It's true: only men pay tax

A study from New Zealand shows fairly definitively that we (women), as a group, don't pay any taxes.

Sure, we file tax documents and have taxes deducted from our paychecks and pay out consumer taxes at the cash register, just like men do, but in the final tally, uh...well, look at this:


Let me explain. If you pay out, say, $100 every paycheck to the IRS, but every month, you claim $200 in benefits, you have not paid a single penny in tax. In fact, you have claimed twice what you have paid. You are $100 up, and the rest of the taxpayers are footing your bill.

It's curious that the data New Zealand doesn't seem to mind sharing is very difficult to acquire in the US. How much money in taxes do men pay versus women? How much money is claimed every month in benefits by men versus women? What is the net difference? We begin with ….. cue ominous music …. THE WAGE GAP!

The US tax system is progressive, meaning the more money you make, the more tax you pay. If men make more money than women, they must pay more tax by definition. There can be no argument that men pay more in gross tax than women. If you tally up at the end of the year all the pennies men gave to the government and compare that to all the pennies women gave, men paid more on that measure alone.

But that is an incomplete measure. We need to know how much money men are withdrawing from the government coffers, compared to women, but let's not include salaries, since a salary is in theory a trade-off for vital services performed. Let's only consider payouts within the social safety net.

What are the main government expenditures that don't include salary?

Of course, women live longer than men and thus draw more social security benefits.

Healthcare? We know that men don't access healthcare at the same rates as women because masculinity is toxic and men prefer to benefit themselves systematically by directing healthcare dollars to women, and thus we can reasonably presume that women are withdrawing more in healthcare dollars than men.

If we were going to consider salaries paid as a withdrawal from government resources, men would win in the military category of spending, but this would be balanced out by healthcare, social services administration and education, all of which are dominated by women. In terms of withdrawing resources from the military in the form of non-salary benefits, neither women nor men have the advantage. Domestic military benefits are probably restricted to natural disasters and feminists haven't yet figured out how to make earthquakes kill only men, although I would not be surprised to discover they are trying.

There are considerably more men who have placed themselves in harm's way in service of the nation, so men likely win the Veteran's Affairs category hands down, and men are the primary producers of food and drivers of agriculture, so it's probably safe to assume most of the subsidies and supports in agriculture and food are going to men. But then we have education, and the much vaunted statistic that there are more women than men earning college degrees (In feminist Dance Therapy, not Particle Physics, but that's another story), so once again, women are consuming the majority of education dollars.

Men take the majority of government money in the form of agriculture subsidies and veteran's benefits. In every other major spending category, women are the primary beneficiaries. Women pay less in tax than men pay, while withdrawing significantly more in benefits.

Ergo …

We really don't pay any tax. We contribute to a system, and then withdraw far more, all of it meaning of course that men – all men – support women – all women – whether they like it or not. When libertarian leaning pundits quip that ‘taxation is theft', they are missing a piece of the puzzle. Taxation might be theft, but more accurately, it's theft for our benefit. The government steals money from men and gives it to women.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 years ago

    women are also disproportionately more likely to live in poverty and enter less well paying fields or work part-time. they're also much more likely than men to be single parents or primary caregivers for disabled or elderly relatives so it's not necessarily surprising that they benefit more from government payments. moreover, this is one study from NZ and some speculation about America. this is not conclusive or a full picture, in part because of the exclusion of sales taxes although those vary from state to state. I wouldn't be surprised in a similar pattern emerged in the US but it wouldn't because women are spongers, but because they're economically disadvantaged compared to men.

    • 4 years ago

      LOL yeah, you just keep telling yourself that. Women are economically disadvantaged compared to men??? What a joke.

    • 4 years ago

      Define poverty, before or after benefits? This is also a choice because most women can get a man to care for them if they didn't have such unrealistic standards and didn't think they were so special.
      We used to understand the partnership dynamic, but feminism destroyed the understanding from women and ruined things for most women.
      The next 2 are choices also.

      Women are usually single mothers by choice and when we tell you to stop picking the bad boys we are mocked as incels and Mr nice guy among other things. Women also initiate most divorces and fight to keep men from getting joint or full custody.

      Sales tax will make things look worse because the philosophy today is still, her money is hers and his money is theirs, plus many other ways mens money becomes women's.
      Men are still the primary bread winner and yet women are still the majority spenders. We know whose money they are spending along with their own.

      To conclude, their economic disadvantage is themselves.

    • 3 years ago
      Johnny Wahd

      Women CHOOSE to get a degree in Gender Studies or Lesbian Dance Theory. Women CHOOSE to work in fields that pay less. Women CHOOSE not to work the OT that Men do. True equality begins when women are required to pay 50% of the annual Federal tax bill. Can't pay? Can't vote. Pretty simple really. Or, they can agree that since Men pay the taxes then each Man's vote should be worth at least 2-3x that of a woman's vote. It should be one of those two scenarios.

    • 3 years ago
      Toby Nixon

      Oh stop. Women are Sponges. Women are Thieves. You don't have any motivation, except to be pretty and get a Man to pay your bills. YOU, start taking responsibility.

      Economically disadvantaged? Really, I think I just spent what little Money I had wisely. I didn't spend on clothing, make-up and fashion. I wore t-shirts and jeans or slacks and a generic button-down. I got a Vasectomy so I couldn't have unwanted children. I didn't spend money on dates or buy women israeliteelry. I didn't let a woman live for free at my house. Didn't buy a woman food. I don't 'Help her with her rent'.

      In fact, I started homeless, because my mother was violent, cruel and sadistic. With scars and brain damage to prove it.

      I fought for money on the street, by participating in illegal street fights. I became a bouncer and I broke up concrete for $40 a day. Where were you? Where were the Women? When did you contribute to my quality of life?

      I went to college and did not distract myself with women. So I made all 'A's and got a National Science Foundation Award Scholarship for Excellence in Science and Mathematics. But like Tesla and Tesla Car founder and most entrepreneurs, I thought a wife would just drag me down. I mean all the Women in my life were abusive and degrading to me and all the Men defeated by those Women.

      Did I deny you something? Did I deny anything to Women? No, Women didn't want to work for me, because they have nails and clothes and want to be treated like queens. No position at my company would have accepted a Woman with nails and clothes and to be treated like a Queen.

      Men don't OWE you anything.
      Women aren't always right.

      I have retirement, you have done nothing but age and wear your only prize out. The only thing that might be worth anything, you have destroyed. Then you think, that I am supposed to join a civil union with you, pay your debts and take care of you financially?

      Ha, HA HA HA HA HA.

      No, you cannot board my yacht.

    • 3 years ago

      > women are also disproportionately more likely to live in poverty

      >90% of totally homeless are men

      >argument falls apart

    • 2 years ago
      Dean Hedges

      The reason, and I don't accept your claim at the moment, more women are in poverty is because they are actually still alive. By age 85 there are twice as many women still alive than men. Look at the data for severely disabled persons, for example. Under age 65, there are 7% more women, after age 65 there are 22% more severely disabled women. So, either men are experiencing spontaneous and miraculous recoveries, or they were too dead to be included in the survey.

  2. 3 years ago
    Toby Nixon

    Well, I am 42, single, I don't pay taxes, have a yacht, don't have the Financial Burden of a WIFE and I refuse to spend money on Women.

    Eat your heart out. You'll grow old broke and alone if I have anything to do with it. Sleep tight.

  3. 3 years ago
    Toby Nixon

    Yes and Men should withhold sexual and financial deposits until you start contributing more to society. As well as being less arrogant, less selfish and less needy. It's not working for you. Men are going to throw you by the wayside, if you don't straighten up and act right. You will have to take more responsibility for yourself and your actions if you want to be an equal. That's what an equal is.

Comments are closed.