Muhammad is the archetypal false prophet and an antichrist.

Muhammad is the archetypal false prophet and an antichrist. His message was but a shallow immitation of the gospel and a diabolical inversion of many aspects of it. Islam does not lead to truth. Anyone who has the truth knows that Islam is a false religion. It is contrary to everything revealed by God and through Jesus Christ.

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68

The Kind of Tired That Sleep Won’t Fix Shirt $21.68

  1. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Muhammad didn't exist doe. "Muḥammad" is a title that means praiseworthy that Arab Christians used for Jesus. The references to "Muḥammad" in the Quran are to Jesus. The Mythical "Muḥammad" that Muslims believe in was created by the Abbasids who also created the hadiths to gain legitimacy after the creation of the Quran. Btw the Quran was written in Arabic influenced Syriac and was a bible commentary by Unitarian Christians. Which later on had Arabic vowel dots added to it which lead to misreading's of it and confusion.
    see this playlist: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jXq4AK562L0&list=PL1zJ2LUq92EkBQpJlVHK2vb7YigCcmzP7&index=1

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      His bloody rise from schizo to warlord is too particular to be fake doe. I would like him more if he didn't larp as some holy prophet and is seens as what he really is: a successful warlord and political figure from Arabia like Genghis Khan for Mongolia

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Jesus is Isa.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I suggest you look into “The Bible in Arabic: The Scriptures of the People of the Book according to Islam” by Sidney Griffith. He argues that Islam was not influenced by sectarian Christians but rather the immediate Oriental and Assyrian Christianty that surrounded the Arabian peninsula. I’m not disagreeing with you, tho. I just think you’d enjoy it considering you are a based Luxembourg enjoyer, cause the hypothesis is a little different but the end result is basically the same

  2. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    The chirstcucks claiming islam is demoniac need to clearly explain. Why satan would prefer an Abrahamic heresy over the outright pagans who lived in Arabia.

    Because chirstcucks will claim with resolute certainty that all polytheist are devil worshipers. Which is how they justified the atrocities they committed in the Baltics and the new world.

    Thus why would satan aid what amounts to a Arabian group of Ebionites over outright devil worshippers.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Muhammad, himself, said so

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        literally just the medieval version of pic related. A means to explain the dichotomy between conscious and temptation. Even Shintoism has a similar concept.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Muhammad says there "a devil commands me but it's cool guys, it's only to do good stuff"

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He's talking about this.
            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qareen
            It's a temptation thing, not a possession thing, and the other poster is right, medieval Christians also had a version of it.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            M-hm it uses that word. And Muhammad and his hearers clearly consider it a negative thing, since they ask if it even includes him, him then responding that he has assistance against this being - why would you need a helper against a non-negative being?

            It's plainly describing what we call a demon.

            >medieval Christians also had a version of it
            I don't see the relevance.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Actually read the article, not just the title. Or search qareen on Sunnah. It literally is a demon on one shoulder and an angel on the other kind of thing, in Islam everyone has two recording angels and a tempting devil. Again it's not a possession thing, it's universal and you can see it as a way of talking about the universality of temptation. And then in this case Muhammad's qareen has been tamed by God because prophets are sinless (which is not an internally consistent doctrine on their part).

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            In the hadith I presented, Muhammad says "فَلاَ يَأْمُرُنِي إِلاَّ بِخَيْرٍ" (fa-lā ya’murunī illā bi-khayr) - "he does not command/order me except in good". The point is Muhammad directly saying that a demon commands him but it's ok bro it's totally only to do good stuff

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            You have to fit it into the rest of the sources on the qareen to read it properly. I swear to god, you hysterical evangelicals, hindus and israelites are 9/10 times more obnoxious than the muzzies. Zero ability or desire to approach Islam as an interesting topic in itself with room for both good and bad. You just pore over the sources to find anything negative you can and then copypaste it all over the internet to prove that ackshually israelite on a stick, eating cow shit or being an insane yid ethnosupremacist are good. It's possible to disbelieve and oppose Islam without approaching it like that you know, and it's a far more interesting subject if you don't.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I'd take the obnoxious religions over the noxious Islam because I want my civilization to continue to exist.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What He said perfectly describes what you said here

            Actually read the article, not just the title. Or search qareen on Sunnah. It literally is a demon on one shoulder and an angel on the other kind of thing, in Islam everyone has two recording angels and a tempting devil. Again it's not a possession thing, it's universal and you can see it as a way of talking about the universality of temptation. And then in this case Muhammad's qareen has been tamed by God because prophets are sinless (which is not an internally consistent doctrine on their part).

            . It seems the only way to approach Islam and believe it is to delude yourself into believing desperate rationalizations rather than reading and understanding the words in front of them.

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >You have to fit it into the rest of the sources on the qareen to read it properly
            If you know a verse from the Koran or a sahih hadith that makes "a demon gives me commands...but don't worry they're all good" not seem like the worst possible thing for your religious teacher to be saying then I am all ears mate

          • 2 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >as an interesting topic in itself
            Also I will freely tell you that I don't find Islam an interesting topic in of itself. Not in the slightest. The Koran is incredibly boring drivel that recycles summaries of Bible stories and says the same things about Allah over and over and over again. The sunnah is by and large dry and completely boring except for when Muhammad is saying lolworthy things like that about listening to a demon.

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        ahistorical drivel written centuries after muhammad allegedly died, written far far away from arabia, it’s nonsense

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      John 1 clearly defines the antichrist by just one thing: denial that Jesus is the son of God and the Word of God.

      Muhammad repeatedly does exactly that.

      As to why? Paganism was losing and on the way out. Roman paganism was defeated by Christianity from the inside and the same would have happened to ME paganism, so they changed tactics

      • 2 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Muhammad repeatedly does exactly that.

        No, he didn't, you fricking moron.

        • 2 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          He does in the way the Christians mean it, and you know that.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      What were the genocides in the Baltic for besides Teutonic want for more land? It really wasn’t religion. That was an excise to get legitimacy in diplomacy from other neighbours, who were christian, that it was no worry about the Order also invading them because they were simply just invading heretic lands to supposedly ‘christianize’ them.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Why satan would prefer an Abrahamic heresy over the outright pagans who lived in Arabia.
      Because an abrahamic heresy is a more powerful deception, hence why it's the second largest religion on the planet.

    • 2 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >the guy who is obsessed with torture, has great difficulty hiding his hatred of mankind, and loves deceiving and putting people against each other isn't the devil
      The islamic definition of devil: someone who has critical thinking and fights the hateful ideology of islam.

  3. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    My abrahamism is better then your abrahamism

  4. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Neither Jesus nor Muhammed were real people.

  5. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't see much of a connection between what Muhammad did and the Gospels
    Could you explain?

  6. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Sotty, anon, but argument
    >my religion is true because desert book says so
    Can't be disproven by any means. It's absolute argument finishing any discussion.

  7. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >prophet of doom

  8. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Muhammad’s name spells out ‘666’ and ‘616’ in biblical code. Very similar to Emperor Nero.

  9. 2 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >archetypal false prophet
    Jesus prophesized twice that judgement day would happen during the lifetime of the disciples yet thousands of years later it still has not happened. Both Christians and Muslims believe in Jesus so both religions have to be wrong since believe the teachings of a false prophet.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *