Is double-slit experiment a psy-op?

Is double-slit experiment a psy-op?
If you "detect a photon going through one slit" it means you've obstructed one slit with measuring equipment therefore it's no longer the same experiment.
Are they deliberately confusing people?
Are they hiding something?
What is it all about?

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

Yakub: World's Greatest Dad Shirt $21.68

Unattended Children Pitbull Club Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    They're hiding the fact that you are clearly unmedicated.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yes its routinely mis-intrepreted especially by copenhagen school of thought

      >They're hiding the fact that you are clearly unmedicated.
      speak for yourself homosexual, they're just uneducated

      double slit is an experiment on polarizer physics, and then single photon double slit is an experiment on laser emission physics but really they never get single photons

      then finally the name 'double slit' in itself is a psyop because its actually a diffraction grating because the spacing needed between the slits is too small to actually build without very high calibre lithography machines; they just assume the physics applies to both scenarios while ignoring thing like subsurface scattering effect and diffraction between different materials.

      and then you may ask, why? Why does copenhagen school of thought push this weirdo angle of quantum physics where they try to make things look like magic? Its because the thought movement was founded by heisenberg and a bunch of dumbass ex-nazi scientists who were super buttmad the US.jews greatly outsmarted them in nuclear physics. They lost the war and as revenge made it their objective to utterly poison modern science discussion

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >bunch of dumbass ex-nazi scientists who were super buttmad the US.jews greatly outsmarted them in nuclear physics. They lost the war and as revenge made it their objective to utterly poison modern science discussion
        i like this theory simple because it's contrary to the usual joos being behind it all

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >omg, my brain, it feels so big!!!
    >its full of so much schizo israelite jargon and fancy soiyence polysyllables
    >oh no
    >i can't hold it in any longer
    >i'm…
    >i'm gonna…
    >i'm gonna QUANTUUUUUUUUMMMMMM!!!!!!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Thing is you have to engage in abstraction and artifically quantize portions of the unified field to make useful calculations with it

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you shine light through a single slit, you see an interference pattern. A wide bulge flanked by smaller ones.
    If you shine light through a double slit, you see the same pattern as a single slit, only little tiny dots are visible inside.
    Electrons, carrying wave properties, follow the same behavior. If you shine them through a single slit, you see a long bulge flanked by smaller ones.
    If you permit electrons to pass through both slits, you retain the same structure only with little dots inside.
    When people say the interference pattern disappears if you close a slit, they mean the fine structure induced by the second slit.
    However, the single slit interference remains.

    See pic rel for light and link for electrons.
    https://arxiv.org/pdf/1210.6243.pdf

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It proves, that measuring device is sink, and light is still a wave, and electrons too.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If light is a wave, is a lightbulb an ocean? Completely absurd.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        We live in ocean of medium, in which photons propagate.

        How does it come, that wave seems absorud, but particle makes a sense?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          so is the astronaut right you cant see anything in space?

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Single photon sources didn't exist at that time.

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Is double-slit experiment a psy-op?
    Why do so many IQfy threads start like this? Why can't you just explain why you're confused without chalking it up to a conspiracy off the bat?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      it's a well-known law of the internet that making people mad is the best way to get responses to your question

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Lust provoking image.jpg
        Is the other best way.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    detection = altering the experimental setup

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The problem is what causes even single electrons to diffuse like a wave in the two-slit case, the single-slit case is a red herring.

    The same experiment for light is deliberate confusion, given that a "single" photon "particle" actually has an extension of several miles.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Remember 1l of milk is a particle.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pilot wave theory is far more elegant in explaining the single slit interference of an elextron than Copenhagen is

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I'm not too informed about pilot wave theory, but physics has a problem with people looking for elegant solutions to models and causing too much trouble for it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Pilot wave theory is far more elegant in explaining the single slit interference of an elextron than Copenhagen is

      I'm not too informed about pilot wave theory, but physics has a problem with people looking for elegant solutions to models and causing too much trouble for it.

      There is only a wave in every case, the seeming particles appear when a threshold is reached. The wave sums with the noise, and when it crosses the threshold, a seeming "electron" appears.

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >waaaah this is absurd because it doesn't adhere to my notion of how reality works!
    >what do you mean it's based on experimental data? WAAAAAAH!
    do morons really?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why are you in a quantum thread? don't you have a climate science thread to cry in?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        i couldn't care less about climate science. i decided to chide you for your stupidity because it's literally just someone crying about how reality doesn't match their naïve understanding of classical mechanics.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Lying really is second nature for you isn't it? You realize you're the only one on this board with your distinct typing patterns right? I won't tell you what it is, even though it's been told to you before lmao. You're easily identifiable, yurotrash

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >schizophrenia out of nowhere
            take your meds moron. i'm nobody. you're nobody. accept that.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You're nobody. I'm somebody.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            humans since forever

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            How many citations has your most cited paper received? I'm sitting at 72, not including self citations. JHEP

            In the past five years I've matriculated six masters students and written recommendation letters for thirteen undergrads to get into graduate school.

            That's my quantifiable contribution to the community and to society. What's yours, Mr. Nobody?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >source: my ass
            yap yap yap. die with honor.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >look at my social credit score
            >I succeeded in an environment that favors mediocrity over genius
            >my stats in an inhumane bureaucracy somehow translate into intellectual achievements because ... uhm they just do, okay??

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You were too smart to make it in the field of scientific publishing?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes, I'm too smart to waste my time publishing dozens of low quality papers with Pajeet, Zhang et al. Have fun with your midwitted ackadummic humiliation rituals.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What groundbreaking research have you been unable to publish?

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    For these old boomers everything not classical is unbelievable unicorn magic, they walk around saying stupid shit like "nobody understands quantum mechanics" and are proud of it. I don't think they understand just how trivial this shit is to younger people who are into it.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *