Major soience breakthough

After spending billions on research, soience has discovered that men are different from women

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

Ape Out Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    the times has fallen on hard times

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    transwomen = men
    so they're saying they've revealed differences between men and trannies(men), therefore troons should compete with women and not with other men.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The issue isn't whether or not men and troony homosexual men have equal physical capability on average, it's whether or not troony homosexual men and biological men have equal physical capability [spoiler: they dont]

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/early/2024/04/10/bjsports-2023-108029
    Such a bizarre study with so much wrong I can barely scratch the surface.
    >19 cisgender men (CM) (mean±SD, age: 37±9 years), 12 transgender men (TM) (age: 34±7 years), 23 transgender women (TW) (age: 34±10 years) and 21 cisgender women (CW) (age: 30±9 years)
    The sample sizes are small. The age variance is large. How do they expect to find any meaningful effect sizes?
    >TW had similar testosterone concentration (TW 0.7±0.5nmol/L, CW 0.9±0.4nmol/)
    Okay, so within three stdev implies "similar". Fair enough I suppose. No p-value? Interesting
    >higher oestrogen (TW 742.4±801.9pmol/L, CW 336.0±266.3pmol/L, p=0.045
    So 0 = 0. They're within one standard deviation of each other and this indicates statistical significance of higher? Wtf.
    >higher absolute handgrip strength (TW 40.7±6.8kg, CW 34.2±3.7kg, p=0.01),
    ibid. Within one standard error.
    >lower forced expiratory volume in 1 s:forced vital capacity ratio (TW 0.83±0.07, CW 0.88±0.04, p=0.04),
    ibid
    >lower relative jump height (TW 0.7±0.2cm/kg; CW 1.0±0.2cm/kg, p<0.001)
    ibid
    >and lower relative V̇O2max (TW 45.1±13.3mL/kg/min/, CW 54.1±6.0mL/kg/min, p<0.001)
    ibid

    >TM had similar testosterone concentration (TM 20.5±5.8nmol/L, CM 24.8±12.3nmol/L)
    ibid
    >lower absolute hand grip strength (TM 38.8±7.5kg, CM 45.7±6.9kg, p=0.03)
    ibid
    >lower absolute V̇O2max (TM 3635±644mL/min, CM 4467±641mL/min p=0.002)
    ibid

    Seriously, how the frick did this shit pass peer review?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/BrUpI9b.png

      Is this a normal thing to include in papers now? I thought this section is traditionally labeled "conflicts of interest".

      Absolute dumpster fire

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/BrUpI9b.png

      Is this a normal thing to include in papers now? I thought this section is traditionally labeled "conflicts of interest".

      >>Data availability statement
      >Data are available on reasonable request.
      ??????

      How do we purge these lunatics from science?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      They probably figured they were being smart by surveying a large age range, but the problem is such a small sample size makes doing that idiotic.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >The sample sizes are small. The age variance is large. How do they expect to find any meaningful effect sizes?
      I've seen research with 8 patients passed peer review, why not this one? it's a decent size for their field.
      yes, "the science" is fricking junk, don't ask why. it's their own "peer" review standard.

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Is this a normal thing to include in papers now? I thought this section is traditionally labeled "conflicts of interest".

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Well at least they’re including it, regardless of which section it’s in.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      and into the trash this """""study""""" goes

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Lol wtf

      So glad I treat these people like slaves. No reason to see them as humans

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >>Data availability statement
    >Data are available on reasonable request.
    ??????

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      what is reasonable request?
      does this mean they can arbitrary deny to provide the data?

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It means data is available to friendly entities unlikely to call out errors but denied to anyone who might have reason to want to disprove their findings.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Since you posted no link I cant know... but doesn't this headline rather imply: 'We found enough statistical differences between men and men who have had surgery and HRT to say it's fair to let men invade womens sports, provided they have surgery and HRT' ?

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      haha yeah

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Now repeat the study between Women and "Trans women" (no such thing).

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Who cares? They should study the difference between trans women and real women if they want to make the argument that trans women should compete in women's sports.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *