>Line up smaller horse fossil to larger horse fossil

This is le… evolution?

I can't believe people have just arbitrarily lined up different fossilized animals in a row, always (no exceptions) with massive gaps, claim they turned into one another, and the vast majority of the general public accepts this garbage as science.

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You got a better explanation for why all animal species didn’t exist at the same time?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      This is fundamentally based on the belief that lower geologic strata is significantly older than it really is.

      Old Earth dates are based solely on radiometric dating, which is the assumption that radioactive materials in decay can be used like a clock (they can't, rocks of known age give extremely inflated dates)

      PhD geologist just finalized a major study on Grand Canyon rocks proving they can't be millions of years old:

      They had to sue the park just to collect samples, the lawsuit took years.

      The rock layers are bent in such a way that could have only been done when they were soft. If they were hardened they wouldn't bend, they'd fracture.

      Just one of many evidences of young Earth you ignore:

      1. Very Little Sediment on the Seafloor
      2. Bent Rock Layers
      3. Soft Tissue in Fossils
      4. Faint Sun Paradox
      5. Rapidly Decaying Magnetic Field
      6. Helium in Radioactive Rocks
      7. Carbon-14 in Fossils, Coal, and Diamonds
      8. Short-Lived Comets
      9. Very Little Salt in the Sea
      10. DNA in “Ancient” Bacteria

      https://answersingenesis.org/evidence-for-creation/10-best-evidences-young-earth/

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >answers in genesis
        >noahs flood made the Grand Canyon
        >radiometric dating is fake
        Back to /x/ with you

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          It is legitimate science, not /x/.

          e.g. you have zero explanation for why we find so much helium in zircon crystals that should have been gone millions of years ago, if you assume their age according to their uranium->lead decay rate.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >you have zero explanation
            Helium easily diffuses through the crystal lattice of zircon with the right conditions while lead does not. The only real way for lead to get there is for it to come from decaying uranium whereas helium can continually diffuse into the zircon over time depending on temperature. Instead of stopping to think how the helium could get there you people instead immediately latch onto this single strand of evidence because it aligns with your pre existing beliefs, regardless of the overwhelming amount of evidence to the contrary.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            ....

            Helium is produced when uranium decays to lead

            It's not a question of how it's in there, the question is why is there still so much left when it easily diffuses out of the crystal, far more than there should be if it's millions/billions of years old

            https://i.imgur.com/zoeRd6j.jpeg

            I fricking hate that /x/ started purging all the flat earth homosexuals and they came over here or even sneak onto IQfy or IQfy. These used to be the smartest boards on the site and now even IQfy and /k/ have overtaken them.

            The Earth is round.

            Please stop confusing us with flat Earthers. There is PhD scientists who work at Answers in Genesis and ICR.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >the question is why is there still so much left when it easily diffuses out of the crystal, far more than there should be if it's millions/billions of years old
            That’s the point dipshit, it just as easily diffuses INTO the crystal. At least do some reading on the topic before arguing about it
            >There is PhD scientists who work at Answers in Genesis and ICR
            lol

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >it just as easily diffuses INTO the crystal

            Gases always diffuse from areas of higher concentration to surrounding areas of lower concentration. They wouldn't diffuse into a zircon crystal.

            Source: well-established diffusion law of physics

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Gases always diffuse from areas of higher concentration to surrounding areas of lower concentration. They wouldn't diffuse into a zircon crystal.
            Except you don't know the relative concentrations of helium in the Zircon's environment

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            If you want to read the actual source of the argument:

            https://answersingenesis.org/age-of-the-earth/6-helium-in-radioactive-rocks/

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No thanks

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Gases always diffuse from areas of higher concentration to surrounding areas of lower concentration. They wouldn't diffuse into a zircon crystal.
            That is unless the surrounding area has more helium in it, I’m not sure how much more simply I can explain it. If the helium is constantly diffusing out until the point where there’s none left as you say should happen, then ANY amount of helium in the surrounding rock will diffuse back into the crystal since a zirconium with no helium left in it is as low a concentration as it gets. Hence why even if a crystal is at the age where all the original helium has diffused out it can still have helium in it, as more diffuses in from an environment with high helium levels and high temperatures. An environment like I don’t know, maybe the magma where zirconium usually forms

            If you want to read the actual source of the argument:

            https://answersingenesis.org/age-of-the-earth/6-helium-in-radioactive-rocks/

            >answers in genesis again
            Take this garbage elsewhere

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I fricking hate that /x/ started purging all the flat earth homosexuals and they came over here or even sneak onto IQfy or IQfy. These used to be the smartest boards on the site and now even IQfy and /k/ have overtaken them.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Look my guy. The methods and assumptions being used are working in terms of finding oil/gas/mineral deposits. Come up with a model that’s equally useful, and not just in a philosophical absolute truth sense, and then we can talk.

        Even if evolution as a theory is completely wrong, it’s still useful. We still use the hard shell model of the atom even though we “know” atoms aren’t hard shells. We still use geocentric methods of celestial navigation just because it’s been so well refined that using heliocentric ones aren’t worth it.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Trying to find evidence for noahs flood is moronic. If the event happened as described it would have destroyed all plant life and made the earth unihabitable. So even if the event happened the evidence/destruction would have had to be undone.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >he thinks it’s based on size and not when they show up in the fossil record and how derived each one is
    Why do you insist on embarrassing yourself like this

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Look at their feet

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Natural selection has major issues when you take combinatorics into account.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Don’t let these horses distract you from the real menace that are whales with legs

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >arbitrarily lined up different fossilized animals in a row
    How about: lined up the same fossilized animal in a row. These people have absolutely no idea what they’re doing
    >btw they have feathers now

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >picks an unusual animal that was for the longest time only known from fragmentary remains which were destroyed during WW2 during a bombing
      Why are paleogays so insufferable

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        your nose-cone is showing

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          The second is basically the same as the third it’s just standing up and the first isn’t even that far off considering when it was discovered

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >nose horn vs thumb spike
            Oh its retarted..

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >this single tiny bone being in the wrong spot means that it’s wildly different
            >ignore the second and third being the same thing in different postures
            Consider suicide

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >single tiny bone
            >it’s a fricking nose-spike
            castrate yourself or turn gay

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >implying a nose spike isn’t a single tiny bone and is inconsequential to how the rest of the animal is depicted
            >ignoring the fact that it’s literally the first dinosaur ever discovered so they had no basis on how to reconstruct it
            Take your gender reaffirming pills and waste away

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It is Vatican fabrication, after all.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *