amerisharts are the only ones calling universities 'college'. in fact, most american unis literally have 'university' in their name >inb4 more bong directed insults
t. germ

In Computer science it is often customary to include 0 in the natural numbers due to the array indexing starting at 0 as that's how pointers work.
In mathematical context it's safe to assume that 0 is not a part of the natural numbers, but in CS you'd use N_0 or N_+ or N_{ge0} to denote the same

It is very common among mathematicians to count zero among the naturals and this predates the prevalence of computers and computer science. Starting from 1 is commoner among more traditionally-minded analysts.

Ive only known 1 programmer from MIT. Extremely average ability, VERY inflated ego. Also wont go into the details but he was a predatory gay and tried to get some underage intern blackout drunk for sex

>MIT: the best college in the world

no it isn't

it's Mocкoвcкий гocyдapcтвeнный yнивepcитeт

every metric used to judge unis says otherwise

>unis

shut up inbred rotten tooth

amerisharts are the only ones calling universities 'college'. in fact, most american unis literally have 'university' in their name

>inb4 more bong directed insults

t. germ

Moscowian State University

Translated from my limited knowledge of cyrillic and Maкeдoнcки

University education is such a meme.

0's considered a Natural number these days? Inclusivity really has gone too far.

only morons think it isn't

Cultureless heathen. Do you even know who Euler was or did you think it was just a German word or something?

Of course I do. What does Euler have to do with the issue? He was from a time from before number systems were properly understood.

0 is only accepted because Terrence tao thinks so

Celebrity dickriders did the rest

In Computer science it is often customary to include 0 in the natural numbers due to the array indexing starting at 0 as that's how pointers work.

In mathematical context it's safe to assume that 0 is not a part of the natural numbers, but in CS you'd use N_0 or N_+ or N_{ge0} to denote the same

It is very common among mathematicians to count zero among the naturals and this predates the prevalence of computers and computer science. Starting from 1 is commoner among more traditionally-minded analysts.

Who cares, when it matters if 0 is in the naturals or not they will define what the naturals are. Like they did in your screenshot.

Americans are still using blackboards over whiteboards?

Holy dysgraphia.

Ive only known 1 programmer from MIT. Extremely average ability, VERY inflated ego. Also wont go into the details but he was a predatory gay and tried to get some underage intern blackout drunk for sex

>Also wont go into the details but he was a predatory gay and tried to get some underage intern blackout drunk for sex

so he was trans

No, just your run of the mill sodomite.

Math is pitiful, can't even decide if 0 is natural or not. Next time try defining jargon before using it in contradictory ways.

I’ve seen what they do in these top colleges, lectures are just impressive displays for the zoomer brain

Numbers aren't real so who cares whether one fake number is or isn't present in a fake list of other fake numbers.

The Von Neumann construction of the natural numbers start at 0, Rajesh.

Mathematical definitions are arbitrarily defined so if some says N includes 0 then that's their interpretation

That's why math community is such a clusterfrick because most of theorems can't be grounded in reality and they can't even form their own consensus.