Intel is dominating the semiconductor industry

Intel is dominating the semiconductor industry

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

POSIWID: The Purpose Of A System Is What It Does Shirt $21.68

Mike Stoklasa's Worst Fan Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    genuinely moronic question but why does it need to go that small? What comes next?

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      Picometers (pm), femtometers (fm), and attometers (am). They will be so small that they will only be visible on a quantum scale.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      it's not that small it's still around 40nm gate pitch

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        At N5 M2 is about 32nm, bucko. N2 is about 20nm.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >genuinely moronic question but why does it need to go that small? What comes next?

      they have been making it smaller and smaller for >50 years. Smaller means (a) less power usage per transistor (they're smaller) and (b) you can fit more onto the same surface area (smaller) meaning more transistors meaning more computational power.

      So "shrinking" if it can be done easily results in a faster, more low power processor even if the design is the EXACT same as the "larger" version

      That's why 1 nm and below. although that would be nearing the size of atoms. I say "would be" because "1 nm node" means nothing, it's 100% marketing. It's probably like 10 nm feature size. Marketing just started making shit up by shrinking the nm every generation

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Why does it need to be so small
      Increase the density of shit on the die
      >What comes next
      More cores!!! :3

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      not the size of the transistor but the resolution of the process. The numbers are faked somehow and cannot be scaled to transistor physical size i.e. a real transistor is of 100nm x 100nm +- 1nm error but it won't get much smaller. Depending on how its current design of course.

      • 2 months ago
        Anonymous

        There is literally nothing "faked" about them

        • 2 months ago
          Anonymous

          Yes there is, 1nm means different things to different companies

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      >What comes next?
      Your wallet.

  2. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    they got the roadmap industry scrambling

  3. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Roadmap means nothing until action is taken.

  4. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Wow, an Intel roadmap.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous
  5. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Cobson's.
    COBOL.
    Cobots.

  6. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    It will be hilarious when people realize AI it's too expensive as it is and will get more so with regulations

  7. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Feels like everything intel does is to give the appearance of progress to pump up the share price.

    They just need an Shitjeet ceo and then get split up into parts.

  8. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Who vill buy ze intel goyslop if they vill boot out ze working man?

  9. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Meanwhile in reality:
    >AHHHHH TAIWAN SAVE USSSSSS

  10. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    They’ve been fricking up for a decade, I don’t think C-suite people slamming random things into a roadmap is going to matter.

  11. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >"1nm plus+++"

  12. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >1nm
    >Intel
    So what is it really, then?

  13. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    >Intel
    😀 Thanks for making this thread, friend.

  14. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    > ai automated factories

    Wow, ~~*intel*~~ is really benefiting american workers

  15. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    If its not 100x faster than a PS5, then I can't see any reason to go there

  16. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Aren't their desktop chips still on 10nm?

  17. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah because their nm roadmap worked so well last tjme

  18. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    how to buy?

  19. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    how to use?

  20. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    14nm+++++++++++++++++++++++++++

  21. 2 months ago
    Anonymous

    Has Gelsinger canned the Wogs who couldn't produce shit for the past 10 years?

    If these incompetent Wogs are still there, this slide is bullshit.

    • 2 months ago
      Anonymous

      A good portion of them have been removed or re-assigned, but there are still plenty to go around. I’d say intel is now on par with its competitors with regards to “woggery”

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *