Porfirio Diaz

Why did Mexicans kill the best leader they've ever produced?

This man was the only hope of Mexico and they murdered him. They also murdered Maximilian who was the second best leader they've ever had.

I'm starting to think Mexicans are legitimately moronic

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

CRIME Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You will never be White, Enrique.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      have a nice day schizoid

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Okay serious question: when did Spaniards and Mexicans cease being white?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Spaniards
        Have always been White.
        >Mexicans cease being white?
        They never were. Nice try beaner.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Massive bait, Iberians are brown but European and Mexicans are dark brown and not

          People in the Victorian era considered Mexicans to be white.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Because during that period the only people considered to be Mexican was the then un racemixed urban Spaniards that comprised up to 30% of the people, they then race mixed heavilly as urbanization was pushed on the rural native majority. Also these were never called white by Victorian or American gentry which regarded only civilized and wealthy Euros as white

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            No they didn't Pedro.

            American sellout or Far-seeing Industrialist?
            Hard to say since he was ousted but could have gone either way.
            Mexicans dont keep records well so we may never know.

            >Mexicans dont keep records
            moron.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Massive bait, Iberians are brown but European and Mexicans are dark brown and not

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >Spaniards and Mexicans
        Don't put us in the same category moron

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        By the late 1800s Mexicans and anglos had the same relationship the US has with Japan. Couple with the porfiriato that made Mexico very wealthy. Most Mexican immigrants to the USA where rich families. Mexicans have anglo and french blood for a reason. They married between each other.

        Everything slowly collapsed starting with the great depression.

        The new immigrants such as Italians,Jews,polocks, and Irish people where very upset for how they where treated. Once they took control of Hollywood during the 60s they took their revenge.

        Mexicans ended up mixing with everyone and anglos pretty much disappeared.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >Once they took control of Hollywood during the 60s they took their revenge.
          They didn't ever "take control," they were the ones that started the whole rotten business in Hollywood.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Yoou don't know how much I seethe everytime I remember one of our president's was called Vincent Fox.
          Originally German, but it doesn't make it better.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Díaz sought to attract foreign investment to Mexico to aid the development of mining, agriculture, industry, and infrastructure. The government mandate to survey land meant that secure title was established for investors. The process often obliterated claims of local communities that could not prove title or extinguished traditional usage of forests and other areas not under cultivation. The private survey companies bid for contracts from the Mexican government, with the companies acquiring one-third of the land measured, often prime land that was along proposed railway routes. Companies usually sold that land, often to foreigners who pursued large-scale cultivation of crops for export. Owners of large landed estates (haciendas) often took the opportunity to sell to foreign investors as well. The result by the turn of the twentieth century was the transfer of a vast amount of Mexican land in all parts of the country into foreign hands, either individuals or land companies. Rural communities and small-scale farmers lost their holdings and were forced to be agricultural wage laborers or pursue or move. Conditions on haciendas were often harsh. Landlessness caused rural discontent and a major cause of peasant participation in the Mexican Revolution, seeking a reversal of the concentration of land ownership through land reform.

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Didn't he rule for like 20 years?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      30 years. The best 30 years.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >lays down a few miles of railroad while the rest of the country is gripped by a bloody civil war he largely neglects
        wow truly a golden age

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          To be fair I also wouldn't trust the Mexican people with democracy.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Mexicans haven't lived under a democracy in all of their history. They started out as a monarchy, went straight to phony republic, then ruled by strongmen military types, one party rule for 70 years, and now they're a narco state.

            Who are you trying to fool, Pedro? No amount of babysitting from White people will ever make you human.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's a relief

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        porfirio diaz wasnt murdered, also he could leave power any time he wanted but even after promising elections he stayed
        maximilian was not a good leader (or even a leader)

        >The best 30 years
        that'd be the mexican miracle (1940-1970) during which we actually developed as a society instead of just "line go up"

        >lays down a few miles of railroad while the rest of the country is gripped by a bloody civil war he largely neglects
        wow truly a golden age

        porfirio diaz was popular because he brought peace to mexico by ending civil war. not much else to be said in his defence since he did cause a war on a whole new level of violence tho

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >maximilian was not a good leader
          B8

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >never did anything, spent his time hunting butterflies
            >puppet to the french and his wife
            >betrays conservatives by passing reform laws
            wow what great leader

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >daily mexcrement homosexual thread about how he wouldn't be living in a brick hovel with a tin roof if he was governed by an illegitimate French monarch

    go pay your dues to the local drug lord jose

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >homosexual
      this movie redpilled me on the gays:

      https://rumble.com/v4uomzo-aids-the-judgement-of-god-full-documentary.html

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Latin American countries do seem to do best with dictators. For Mexico besides Diaz, also see the early PRI (late PRI was corrupt and tied to cartels)

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Mexicans are too moronic to govern themselves so they need to be tard wrangled by strong men dictators.

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >govern the country for 30 years of slow but stable industrialization
    >there are some issues with social movements for democracy and agrarian reform but nothing too threatening as no one wants to risk a civil war when they could just wait for you to kick the bucket
    >have an interview in which you for whatever reason decide to quite explicitly say that you will allow free elections and won't be a candidate for reelection anymore
    >political movements explode all over the country as a consequence (some of them liberal, others from the younger generations of your own supporters)
    >suddenly decide to backtrack
    >suppress opposing political groups and candidates and even exile the most popular possible successor among your own supporters
    >find out that once political movements are allowed to start they can't be suppressed and that trying to actually radicalizes them even more
    >country falls into the start of a decade long series of civil conflicts and you go into exile - your legacy destroyed
    BRAVO, DIAZ.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      kek this, but let porfiristas blame it on "muh judeo masonic marxism supported by the US etc etc etc"

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        The thing that angers me the most is that he could have easily become sort of a uniting paternal figure of a new gradually democratizing nation (after governing for 30 years of relative peace most of everyone, grudgingly or not, respected him) and might have even been remembered relatively fondly to this day instead of as a power-greedy oldfart.

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    American sellout or Far-seeing Industrialist?
    Hard to say since he was ousted but could have gone either way.
    Mexicans dont keep records well so we may never know.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Mexicans dont keep records well so we may never know.
      what?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Nta but they dont, that’s why most conflicts within itself is just vague estimations for the casualties mostly estimated by Americans using census datas that are few and far inbetween. Latams, Africans and Indians are horrible with record keeping

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          We do, though?
          The journals and memoirs from the period are out there man. You can read what the scientificos thought. If you are literate in Spanish.
          You aren't looking at pre-history here.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >I'm starting to think Mexicans are legitimately moronic
    Correct.

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >tfw you bought shares in mexican railway companies in 1890

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Gets expropriated in 1920

      >But you play the long game and re-incarnate just in time to buy shares in 1995

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Porfirio and Maximiliano weren't leaders of the people, but of the bourgeoisie and the rich. On the other side revolutionaries offered to amend the hate the lower castes had on the higher ones, and everyone took on that offer, just like anybody would do when offered.

    >Why did Mexicans kill the best leader they've ever produced?
    Oh shoot, I didn't realize you were just racebaiting. Why you should know Porfirio wasn't murdered.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      How is it race baiting when he was a literal mestizo?

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        https://i.imgur.com/nGRMz4T.jpeg

        Why did Mexicans kill the best leader they've ever produced?

        This man was the only hope of Mexico and they murdered him. They also murdered Maximilian who was the second best leader they've ever had.

        I'm starting to think Mexicans are legitimately moronic

        >I'm starting to think Mexicans are legitimately moronic
        I mean it's all over the place dude. If your only explanation you can come up with is "hurr durr Mexicans dumb me smart" without even realizing why did they kill a pair of tyrants, then you are fricked up in your mind.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      and nowadays the cartels are catholic revolutionaries and the government is freemason good job

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Kill?
    He died in France five years after the revolution, senile and sad.
    > They also murdered Maximilian who was the second best leader they've ever had.
    Do you actually know anything about his government besides the fact that he was white, of the House Habsburg, and a monarch?
    No shade thrown at him though, he stood and went down with the ship.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Do you actually know anything about his government besides the fact that he was white
      Of course not. Hispanista beaners automatically grovel at the feet of every White person they see. Despite the fact that the ruling classes before and after independence were all ethnic Spaniards who completely fricked everything up.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        I don't think that is particularly true, either.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Both of those statements are 100% true.

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Why did the Mexicans get rid of the guy that was brought in by a foreign power and based his rule on favoring the conservative elites
    why are monarchists such cucks?

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Murder is an intricate part of Mexico's culture.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Freemasons and calvanist protestants allied with britian did a "ukraine style coup" to deny catholic spain and holy roman empire mexico

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    A positivist warrior of EVROPA.

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I have Mexico export statistics from 1910 and seems like their economy was centered around silver, copper and gold mining, coffee farming and henequen(weird textile crop)

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      correct, real industrialization only came in the 40s

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *