I've posted already this theory several times in the previous months.

I've posted already this theory several times in the previous months. I'm open up for suggestions or clarifications. It needs moar math

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dark matter is just cosmologists not accounting for magnetism. Take your schizo-scribbles to /x/.

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What testable hypothesis we got

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      15% baryonic matter, 85% dark matter (not taking in account dark energy)
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Planck_(spacecraft)

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        What does it mean that r^4 is exotic

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exotic_R4

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What does it mean when a dimension is hidden?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's the core problem. According to Bosonic String theory, from Nambu-Goto action (spacetime area minimization), quantum mechanics implies that if we want lorentz invariant theory, we need 26 spatial dimensions. That happens microscopically. But foam makes spacetime to behave 4 dimensionally at the classical level (General Relativity). There must be some kind of mechanostatistical emergence from micro to macro, first with 26 dim and last with 4, we lose 22 degrees of freedom, 22 hidden dimensions

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >26 spatial
            sorry. 26 spatiotemporal dimensions

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Equipartition_theorem
    It's basically equipartition theorem applied to quantum foam (assuming bosonic string theory as hypothesis)

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    dark matter is just regular matter.

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dark matter has had a zillion people work on it and lots of experiments and they haven't found shit in 50+ years. Modified gravity is where it's at, something is clearly fundamentally wrong with our understanding of gravity

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/RYWoeYA.png

      Sixty-Six Theses: Next Steps and the Way Forward in the Modified Cosmological Model
      >https://vixra.org/abs/2206.0152
      >http://gg762.net/d0cs/papers/Sixty-Six_Theses__v4-20230726.pdf
      The purpose is to review and lay out a plan for future inquiry pertaining to the modified cosmological model (MCM) and its overarching research program. The material is modularized as a catalog of open questions that seem likely to support productive research work. The main focus is quantum theory, but the material spans a breadth of physics and mathematics. Cosmology is heavily weighted, and some Millennium Prize problems are included. A comprehensive introduction contains a survey of falsifiable MCM predictions and associated experimental results. Listed problems include original ideas deserving further study as well as investigations of others' work when it may be germane. A longstanding and important conceptual hurdle in the approach to MCM quantum gravity is resolved with a framework for quantum cosmology time arrow eigenstates. A new elliptic curve application is presented. With several exceptions, the presentation is high-level and qualitative. Formal analyses are mostly relegated to the future work which is the topic of this book. Sufficient technical context is given that third parties might independently undertake the suggested work units.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Sixty-Six Theses: Next Steps and the Way Forward in the Modified Cosmological Model
        https://ibb [doot] co/cQDdfpP
        https://ibb [doot] co/0CN8RtN
        https://ibb [doot] co/xsCmz1x
        https://ibb [doot] co/JyTCZHt
        https://ibb [doot] co/2kVYhbQ
        https://ibb [doot] co/YQqVtmk
        https://ibb [doot] co/zZ4tBC2
        https://ibb [doot] co/PFTpg8R
        https://ibb [doot] co/HGPZKhf
        https://ibb [doot] co/2NmBKMH
        https://ibb [doot] co/ww0z2Bs
        https://ibb [doot] co/V2CJf4K
        https://ibb [doot] co/t2bxWYT
        https://ibb [doot] co/BPVgWd2
        https://ibb [doot] co/jrd0yrQ
        https://ibb [doot] co/PZdbL6f
        https://ibb [doot] co/M96nW7j
        https://ibb [doot] co/myj9RLm
        https://ibb [doot] co/g3RKw0F
        https://ibb [doot] co/R7w1Rzb
        https://ibb [doot] co/7QYXMRn
        https://ibb [doot] co/1f3bXCt
        https://ibb [doot] co/Ytc1c5f
        https://ibb [doot] co/NSzN6Zb
        https://ibb [doot] co/5Y2xT4k
        https://ibb [doot] co/8r01BYY
        https://ibb [doot] co/k0LzrrC

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        doesnt seem understandable to the layman honestly

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Wait till you hear what the non layman thinks

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        IM GONNA FRICKING TOOKKKKKK

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Fractional Distance: The Topology of the Real Number Line with Applications to the Riemann Hypothesis
    >https://vixra.org/abs/2111.0072
    >http://gg762.net/d0cs/papers/Fractional_Distance_v8-20230808.pdf
    Recent analysis has uncovered a broad swath of rarely considered real numbers called real numbers in the neighborhood of infinity. Here we extend the catalog of the rudimentary analytical properties of all real numbers by defining a set of fractional distance functions on the real number line and studying their behavior. The main results of are (1) to prove with modest axioms that some real numbers are greater than any natural number, (2) to develop a technique for taking a limit at infinity via the ordinary Cauchy definition reliant on the classical epsilon-delta formalism, and (3) to demonstrate an infinite number of non-trivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function in the neighborhood of infinity. We define numbers in the neighborhood of infinity as Cartesian products of Cauchy equivalence classes of rationals. We axiomatize the arithmetic of such numbers, prove all the operations are well-defined, and then make comparisons to the similar axioms of a complete ordered field. After developing the many underlying foundations, we present a basis for a topology.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      OP here

      Holy frick dude, you are clever as frick

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        He's certainly something as frick

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    nobody cares, please stop spamming us with your useless, self indulgent know-it-allism

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    SCP-001

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OP's idea is actually kind of cool. You could maybe apply the virial theorem on that.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I love you, many thanks
      -OP

  12. 3 weeks ago
    sage

    >29 posts
    >7 ips
    Dark Matter doesn't exist, it's a patchwork for a leaky hypothesis which is formulated to get government grants.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *