ITT: We post the smartest humans alive

ITT: We post the smartest humans alive

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

A Conspiracy Theorist Is Talking Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ancient people couldnt possibly have been advanced enough to build this
    >so it must have been even more ancient people

    ive never understood the thought process here.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >all these ancient cultures point to an even older civilization that was implied to be advanced enough to build this*

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        they dont though

        if this ancient advanced culture existed why didnt the wheel persist to all its children?
        Why was the only thing all the splintered cultures inherited from the original the ability to work stone? And if stone working was so key to the ancient culture, where are its monuments?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >if this ancient advanced culture existed why didnt the wheel persist to all its children?
          That's exactly his question. Why didn't they? Some things point to the Flood, which could potentially be the Younger Drias

          Those ancient cultures couldn't possibly be more different from each other. It's just a case of cherrypicking evidence and a general lack of knowledge.

          There's a reason nobody with actual ancient history knowledge agrees with this guy, if you study the bare minimum about ancient civs you will realize how different they are from each other. Hanwiener is just playing to the crowd. His audience is the uneducated masses.

          What does their difference have to do with anything?
          >There's a reason nobody with actual ancient history knowledge agrees with this guy
          The same guys who hide artifacts, selectively present "evidences" and change their minds from time to time?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            well its a dumb question because the obvious answer is "because it never existed in the first place"

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nice faith, bro

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Im completely open to changing my opinion. In fact I think it would be possibly the most interesting and exciting discovery in the history of mankind were it to be true. But theres no evidence.
            So yea, I guess if any evidence weighted opinion is faith, this is my faith. Feel free to change it. I would honestly love that.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Faith means believing something without evidence. This is what you are doing.

            Until the moment Graham Hanwiener appears in a JRE episode with a 20,000 year old wheel and making Flint Dibble suck his wiener in humiliation I will still not believe him.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The burden is on you to provide a smidgen of POSITIVE evidence to support the theory of a ice age civilization and not rely on the lack of evidence to presume its existence. This is what happens when they don’t teach logic/critical thinking in high school

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >provide a smidgen of POSITIVE evidence to support the theory of a ice age civilization

            Atlantis, literally, was the original civilization and civilization started on Atlantis. Before the ice age there was no civilization on earth except Atlantis, and after the sea levels rose (the flood) and it sank, the people of Atlantis (white humans) were exiled (from the garden of edin) and had to rebuild civilization again.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Cool. Show me atlantean artefacts or ruins.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Show me atlantean artefacts or ruins
            underwater at the mid atlantic ridge, nobody has looked or if they have they aren't telling because reasons

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Everyone have already seen this image, schizoanon. It's posted on IQfy on a daily basis.
            Still doesn't prove shit. Show me real stuff.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            We don't have to when Tacitus and such sources are taken as fact. We have excellent primary sources proving Atlantus existed.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Thousands of years from now morons like you will absolutely believe that Narnia existed.
            >B-but we have excellent primary sources! We need to take Lewis as fact!

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Do something about it then, start calling and mailing historians saying they can't use Tacitus

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Nta but can you drop a quote from Tacitus about Atlantis? I'm interested in what he had to say about it.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Tacitus described how Agricola found Thule.

            It's Plato who mentions Atlantis.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So a complete nothingburger? Plato isn't known for his historical accuracy, he makes shit up all the time

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >The same guys who hide artifacts
            I'm not talking about the owners of Smithsonian or some shit like that.
            No, I mean any hobbyist who gets the bare minimum education from youtube essays is already knowledgeable enough to realize this dude is talking shit. Yep, the bar is that low.

            >change their minds from time to time?
            Isn't that good, though? This is what scientific knowledge is about. New evidence means new paradigms. I thought the whole problem Hanwiener had with academics is that they don't change their minds enough.
            Decide yourselves, Hanwienertards: is academics changing their minds in the face of new evidence good or bad?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Look mate they are all under the sea. No I don't know where exactly stop asking.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >And if stone working was so key to the ancient culture, where are its monuments?
          you understand the sea level rose 400 feet 12k years ago, right? And that a seafaring civilization would have their civilzational epicenter near the water? which would become submerged and in due course sedimented over..? right?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Those ancient cultures couldn't possibly be more different from each other. It's just a case of cherrypicking evidence and a general lack of knowledge.

        There's a reason nobody with actual ancient history knowledge agrees with this guy, if you study the bare minimum about ancient civs you will realize how different they are from each other. Hanwiener is just playing to the crowd. His audience is the uneducated masses.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm not gonna post a selfie

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Don't be bashful, Mr Langan

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You first

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    .

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He's wrong though, gobeki teple had wild einkorn proving they were at an early stage in the development of agriculture, not the remnants of an older civilization. Some random German students proved him wrong, he is only smart in terms of writing scifi fanfics and scamming the mentally ill and LSD addled hippies into buying them.

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *