I've posted already this theory several times in the previous months. I'm open up for suggestions or clarifications. It needs moar math

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |

Skip to content
# I've posted already this theory several times in the previous months.

###

I've posted already this theory several times in the previous months. I'm open up for suggestions or clarifications. It needs moar math

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68 |

Dark matter is just cosmologists not accounting for magnetism. Take your schizo-scribbles to /x/.

What testable hypothesis we got

15% baryonic matter, 85% dark matter (not taking in account dark energy)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_(spacecraft)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

What does it mean that r^4 is exotic

this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_R4

What does it mean when a dimension is hidden?

That's the core problem. According to Bosonic String theory, from Nambu-Goto action (spacetime area minimization), quantum mechanics implies that if we want lorentz invariant theory, we need 26 spatial dimensions. That happens microscopically. But foam makes spacetime to behave 4 dimensionally at the classical level (General Relativity). There must be some kind of mechanostatistical emergence from micro to macro, first with 26 dim and last with 4, we lose 22 degrees of freedom, 22 hidden dimensions

>26 spatial

sorry. 26 spatiotemporal dimensions

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipartition_theorem

It's basically equipartition theorem applied to quantum foam (assuming bosonic string theory as hypothesis)

dark matter is just regular matter.

Dark matter has had a zillion people work on it and lots of experiments and they haven't found shit in 50+ years. Modified gravity is where it's at, something is clearly fundamentally wrong with our understanding of gravity

Sixty-Six Theses: Next Steps and the Way Forward in the Modified Cosmological Model

>https://vixra.org/abs/2206.0152

>http://gg762.net/d0cs/papers/Sixty-Six_Theses__v4-20230726.pdf

The purpose is to review and lay out a plan for future inquiry pertaining to the modified cosmological model (MCM) and its overarching research program. The material is modularized as a catalog of open questions that seem likely to support productive research work. The main focus is quantum theory, but the material spans a breadth of physics and mathematics. Cosmology is heavily weighted, and some Millennium Prize problems are included. A comprehensive introduction contains a survey of falsifiable MCM predictions and associated experimental results. Listed problems include original ideas deserving further study as well as investigations of others' work when it may be germane. A longstanding and important conceptual hurdle in the approach to MCM quantum gravity is resolved with a framework for quantum cosmology time arrow eigenstates. A new elliptic curve application is presented. With several exceptions, the presentation is high-level and qualitative. Formal analyses are mostly relegated to the future work which is the topic of this book. Sufficient technical context is given that third parties might independently undertake the suggested work units.

>Sixty-Six Theses: Next Steps and the Way Forward in the Modified Cosmological Model

https://ibb [doot] co/cQDdfpP

https://ibb [doot] co/0CN8RtN

https://ibb [doot] co/xsCmz1x

https://ibb [doot] co/JyTCZHt

https://ibb [doot] co/2kVYhbQ

https://ibb [doot] co/YQqVtmk

https://ibb [doot] co/zZ4tBC2

https://ibb [doot] co/PFTpg8R

https://ibb [doot] co/HGPZKhf

https://ibb [doot] co/2NmBKMH

https://ibb [doot] co/ww0z2Bs

https://ibb [doot] co/V2CJf4K

https://ibb [doot] co/t2bxWYT

https://ibb [doot] co/BPVgWd2

https://ibb [doot] co/jrd0yrQ

https://ibb [doot] co/PZdbL6f

https://ibb [doot] co/M96nW7j

https://ibb [doot] co/myj9RLm

https://ibb [doot] co/g3RKw0F

https://ibb [doot] co/R7w1Rzb

https://ibb [doot] co/7QYXMRn

https://ibb [doot] co/1f3bXCt

https://ibb [doot] co/Ytc1c5f

https://ibb [doot] co/NSzN6Zb

https://ibb [doot] co/5Y2xT4k

https://ibb [doot] co/8r01BYY

https://ibb [doot] co/k0LzrrC

doesnt seem understandable to the layman honestly

Wait till you hear what the non layman thinks

IM GONNA FRICKING TOOKKKKKK

Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis

>https://vixra.org/abs/2111.0072

>http://gg762.net/d0cs/papers/Fractional_Distance_v8-20230808.pdf

Recent analysis has uncovered a broad swath of rarely considered real numbers called real numbers in the neighborhood of infinity. Here we extend the catalog of the rudimentary analytical properties of all real numbers by defining a set of fractional distance functions on the real number line and studying their behavior. The main results of are (1) to prove with modest axioms that some real numbers are greater than any natural number, (2) to develop a technique for taking a limit at infinity via the ordinary Cauchy definition reliant on the classical epsilon-delta formalism, and (3) to demonstrate an infinite number of non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function in the neighborhood of infinity. We define numbers in the neighborhood of infinity as Cartesian products of Cauchy equivalence classes of rationals. We axiomatize the arithmetic of such numbers, prove all the operations are well-defined, and then make comparisons to the similar axioms of a complete ordered field. After developing the many underlying foundations, we present a basis for a topology.

OP here

Holy frick dude, you are clever as frick

He's certainly something as frick

nobody cares, please stop spamming us with your useless, self indulgent know-it-allism

SCP-001

OP's idea is actually kind of cool. You could maybe apply the virial theorem on that.

I love you, many thanks

-OP

>29 posts

>7 ips

Dark Matter doesn't exist, it's a patchwork for a leaky hypothesis which is formulated to get government grants.