Lol this why no one likes?

>Well you see...1000 years ago the ancient empire of Tameron
OH NONONONONO NO CARES YOU DORK THEY DIED BEFORE MY GREAT GREAT GREAT GRANDMOTHER'S PARENTS WERE POTTY TRAINED GET OUT OF MY FACE BEFORE I GIVE YOU A WEDGIE

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OP is a bawd for history wiener.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You couldn’t foresee for your microdick underneath your massive beer belly, you fat atheist cum guzzler.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >projection
        My dick is 7 inches long and it passes the toilet roll girth test. So once again. You are a bawd for History wiener.
        Also
        >atheism out of nowhere
        You're literally a scorned christcuck that got btfo'd so badly you ran away aren't you? Kekypo!

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You couldn’t foresee for your microdick underneath your massive beer belly, you fat atheist cum guzzler.

      >projection
      My dick is 7 inches long and it passes the toilet roll girth test. So once again. You are a bawd for History wiener.
      Also
      >atheism out of nowhere
      You're literally a scorned christcuck that got btfo'd so badly you ran away aren't you? Kekypo!

      quintessential israelitery

  2. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Get a life you ingrate. I’m sick of talking about Richard Little’s penis and Dennis Hogreve’s penis. I will LITERALLY murder the both of you and castrate your corpses.

  3. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >UKROP IS A MURDEROUS NEO NAZI STATE
    REEEEE
    >DEEP STATE IS CONTROLLED BY INCOMPETENT BOOMER FRICKS
    >MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX IS SCAMMING EVERYONE REEEE
    >MAIN STREAM METEROR
    Putin is a big time schizo-poster.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Is what he said about countries abandoning their dollar reserves true?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Could be due to inflation.

  4. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-68255302.amp

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Oh yeah, my favourite propaganda outlet the BBC

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Anita Prazmowska
      No bias here, clearly.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Yeah, the real unbiased party must be the russian dictator

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >taking butthurt belter opinions on russia seriosly

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Mr Putin began the interview by claiming that 862 was the year of the "establishment of the Russian state". This was the year that Rurik, a Scandinavian prince, was invited to rule over the city of Novgorod, the capital of the Rus - the people who would eventually develop into today's Russians.
      Isn't Putin an anti-Normanist moron?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        well russia's recent legacy mostly stems from the germanic royalty of the romanovs so there's not much he can do

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Scandinavian prince
        Incel fantasy

        well russia's recent legacy mostly stems from the germanic royalty of the romanovs so there's not much he can do

        >romanovs
        if anything, the German line ruled Russia for a little more than the 1st century, and it began only with the inbreed moron Peter 3, who was not a direct descendant of Peter the Great, but only a nephew.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      So, she's just not going to address the fact that Poland and Germany carved up Czechoslovakia? Nice debunk lol.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >carved up
        how many walmart parking lots' worth of land did they take exacltly?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Poland retook some polish speaking villages that czechia took from them kn the 1920s

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          They also took territories in northern Slovakia.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      my god what a bullshit "debunk". Most of the 'experts' are covertly agreeing with Putin in terms of historical facts cited

  5. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's astonishing to see Americans ape out at a political leader thinking in generational terms, as opposed to four years, their first 90 days, the annual budget and midterm elections.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      larping as the rurikids and ancient muscovites when you're really a rump communist state is pretty cringe

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      If you take context completely out of the equation you'd have a point, Putin didn't need to go further than the USSR being established to explain why he invaded Ukraine.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      No one cares about what some ancestor's neighbor did 1000 years ago.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        are you lost?

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Are you? /misc/ is down the hall.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            this is IQfy, if you don't care about some ancestor's neighbor did 1000 years ago, frick off

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I only talk about topics after 1750. Everything else is largely irrelevant.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            you couldn't have picked a more boring era
            >b-b-but muh civil war
            only americans care about that

  6. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >eurangotans

  7. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    How many normies think Russians were the nazis in WWII?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      that's not an idea that has ever been floated, however, what's more interesting is that the soviets collaborated with the germans to divide europe between them (before their weakness inspired treachery from the other socialist authoritarian state vying for dominance in the 20th century)

  8. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >why are you doing this?
    >LONG AGO BEFORE LIFE EVER BEGAN A CONFLICT WITH A WARING TRIBES OF PREBIZZIKIAN

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >you now reread like it's a Top Gear bit about Hammond questioning Clarkson

  9. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    did they talk about trannies, jk rowling or biolabs at all?

  10. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I was laughing hard when he started ranting about Poland being responsible for ww2.
    I mean I one of those who are very ciritical of the war in Ukraine and its pro-western narrative but this was such a cringe propaganda. This Russian is sitting there lecturing us on Polands responsibility to ww2 and at the same time makes basically ZERO remarks on the fact that Russians both enabled and participated in the German invasion, because it doesnt suit his 'de-nazification' narrative and an obvious agenda to take shots at Poland.

    As for the rest of the interview, it was almost objectively worthless because nothing new was said. We all know the Russian arguments of denazification, historic ties and NATO expansion.

    It really doesnt matter who you interview, Zelensky, Biden, or Putin. It will all just be a massive propaganda rant one way or another

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Contrarian /misc/kid or genuinely mindbroken & demoralized by russian firehood of falsehood propaganda

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Putin didn't start that slapfight

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It's just a massive propaganda fight from both sides as I said in my post. Both sides just attack each others with selective arguments to support their narrative and demonize the other side. In the end none of this shit is even relevant to the Ukraine war 2022 but the media is just going to jump on hype train, the general public is going to try to make sense of it, and historians will just be shaking their heads.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the war in Ukraine and its pro-western narrative
      the narrative:
      >'invading for conquest, loot and population replacement in 21st century is le bad'

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nope, the narrative is that Russia invaded without reason or provocation which is blantantly false because NATO has been arming and training Ukraine for years while ignoring Russian pleas for not escalating tensions and Russian threats of conflict for decades.

        The west knew perfectly well that war would be likely if they continued and they did it anyway. Does it justify Russias war of aggression? No it doesnt, and Russia had no right to invade a sovreign country for their own amibtions, but to say it was completely inprovoced and the west dindu nuffin to make this conflict possible is also bullshit.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >NATO has been arming and training Ukraine for years
          may i see said massive NATO arsenal's in ukraine pre 2022?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            https://paulwienershott.wordpress.com/2022/02/28/guest-post-on-the-ukraine-crisis/

            Never let them memoryhole it- 16,000 dead in less than ten years.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            sorry not reading your schizoblog
            still waiting for 'NATO arming ukraine for years' when they had to beg for months for infantry weapons a few months before the invasion

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >can i get a source?
            >sure, here you go!
            >no not that source
            those goalposts heavy?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why do you think Trump was impeached?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous
          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            8. Putin and the Color Counterrevolution
            In short: Putin’s “special military operation” to defend the people of Donbass from an imminent general offensive by the neo-Nazi regime in Kiev — which has claimed 13,000 lives in the region since the 2014 Color Revolution, the lumpen-oligarchic coup d’état funded with $5 billion dollars from Washington (Victoria Nuland dixit) — not only is it fully justified in international law by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, but it is fully consistent with the military praxis and doctrine of the legitimate self-defense of States in the face of an imminent threat emanating from a neighboring State or enemy forces.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No one outside of the Kremlin can vouch for this Donbass genocide. Not even North Korea.
            They are following the Nazi playbook, who's propaganda also accused Poland of killing 89,000 Germans in 1939.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >threaten neighbour
          >nooo you can't just...defend yourself!

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            sorry bro, my map says you're supposed to be in my sphere of influence, so just give up ok

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            USA has spheres of influence too. It was called the Monroe doctrine and it nearly led to ww3 when Cuba tried to join the Soviet sphere.

            The whole reason there is a war today is because the west pretended like Russia didnt have any sphere of influence.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >b-but the us does this too! It's not fair!
            Lmao

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Why are you being a child about it?
            Russias invasion of Ukraine was a criminal act and Ukraine should by all means win the war, but to pretend that this shit is something isolated in the wider geopolitical game is naive. It's basically USA and Russia resuming cold war hostilites and play their games, and Ukraine just happens to become a chess piece for which they must now suffer the consequences

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Isn't it about historical justice for Putin? He keeps telling us so.

            Only problem is he adheres to a schizo version of history.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >arming and training Ukraine for years
          Yeah, they armed and trained them so heavily that both Russia and the CIA expected Ukraine to fall within a week.
          It's Russia who chose to escalate all of this. Why didn't they invade Ukraine in 2004 when the exact same thing as Euromaidan happened?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Why didn't they invade Ukraine in 2004 when the exact same thing as Euromaidan happened?

            Because they simply couldnt.
            Russia had an economy and life expectancy close to Zimbambwe in 1999, and Putins position in power was still shacky despite reforms in early 2000s.
            This is why Russia wasnt in any positon to do anything to stop NATO expansion in the early 2000s. They were themselves practically on life support from the international community to not suffer from a complete state collapse.

            You will be asking the same question whenever China desides to invade Taiwan in the near future, "why didnt they just not do it 50 years ago?".

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            My point was that they had no reason to invade in 2004 because Yanukovych was back in power in 2006. The pro western and pro eastern factions in Ukraine were constantly vying for power, the idea of a "CIA coup" is moronic.
            If Russia had not invaded Crimea Yanukovych could have been back in power by 2016, but they wanted to escalate this and it backfired and ended up pushing Ukraine completely to the west.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            2004 was about elections and Yanukovych backed off. 2014 was about overthrowing the president.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            2004 - Yanukovych is forced to resign due to hundreds of thousands of people on the streets
            2014 - Yanukovych is forced to resign due to hundreds of thousands of people on the streets and chooses to flee to Russia

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Let's ignore all the violence in 2014 and the fact that the opposition didn't obide with their dealings with Yanukovych.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Let's ignore all the violence in 2014
            Let's not. The protestors got violent because of the anti-protest laws that were passed. They weren't allowed to peacefully tent anymore without getting their heads cracked in.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            So you agree 2014 was more high-stakes.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I agree that it was more heated but I don't think it was that high-stakes. I believe Ukraine could've gone back to sitting on the fence, never being able to decide if they really want to be western or eastern. But instead we got this shitshow.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I disagree, polarization already happened in Ukraine. There was no true sitting on fence party or at least the party that was perceived like that. Yanukovych tried something similar to that and got fricked firstly by Russia then by the protests.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I disagree, polarization already happened in Ukraine. There was no true sitting on fence party or at least the party that was perceived like that. Yanukovych tried something similar to that and got fricked firstly by Russia then by the protests.

            yeah ukraine got so radical after the cia coup that they elected a russian-speaking soviet israelite running on 'just talk to russia lmao' platform in 2019

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >elections
            Yeah, Zelensky was such an influential leader that his own soldiers laughed to his face.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Yanukovitch betrayed his word first by fleeing.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Also, Yanukovych wasn't even inaugurated in 2004.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >exact same thing like Euromaidan
            Euromaidan was far more violent and resulted in radical changes.

  11. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why does IQfy actively hate history?

  12. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    its a pretty big redpill that this is how people view me when i start talking about history in conversations with coworkers. its over

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yes you are socially inpet.
      To talk history with normies you must understand a few fundemental things to make it work.

      1. They have almost zero interest in it
      2. Even if they do have some interest, they dont have the mental stamina for any indepth explaination
      3. Even if they have some interest, and some mental stamina, they still have a extremely limited knowledge and pretty much cannot map any point or year despite how hard you try to tell them when and what and where something happened.

      Basically, you need to limit yourself to a near-child level of discussion, cut out virtually every detail or piece of information that isnt absolutely vital to your point, and find some bullshit perspective they can relate to such as how medieval gatherings was their version of tinder so the normie can get involved and help them follow you.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Basically, you need to limit yourself to a near-child level of discussion, cut out virtually every detail or piece of information that isnt absolutely vital to your point, and find some bullshit perspective they can relate to such as how medieval gatherings was their version of tinder so the normie can get involved and help them follow you.
        IQfy is a normie board then?

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      such people also think ill of you when using complex words that truncate nicely an idea with multiple parts

  13. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I'm glad the average Westerner gets filtered by history
    It's easy to tell who's a lobotomised gimp moron who wore a mask and got vaccinated for a virus that didn't even exist, like b***h muzzled dogs. I know who to never associate with or give a single second of my time in life to. Braindead NPC slave race

  14. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The correct take is that the invasion was wrong, even though it was definitely provoked.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The correct take is that for 1,500 years the white race has been a domesticated, golem, castrated NPC slave race to israelites
      That's why your entire moron, lobotomised gimp race name themselves hebrew israelite names like: Matt, John, Peter, Ben, Jake, Sam, Tom, Josh, David etc.
      That's why you all wore masks like lobotomised gimp homosexuals for 2+ years for a virus that didn't even exist and got a israelite cum vaccine

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >definitely provoked
      whit what motive? what did ukraine gain from this?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        You seem to believe that Ukrainians are rational people. Of course they didn't gain anything from their ape outs in the east, but they're still semi-savages and couldn't help themselves.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I dont think the argument is that Ukraine itself provoked it, but that the west did by its constant interference with Russian what Russia considered a Russian affair

  15. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
  16. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      thousands of years ago, before there was Ukraine as you know him, there were primitive russians forming crude and pointless cope cages out of dino-bone and their own waste...

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Where are the labels? How am I supposed to know who these people are?

  17. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dumb interview, everything putin said he said on the day of the invasion when he released his prerecorded autism speech. It's word for word the same.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      yeah, it's basically his "little" essay that he released before. the guy thinks this shit doesn't smell

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      he has given the same speech several times
      but westoids have tiktok brains so they think it's something new when putin gives the same speech every year

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that's a rather dismissive comment, almost as if you're seeking to undermine the image of people outside of your nation, specifically peoples that might stand in opposition to russia or the chinese

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          westoids can't stand in opposition against freaks giving hormones to their kids
          europe and the middle east will belong to russia
          asia and africa will belong to china
          there's jack shit westoids can do anything about it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I want to beat you

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *