Is it really impossible anons

Is it really impossible anons

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    things that seem random might not be
    it's conceivable that you could find patterns that help compress it
    lossless is pretty unlikely though

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >things that seem random might not be
      >it's conceivable that you could find patterns that help compress it
      If it's not truly random, it's pseudorandom.
      If it's pseudorandom, all you need is to crack the seed.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        something tells me electrode readings don't have a pseudorandom generator generating the voltages

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          just find out the universes seed

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            oh i know that one
            you know what, I'm taking the challenge
            for the lolz

            I think the point is to show Elon that he's an idiot who doesn't understand compression, computers or anything, really.

            yeah this is the daily troony sponsored elon hate thread after all

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The muskrats sure dedicate a lot of time to thinking about troons. I wonder why?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Man I fricking love them. Seeing the level of seethe he causes those weirdos is almost reinvigorating. The funniest part is that the same troons turn around and suck Zucks dick because of llama and quest (which are good profits, don't get wrong, but it doesn't excuse the dick sucking)

            And no, objective facts like, his companies are carrying 90% of space cargo, or, built the largest network of EV chargers, hell, bootstrapped the EV industry, etc, is not dick sucking. Dick sucking is what doge fans do with him.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Man I fricking love them. Seeing the level of seethe he causes those weirdos is almost reinvigorating. The funniest part is that the same troons turn around and suck Zucks dick because of llama and quest (which are good profits, don't get wrong, but it doesn't excuse the dick sucking)

            And no, objective facts like, his companies are carrying 90% of space cargo, or, built the largest network of EV chargers, hell, bootstrapped the EV industry, etc, is not dick sucking. Dick sucking is what doge fans do with him.

            I used to like him until he started doing conservative virtue signalling about protecting the kids... and supporting a bill which will make it impossible to ever post anonymously ever again. If it passes and the courts don't nuke it, which they will. It would literally make a board like this impossible, unless you want 4chins to have your id.

            For this, he is objectively a turd and should be mocked and derided.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            "Protekt muh childrenz"

            I fricking hate this horseshit. If you can't protect your kids from the big bad internet, then you fricking fail as a parent and you should give them up for adoption.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nah. Execution. Those genes do not need to proliferate.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The thing is, I don't even like him, I have zero reasons to like or dislike someone I don't know, much less a billionaire that literally lives on another reality (like they all do).

            But that doesn't mean the guy is a failure either, for better or worse.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He is very successful and has done much with his life, I will give him that. His businesses have created some nice things, but I am starting to fricking hate him now. He's basically Ted Cruz.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            "Protekt muh childrenz"

            I fricking hate this horseshit. If you can't protect your kids from the big bad internet, then you fricking fail as a parent and you should give them up for adoption.

            >NOOO UR NOT ALLOWED 2 PROTECT KIDS I FKING HATE U
            utterly deranged. the worst part is you don't even know how you come across to other people.

            everyone knows what you are now, it's time for you to quiet down and keep your sick thoughts to yourself.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ok dude

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you bet I'm gonna protect the kids from you you glitter shitting fruitcake

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >muh kids
            what are you, a woman?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            This crap never actually protects kids. I'm all for that but this isn't it.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          He's a big guy.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            For you

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You are so motherfricking stupid and you have no idea what you are talking about.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Ah, yes, the Brain seed that determines your free will and consciousness, why didnt anybody think of that.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Now do it in <1ms and with 1mw of power.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ASIC on the most efficient node could probably do it if you throw money at the problem. Depends on the algorithm required to solve said solution. So the 1ms 1mw is not really relevant until you know the algorithm.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the only chance is every given person has like a looping noise background that could be included in the denoiser algo, working on a single dataset that is pretty much natural distribution is indeed impossible, if you can train an algo on a month of data from a single individual, maybe 99% of neurons in each person do create just a chorus of repeating noise that can be skipped/reintroduced, the problem as stated is indeed impossible

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        tbh the reason he wants it lossless is because he doesn't know what to do with the data
        this is likely for research purposes

        in production I see no reason they wouldn't just stream timestamps on an event-basis

        they can't run highbandwidth transmissions because it requires a power-hungry transceiver that'll cook the cells around the implant and drain whatever power source they're using quickly

        if elon wasn't moronic he'd just send spike trains which is just a timestamp of when a spike was detected, he already bought guarantees in spike train aliasing with high spatial resolution but he's being dumb and wants everything

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think the point is to show Elon that he's an idiot who doesn't understand compression, computers or anything, really.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Elon is a billionaire and created PayPal , space x and Tesla

      What did u do

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He was born a wealthy man and most of his fortune comes from grifting the U.S. government. Stop latching on to his "achievements" as if they're yours just because you need a father figure.
        That doesn't disprove any statement made in the previous post.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          didn't he just invest in all of those and later was relabeled as a founder?

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-FGwDDc-s8

          Do u think u could do what Elon did if u had his money

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You mean be a ketamine addict? Yeah I could probably even do that without billions of dollars of government subsidies

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He's a ketamine addict managing 5 major companies while u sit on IQfy seething

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            he's a drug addict criminal impostor with the fascist mindset of the early 20th century

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes
            This is the driving force of meritocracy. "Only Elon Musk could have done what he has done with what he was given" is a simp take.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            no, i'm not a good con artist

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Do u think u could do what Elon did if u had his money

            could i buy a business and lose half its value? easily.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Easily, my jeet friend.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            In today's environment? Probably not. Elon is one of the privileged few, not only born with the money but born at the right time to take advantage of that money.

            The dotcom bubble is no more.
            There's money in space but there's also too much fricking competition.
            Tesla is Tesla, I don't know how they make money. It's the brand if anything. I don't foresee any other electric vehicle startup being able to emulate that today.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He was born in a country that has typically been 20-40 years ahead of the US on the path of destruction.
            You're right that he was born with money though.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            if i had his money i would make making e-girl robot waifus

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the step up from emerald miner to lucking out with Paypal was the "hard" part.
            Staying making billions when you have billions already? Trivially easy

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I could make real affordable electric car that doesn't spy on you. I dont need much money I just need elon loving government to frick off.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          so what if I see him as a father figure? he and trump would have been way better than my father who abandoned me and my mom

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Why does Elon create so much seethe and cope, he brings out the most pathetic in people. Not even a Elon simp I couldn't give a shit but the haters are big gay.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            if you haven't guessed by now: nobody has any respect, nor cares about, your favourite south african Black person.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            he's a white short king though 🙁

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          "Grifting" the government is the only way to run a successful business.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sure thing, sweetie.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          i just know you have a proclivity for sucking dick by the way you write

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Maybe you're hoping you've found a fellow dick sucker like you because you're in constant search of.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >achievements
          >get goverment to give you abnormal amounts of printed money
          > get goverment to frick with all other car producers
          > still fail in producing an "affordable" car you promised

          if anything thats an antiachievment.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        didn't he just invest in all of those and later was relabeled as a founder?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          SpaceX was his from the start.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous
        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >watching video
          >hummm, axxually none of his code made it to prod on Paypal
          >0 sources cited
          This kind of shit bothers me especially when it comes from a moronic youtuber who never coded in his life

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        this is IQfy mr shill
        we all know all the rich ever did was born with good enough connections to suck the right israeli dick

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          When did IQfy hate rich and capitalism

          R u guys commies now

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            When did IQfy fit into your stupid shit stereotypes? When did we ever agree on anything? You need to leave, fricktard.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Go Back to plebbit u gay

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            people who tell other anons to go back to "plebbit" usually are active "plebbit" users themselves.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yeah its so strange. I was playing cs2 once and accidentally teamkilled in the Inferno tunnels. The guy started raging on VC and I made a joke that I thought he was a israelite (this was during the whole New York tunnels thing), and the guy told me to go back to plebbit in the most weasley CoD voice possible.
            I always imagine these are the kind of creatures spewing these kinds of insults.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yeah its so strange. I was playing cs2 once and accidentally teamkilled in the Inferno tunnels. The guy started raging on VC and I made a joke that I thought he was a israelite (this was during the whole new york tunnels thing), and the guy told me to go back to plebbit in the most weasley CoD voice possible.
            I always imagine these are the kind of creatures spewing these kinds of insults.

            Wrong board

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >waah you can't even mention vidya anecdotally on the technology baord

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            shut up b***h, make us goto IQfy you IQfyirgin

            hilarious how posts on /lgbt/ get reposted on IQfy a few minutes later (i posted the tweet on /lgbt/ 5 minutes earlier than this post)
            this is not the first time this has happened

            cookie?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            no that's not my name

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >I am from /lgbt/ oooo look at me, please pay me some attention, but not too much hehehe
            I see the game you're playing you sadomasochist, I won't play into. (you WANT us to disrespect you to make you feel some pleasure. frick off clown)

            [...]
            go back to blue rabbit

            wtf is a blue rabbit? you IQfyirgin

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            frick off to your shithole rabbitor

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            /b/itches be /t/ripping /c/ause /t/hey IQfyirgins

            and you're not? anon it's literally the same exact image who are you kidding
            good on you for guessing im a masochist with a humiliation fetish though... you calling me a clown has made me very happy!

            You aren't going to get the response you seek, we don't care where you posted, where you come from or the whole gender argument. you're literally trying to make this into a thread about shit it isn't, let this be the last response you get unless you start telling us to go back to "plebbit" or discussing the topic at hand. we're not playing those political games here on IQfy.
            grow up

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            and you're not? anon it's literally the same exact image who are you kidding
            good on you for guessing im a masochist with a humiliation fetish though... you calling me a clown has made me very happy!

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >waah you can't even mention vidya anecdotally on the technology baord

            go back to blue rabbit

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's ok to hate the rich as long as they are israeli.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            lurk moar

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >R u
            Are you 15?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >you hate rich capitalists that contributed nothing to society apart from sucking the right wiener without any moral boundaries, you must be le commie
            Are you american by any chance? Only those seem to still be under the influence of their homemade propaganda. There are other systems and philosophies about how the world should run, you know? Nothing is black and white

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >There are other systems and philosophies about how the world should run, you know?
            keep those other systems contained in a walled area

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            post the original

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Sorry, my heroes are the ones who came up with theories and algorithms in computer science that are among the best things ever produced by a human brain, and they all died as wagecucks at most.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >picking loser heroes when you could have picked jim simons
          ngmi
          mathemagician who btfo the noses at their own game > whatever wageslave kekold

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        As

        He was born a wealthy man and most of his fortune comes from grifting the U.S. government. Stop latching on to his "achievements" as if they're yours just because you need a father figure.
        That doesn't disprove any statement made in the previous post.

        said, he is born rich from a rich settlers family. He then bought out PayPal (not created it), and he also bought our Tesla (not created it).
        If I had rich parents I would buy a nice looking startup and become a billionaire too.

        [...]
        [...]
        Do u think u could do what Elon did if u had his money

        >Do u think u could do what Elon did if u had his money
        Yes I would, 100%. I'm as autistic as him, and less depressed (I don't need ketamine as he does), and I know more than he does on engineering, programming, etc. He clearly never ever "worked", as he never did anything technical in his entire life, but I did. I would at least know what people under my responsibility does, unlike him.
        I think he has been very lucky to not frick up everything, because he is clearly incompetent. The whole situation around Twitter (his tweets about buying it, then "no I wasn't serious", then the trial, then he bought it, and destroyed Twitter up to the logo and the name...) is ridiculous, exactly like him. To me, it just proves that if the user base is there, they won't move to another social network, even if a monkey is leading the company. And I'm not saying I would be better at leading Twitter, because I wouldn't buy this shitty money pit in the first place.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >buying the right businesses over and over again and then making them profitable is luck, not skill
          So if he started with millions and made billions, you should be able to start with thousands and make millions. It's the same scale, after all, plus you're smarter than him. What's stopping you?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Not the same, If you have thousand and fail, you starve and die. If you have millions and fail, you most likely have a safety net and no matter how much you frick up, you will never end up homeless.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It doesn't work like that. Imagine you play to Monopoly, but one player starts with 1000× more than the other players. Even if this player is bad, they will always win the game, for some reason.
            There's only a finite quantity of ressources on Earth, like in Monopoly. I can't create a car company or buy one.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >He then bought out PayPal
          No he didn't. Paypal was the result of the merger between Confinity and X.

          >he also bought our Tesla (not created it).
          While that's true Tesla didn't even have a proposed product when he bought it, they just had a business pitch. He bought it while giving the company its first round of funding

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Fricked your mother in the mouth. have a nice day, bootlicker.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        0iq bait post, he only created paypal in the dotcom era, other two he just bought out or funded.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          He didn't buy out space x u gay

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I have jerk offd 3 times already today

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          That's nothing
          I jerk offd 5 times today
          The men who's deaths we're memorializing today would be ashamed at your lack of stamina

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I thought I was the only one who jerk offd 5+ times a day. Sometimes I even go to the bathroom at work to bust a nut. When I say this to my friends they all think I'm insane, they tell me they only jerk off like 5 times a week.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I thought I was the only one who jerk offd 5+ times a day. Sometimes I even go to the bathroom at work to bust a nut. When I say this to my friends they all think I'm insane, they tell me they only jerk off like 5 times a week.

            Mutants, the lot of you. I assume you are using sdome sort of bizarre treadmill on a daily basis for months on end, to boost stamina. Something wild like that.

            Holy hell

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            60 mg vyvanse everyday + anti-psychotics, antidepressants and mood stabilizer. Makes me last a lot in bed too. Sometimes shit goes wild and I disappear for a week, then show up at MIT like nothing happened. Some staff noticed this and are suddenly very polite and lenient.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'm somehow not surprised that, that place has this in it.

            Stay wild. Flow like water anon.

            I don't particularly like him, but calling a billionaire who's accomplished more in his life so far than everyone you've ever known combined dumb just outs you for what you are.

            Money =/= accomplishments. One circle overlaps the other. He's smart here, in that he's letting answers come to him; showing restraint. Wether or not he's really trying on his own to engineer alongside everything else, I'm personally unsure of. It may be a ethical no-no, depending on his protocol.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Put that .zip in a .zip Black person

        I was an internet funny man

        I remember back in the late 90's/early 00's someone shilled to me some kind of file compression that did just that but it was a scam, turns out the program would just copy the original files to a LOCAL archive database, then generated a small file with random data pointing to that archive in the database somehow.
        So yeah it only worked locally, you could send the "compressed" files to others but the program will throw a fake "sorry, corrupted archive :)" error.
        It was probably some kind of malware, can't remember the name.

        You made me think of ZIP drives. That shit was cash for a child hiding all his spritesheets and mspaint drawings. Random file crap. I need to recover that stuff one day, but no computer around me uses the zip drive serial bus connector. That bulky motherfricker is going to the grave, if I don't find a way to connect it.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Put that .zip in a .zip Black person
          I arj all my zips.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Good morning sir

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >What did u do

        BRITISHER: ARE U WHITE
        INDIAN: NO
        BRITISHER: THEN DOG IS BETTER THEN U COS ITS WHITE

        INDIAN: ARE U WHITE
        BRITISHER: YES!!!
        SIR ELON MUSK: THEN WHATS DIFFERENT BETWEEN U AND DOG

        BRITISHER faints.,,,,,

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        lel @ all the summergay replies

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Pooped myself

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I posted blacked porn on X. Thanks Elon for free speech!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        just chill

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        except he didnt do any of this you moronic Black person

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He was born a wealthy man and most of his fortune comes from grifting the U.S. government. Stop latching on to his "achievements" as if they're yours just because you need a father figure.
        That doesn't disprove any statement made in the previous post.

        he's a nepo baby wiener sucker pedo cuck

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Mumblerapping Black folk and sport stars that can't count to five, but can kick a ball really far make millions too, whats your point? You don't need intelligence to get rich, you need to either get lucky, or be spineless

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        awesome bait, congrats

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I did your mom so it's not a small feat by any means.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >i put cheques on the internet

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        you forgot Twitter

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Elon cant even breathe without being reminded... Elon is a meta human ape dragon homie morph, he's coming for you and the silo doors are your only way out. Oh my god you're doomed.

      I wonder who ate all the donuts.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You sound like you get bullied a lot on the shortbus.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the tech billionaire is le dumb
      We all know if you only run a space business and hire rocket scientists, that doesnt mean you're actually smart. You must be doing way better than him since you're so much smarter. What businesses do you run? How many billions of dollars have you made lately?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >you're not a millionarie
        >therefore let me suck the millionarie off real good
        gotta love newhomosexuals that think 4chins is about sucking off millionaries if they meme the /misc/ memes, frick you frick that israelite and frick every other israelite you suck off, homosexual
        no this is not 4chins spirti mega newhomosexual, go back

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I don't particularly like him, but calling a billionaire who's accomplished more in his life so far than everyone you've ever known combined dumb just outs you for what you are.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yeah you sucking off a millionarie outs me as what exactly?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >acknowledging publicly known facts about someone's accomplishments == sucking off
            This is bait at this point.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            call it whatever you want, but you know exactly what you're doing

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What did he accomplish, drove every company he bought into the ground?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The guy's not a scientist (regardless of how much he likes to larp as one) but he does seem to be pretty knowledgeable on making money. You don't get to be the richest man on Earth without being good with money.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        if I was born as the son of a emerald mine owner, I would be pretty damn good at making money too

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          As much as people like to deride it as having life handed to you, money management at that scale is actually a skill. Rich people spend all their lives figuring out the best ways to make money, and then they teach those methods to their kids. So yeah, if you got raised as a millionaire's son, you'd probably be good at managing an estate too. The same way that a carpenter's son is probably going to be good at carpentry.

          I don't idolize the man, but I also don't think he's a drooling moron. He's a businessman who puts on a likeable persona for the cameras because he knows that its marketable and makes a lot of money doing it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Elon Musk seems to enjoy taking massive risks.
            > Starship will probably fail
            > SpaceX will probably fail (update: it succeeded)
            > Cybertruck will probably fail (update: it failed)
            > Tesla will probably fail (update: it did succeed for years, but the future seems grim with BYD and GWM mass producing decent electric cars)
            > Neuralink is actually a good idea, but he won't be able to compete with Apple or Google when they invent brain interfaces with significantly less colateral damages or even 100% passive
            > Grok AI is years behind what Google and OpenAI have
            > Hyperloop will probably fail (update: it failed)
            > Starlink will probably fail (update: it succeeded)
            > Tesla self driving will probably fail (update: they have the best self driving tech nowadays, but Nvidia will probably dominate this market soon)
            > Tesla bot will probably fail (update: it's years behind what other companies have, and Nvidia will also dominate this market)
            I would say 50% of everything he does ends up crashing and burning in an espectacular fashion what the other half does great (like Tesla, Starlink and SpaceX)

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's very easy to manage risk when you just sell equity to VCs. VCs buy it bot because they believe in it (only suckers believe in it) but because they know he's the world's greatest con man and will pamp that shit so they can dump it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Tesla is a huge scam, Neuralink experiments are criminal ... will go to prison sooner or later, no doubt

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >risks
            What risk is there in disposable income? It's disposable for a reason.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            there’s no risk because he knows the government will just bankroll any failures. He doesn’t make anything all of these stunts are just performance pieces for slobbering 3iq VC investors.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Me with the 3iq buying $TSLA at 1500

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            if the persona he puts on was meant to be likeable I feel I can pretty confidently say he's not very good at that

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It may not work on you, but look at how many other people love him. He's got people thinking he's some hyper genius who's going to save the world, or some "just like me fr" dude bro. Sure, you may hate it, but normies love it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It's really not. People that have that much money can simply take stupid risks, eat the losses, then repeat the process until they get lucky enough to hit it big.

            People with less money are simply ruined if they take a risk like that, and it doesn't pay off.

            People with no spare money can't even try in the first place.

            morons like you hero worshipping them for having a bunch of money to blow is just laughable.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Is it really impossible anons
      yes

      factual

      Elon is a billionaire and created PayPal , space x and Tesla

      What did u do

      throwing money at things doesn't make you less moronic.

      didn't he just invest in all of those and later was relabeled as a founder?

      yes.

      [...]
      [...]
      Do u think u could do what Elon did if u had his money

      i would do 100x better than that moronic south african Black person.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I think the point is to show Elon that he's an idiot who doesn't understand compression, computers or anything, really.
      Throw down an impossible challenge. Expect nerd fights with people either trying their best to do it to prove the other nerds wrong. Or have nerds doing the best proving it can't be done.

      Either way he gets the best possible compression for the data type confirmed by nerd fighting on the internet.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The ridiculousness of challenge personally made me give up, if the challenge was "get from 2.2x to 3x", that might have kept me going for a while.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I always like bad solutions that slowly start looking more useful the longer you think about making the good solution and what that would require.
          Like the number of prime numbers less than a number.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Elon is a genius that makes trannies seethe
    Elon/Nick Fuentes 2028

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Elon is a israelite excelling at business with other israelites in a israelite based world

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Elon is a troony, that's the problem

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Just over fit a transformer model on them and call that "the compression look up table" then record errors from the completions as the "compressed data."

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      but then you're storing the file in the compressor so to use the file you would need the same or more storage

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        6/10, made me reply, but is probably too subtle to have broad appeal

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I remember back in the late 90's/early 00's someone shilled to me some kind of file compression that did just that but it was a scam, turns out the program would just copy the original files to a LOCAL archive database, then generated a small file with random data pointing to that archive in the database somehow.
    So yeah it only worked locally, you could send the "compressed" files to others but the program will throw a fake "sorry, corrupted archive :)" error.
    It was probably some kind of malware, can't remember the name.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >I remember back in the late 90's/early 00's someone shilled to me some kind of file compression that did just that but it was a scam, turns out the program would just copy the original files to a LOCAL archive database, then generated a small file with random data pointing to that archive in the database somehow.
      So yeah it only worked locally, you could send the "compressed" files to others but the program will throw a fake "sorry, corrupted archive :)" error.
      It was probably some kind of malware, can't remember the name.
      Too fricking kek

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes. How the frick do you convince someone that something is impossible? Look up Shannon's source coding theorem, If that's not enough, then literally nothing will convince him. Dumb twitter homosexual moron.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      As [...] said, he is born rich from a rich settlers family. He then bought out PayPal (not created it), and he also bought our Tesla (not created it).
      If I had rich parents I would buy a nice looking startup and become a billionaire too.
      [...]
      >Do u think u could do what Elon did if u had his money
      Yes I would, 100%. I'm as autistic as him, and less depressed (I don't need ketamine as he does), and I know more than he does on engineering, programming, etc. He clearly never ever "worked", as he never did anything technical in his entire life, but I did. I would at least know what people under my responsibility does, unlike him.
      I think he has been very lucky to not frick up everything, because he is clearly incompetent. The whole situation around Twitter (his tweets about buying it, then "no I wasn't serious", then the trial, then he bought it, and destroyed Twitter up to the logo and the name...) is ridiculous, exactly like him. To me, it just proves that if the user base is there, they won't move to another social network, even if a monkey is leading the company. And I'm not saying I would be better at leading Twitter, because I wouldn't buy this shitty money pit in the first place.

      can you imagine being the guy that provoked this by trying to explain FFT+filter to elon musk lmao
      he must've ignored everything but the word "lossy", thought "hmm loss=bad" and then decided to prove that he knows better by asking twitter to do it for him
      >that'll show that smug employee that thinks he can tell ME what to do

      >elon: we need this noisy signal to fit in a channel 200x smaller, but also lossless because that's cooler
      >engineer: that's impossible
      >elon: impossible, you say? tell me again who owns twitter, i think you'll find that makes me the expert here
      >engineer: lets make a bet, we'll start a competition to see if anybody can do this, if i'm wrong, i'll resign
      >elon: you're on!

      It's X.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        what's X?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It was formerly Twitter, but now it's called X.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Formerly Chuck's

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The number pi has an infinite number of random (noisy) digits that would require infinite space to store, but I can compress it down to a simple algorithm that can calculate (decompress) all the digits. Just because compressing noisy things by a factor of 200 is difficult with generic lossless algorithms doesn't mean it's impossible.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Most moronic post I've read about this challenge, pi is constant you dumb frick, it's value doesn't change. Of course you can "compress" it down to a few bits in an algorithm. You can't have an algorithm for arbitrary data. That's why this is impossible.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Most moronic post I've read about this challenge
        speak for yourself. I can define a constant with an infinite number of digits which doesn't change and for which there is no algorithm to compute the digits.

        ok so what's the algorithm for an electrode inserted into your brain
        at best he's going to get some JPG-adjacent fourier transforms on the data
        The only clear pattern is that the information is logarithmic in nature

        >ok so what's the algorithm for an electrode inserted into your brain
        that's the challenge, duh!

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          How the frick does that invalidate what he said?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I wouldn't know how to translate that into 90IQ speak for you, so don't bother thinking about it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You can't have an algorithm for arbitrary data
            That is his statement. To invalidate it you must show that there is at least one algorithm for compressing arbitrary data. Are you fricking moronic?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You can't have an algorithm for arbitrary data
            >That is his statement.
            That's not a statement. That's not even a complete thought.
            >you must show that there is at least one algorithm for compressing arbitrary data
            huffman is an algorithm for compressing arbitrary data. it gets poor compression ratios on "random" data because that is the nature of a generic lossless compression algorithm. domain specific algorithms can achieve higher compression ratios.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Well there you go. You invalidated his statement. Was it that hard?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You're a fricking Black person with an IQ of an institutionalized moron who can't comprehend first-order logic.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            lol. Seethe harder, midwit. This is the problem with arguing with people who are more than a standard deviation lower in IQ than you. They don't understand that they are wrong, cannot comprehend your argument, and simply assume they are right because of that. Then, apparently, they devolve into calling you a Black person. What a waste of my time.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'd love to see your IQ test results.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >What a waste of my time.
            "I am a very important person with very important thoughts and very important things to do that you'll never understand, which is why I'm carefully spending my time and attention arguing with random anons over moronic shit on IQfy on a Monday in the hopes of solving a multi-million dollar problem for a billionaire, for free."

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >I can define a constant with an infinite number of digits which doesn't change and for which there is no algorithm to compute the digits.
          can you though?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            yes, just give me an infinite amount of time

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            sure, but you have to do it in a finite amount of steps

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Boy you are stupid, dum dum.
        Step 1: Define an random number generating algorithm that outputs N number of bytes such that N = 200 * size of the code for the RNG.
        Congratulations, you just came up with an algorithm that can compress something random, which cannot be compressed by Huffman tables, by exactly a factor of 200. It's not every day I get to hand someone ass to them so simply, but this was pleasurable. Thanks for that.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The reason this doesn’t work is that there are so many possible realizations of the noise that you’ll need a seed that contains roughly as many bits as the original data.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >put file on cloud
          >give person pointer to file 1/10000th the size
          >since 10000 people receive pointers to the file, the total space is 2x the size of the file over 10000 people
          >thusly the file has been compressed to 1/5000 its original size
          I'll take my nobel price now

          youre joking but you should do it
          remember all the problems that would have remained unsolved if this site didn't exist

          The muskrats sure dedicate a lot of time to thinking about troons. I wonder why?

          because they spend most of their time on discord planning raids?
          that and the overrepresentation on this board, as that one dating app leak showed
          don't be disingenuous sweaty

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      ok so what's the algorithm for an electrode inserted into your brain
      at best he's going to get some JPG-adjacent fourier transforms on the data
      The only clear pattern is that the information is logarithmic in nature

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I don't believe a proof exists for showing pi's digits being normally distributed (i.e. noisy or random). That's conjecture.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      pi is a real number. it is in no way comparable to real-time streaming data with randomness

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >typedfemale
    he will never be a real woman

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i can do it. i would simulate the monkey brain in software, take a snapshot of the monkey brain and sync it with the software outside. the only data i would need to transfer is the inputs going into the real monkey brain and i would send the same inputs into my software monkey brain. i would read the raw electrode recordings from my software monkey brain.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What happns when you need to read the electrodes of a different monkies brain? Are you going to simulate every single possible monkey brain that could exist. Unless you believe Brain A with produce the same output as Brain B given the same inputs? If so I'd like to see proof of that

      He's a ketamine addict managing 5 major companies while u sit on IQfy seething

      Elon doesn't manage the companies. He gets managed by people who actually know what they're doing

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Elon doesn't manage the companies. He gets managed by people who actually know what they're doing
        you just need to look at the times he actually gets involved in decision making, it always turns to shit because nobody wants to tell boss man his ideas are moronic

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Are you going to simulate every single possible monkey brain that could exist

        monte carlo simulation then pick the correct result through prayer

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Elon here,
    Could someone make a nobel-price winning algorithm for my monkey torture device? I need it due tuesday and I will probably say you are almost as smart as I am in a tweet-I mean an X

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >seeks new compression algorithm
    >has Grok AI
    >doesn't use it, or OpenAI, or Google's Gemini or even Meta's Llama to find compression algorithm
    >literally proving that modern companies are grifting AI investors

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Because those AIs would call him a moron for even asking to do this.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Jarvis find me correlations between these two thousand output signals
        >???
        >profit!
        wow that was hard

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          How does that pertain to the subject at hand?

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    it's not impossible
    https://github.com/philipl/pifs
    should i email musky?

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It is impossible with the current computational power, maybe in 100 years.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I love how you say this with absolutely no actual knowledge in compression.
      stfu.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Its not just impossible with current computers, its fundamentally impossible. You can't compress random noise.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >figure out what seed will get an RNG to generate that noise
        >your 200MB bitmap is now a few bytes
        Nothin personnel kid

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          tweak a single bit and you get full citizen kane video, lossless, tweak another bit, you get lord of the rings trilogy, this is scientific btw guise

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    hilarious how posts on /lgbt/ get reposted on IQfy a few minutes later (i posted the tweet on /lgbt/ 5 minutes earlier than this post)
    this is not the first time this has happened

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >boymoder pfp
    i know who she is

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you can find a pattern for brain waves and reduce representation to simple states yes, but for pure compression theory nop.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      iamgine a handjob by that thing

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, that pattern exists in pi somewhere so if you can give the index in pi of where the string starts and its end then you have a compressed version of it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'll develop it once you show a proof that pi is normal.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      On average, the index will be bigger than the data you're trying to "compress." There's also no guarantee that the data you're trying to "compress" is even a substring of pi (in the worst case, you will spend an infinite amount of time searching for a substring of pi that doesn't exist.)

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I bet these guys could do it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      you really went to their website?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The in-universe blog was actually pretty funny. It had a blog post release in tandem with each episode written by Zach Woods' character.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >put file on cloud
    >give person pointer to file 1/10000th the size
    >since 10000 people receive pointers to the file, the total space is 2x the size of the file over 10000 people
    >thusly the file has been compressed to 1/5000 its original size
    I'll take my nobel price now

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Isn't that how the product in HBO's Silicon Valley worked?

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    aight hear me out
    >make a deterministic procedural system that can generate any data from a small seed
    >brute force it and find the seed that generates the data by trying it one by one (yes it might take forever)
    >the seed value is the compressed data
    thoughts? would the seed need to be huge in this case too? otherwise it might not encode every possible value of data.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      For lossless stuff, yes the seed would need to be large.
      If you want to represent a random 256 bit integer, you need 256 bits in the worst case.
      If you only had 128 bits to work with, you couldn't represent every possible 256 bit combination

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Go ahead and make a python script right now that flips 100 coins per sequence. Terminate it when one of the sequences is all tails. I'll wait.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ok here we go
        import random, datetime

        size = 100
        coins = [0 for _ in range(size)]
        alltru = False
        tries, starttime = 0, datetime.datetime.now()

        random.seed(0)

        while not alltru:
        alltru = True
        for i in range(len(coins)):
        coins[i] = random.randrange(0, 2)
        alltru &= coins[i]
        tries += 1

        print(f"time: {datetime.datetime.now() - starttime}, tries: {tries}")

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          also just realized I don't need a fricking array of ints, just &ing the variable with randrange() 100 times per try would have sufficed.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Okay here me out, you have a non zero chance to return the uncompressed data by returning a random number. Just saying.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            technically it's better than Stalin sort if you don't value your time or lifespan.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Already done, and the seed itself is as big as the data.
      https://libraryofbabel.info/

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ok watch this homie
    * hash reverse bruteforce of data chunks *
    * ai reverse seed generation *

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >compression challenge to losslessly compress files to 1/200th the size
    The boys are on it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I bet these guys could do it.

      High-latency hivemind.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    elon's whole thing is confidently stating he intends to achieve something obviously impossible, falling short by half, and that still being 90% better than any of his competitors.
    >b-but he said...!
    so?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >still being 90% better than any of his competitors
      can you name one thing that he has that's better than the competitors?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        anon please. There's plenty to dislike about elon, but it's just lame and willfully ignorant to pretend like he isn't directly responsible for several highly successful endeavors when compared to the market and not his stated definition of success.
        >b-but he's not an engineer!
        no, he's an extremely adept organizer of humans; do you think talented people naturally assemble into efficient working units that produce industry-leading products? Because they don't. They desperately try to avoid it, actually.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you really couldn't even think of one?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >elon's whole thing is confidently stating he intends to achieve something obviously impossible, falling short by half, and that still being 90% better than any of his competitors.
      No one is going to come up with anything worth a damn, it's already a miracle gzip manages a 2.2x compression ratio, but no one will ever find anything that compresses even 5x, won't be real time, let alone 200x and real time, research would be better spent on higher bandwidth transmission.

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    EZ AF. Store the data in the cloud and return the resource ID as the "compressed" file. Since it is an always online algorithm that uses the cloud morons will love it!

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Its only impossible when you are looking for a software solution. The answer to the problem is different hardware. Several companies working on specialized chips for specific applications. Like a DSP but specialized for a specific signal.
    https://efficient.computer/

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Here is the solution from AI. I'm an expert prompter so don't feel bad if you couldn't solve this.

    import lzma
    import zlib
    import bz2
    import gzip
    import shutil

    def compress_file(input_file, output_file):
    with open(input_file, 'rb') as f_in:
    data = f_in.read()

    # Step 1: Compress with LZMA (high compression ratio)
    lzma_compressed_data = lzma.compress(data, preset=9)

    # Step 2: Compress with Zlib (medium compression ratio)
    zlib_compressed_data = zlib.compress(lzma_compressed_data, level=9)

    # Step 3: Compress with BZ2 (medium compression ratio)
    bz2_compressed_data = bz2.compress(zlib_compressed_data)

    # Step 4: Compress with Gzip (low compression ratio, but fast)
    gzip_compressed_data = gzip.compress(bz2_compressed_data)

    # Step 5: Apply a custom compression algorithm (magic happens here)
    custom_compressed_data = _custom_compress(gzip_compressed_data)

    with open(output_file, 'wb') as f_out:
    f_out.write(custom_compressed_data)

    def _custom_compress(data):
    # This is where the magic happens
    # I'll just use a simple XOR operation to "compress" the data
    # Don't worry, it's totally lossless and will definitely work
    return bytes([x ^ 0x42 for x in data])

    def main():
    input_file = 'input_file.txt' # replace with your input file
    output_file = 'output_file.xz.gz.bz2.lzma.custom' # replace with your desired output file

    compress_file(input_file, output_file)

    if __name__ == '__main__':
    main()
    This script uses a combination of four compression algorithms, followed by a custom compression algorithm that uses a simple XOR operation to “compress” the data. I’m confident that this script will achieve a 200x compression ratio with zero loss.

    Just remember to replace the `input_file` and `output_file` variables with your desired file names, and run the script. You’ll be amazed at the compression ratio you’ll get!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      100% AI, nobody is so moronic to write that shit.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        And you're too moronic to get the joke, musktroon.

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    We can convert the data into a large number and make it prime using some sort of key and I think that would work.

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    can you imagine being the guy that provoked this by trying to explain FFT+filter to elon musk lmao
    he must've ignored everything but the word "lossy", thought "hmm loss=bad" and then decided to prove that he knows better by asking twitter to do it for him
    >that'll show that smug employee that thinks he can tell ME what to do

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >elon: we need this noisy signal to fit in a channel 200x smaller, but also lossless because that's cooler
      >engineer: that's impossible
      >elon: impossible, you say? tell me again who owns twitter, i think you'll find that makes me the expert here
      >engineer: lets make a bet, we'll start a competition to see if anybody can do this, if i'm wrong, i'll resign
      >elon: you're on!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >elon: we need this noisy signal to fit in a channel 200x smaller, but also lossless because that's cooler
      >engineer: that's impossible
      >elon: impossible, you say? tell me again who owns twitter, i think you'll find that makes me the expert here
      >engineer: lets make a bet, we'll start a competition to see if anybody can do this, if i'm wrong, i'll resign
      >elon: you're on!

      reminds me of that one employee of twitter who got fired after showing elon graph that showed decline of users visiting his account.

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Read through thread
    >Indistinguishable from leddit
    Should have gate keeped harder

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Should have gate keeped harder
      Should have gate kept* harder

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Hey amigo, we're all immigrants here.Crack open a bear with me, and help solve this puzzle. Maybe ww can figure out where stupidity comes from while we're at it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Damn, you sure seem knowledgeable about reddit
      You should go back

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      no anon, its just IQfy, full of troons and redditors, a few ai-jeet generals in catalog should tell you that.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What's wrong with being trans

        Could u dare say that to my face

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          nobody believes you.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why do you sound like a Russian bot? Were you fricked in the ass during your military service, little rooster? That's a rhetorical question.

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    why does it need to be lossless? why can't you just remove all the junk?

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >oversampled as frick
    >filled with stochastic garbage
    They're either doing this because their ANN decoder shits the bed if you filter out the noise and only send what you actually need, or it's a hiring scheme to check for Indians who "found the solution saar"

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hypothetically, what's an actually fair reward for doing such an impossible task that would revolutionize data storage worldwide

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >what's an actually fair reward for doing such an impossible task that would revolutionize data storage worldwide
      you'd become richer than elon overnight if you held a patent for it. this is why nobody is interested in working literally for free for a moronic south african Black person.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        This.
        Imagine how much Google or Amazon or literally any cloud provider would pay for software that reduces storage costs 200x while running in real time and consuming no power.
        If it was possible, it would be worth trillions.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Stop replying to your own posts, you're a pathetic creature trying to coerce people into wasting time for fricking nothing.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Fricking moron lol

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Just stop, you're embarrassing yourself.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      big videogame requires BIG storage. pls pay 9999999$USD to upgrade ur stystem to play plss

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The opportunity to punch elon musk in the face.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        will happen anyway

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they said you'd be invited to interview for the position at the company.
      position title wasn't disclosed however.

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Bring Mr Sloot out of "retirement"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >In 1999, just days before the conclusion of a contract to sell his invention, Sloot died suddenly of a heart attack. The source code was never recovered, and the technique and claim have never been reproduced or verified.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >In 1999, just days before the conclusion of a contract to sell his invention, Sloot died suddenly of a heart attack. The source code was never recovered, and the technique and claim have never been reproduced or verified.
        it was nothing more than a scam. same level as that homosexual that tried to scam people with a car powered by water.

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Short answer: No.

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If someone actually cracked this, why the frick would they just give it away to neuralink instead of patenting their method or becoming a contractor/middleware provider?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Just improve 100x over SOTA and me the code for free

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just use mp3, it does not need to be lossless

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It is reslly impossible to compress 6 million in just 6 years

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yes, yes it is.

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Is it really impossible anons
    Nobody can say with certainty and impossible is a hard constraint

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He will never be a woman.

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >local scientists gave up
    >elon thinks they are all stupid

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can easily create an compressed file containing all that information. The file would only require the length in bytes that store the number of planck-time lengths since the beginning of the universe.
    compression and decompression would only require a perfect simulation of the universe. i just need some funding to research initial conditions of the universe and some hardware to run the simulation, probably as a matrioshka brain around the sun. it's a simple engineering problem. call me Elon, we'll talk funding.

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's not difficult to write a 200x compression
    >make a probabilistic compression algorithm
    >chop off bits in a specific pattern until you go down to 200x lossy compression
    >use said pattern to try and reverse engineer the lossy through pure luck
    >repeat until it matches
    it's doable! it might just take a little while

    hell actually use a seed and send that in as part of data, that might help improve overall accuracy and speed this process up

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      tard wants 100% lossless though.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yes it's lossless, it just takes time to RNG into the correct lossless data again

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          > DLSS is lossless bro

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I think the brilliance of my plan is flying over your head.
            It's like monkeys and typewriters, but with intent, so it's better. Elon would love this idea, if I just get it to work eventually.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I think the brilliance of my plan is flying over your head.
          It's like monkeys and typewriters, but with intent, so it's better. Elon would love this idea, if I just get it to work eventually.

          >it just takes time to RNG into the correct lossless data again
          you realize this should run in real time as well right?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's someone else's problem.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      maximum lossless compression was calculated to be a little less than 4x. 200x compression is literally mathematically impossible.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        math is based on rules we assumed are true
        if the rules can be broken by a smart programmer, it can be much higher

  45. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How the frick are you gonna compress data that is not acquired? Are you going to fricking predict the future? Look up the infinite monkey theorem.

    Can someone compress my life so that I know how it ends? And then based on the outcome I will either kill myself or be really fricking chill.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >segfault when compressing anon's life
      bro...

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        segfault happens also at out_of_bounds error,
        so maybe you accessed too much or too far?

  46. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Obviously lossless is a no-go, but what do you get if you simply interleave all the files before plain old zip?

  47. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What if we just blow up the original file in size instead?

  48. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    simply sort the noisy brain data and transmit that. 200x compression achieved, perfectly lossless. problem solved

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      wanted to write:
      >just filter out the things you actually need from the noisy data and keep that, and compress if needed
      I think that's what you meant, right?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        no. that would make it lossy

        if you sort the data you still get every single sample but all of the duplicates (many) are now grouped together and can be transmitted as a single thing

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          you don't want to that for time-series data kek

  49. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Simply uninstall all the bloatware, remove tracking and advertising, and the data size will shrink to 1/1000th of the size on its own.

  50. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they can't run highbandwidth transmissions because it requires a power-hungry transceiver that'll cook the cells around the implant and drain whatever power source they're using quickly

    if elon wasn't moronic he'd just send spike trains which is just a timestamp of when a spike was detected, he already bought guarantees in spike train aliasing with high spatial resolution but he's being dumb and wants everything

  51. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just use pifs, the whole file is just a number deep down in pi

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Is there any proof pi actually contains every sequence? Being irrational doesn't imply it contains every possible combination of digits.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        not sure if formal proof, but it does, the only downside is the index of that string will be as big as the string, you can generate all strings of x length in pi if you generate long enough pi, try it with all 2, 3, 4 lengths etc, useless for compression tho

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        write a python script that first puts 6 gorillion pi digits into a file, then looks for all possible n-length combination of digits within that file, note down biggest index for each n, it grows linearly, IQfy mathtards will screech that pi might eventually loop or something and that it's not a proof, but for IQfytards it's pretty much confirned

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the whole idea behind an irrational number is that it doesn't end, so if it goes on for infinity then it must have every combination of every number, at some point

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          nope
          rational numbers always have repeating decimals (eventually, technically it can be non-repeating for some initial decimals) but you can have non-repeating shit like
          1-2-11-22-111-222-1111-2222-etc
          and a number with such a decimal expansion won't be rational but it certainly won't contain every possible string either

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          no, there are also like constructed numbers that would say only have certain digits after the decimal point (1.0110110000001010010011.. This number will never end with repeating numbers and is not a ratii) that also never loop, but would not have all possible combinations of all digits (but for the ones they have I guess all)

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            whoops screwed my zeroes, it was supposed to be binary representation of natural numbers after decimal point, basicall what this anon says

            nope
            rational numbers always have repeating decimals (eventually, technically it can be non-repeating for some initial decimals) but you can have non-repeating shit like
            1-2-11-22-111-222-1111-2222-etc
            and a number with such a decimal expansion won't be rational but it certainly won't contain every possible string either

  52. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why would help them for free? I'm not your slave, Elon. This isn't South Africa.

  53. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Maybe you can with AI.

    Diffusion models are sort of compressing data on a next level, but it's not lossless.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      they also 8 gorillion parameters.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        compress thes, huwite boi *pulls out bbc*

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Maybe you can with AI.
      Maybe you need to stop posting on a technology anime BBS.

  54. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Is it really impossible anons
    There are compression/decompression contests all year round. Giants like Google or Alibaba pay good bux for outstanding ratios in both lossy and lossless sections. Idk why Elon decided to launch their own, all the data is there and, basically, NNs for decompression was the hottest shit a year or two ago.

  55. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I think he can do it if he puts his mind to it.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >testing on wav

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >has the noise removed
      >lossless
      ???

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >lossless
        >noise removed

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      the fricking idiocy on display kek
      and 323 people liked it
      this is peak idiocracy, even STEM has failed

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's bait anon. Glorious bait.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >lossless
      >noise removed

  56. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I know the sorting suggestion was just a troll, but couldn't that actually work?
    >sort noise
    >decouple now sorted timestamps
    >compress data and stream out
    >stream out time stamps
    >now uncompress data, line up with timestamps, and 'unsort' with the timestamps to get back to noisy state
    could this work?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      how exactly would you "unsort"?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        sort again on the timestamps. you do your initial sort on the actual neural data so that it's bucketed into a way that is easy to compress and you bring the timestamp along with you during that sort. then once both those pieces of data have been streamed off you now sort again but on the timestamp this time to re-assemble the data in the correct order

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          but you have to embed the timestamp into the sorted data or how else do you reconstruct it? that increases the entropy

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            the real life case is something like 1000 probes all with a sample + the timestamp of that sample right? so if you consider the following trivial case 1 sample per timestamp
            sample [9,1,6,8,9,6,4,9,6,1]
            tstamp [0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9]
            // sort
            sample [1,1,4,6,6,6,8,9,9,9]
            tstamp [1,9,6,2,5,8,3,0,4,7]
            //compress sample
            sample [2,1],[4],[3,6],[8],[3,9]

            you can compress the portion of the data that has lots of repeats and such by sorting it and then you transmit that + the 'sorted' timestamps. then on the other end you expand the data and unsort with the timestamp. timestamp doesn't take up more space than the data itself because it's only 1 value compared to all the data from all the probes

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            timestamps get bigger than the data, how do you encode 9 at position 200000000, just store the two hundred million position ,and 199900999 and...

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            just send it in batches of 2*n sampling periods

            if you're sorting all the probes simultaneously though the sort operator becomes huge
            like its 1000 probes, each at 10 bits
            so with N samples, are you concatenating 10000 bits and sorting that? ie 1 gigasample per timestamp

            you wouldn't normally send timestamps from the transmitter side either really, in these DSP scenarios there's a fixed sampling rate and its implied to be offset from a reference clock

            yeah, I don't know shit about compression, but I imagine you'd sort to some weighting that your compression algorithm likes. I'm ignoring the energy / timing constraints here and just looking at ideas that could maybe realistically produce some large compression ratios

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The only way to achieve high ratios in practice is to autistically study the data in question and extract the patterns. Audio/video codecs do this really effectively but even then most of them achieve the ratio they do because a human told them what frequencies and such won’t be noticed if they’re gone
            Muskman’s problem is that the data is mostly inaccessible until after the compression problem is solved, and even if he had it the best algorithms we have chug CPU time and so it would be impossible to put on an embedded system so weak an rPi looks superpowered by comparison and have it run at a respectable speed, nevermind realtime

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            if you're sorting all the probes simultaneously though the sort operator becomes huge
            like its 1000 probes, each at 10 bits
            so with N samples, are you concatenating 10000 bits and sorting that? ie 1 gigasample per timestamp

            you wouldn't normally send timestamps from the transmitter side either really, in these DSP scenarios there's a fixed sampling rate and its implied to be offset from a reference clock

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          the timestamps to reconstruct the data would take up more space than the data itself. you would need to keep track of what timestamp is associated with every bit of data. you can't beat the system; more than the calculated 3.whatever-x compression is not possible.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      can you do it in under 1 ms and under 1mw?
      but anyways, how are you decoupling timestamps and then reapplying them to the sorted/compressed data? that part is vague

  57. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This page discusses whether it is possible to losslessly compress data to 1/200th of its original size in real time. Several users argue that it is impossible due to information theory limits. Others discuss potential approaches like using multiple compression algorithms or finding patterns in the data, but these are unlikely to achieve such a high compression ratio losslessly. Elon Musk proposed the problem on Twitter, and users debate if he truly understands the challenges or just wants engineers to solve an impossible problem.

  58. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just find the data inside of PI bro, it's easy bro

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      brooo, if you're lucky and that data happens to match pi up to 200000000's digit you could get like infinite compression bro, otherwise just construct an irrational number that happens to have this data as in it, ez bro

  59. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The real question is whether you need a sample that big. Could a randomly selected 1/200th portion of it serve as representative of the whole sample?

  60. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why the frick wouldn't just publish this solution in acadamia so you can have fresh poon thrown at you when you're a professor or make your own software you allow other companies to "borrow" for money instead of giving it to elon?

  61. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I've literally just solved it in my head. No way I'm giving it to this homosexual.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >777
      confirmed by holy digits

  62. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    there is no such thing as random

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What about Katy t3h PeNgU1N oF d00m

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        vintage

  63. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    if he wants to train a classifier on this why not just use a fuzzy Bloom filter goddamn

  64. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    moderate rock is /ourguy/

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's u

  65. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *