Now that the dust has settled, what's the verdict on Ted Kaczynski?

Now that the dust has settled, what's the verdict on Ted Kaczynski?

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    He did nothing wrong.
    >b-but he was violent!
    Everything that we have (and don't have) is a result of violence, violence defines humanity. The state will use violence against you if you threaten its integrity.
    I don't know if uncle Ted picked the best targets but he certainly got his message across. Had he not done what he did we probably wouldn't be sat here, 3 months after his death, talking about him.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >Had he not done what he did we probably wouldn't be sat here, 3 months after his death, talking about him.

      For over a decade the Smash Mouth guy has occupied millions of people's brains in meme form, and his death will probably give him a second wind for at least a little while longer. Fame and attention don't necessarily translate to enduring fundamental value or importance.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >in meme form
        Well I've actually listened to Ted's manifesto and I am in fundamental agreement with his worldview. The memes surrounding him are great but I also take him seriously and his writings have influenced my own view of the world, so I suppose he succeeded. How many people have you or I influenced on a deep level? History will vindicate Ted.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      And what did he accomplish with his violence? He killed random innocent people only for him to become a meme among moronic anprims online

  2. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Typical leftist meme. Doesn't even understand the format.

  3. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    If you have to kill people to make them read your writing it can't be very good.
    I won't read crap like that just out of spite.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      So if he had returned to modernity with the sole purpose of publishing his writings he would have been taken seriously by his peers rather than ridiculed and being further alienated?

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        He returned to modernity to bomb people.
        And he never really left modernity in the first place.

        He lived in a cabin paid for by his parents, harassing his neighbors with his modern rifle and poisoned their dogs with modern poisons.

        • 5 months ago
          Anonymous

          Can you answer my question? Would he have been taken seriously? If not, he didn't really have any other way of disseminating his ideas.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            If his ideas were good enough why not?
            You're just admitting no one would take his lame ideas seriously if he didn't become a famous terrorist.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            >lame ideas
            Yet he has influenced the world in such a way that it has forced you to react and take a position on him. Ted's influence is enduring.

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            and I reject his ideas, we should not go back to being like cavemen, we should rather struggle and achieve, if we are becoming decadent, then we struggle against that and overcome it too, as we did smallpox, famine and various other trials

          • 5 months ago
            Anonymous

            >Yet he has influenced the world in such a way that it has forced you to react and take a position on him.
            But it hasn't. As I said I haven't even read it out of spite.
            The only reason we're talking about him are his bombings, not his actual ideas.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >noo you can't just kill a bunch of israelites! Mein Kampf wont sell!
      >noo you can't just kill a bunch of slavs and Asians, Das Kapital won't sell!
      moron

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        I consider it a moral imperative to not let myself get blackmailed into reading someone's idea through terrorist acts.
        It would only serve to encourage others to use the same methods and promote further terrorism.

  4. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    He was a very smart schizo.
    He largely understood the problems of our modern society and realized that violence is the only real way to solve them, but the was too mentally ill to act on his ideas in any reasonable way.
    Oversocialization is a massive social threat, but randomly bombing shit is pointless.
    He should have been a proper terrorist instead, but that kind of shit requires high level practical social skills he didn't have to capitalize on your actions.

  5. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    He was an MKultra glowie troony schizo I wouldn't be surprised if the FBI was funding his bomb making to justify their budget.

    • 5 months ago
      Anonymous

      >I wouldn't be surprised if the FBI was funding his bomb making to justify their budget.
      This line of thinking is inherently flawed. You're giving power over to your enemies. They will always find a way to justify their agendas and tighten their grip on you, with or without terrorist acts.

      • 5 months ago
        Anonymous

        >This line of thinking is inherently flawed.
        No, you see this?
        >You're giving power over to your enemies
        Threats perceived as even slightly credible grant legitimacy to respond with exponential force.
        >The enemy has a scary new rifle! Let us create rapid fire machines of death that were previously shunned.
        >The enemy has a new chemical weapon! Let us utilized weapons even worse than that which were previously banned by vote.
        >The enemy has an evil agenda! Let us carry out dubious operations in other countries with little purpose beyond making our contractors rich.

        It's literally geopolitics 101 in the current year.

  6. 5 months ago
    Anonymous

    Pseud moron

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *