It's over...

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i've been neet since 2010, it's been over for a while

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i'm slowly staring to believe being a NEET is the right thing to do.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        jobless people dont pay taxes, that means no NEET bux.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          checked.
          You're halfway there. Keep going! You're almost at the conclusion, I can feel it. Yes, yes anon, it's true, we are almost there. I didn't believe it either, but there we go

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I mean, the middle ground is having some cozy business you work on 2-4days per week to stay sane. I fix delicate things for a living, started with random furniture and eventually became statues and other antiques, so I either go to a house for 4-8 hours or go pick things up and work on them at home.
        >Never dealing with the same group of people every day
        >Never in the same place
        >Rich clients can handle being charged well for my time
        >Results of work are satisfying
        The catch is you'll never be super wealthy doing what I do, but I get by and have had enough to have a home and support my family.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Where's sadam husein in your graphic?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            out of frame, taking a big fat dictator shit

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Too bad I can't be a neet in my 3rd world shithole, you either wage or starve to death.
      neetKANGZ don't go without me...

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        don't worry bro, we made you an honorary neet a while ago

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      i've been neet since birth

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Damn, do you even know basic calculus?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          which is basic calculus? I had to take calculus up to calc II for "science majors" but I know they had calculus for "business majors" and just "calculus" as well.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >neet since birth
            >I had to take calculus up to calc II for "science majors"

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      cute

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >sent to forced labor to buy new GPUs for the AI in your basement that spend all its resources analyzing anime and video games

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      good on you!

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        thanks, i try my worst

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I wish I could NEET again and not contribute to this gay society but my parents wouldn't let me and I don't even know if I'd qualify for bux.
      >t. have $75k per year job but feel like I'm wasting a large amount of time with it when I want to do other stuff

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        then focus on investing and saving every $ and retire early otherwise you'll be stuck in the wage loop
        >wagecuck
        >come home (or finish wfh-ing)
        >too tired to do anything
        >too little time left
        >waste it on stupid shit
        >sleep
        >repeat until 50 years have passed

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How? Do you at least do something like sports, or have friends or something? I lost my (shit, non-IT) job in november and I feel like I'm going crazy and losing iq rapidly despite running regularly and learning nihongo.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        extroverts will never know true happiness. their brains always force them to seek some sort of useless gratification.

        take the introvert pill.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >life gets worse after losing dead end mcjob
        Wagie really do need his cagie

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      anyanyanything

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Same.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Yeah, it’s the reason I have 0 interest in getting a tech job anymore.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      why are codemonkeys literally programming their own replacements

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because they figure if they don't do it someone else will so might as well get that money while they can and deal with the consequences later.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        AI is growing more advanced by the day

        2 more weeks

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >2-2 more wee- ACK!

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Anybody got the non censored version of this?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why do you want the uncensored version? Do you want to shame people over having said incorrect things on the internet years ago?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yes. Why would you protect the identity of morons?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Because it discourages open and honest discussion. Attitudes like that is why internet communities changed into virtue signaling shitholes.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Do you even remotely have an idea how many tools and automation was already created over decades to reduce the workload?
        AI is a tool like the others. The assumption that the people who cant write a simple program today will just start prompting entire complex programs without issues approximates zero.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          A lot of people have been misled by articles about how they asked ChatGPT to make pacman or whatever and it worked
          In practice you get a program that probably outright steals 80% of its code verbatim from frick knows where under who knows what license, and it usually doesn't even work properly until you correct it a bunch (which you can only do with an understanding of how to do it yourself), and that's just for something trivial

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Only anon in this thread that’s bothered trying
            Everyone in my org that’s played around with GitHub Copilot has abandoned it within a week, it was unironically faster to just write the damn code rather than trying to prompt engineer their way to something even close to usable

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            chatgpt is outdated as frick lmao, have you even used claude opus or any of the better models?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Why do soldiers perpetuate the wars that get them killed?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Because we're not selfish fricking losers who would rather sit on a fat kushy stack and artificially stagnate technological progression as humanity kills itself off.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      losers look for any reason to quit

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >A report by Beautiful.ai, which makes AI-powered presentation software
      Oh wow. a company that does AI products produces a survey that makes AI look good. I'm sure this is totally not biased.
      https://www.techspot.com/news/102385-survey-reveals-almost-half-all-managers-aim-replace.html
      https://archive.is/Hvwqt

      The survey also doesn't specify the type of employees being replaces so if you asked a call center manager "Will AI tools replace employees?" they will most likely say "yes".
      https://www.beautiful.ai/blog/2024-ai-workplace-impact-report
      https://archive.is/3QCw1
      What a dogshit thread, into the trash it goes.

      >I-I didn't want a tech job anyways!
      Cope.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >A report by Beautiful.ai, which makes AI-powered presentation software
      Oh wow. a company that does AI products produces a survey that makes AI look good. I'm sure this is totally not biased.
      https://www.techspot.com/news/102385-survey-reveals-almost-half-all-managers-aim-replace.html
      https://archive.is/Hvwqt

      The survey also doesn't specify the type of employees being replaces so if you asked a call center manager "Will AI tools replace employees?" they will most likely say "yes".
      https://www.beautiful.ai/blog/2024-ai-workplace-impact-report
      https://archive.is/3QCw1
      What a dogshit thread, into the trash it goes.

      >I-I didn't want a tech job anyways!
      Cope.

      Machine learning is killing my interest in tech too.
      Not even from a job perspective, just in general. It's an incredibly uninteresting and shitty direction for the tech world to head in and it's going to end in disaster. Every public figure engineer, including ones I grew up thinking were cool are devolving into unserious actors trying to sell the public on the grift that if we feed a datacenter enough porn and github code it will eventually turn into god. This is a technology that does wonders for marketing, but makes literally every other field worse.
      I was never going to have a job in tech, but now even reading about it is just boring.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        llms and a few other paradigms are the future and you're a dumb luddite

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >a few other paradigms
          you'd have named them if they actually existed dumb Black person.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        llms and a few other paradigms are the future and you're a dumb luddite

        then
        >by moving these bits x positions to the right I can get a speed improvement of 0.523%.
        now
        >I require heavy duty data centers to run bloated llms for writing code that probably won't even work.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Is this your first tech bubble? The market will eventually get oversaturated with AI startups and people start hyping the next "big thing".

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The problem with that is that there really is no "next big thing". Once it becomes clear these stupid AI startups will never have a "true AI" or even "true AGI" that's pretty much it. So they're gonna keep this going for a long time and make sure it goes out with a whimper just to squeeze what they can out of it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >there really is no "next big thing"
            There's always a "next big thing". There isn't enough venture capital for a billion generic AI startups and founders will need to come up with new things to wiggle infront of the investors to keep their attention.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          NTA but I’m an old man that entered college during the dot com bubble collapse
          That time was "man those people trying to make money off online vendors was stupid, oh well I’ll go back to playing EverQuest and chatting on AOL IM"
          This one feels likes we’re seeing an existential crisis in the tech industry itself, that this is the endpoint and it’s so utterly soulless and trash that there’s no point to use computers anymore

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    "AI" is no more of a threat to software developers than low-code platforms are.
    Sure, you can generate some basic b***h app in a jiffy, but that's nothing new.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      AI is growing more advanced by the day

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >2 more weeks

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Not going to happen.
        You still need people to vet the training data and output, as well as needing to fill in novel ideas and likely completely redo the output.
        Ultimately the very ephemeral threat of AI will be used to drive down wages and discourage unions, but it's a pretty empty threat and not useful as anything but a short stalling tactic at the bargaining table.
        You can't rely entirely on AI for the same reason you can't just copy and paste all of your code from stackoverflow.

        It will still be constrained by its nature no matter how far it advances.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Doesn’t matter how capable it is - it’s a question of accountability. When AI will cause some prod incident - it’s manager’s ass. They’d rather blame a dev for a frickup.
        For the same reason we won’t see AI in real medicine outside of research.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You could have an AI that perfectly implements exactly what users ask for and it would still be useless, because users never provide a complete specification for what they actually want. Current code generation AI is barely on par with outsourcing to India and that failed to replace senior devs who actually know what they're doing too.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >current
          well its a good thing that it grows and changes exponentially right now

          indian poo dev in 2024 means omnipotent megamind in 2026

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The problem I described (people cannot actually specify what they want in sufficient detail even if the AI is perfect at the given task) is fundamentally unsolvable
            You would just be replacing programmers with someone whose job is having a high level understanding of how to build a complex interdependent system and writing that into a spec the AI can use, at which point you still functionally have a senior developer

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            AI can understand your reasoning already with good prompts.

            the time of intelligentia jobs like devs or scientist is over. If you haven't looked for alternatives already you are fricked

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Current code generation AI is barely on par with outsourcing to India and that failed to replace senior devs who actually know what they're doing too.
          Failed in the sense of 'it caused productivity to crash and companies shot themselves in the foot by doing it', yes. But it certainly has happened and continues happening. Just because something is a bad idea doesn't mean short-sighted executives blinded by prospective cost savings won't go for it.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        if anything it's gotten worse. Looks like it just isn't cost efficient to run ChatGPT on "full power" so they give us downgraded crap instead. I paid for GPT-4 when it was first announced and I've been using it for 6 months now too and the difference is so fricking big, it's almost unusable honestly.

        I don't think running these AI systems will be possible for most use cases simply because of the power requirements to actually produce some worthwhile results. Too costly, tech just isn't there yet

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I was astounded as to how the frick they were running it cheaply for so many users and now I realize they were doing it at a loss just for publicity. Typical psyops shit, right?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yea I can understand eating up the costs to get things rolling but it's kind of funny how quickly they started to downgrade... it simply must be way too costly to do this even for a short time

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's the entire silicon valley startup business model, burn huge piles of money running at a loss and hope you get bought out by a megacorp before your VCs stop feeding the furnace.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Since software isn't capital intensive except for salaries (which isn't an issue if you're already good at programming) this as much means you don't need the company as they don't need you.

      As usual technology lifts the competent and capable up while confusing the mass of morons who try to drag us down.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >As usual technology lifts the competent and capable up while confusing the mass of morons who try to drag us down.
        The technology most directly related to interpersonal conflict is weaponry. It's also the most obvious example of how technological advancement bridges the gap between the weak and the strong in the areas it applies in.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Related: in historical settings, crossbows are typically depicted as much stronger than bows, but this is historically inaccurate. For a very long time, bows wielded by experts were still more powerful than crossbows. The crossbow was revolutionary primarily because of its ease of use; anyone could use it after basic training while proper bow use takes years of practice.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Also you can shoot a crossbow from behind cover, or while crouching, or standing in odd positions, such as on a rampart.
            I also wouldn't call the concept of the crossbow revolutionary because you can make one out of some carefully selected sticks and the odd bit of string (it's not going to have a very high draw weight but you can do it), and because they had crossbows as far back as ancient Greece (if not farther), they just got a lot more powerful once people figured out how to mass produce spring steel i.e. after the introduction of the blast furnace.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    they prefer ai over human workers since ai doesn't sass back or talk trash behind their backs.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >ai doesn't sass back or talk trash behind their backs
      >he doesn't know

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who are they going to sell their products to when everyone's unemployed and broke?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      this is what globalism is about. When local consumers have less money sell the product elsewhere. Also the whole idea of mass production started with people like henry ford who wanted workers to be interchangeable, disposable and to have no important skills. All the skills are kept in the machinery which is owned by the company. AI will hopefully clear out whole buildings of paper pushers and replace them with low wage workers who can produce the same output after a week of job specific training.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Henry Ford pleaded with his plebs to improve themselves after giving them a better life than they could ever hope for. You write like a israelite.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          8 hours should be the norm, not "giving them a better life". It is their fundamental right and freedom to work like this. Not a privilege. Also outlawed everywhere except USA at that point. You are the israelite here.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >after a week of job specific training.
        there's no such thing as training in america
        >but i'm not just talking abo--
        your opinion doesn't matter byebye

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >there's no such thing as training in america

          that's dumb, even when you work at starbucks they have to spend 15mins teaching you how to make lattes.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >a week of job specific training
        You mean after getting a master's degree for that $15/hr job, surely

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >managers are moronic
    mitochondria is the powerhouse of the cell

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wait til they discover that managers can be replaced with AI.

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Managers replace workers
    >No one to manage anymore
    >Managers get the boot

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >managers get the boot
      will never happen because managers will fight tooth and nail for their useless positions
      It total collapse of the company isn't enough to purge the bloat in most cases, AI definitely won't.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        like how wagies fight tooth and nail to their slavery?
        They open twitter, screech some bullshit about how morally wrong everything is, and then frick off to find another job because they need to eat and pay their rents in whollysome walkable cities.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's the most someone can do without actually getting fired, since in your shithole you call USA if someone ever slightly disobey managers it gets the boot, sometimes you guys can't even strike ffs.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          just imagine living in these comfy walkable neighborhoods

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >managers will fight tooth and nail for their useless positions
        nah that's the beauty of AI. if it does the job better for less then not many positions are safe. like really, longer term speaking.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Elon Musk wiped them out in Twitter, then FAANG followed suit.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          nice cope. they fired developers. 20% are developers. consulting (management) is 7%

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Who's going to boot them?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        the AI, duh.

        Managers much much more replaceable than the workers. Even with 100% robotic staff you'll still need technicians for the robots. managers are 100% replaceable with AI, and with current AI abilities it's doable today, right now this very second! It was possible to do yesterday!

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Who actually has the power to fire them? The AI isn't on the org chart yet, it can't issue the firings.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Who actually has the power to fire them?
            The people who hire them, executives and the company owners.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            But will they?
            Do they know their company well enough top to bottom to know who they can safely chop off, or do they delegate all of those decisions to middle layers?

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Why are they all black?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they're more obedient
        https://rumble.com/v3772q9-waiting-for-doggo-aka-og-ai-npc.html

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The thing these managers don't seem to realize is that once you do that.. then why do you need management?

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why can capitalism wins when millions lose and it still grows strong? Why is that legal? That's not even fair

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      It's legal because people take it up the ass without complaining, that's why.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >millions lose
      We need people to do the real important jobs that no one wants to do. Cooks, garbage pickup, cleaners, nurses, truckers, etc. The only way people do those jobs is if they need the paycheck to survive or the government forces them to. Former is capitalism, latter is communism. Either way you can't win.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Todays losers have it much better than average winner 100 years ago.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Absolutely fricking not. moronic lying homosexuals like you are why we're in this mess
        >YOUR LIFE IS BETTER BECAUSE GDP GO UP!!!!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        How about national socialismo?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's all the same shit. Well, maybe nazis have the foot further down actually crushing some people as they were killing their own population while society went to shit even harder than in other systems. (Hitler reigned for only 12 years, consider the time between 2012 and now.) Granted, they had abysmal starting conditions, but it was definitely following the 'short term gains followed by total collapse' pattern common in corporations.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Basado

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          "National socialism" is literally just capitalism. There's no difference.

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's more likely these managers will be replaced by AI than the programmers.
    How hard is it to sit at a desk and ask people how far away a feature is from being released?
    Good managers are useful people to have, shit managers could be replaced by nothing and it'd be a net gain.

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Do the managers not realize they're redundant if there is no one to manage?

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >replace everyone with AI, lower wages
    >"PROFITS ARE DOWN??? WHY IS NO ONE BUYING????"
    BWL Black folk need the rope

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If they think it's difficult to "manage" a bunch of mildly autistic employees, they're in for a surprise when they find out what it takes to manage machines which are basically hyper-autistim simulators

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You're moronic. They'll just hire one autist to manage a dozen of your hyper-autism simulators, just like they did with self-checkout

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        If you don't have money, how will you pay for rent? how will more obedient wagies be rewarded and separated from lazy, ugly neets?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          You'll get redirected to menial jobs like cook, housekeeper, plumber, waiter and live from paycheck to paycheck.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            plumbing fricking sucks, but i sure don't live paycheck to paycheck doing it in the US

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            When your neighbors are also plumbers, don't expect your rates to stay the same

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            line only goes up Anon, no exceptions in any business

  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >t. didn't try making complex programs out of GPT
    Prompting by trials and errors is still way faster than learning to code from ground-up and getting a sufficient skillset to build anything worthwhile.
    >steals 80% of its code verbatim
    Yeah it's not like you're copypasting from stack overflow amarite?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >it's not like you're copypasting from stack overflow
      Correct, I'm not Indian. Stop projecting, Sandeep.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah you sure reinvent the wheel every time you code lol

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I doubt you have a real understanding of what constitutes a complex program. The project I work on has tens of millions of lines of code. If you're the sort of person who codes by copy/pasting crap from stack overflow until it sort of works that would explain why you think that way though

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        A program is not a monolith junior, you don't shit millions of lines of code in one go. If you had a proper understanding of separation of duties you wouldn't spout that moronic nonsense. GPT is enough to build anything you want, as long as you can provide a non-moronic design.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          So you're saying as long as you understand how to architect a complex system (the part of being a senior dev that is actually hard) you can automate the easy parts? Because that doesn't mean AI can replace your job.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            It won't replace every dev but it'll downsize teams by a lot, which is the topic of OP.

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Doesn't this just mean that we don't have to care about working for big monolithic corpos anymore? If AI is really this big of a productivity boost, then won't we be seeing the rise of small independent teams again? Seems more like a reset to the 80s/90s before the big tech winners were all set in stone.
    It's just the beginning of a new cycle of innovation, isn't it? The time has never been better to break in. Having vision, a good idea, and a high quality product will never have been easier for smart people, and most of what people come up with will still be worthless diarrhea. I think now is the time to realize we never needed this big tech charlatans in the first place.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Unless the current internet architecture changes significantly, no.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Your entire argument is based on a faulty assumption, namely that market viability is determined by the quality of the product being created. Megacorps aren't dominant because their products are superior, they're dominant because they game the system to remain dominant no matter how much their products suck. People hate megacorps, but any viable competitor either gets bought out or killed through lawfare. There used to be antitrust regulations by governments to prevent or slow this, but then we legalized corruption by calling it 'lobbying'.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        That pic was trash the moment it got posdted first. Just because your search-fu sucks and you cannot keep bookmarks due to clinging on to Chrome et. al., doesn't mean the web shrinks.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It's not me, it's the average person. That image doesn't imply there are fewer websites, it shows that most of the traffic goes to the big centralized sites.

          Also, search-fu becomes increasingly less relevant as search engines continue to self-destruct. All of the search engines see things like quotes as only suggestions now. How relevant is your ability to compose relevant search queries when the engine chooses to just ignore your query and show you what it thinks most people want to see?

  18. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Customer support will go first, then HR, then management, then wages will start to go down for everyone.

  19. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hope AI kicks off so I can start a simple 1 man company service. I will be the lead dev and the ceo and the manager and HR all in one.

  20. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This is a good. Maybe finally all the codemonkeys who got into this only for the money can finally frick off and leave this to those of us who actually enjoy building stuff.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Nope, cuckernetes and HR c**ts are here to stay, as are the normaltards and their shananigums.

  21. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Accelerate.

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    AI developers should start displaying how efficient they are in decision making so they can replace all managers

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Frick working
    Frick slavery
    Frick everyone

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >be manager
    >produce zero actual value by definition
    >seek to eliminate the remaining few humans who do
    Who are these moronic managers and their robot army going to sell all of thier overpriced shit to?

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's easier to replace managers than it is to replace engineers, except for the part where managers are running shit and won't replace themselves no matter how useless and moronic they get.

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If the managers can replace employees with AI then the positions were likely artificially created and not really required. When this backfires it will be managers and directors that get fired.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      None of this will be good for the working class, especially seeing that 1/3 of college students went for a compsci degree that will now be useless since ChatGPT can do any sort of coding job no problem, not to mention graphic and UI design. We're going to have a flood of unemployed, homeless people and it will be as ugly as the 1930s Great Depression. Meanwhile the richest companies will only expand their wealth and make everyone more dependent on them. WALL-E will be the future in our lifetimes.

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Joke's on them, the opposite will happen. AI replaces managers the best 🙂

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    yes, their wages, which were from managing people (their headcounts). the people who manage machines are autistic it people.

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The same managers promised a paperless office with all these computers. How did that work out?

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's fine. As with pretty much anything, managers are almost clueless about the inner workings of the project and tools, so we just feed them the bare minimum info and leave them play around with middle management.

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Clearly the problem here is AI increasing productivity resulting in less labor being required, not the socioeconomic systems funneling wealth to the rich resulting in the majority of people becoming poorer despite overall wealth increasing. Star Trek promised us a world where we do not need to work to live because there is no scarcity; the reality is that while our society's wealth increases the common person is only forced to labor harder.

  32. 3 weeks ago
    lorry

    >manage 20 people
    >make $200k per year
    >fire 10 people
    >only manage 10 people now
    >hey why are you getting $200k you're just a low level manager here is $60k/yr you pleb.

    That's why managers never shrink the workforce unless forced by shareholders.

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    If you show that you dont want to work/come to office, dont want to form human connection, why should the company and the mangers keep you?

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How come ai taking jobs lowers wages but imgriants taking jobs supposedly doesn't?

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Half of all managers are terrible at their jobs and actively create problems through their incompetence.

  36. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Whos going to replace the managers?

  37. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I just hope that CEOs use AI to lay off middle managers.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Never happening

      [...]

      Only real post ITT, the only way the managerial caste breaks down is if the place goes out of business entirely.

  38. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    but managers are easier to replace with AI and APIs than any other profession
    they literally only exist to delegate duties

  39. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Are coding chatbots significantly more cost-effective than a team of jeets?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They're more efficient, because you get the shitty broken code back instantly and can skip right to the step where an expensive senior developer has to rewrite 80% of it to make it work

  40. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Hmm... my company just cuts staff and expects the rest of us to do way more work. That's some real cost savings there!

  41. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Side note: over half of all managers are fricking moronic and don't know what they're doing. They replace even just moderately complex jobs with AI and their ship will sink, guaranteed.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So? We're still losing here

  42. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Thanks for the post. Have you heard of Ethereum? It breaks the cycle you are describing 🙂

  43. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ... For you, israelite boy.

    https://scribe.rip/@sushantvohra/your-boss-will-be-replaced-by-ai-before-you-do-91a8e7cca9fc

  44. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    but when can we replace manager with AI?

  45. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    sadly these happen automatically, these are the logical choice. Short term (5 years) game theory.
    You have to do everything you can to stay competitive because everyone else will.
    If you keep human workers for jobs that can be done with AI, while your competitors replace those workers, then you're at a disadvantage and will soon lose customers (because you WILL be more expensive than others), become unprofitable and die off.

    Apparently only half of managers know why they're there.

    I'm not protecting them, but this is the result of the current capitalist system. I'd do the same as a company owner or manager, and anyone saying they wouldn't, well... that's how you go bankrupt.

    We absolutely have the means for everyone to have a job, food, house, and everything, but the current system will never get us there.

  46. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >managers
    AHAHAHHAHAHAHA

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *