Is monogamy inherently Socialist

In the sexual market males with more social worth (looks, skills, networking) are inherently better than masses of beta npcs. With the fall of Socialism monogamy declined and fell, female empowerment meant they have no reason to put up with average Joe anymore.

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

CRIME Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Monogamy is the basis of civilization, virtually all societies in civilized history were monogamous, it's not specifically linked to an ideology

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      What about Muslims, Mormons, and West Africans? These people extensively practiced polygamy and they're still around.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        He said "civilized".

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Just because polygamy is allowed in Islam doesn't mean Muslims are polygamous. 99% of Muslim marriages are monogamous. Same for Mormons, it's technically legal but few people actually do it.
        >West Africans
        I said "civilized"

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        “Around” doesn’t mean much.

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Is monogamy inherently Socialist
    I would like to enquire which system of relationships is inherently conservative, liberal and ancap respectively.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Conservative
      Harem
      >Liberal
      International sex turism
      >Ancap
      Child rape

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >ancap
      Rape

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    you b***h about le alpha, but go look at IQfy rn. its the most schizo and mentally ill board on this website, /x/ and IQfy don't remotely approach the level of mental illness. they aren't happy either. perhaps you should reconsider your priorities.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That's because half of IQfy is full of twinks who never did sports in high school and then demoralise themselves after not seeing gains only a year after lifting (mostly staring at their phone, but at the gym) in their mid 20s.

      I can assure you most people who are actually IQfy are very happy.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Theres been like 5 mainstay threads all day, 2 gays pretending to fugg, 2 women posting nudes for attention, and one completely insane man having a total mental breakdown, and everyone is feeding into it.
        the rest has just been blogposts about wanting to rope.
        first time on their but far as im concerned its /lgbt/ tier.

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    yet another example of socialism being an utterly worthless word
    egalitarian may be a better alternative to describe that

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Should similar words like "liberal" be discarded as well? I feel like "liberal" has it even worse sometimes.

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >fall of Socialism[...] female empowerment
    What?

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The sexual revolution was good for men, not for women.

    The next thing we should demand is to do away with the outdated notion of child support to unmarried women. We should be able to impregnate them instead of just fricking them with layers of rubber protection.

    Single mothers will breed athletes and our society will become beautiful even the lower classes, while the upper classes stay much the same as it was before with only the top tier of women enjoying the priviledge of a luxurious married life. The burden of this Eugenics programme should be carried entirely by titlet lower class women who were dumb enough to ask, nay, even demand it.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The sexual revolution was good for a few men.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        It was good for all men, all men have a the ability to get fit. Most choose not to and those betas deserve to suffer.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Getting fit won't fix your face or height: immutable characteristics women care about the most.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Getting fit won't fix your face or height: immutable characteristics women care about the most.
            Yes, but ugly men shouldn't be allowed to breed to begin with. They weren't allowed before either.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >They weren't allowed before either.
            Literally never happened anywhere in history.
            You're going to breed with ugly men, femcel.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Literally never happened anywhere in history.
            Greeks sacrifices ugly people just because they were ugly.

            Only 20% of men who lived in history eventually bred. Dysgenic people should never be allowed to breed.
            >You're going to breed with ugly men, femcel.
            No, I'm going to breed your crush, your sister and your mother. You can be the caretaker after I'm done.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Greeks sacrifices ugly people just because they were ugly.
            Never happened. Spartans would discard physically deformed babies but Greeks didn't kill ugly people.
            >Only 20% of men who lived in history eventually bred.
            Nope, incel talking point that never happened. Human males and females have reproduction ratios near parity.
            https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2833377/
            >Dysgenic people should never be allowed to breed
            Which is precisely why low IQs like you won't be allowed to breed in our modern era of science.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Cope

            >In Athens, for example, a man and a woman who were considered ugly were selected as scapegoats each year. At the festival of the Thargelia in May or June, they were feasted, led round the town, beaten with green twigs, and driven out or killed with stones.

            https://twitter.com/cracked/status/1050587863568416768

            >Nope, incel talking point that never happened. Human males and females have reproduction ratios near parity.
            Nah, you're the incel here trying to cope about the fact that society isn't allowing you to breed. Whatever the cutoff percentage is you didn't make it.

            >Which is precisely why low IQs like you won't be allowed to breed in our modern era of science.
            Tall people also have higher IQs. You are just a coping "smart but lazy" redditor. You're not smart, you're dumb (and lazy, you got that part right).

            https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Height_and_intelligence
            >Across studies, the correlation coefficient of height and intelligence was generally found to be around 0.2, indicating a positive association between height and intelligence

            Ugly people have ugly minds. Tall, attractive people are also the most intelligent. Dysgenic people should not be allowed to breed and both the sexual revolution and the troony stuff is a gift that will remove all the weak, ugly and dysgenic people from our population. The next generation will be so beautiful. The greatest Eugenics programme in human history, all self imposed.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Extremely delusional post. A ritual where in one city state they once a year beat ugly people doesn't imply that "ugly people used to not be allowed to breed".
            Tall people are inefficient and obsolete. A correlation coefficient of .2 is nothing, especially when we can isolate the variables that actually correlate with intelligence (height isnt one of them). Tall men aren't even going to exist in a few years. They're going to be genetically engineered out of the genepool directly. No reason to waste resources on large people going forward in this era of science.
            Cope more buddy.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            How much onions did you need to suck from your reddit friend's wiener to type out such a pathetic limp wristed post?

            No, genetic engineering is not gonna make everyone ugly like you, it's gonna make people beautiful like us. People will choose beauty every time. Women will only choose beauty to carry in their wombs because the real waste of resources is the existence of manlets, minorities and other low IQ unsightly people in our society. As for the objectively true facts we posted they are just that: objective facts, you have nothing but feelings to offer and feelings about the facts we posted. We are as uninterested in your feelings as women are in you.

            And finally, let me make one thing abundantly clear to you incels: you can try to whine, blame and hate women all you want for not giving you sex, but this is a cope. Women aren't the ones denying you sex. WE are. Women barely have any agency, they just do what Chads command. And we are the ones that don't want you uglycels to breed. We are the ones stopping you from raping, not the cope that your "self-restraint" is, you are just a beta too weak to face strong, intelligent men with power and money. You may take care of our seed that we put into the lesser women. Just don't feed them onions or teach them your beta ways. This is the only sex you are allowed to have, the non-reproductive kind on used up ugly wombs who aren't in the top 5% to be our first wives.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >No, genetic engineering is not gonna make everyone ugly
            Never said anything about being ugly. Just short, as short people are healthier, live longer, and need less food. Tall people are inferior. You're not in the field so you don't know what we're working on.
            >the real waste of resources is the existence of manlets, minorities and other low IQ unsightly people in our society
            Both non-white men and short men have greater reproductive success than tall white men lol. A short
            >As for the objectively true facts we posted they are just that: objective facts, you have nothing but feelings to offer and feelings about the facts we posted
            Who's "we" schizo? And no you didn't, there's no correlation coefficient above a .9 or even a .5. There's a stronger correlation between nutrition and iq than hgh. You don't know how regression works. Meanwhile you outright denied the recombination rates which show near parity. You probably can't even read the math in that paper lol.
            Ironically the societies that have more females breeding than males are African ones, not European or Asian.
            It's obvious you're a woman pretending to be a man btw.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Tall people are inferior.
            Tall people are CEOs, lawyers, doctors
            hedge fund managers, top engineers (PhDs, not B average Bachelor grads) etc.

            They are superior by every metric. Every study has concluded this.
            > You're not in the field so you don't know what we're working on.
            Neither are you LARPing redditor incel.
            >Both non-white men and short men have greater reproductive success than tall white men lol. A short
            Wrong, the least fertile people on Earth are ultra short East Asians.

            >Who's "we" schizo? And no you didn't, there's no correlation coefficient above a .9 or even a .5. There's a stronger correlation between nutrition and iq than hgh. You don't know how regression works. Meanwhile you outright denied the recombination rates which show near parity.
            Dribble, you have posted no new facts.
            >You probably can't even read the math in that paper lol.
            Statistics is not real math, you would know this if you knew anything about math or statistics.
            >Ironically the societies that have more females breeding than males are African ones, not European or Asian.
            Short Africans are less fertile than taller Africans. Also Africans in Western actually have some of the lowest TFRs.
            >It's obvious you're a woman pretending to be a man btw.
            Lmao, the last cope of a bitter incel.

            Nope, imagine the guy who bullied you in school. It's me, I'm still bullying you and I also cream pie'd your crush last night. Keep the image of your bully fricking your crush's pussy raw and filling semen so deep into her soft veganal canal that's it's still leaking out while impotently try to make small talk with her.

            Get it into your tiny fricking malformed skull and let it stick there for the rest of your miserable depressed life: you were not worthy of breeding. Evolution has rejected you. All your little rat schemes and copes are irrelevant. We will never give you access to pussy, you don't deserve it.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            More sad cope. Couldn't even let the thread die.
            Keep pretending to get pussy and crying about about incels while not being able to do math bro.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Wrong, the least fertile people on Earth are ultra short East Asians
            brootal but true. Asian women willingly spread their legs for their white masters. The only thing stopping all out bleaching of ethnic women is the white man's innate disgust to ethnic women

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That, and the rediculous notion of child alimony. China is already importing white semen at a super expensive rare. SEA is already about half bleached. Once we do away with this archaic law an entire generation of kids will be paternally half white.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Its just timeless traditional values, not socialism which is an ideology, and such ideologies always push sexual degeneracy.

      Divorce and depression rates through the roof. Its a life like that of beasts. Its a societal hazard.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >The sexual revolution was good for top men, not for women.
      you had essentially top men on top, then women in the middle and rest men on the bottom

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >That image
    The mouth-breather spelt invisible as "invincible" not once, but twice.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      He didn't spell it wrong, those are wizards, they cannot be defeated.

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Redistribution isn’t “socialist”.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Many socialists were against traditional family structures.
    Charles Fourier, for example was a socialist and he advocated for polygamy.
    Not saying all socialist are against monogamy, but technically if you take "communal ownership" a step further then you could argue that monogamy also would go away.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      monogamy is socialism because monogamy artificially gives each man a wife

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        you can say that monogamy is more akin to feudalism and it make more sense

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Marx said that if people accuse him of being anti-family then he's guilty as charged.

      monogamy is socialism because monogamy artificially gives each man a wife

      You can look at any element of society, biology, or indeed the metaphysics of the universe, and claim that if it doesn't have an emergent hierarchy then it is "socialist". Not a very useful exercise.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Marx said that if people accuse him of being anti-family then he's guilty as charged.
        Anti-family does not mean anti-monogamy. Friedrich Engels was anti-family, but believed monogamy was good. He thought dismantling the family would allow couples to pursue "true" romantic relationships.
        bunch of nonsense, but that's what he thought

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No because it’s conducted through merit.

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Women want hot men!
    As if beta chodes don't want a stacy, this chart is moronic. You gonna tell me that water is wet, too?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      The point is that women actually attain that because rape is illegal and men have to settle for beasts just to pound some tuna

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Women will end up with hideous men all the time, moron. They just wont frick you because you are a walking, talking advertisement for an ugly abusive partner.

        also most incels self sabotage all the time. They will talk to a cute girl but then they will say some autistic shit like crying about how rape and beating your spouse is illegal.

        Women have base standards and if no man meets them then most women will be perfectly content being alone

  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    The government owes me a gf with her attractiveness based on how much taxes I pay

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This only their attractiveness is actually based on how much gum I can fit in my mouth at one time.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Whoever made this image hasn't actually spoken to many women.

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    It's always funny seeing incense try and make this argument about "Alphas" stealing all the traitorous harlots because even a cursory glance at history would show it isn't true. You know what time had the most Polygamy and most seething incels? It's not the fricking modern day I'll tell you. It's the beginning of the Bronze Age. You're "Le heckin trad lifestyle" was so bad it created a Y-chromosome bottleneck in the human gene pool. Humans are naturally monogamous and always trend towards it. Polygamy happens in deeply uneven societies where the ruling class has such a monopolization on resources that the common man cannot support a family (or is outright enslaved and thus prohibited from doing such) while the women are subsequently enslaved and forced into harems. Look at every polygamist society on the planet, in each case the women have no choice in marriage partner, and are often literally enslaved concubines.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Well most of history didn't have sexual liberation either
      >inb4 sparse tidbits

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *