Muh 144hz!!!!!!!

Is this the biggest scam ever?

I bought a new monitor, and I paid a plus for it to have 144hz.

But I see no difference in motion fluidity between my old 60hz monitor, and this brand new 1440hz monitor.

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you have eye cancer mate

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hope you get in a car crash with your family and you are pinned between two crushed panels and you have to watch the life slowly drain from your loved ones, completely helpless.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I hope you die.

      Dogshit genetics. Consider ending your bloodline.

      144hz displays frames every 6.944ms. It has its own individual processing lag, usually 2-4ms at most.

      How can a single thread drive someone that mad ?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I hope you die.

      same, op is moronic and should bleed to death in front of his family

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    There is a difference when gaming. You see horizontal lines when panning your camera too quickly if the hz is too low.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Except I have freesync activated on both.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Not only gaming, everything. 120 to 144hz is from what I've seen not relevant tho.
      https://www.testufo.com/

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I hope you die.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I should have bought a 60hz 4k OLED monitor.
    It wasn't THAT much more expensive.

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >buy 144hz monitor
    >too dumb to enable the full refresh rate in OS settings
    >hurr it looks the same
    Many such cases

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You need to set it to 144hz in the settings.

      This. Unironically.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I might just be autistic but I was blown away by simply moving my mouse around on a 144hz monitor, to the point that I was sunk back in my chair. Like those people who saw that train movie a century ago.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That's a pretty normal reaction for anyone with non-defective eyes. OP just doesn't fall into that category, or he forgot to change the refresh rate like that other anon said.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      My reaction was much the same
      I was moving a window around and sat their jiggling it for a good while whilst thinking "wow so smooth, I can actually still read the text"
      Nearly as good as CRTs

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Had the same reaction
      OP must be mentally moronic

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Yeah I bought 144hz for gayman but I wouldn't want to go back even just for office use.

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    This reads like bait but if it isn't. Set 144hz in the display settings.
    And there is a huge difference, even old farts in their 70's can tell the difference.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    i can't notice much of a difference past 90Hz

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I agree with this. I have a 120 Hz phone, a 120 Hz laptop and a 144 Hz PC monitor. I can't tell the difference between 120 and 144. I can tell the difference between either of those and 60 though, but it isn't something that jumps out at me all the time. I only spot it sometimes.

  10. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    144hz isn't enough for me. One day I want to buy a 360HZ monitor. When will we have a 1MHz monitor? When will monitors reach 1GHz?

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Panasonic plasma TVs with NeoPDP panels ran at 600Hz internally and supported 10bit color, and that was back in like 2009.

      Plasma tech getting thrown out in favour of LCD was like getting stuck in the dark ages for over a decade. I'm glad things are improving now.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        why did plasma die, anyways

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          2008 financial crysis. LCD was cheaper and therefore more profitable. Normal people didn't care as long it's thin and big unlike their CRTs.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      anon do you understand the meaning of diminishing returns

  11. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    maybe you're moronic or something

  12. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    said literally zero people on earth. Frick 60hz trash

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      plenty of people fail to actually enable high hz output in windows/nvidia settings
      i've seen it countless times

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        yeah I wonder how that happens
        they just plug in the monitor and never check it

  13. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, because it lowers latency. gaming jesus has a video out today about that.

    144hz ~= 5ms latency.

    It matters, because latency adds up.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Dogshit genetics. Consider ending your bloodline.

      144hz displays frames every 6.944ms. It has its own individual processing lag, usually 2-4ms at most.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://www.rtings.com/monitor/tests/inputs/input-lag
        Processing lag is 0.3-0.7ms
        The real lag is that the monitor receives from GPU-DP/HDMI and renders each frame pixel by pixel and line by line, this means that in addition to the 6.9 ms lag you get a 6.9/2= 3.4ms lag, this is the time after which you will see the top half of the new frame. This is also why 120fps makes sense on a 60Hz monitor

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          In the same way, 120Hz monitors reproduce 60FPS content better than 60Hz monitors, because they render the next frame twice as fast, i.e. no longer in 16.66ms, but in 8.33ms. Of course, you will still have 60 fps, but you will see the top part of each next frame not after 0-8.33 ms, but after 0-4.16 ms, and the bottom part not after 8.33-16.66 ms, but after 4.16-8.33 ms. Therefore, now the most based ones are 1440p@240Hz or 4K@144Hz, not single point in anything else, and soon 1440p@360Hz and 4K@240Hz will appear.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >and soon 1440p@360Hz and 4K@240Hz will appear.
            They exist already, they're just expensive since it's relatively close to the top of the line

  14. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It is a scam. I have a 160 Hz display and did set it back to 60 Hz. The saved money for electric is more worth than the tiny amount of more fluidity.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      turd worlder bait

  15. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I see no difference in motion fluidity between my old 60hz monitor
    are you blind?

  16. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The human eyeball can't see more than ~50 motional changes per second so you're entirely right OP. It is a scam

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Spotted the europoor

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No I'm not, science denier.

  17. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    you DID use a Displayport cable AND enable 144hz refresh rate settings right? otherwise you'd be the moron for not using the hardware right

  18. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You're not Esport level ultra GAYmer, OP. And that's a good thing.

  19. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I see no difference in motion fluidity between my old 60hz monitor
    It's inequivocally a (You) problem. Some people are just unable to notice even with 2 different monitors side by side.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      That means they don't move the pointer or see things in action. Like you'll see the difference idle. kek @morons

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        It makes a difference idle with CRT monitors
        I remember switching to 85hz just because 60hz was annoying as shit

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          check, I was talking about the same tech, CRTs are another story, even more while recording. With recent LCDs it's the first thing you catch, going up to 60hz is refreshing.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          check, I was talking about the same tech, CRTs are another story, even more while recording. With recent LCDs it's the first thing you catch, going up to 60hz is refreshing.

          Yeah CRTs flicker as they redraw, LCDs don't
          60hz used to give me a head ache from the flicker, I had to use 85hz at least.

          Ironically the strobing effect makes motion look more fluid somehow, part of the reason why now if you watch a dvd or VHS on an LCD it looks like shit

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >part of the reason why now if you watch a dvd or VHS on an LCD it looks like shit
            That's very partial kek, there is so much more to that like how badly DVD are encoded (a huge proportion of them are craply done) and the technology itself of analog displays. LCDs are bad to display analog no surprises it's numeric and VGA can't save them, only filters to emulate older tech.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Ironically the strobing effect makes motion look more fluid somehow,
            I feel like that's probably related to how some of the higher-end gaming monitors tend to include strobing backlight functionality (usually advertised as some variation of "low motion blur"). We've come full circle.
            Though at least with gaming LCDs pushing 144Hz, and now commonly even 240Hz, they do have an absolute objective advantage over CRTs when it comes to strobing, because the difference between ~85Hz strobes and 240Hz strobes is massive and will be much much easier on the eyes of the majority of people. So you get all the benefits and none of the downsides.

  20. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Peoples eyes and perception vary a lot

  21. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You need to change the display settings in your operating system to enable 144hz. Also, you might need to use display port instead of HDMI to use the higher refresh rate.

    moron

  22. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Everything in a capitalist market is a scam, moron.

  23. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The human eye cannot see more than 17 fps so I'm not sure why we ever built 60hz panels

  24. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I can tell 60 vs 144 just moving my mouse on the desktop dishonest troll

  25. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OLED is a bigger korean asiatic scam.

  26. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Going from a very old PC to a very new one I can say that the most obvious and impressive change was the move from 60 to 144hz. Even just using Windows itself is significantly better.

  27. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >But I see no difference in motion fluidity between my old 60hz monitor, and this brand new 1440hz monitor.
    sound like a (you) problem bud.

  28. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    for real though, very little stuff utilises a high frame rate
    moving the cursor, scrolling on a web browser, _some_ video games, css animations, that's pretty much it

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Weird take, considering moving the cursor and scrolling anything on any software are both extremely universal tasks. Even in video games, it's true that for many it won't matter in terms of improving your gameplay, but even on something like a top-down strategy game scrolling the map around will still feel just that much smoother, just like scrolling a page in a web browser.

      Pretty much the only things that don't benefit from an increased frame rate might be super-autistic text editing setups that use the terminal for everything, and thus scroll by jumping some number of lines (and probably using the keyboard rather than ever touching the mouse, too). If you're writing C++ in vim in the terminal all day, yeah, you're probably not gonna see any difference. But if you're even slightly normie and, say, use vscode, or if you also use a web browser sometimes (even just to read docs), then scrolling and mouse movement comes into play again.

  29. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >But I see no difference in motion fluidity between my old 60hz monitor, and this brand new 1440hz monitor.
    See a doctor. I mean it.

  30. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >1440hz monitor
    At this point you're not competitive but master of the universe

  31. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The polling rate of your perception of reality is lower than the monitor’s refresh rate
    Can you see an apple in your head?

  32. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Why are so many asshurt with OP's statement?
    It isn't lie, a lot of people don't see any difference from the regular Iphone 15 screen which is 60hz, to the Iphone 15 Pro that is 120hz.

  33. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >But I see no difference in motion fluidity between my old 60hz monitor,
    so why did you buy it? ; )

  34. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    just run your monitor at 60hz, problem solved : )

  35. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Remember, the ability to perceive latency is correlated with IQ. People who enjoy 4k60 seem to be about 10 points lower than normal, and this makes sense: they have better eyesight because they didn't read books growing up

  36. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    One day you'll figure out diminishing returns. Then you'll figure out sample and hold.
    Only then can we discuss things like adults.

  37. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    For me, its the P170S @ 75hz, 125% scaling.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >75hz
      fricking awful, pick something divisible by the 60, 30, and 24 fps video you watch eg. 120hz, 240hz, 360hz, etc. 75hz is the most moronic thing to ever happen.
      >125% scaling
      disgusting, use 100% or 200%.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Its either 60.02 or 75.03hz, ask Dell. The scaling is bad I agree though.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Also I have my max FPS limited to 72 in NVCP

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Screen refresh rate is not locked to 75Hz you idiot, it adapts to the media you're watching or the game you're playing, 75 is just the maximum.

  38. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >buys a monitor with a high refresh rate
    >doesn't know that you have to change the refresh rate in windows settings

  39. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    this is either
    bait, or
    you're moronic, or
    both

  40. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You don't need more than 90hz.
    Anything above 90hz is placebo.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I still aim for 120 so when the framerate dips (and it will dip because modern game developers) it isn't so jarring.

  41. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Op thinking he did something by dropping money cash green for 144Hz in 2024
    LMAO

  42. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You just get to see bad software lagging but with higher resolution. Also it gives me a headache.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *