceteris paribus the natural consequence of homosexual relationships vs heterosexual relationships is disease.

      https://i.imgur.com/8LyG6KZ.jpeg

      my great grandfather died of Syphilis, I didn't realize my family line was an affront to nature...

      Nice argument, I am glad your grandfather is not alive to see you take it up the ass from other men.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I have data that homosexuality is natural

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Nice argument, I am glad your grandfather is not alive to see you take it up the ass from other men.
        I'm not gay, I'm just not afraid of gay boogeymen

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Then address the original argument Nancy.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I did, your argument was that gays are unnatural because they die of AIDs, my argument is that its no different from contracting any other potentially lethal STD like syphilis, since your criteria is extremely nebulous, and you're a dumbass

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It requires an high degree of promiscuity and uncleanliness amongst heterosexual sexual partners to contract disease and illness from sexual activity.

            For homosexuals it merely requires the common acts, even if they are kept to a single sexual partner.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >It requires an high degree of promiscuity and uncleanliness amongst heterosexual sexual partners to contract disease and illness from sexual activity.
            How do you define "high degree of promiscuity"? If you have a couple and one of the people had 1 lifetime partner while the other had 2, it's still possible for both to get aids.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Syphilis was also from degeneracy from prostitution and now most syphilis cases in the USA are gay.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    my great grandfather died of Syphilis, I didn't realize my family line was an affront to nature...

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    idk what that's a scan of. But it looks like me giving OP's mom the mating press.

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >The virus has spread extremely rapidly in Botswana. Two decades ago, virtually no one there was HIV-positive. By 1992 an estimated 20 percent of sexually active adults were infected. By 1995 that proportion had reached one-third, and today it is roughly 40 percent. In Francistown, Botswana’s second largest city, nearly half of all pregnant women in the main hospital test positive for HIV.
    Now what?

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >OPs entire argument falls apart when he's reminded STDs exist
    lmao

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >STDs amongst heterosexuals virtually non-existent outside of situations of extreme promiscuity

      >literally shove feces in your urethra and die in a strictly monogamous homosexual relationship

      OP truly btfo

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        what if you're still gay but don't take it up the ass and just suck wiener instead?

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          So like .001% of the homosexual population would be a technical exception.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Black person you're not getting away with that, tell everyone in the thread that you're a Black person and are conflating anal with homosexuality because of your inane religion

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            the anal parasites have infected your brain you fricking wienersucker

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      STDs is an atheist issue.

      >Our analyses suggest that being religious and frequently attending religious meetings are associated with lower odds of being diagnosed with STIs as well as lower self-assessed risk of getting HIV/AIDS. This seems particularly true for adherents of Christianity and more specifically, those of the Catholic denomination.
      https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33783671/

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >STDs is an atheist issue.
        Yes, and sexual satisfaction is an atheist privilege.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    according to a CDC survey heterosexual men were more likely have anal sex than gays
    https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhsr/nhsr088.pdf

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Bi man here: I'm not into anal. I'm more of a handy type of guy. I await your response, OP.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He thinks all gay men have anal sex
      He's very obsessed with anal sex and man butt because he brings it up in every thread

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >If homosexuality is not an affront to nature
    Appeal to nature fallacy, everything is "natural" since it exists in the natural world, and nothing can be removed from this context technically speaking. Disease and death are both natural, and are both, as you've pointed out, a consequence of contracting AIDs. But by the same token, medicine is also natural, which makes this point completely moot. As others in this thread have pointed out, STDs in general exist in nature, and are likewise also preventable with modern medicine and modern hygiene practices.

  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It doesn't.
    You're deliberately confusing unhealthy practices with mere homosexuality.
    >inb4 cope and denial

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Homosexuality is repulsive like cannibalism or cropophagy and results in nothing but illnesses. That's the only reason you need to hate and ban it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >I don't like it, so it should be banned

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Obesity is repulsive and results in nothing but illnesses. That's the only reason you need to hate and ban it.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Yes and it should have been done a long time ago

  19. 1 month ago
    Radiochan

    pretty much anything requires "modern medicine and technology," syphillis was endemic in the early modern period and I'm pretty sure it wasn't spread exclusively by homosexuals

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How can something produced by nature be an affront to it?

    Here's the thing: all sexuality is just a matter of neural wiring. Heterosexuals and homosexuals are the same in this regard.

    Heterosexuality is the norm because it evolved to become as such. However, nature does not regard norms as "healthy" — it has no sense for such a thing. It has no sense of any hierarchy at all. The closest approximation to a natural hierarchy we can perceive is simple vs. complex; organisms appear to complexify over time, and nature seems to urge toward complexification.

    Homosexuality may not be helpful towards the species' survival, but it is not "unnatural" or "unhealthy" because nature is what produced it, and nature does not actually care about survival. It just moves. Further, homosexuality is actually a result of complexity; all sexuality is. Humans are capable of the greatest sexual diversity because we are the most complex organisms.

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is rock climbing an affront to nature? If you don't use protective gear, there's a good chance you're going to die doing it.

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Ignoring the truth

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Lots of brainwashed golems ITT

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >jews push homosexuality on everyone
      >the israelite thinks he is clever when he tries to do reverse psychology by making a meme that says hating homosexualry is israeli brainwashing

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >homosexual
        reminder that all the almost redpills you need on the LGBT are inside this movie?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >homosexual
        reminder that all the almost redpills you need on the LGBT are inside this movie?

        Golem.

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I love women's buttholes.
    Animals lick eachothers asses therefore it is natural.
    Dogs literally eat shit they find laying on the street... Is that an affront to nature?
    How about dung Beatles.. they spend their lives rolling around and eating shit.
    Op is a Low IQ (repressed) homosexual

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    "Affront to nature" my dick and balls. You're not ignoring theism if you just personify nature into a god like this. Nature doesn't give a frick what we do.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *