Post books for understanding female psychology

Post books for understanding female psychology

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

Rise, Grind, Banana Find Shirt $21.68

Beware Cat Shirt $21.68

  1. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Don't need a book, this is enough:

    Campbell, A., Stockley, P., & Pickett, J. (Eds.). (2013). Female competition and aggression [Special issue]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 368(1631).
    https://royalsocietypublishing.org/toc/rstb/368/1631

    Especially "The development of human female competition: allies and adversaries."

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >In each case, the intensity of aggression is correlated with population density, and aggressive behaviour can be interpreted as a strategy to reduce competition for space and resources.
      fascinating

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >In each case, the intensity of aggression is correlated with population density, and aggressive behaviour can be interpreted as a strategy to reduce competition for space and resources.
      fascinating

      >For the most part, young women's competition is, directly or indirectly, about men and the resources they can provide. Hence it is perhaps unsurprising that women compete about those qualities that are highly valued by men: youth and attractiveness. Men find dominance or status less attractive in a prospective mate than do women [105], which may contribute to women's less overt striving for rank. When competition escalates in intensity, it typically involves the use of indirect aggression such as reputational attack, stigmatization and exclusion (see contributions to this issue from Benenson [101], Campbell [102] and Vaillancourt [104]).
      wtf? I love science now.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >women's less overt striving for rank.
        Don't understand why one would think women don't care about rank as much as men. All the women I've seen in real life were obsessed with either having "the highest rank" in the room or being married to the "guy with the highest rank".

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You're misreading. "Less overt" and "are obsessed" don't contradict each other. The point of the excerpt is specifically that women strive indirectly. As an example, men like and care aout overt, legible video game rankings much more than women do.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >You're misreading.
            Excuse my moronation. You're right.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >or being married to the "guy with the highest rank".
          That's what the authors are saying there, smoothbrain.
          >obsessed with either having "the highest rank"
          Effect of feminism. feminist women mistakenly try to display the male traits they themselves find attractive, such as worldliness and career status, solipsistically overlooking biological sex differences.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Over time I've found myself valuing women's social standing more. At this point I would no longer date a working class woman, and an undereducated woman, I don't think.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >At this point I would no longer date a working class woman, and an undereducated woman, I don't think.
          This is problematic, anon. Give me your reasoning.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >In settings where mate competition is more intense, such as inner city areas where men are in short supply and where male variance in resources is marked, cultural norms are adjusted to tolerate (and sometimes applaud) direct forms of female aggression (see Campbell [102] this issue). In these settings, girls do not view themselves as ‘unfeminine’ because stereotypes about what constitutes femininity are adjusted to accommodate the exigencies of their situation.
        catfight

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >women are highly sensitive to threats of rejection. They are more susceptible to group pressure than men [111]; their self-worth is more strongly dependent on peer evaluations [112], and they are more punishment sensitive [113]. Women also exceed men in the ability to decode emotional signals from visual and aural information [114] and perform better in tests of mind-reading and empathy
      Nice study
      Yall should also read and understand chimpanzee mating culture aspects that help understand why girls bang the whole squad, why they let the most aggressive guy hit it first and why when they get dumped, they bang a new guy asap

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That does apply for most women, maybe 90% of women Ive known. Theres a small amount of women that arent like that. I think that study is mostly for low class women, not middle class. Yes, theres the occasional black sheep that bangs hoodlums, but it isnt widespread. Those women you see in podcasts talking about how they want a man who can behead them are low class women. How are they low class? They live in tiny appartments and earn money by modeling, which means showing off tita on OnlyFans. Theres only a tiny amount of women who make big in OnlyFans, kind of like making it big with crypto.

      Most of you anons think women in general are scummy pieces of shit, but this is true for almost all low class women, so most of the female population.

      My suggestion is to stop talking with trashy women AKA low class prostitutes and those annoying middle class b***hes who pretend to be poor.

      https://i.imgur.com/yLr44mz.jpg

      Post books for understanding female psychology

      Otto Weininger unironically.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Are you kidding? The women I know dismiss the nice, stable guys in their circle, and end up with the abusive buttholes...over and over and over and over. Then they have the gall to complain "men are pigs". No, not all men...just the ones you're attracted to.
        If you really want to understand women, you have to realize that, every time they have a thought, they assign an emotion to it. The only way men can come close to achieving this is to consume a lot of estrogen, or estrogen-mimicking chemicals in foodstuffs, e.g. basedbeans.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          basedbeans -> s-o-y-b-e-a-n-s. So even IQfy is engaged in censorship? And to what end? No wonder I'm a self-identified blackpill.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >So even IQfy is engaged in censorship?
            Been like that for a good decade now, buddy.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >And to what end?
            it outs newbies who don't know about word filters. even if you haven't written soibeans before and been caught by the filter you should have lurked enough to have spotted it. it allows anons to dismiss posts.

            oooh, you're so le edgy. i'll bet you're the envy of all the other incel NEET shutins with room temperature IQs. you must be so proud of yourself.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >And to what end?
            it outs newbies who don't know about word filters. even if you haven't written soibeans before and been caught by the filter you should have lurked enough to have spotted it. it allows anons to dismiss posts.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Ooooohhh Im so blackpilled oooooohh I don't get pussy

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Laughed out loud while on the toilet.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          basedbeans -> s-o-y-b-e-a-n-s. So even IQfy is engaged in censorship? And to what end? No wonder I'm a self-identified blackpill.

          Gtfo, newbie. I can hardly take a sniff of that rancid, putrid, normalgay reasoning. "Wah, wah, i'm the nice guy!"; shut your damn mouth.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Not feeling sorry for myself...just pointing out why I don't feel sorry for women that find themselves in abusive relationships. After all, they picked him.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >That does apply for most women [...] I think that study is mostly for low class women
        That's not a study, that's a special issue, a collection of reviews and studies (how is everyone missing this?); I don't ever interact with women low in economic class or social class, excepting those working the cash register or in similar occupations; and the "Allies and adversaries" review is highly descriptive of the behaviors of women in finance, journalism, psychology, and the academy.

        I can't speak to OnlyFans or any of those podcasts you cite, as I have never in my life opened an OF link — though I did visit some other one two or three times, Chaturbate I think? — and I don't watch or listen to podcasts that aren't Cowen and Tooze, but "Allies and adversaries" describes the pathological behavior of upper-middle-class women on Twitter to a tee. Remember, in 2019 women made up more 65% of the 10% most prolific Twitter users (https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/). Twitter gossip, ostracism, wokeism is quintessentially female behavior.

        Have you ever managed a team or department that had women in it? There will always be social scheming, clique forming, lying; none of which you can avoid if you have women, and all of which it is senseless to fight. The most you can do is try to figure out what is a lie or what is not, and work around the . . . femininity.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        so be a trophy husband to a qt3.14 rich domfu? well, i'd do it if i could but how do you do it?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Chud study, already refuted

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        refuted where and how?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >post evidence!
        >refuted!

  2. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    A big problem in male rape cases is that somewhere around 40% of dudes nut when they're forcibly penetrated.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No way. It would be an extreme turn off unless you're gay.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        I can see it. Your prostate gets pounded how you gonna stop it? It's just mechanics.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You would not get hard. It would feel like taking a giant shit. Do you get hard while pooping?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            D-do you not? Obviously, back and forth stimulation is different from a single motion, right? Do you suck your shit back in and go again?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Do you suck your shit back in and go again
            When it's big you have to to get it out. There is a satisfaction after because it no longer hurts but it's in no way sexual. If someone else had control of pain over you you'd feel angry. I'd kill the person.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >I'd kill the person.
            Yeah, yeah. I heard a story from a prisoner on youtube where some blonde surfer dude went to prison so 5 c**ts put a bag on his head and then ran a train on him fricking his shit up.. Kill who? Sometimes shit's just fricked.
            Anyways, feels like we're talking past each other. Agree to disagree is fine with me.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Giant woman fricking you with a strap on "against" your will

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          You fricking homosexuals. It's penetrating women that turns us on. Only you b***hes like to be penetrated.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It would be an equal relationship plus she could spot me at the gym

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Don't be ashamed of who you are. Just marry a dude.

            >I'd kill the person.
            Yeah, yeah. I heard a story from a prisoner on youtube where some blonde surfer dude went to prison so 5 c**ts put a bag on his head and then ran a train on him fricking his shit up.. Kill who? Sometimes shit's just fricked.
            Anyways, feels like we're talking past each other. Agree to disagree is fine with me.

            I wouldn't go to prison.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Lmao, anon no one plans to go to prison.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You certainly seem to want to go there just to get raped like the gay prostitute that you are. I bet you think about it all the time. Gay men are basically women and women like rape fantasies.

            One day women will be made to be tall and super fecund. And men, tiny and athletic. This is the future.

            Barkon would you frick a giant woman, you might not realize it currently but the answer to this question is essential to validating your theory

            You fricking trannies.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah okay why don't you write another paragraph of prison rape fantasy, meanwhile me and my homie barkon gonna be genetically engineering amazonians

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >amazonians
            For what? Women are built to be mothers. Built to give birth to men.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That's why we are building different ones moron

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah but your troony world doesn't exist. Women are tiny and vulnerable. If the law didn't exist they'd get raped all the time unless they had a man to protect them. They still do even with the law.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That's why we are building different ones moron

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Evolution doesn't work that way.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >durr im smarter than barkon!!!
            Okay kid lmao

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm not going to pity you. You deserve your pain until you stop with your bullshit.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Why are you dicksucking this guy?

            >Do you suck your shit back in and go again
            When it's big you have to to get it out. There is a satisfaction after because it no longer hurts but it's in no way sexual. If someone else had control of pain over you you'd feel angry. I'd kill the person.

            Bro there’s the g spot in your butt. Maybe you wouldn’t cum but it might feel good if they hit the right spot. Of course if you ain’t gay it probably won’t make you feel good enough to make you happy. And itll be shameful and more painful then pleasurable. 99% pain 1% pleasure

            Obviously when someone says something like that they mean it somewhat poetically, it really doesn't warrant a thorough deboonk on the grounds that the outside world is literally real. What I'm saying is the internet and the "real world" are now closely intertwined so much that attempts to put the internet in a little box and treat it as some completely mutable thing that 'doesn't count' is naive.

            Everyone gets the obvious ways they are intertwined: you use your phone to physically accomplish things, you gain real life connections through the internet, people talk about things from the internet in real life. The less obvious is that the internet is so prevalent that people in "real life" are aware that real life is not the only option, they often see "going outside" and talking to strangers as a specific thing to do, in the way that someone might 'try' veganism or finger painting or something. Socialization and 'outside' used to just be immutable facts of life, you didn't have to consciously do them, they just happened. Now they're recognized as 'things' or even products that you pay for and possess. (Again, read Baudrillard) People's behavior outside is becoming less and less natural and more and more influenced by this abstract school of thought (from the internet) about what outside is 'supposed' to be.

            Imagine the sorts of self-hating internet dwelling teenagers you see here following their own advice and trying to go to a bar or a club and meeting people for the first time. They wouldn't be acting naturally are genuine parts of the 'outside' ecosystem like people did back when everyone lived that way without another option, they would essentially be trying to imitate the image they have in their heads of how people in that situation should be acting (an image with a lot of influence from movies, memes, annoying posts here, etc.) When there are enough people outside doing this, you hit a critical mass and it's a totally different situation that's far removed from the original, natural situation.

            This sounds maybe right. Idk there’s a lot of people irl I know that don’t care about the net much but I do think most people spend time on it more then they need to. Even if you are right why do you seemingly embrace this like it’s good instead of fighting against it? Even if it’s reality it’s clearly not a good one

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Bro there’s the g spot in your butt.
            That has to be the gayest thing I've read all week. It's not designed for sexual stimulation, unlike the g spot. Our 'g spot' is our penis. It's already been shown that trannies themselves have trouble 'stimulating' their prostate, it's obviously less receptive to pleasure than the penis.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Shits attached to your dick, moron. When you tug your wienertail your prostate is involved because that's where a portion of semen comes from.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Shits attached to your dick
            And that contradicts anything I said? Unless you're a homosexual its only function is secretion.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >It's not designed for sexual stimulation
            You tugging is sexual stimulation, dumbo.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I think you may be genuinely moronic. A role in the sexual process does not mean it is made for direct sexual stimulation. And what you're saying doesn't make it a 'g spot', that's gay lore.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >mental gymnastics
            Whatever you need to cope. Look up the word stimulation when you're done.
            >I just pull on the rope doesn't mean I am using the bell
            That's you.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            LMAO, you're now attributing all male orgasm and sexual pleasure to the prostate? Not only are you wrong about extraordinarily basic science, you are clearly a twisted homo.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Oh wow, get your caretaker to read this to you when they dress you. I clearly don't have the skills to communicate with people who have your disability. Now the rope plays no function. You are an all type of moron.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            all in*

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Do you not understand the difference between erogenous stimulation and a non-erogenous 'stimulation'? It is this pathetic playing around with terminology that makes you so moronic. When you're wanking, the prostate is not being erogenously stimulated, YOU FRICKING MORON. And what do you think your calling the prostate a bell and the penis a rope implies? It obviously implies that the penis is only a method of stimulating the prostate erogenously. And when did I imply, when I denied that the prostate is responsible for all sexual pleasure in the penis, that the penis plays no function in respect to the prostate? Go ahead, answer any of these. You are a homosexual sophist.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            > the difference between erogenous stimulation and a non-erogenous 'stimulation'
            >It is this pathetic playing around with terminology that makes you so moronic.
            Holy fricking kek, brother. Your are deep in the sauce.
            >think your calling the prostate a bell and the penis a rope implies
            That when you play with one thing it affects the other, obviously.
            >It obviously implies that the penis is only a method of stimulating the prostate erogenously.
            You can also shove shit up your ass. So no, not the only.
            > that the penis plays no function
            > now attributing all male orgasm and sexual pleasure to the prostate
            >Go ahead, answer any of these
            Here's all, you screeching fricking toddler.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            nta, jesus your reading comprehension is shit.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Show don't tell. No one cares about your blog.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Holy fricking kek, brother. Your are deep in the sauce.
            You claim that the prostate is made for sexual stimulation when its function in sex is completely different from what gays use it for. What the prostate does in sex is an activation, it shouldn't be called a sexual stimulation. You keep calling it that for the obvious reason that you are a homosexual and want to seem normal by conflating definitions.

            >That when you play with one thing it affects the other, obviously.
            And what exactly is the nature of this relation? Isn't that rather important for this entire discussion you dumb dumb homosexual?

            >So no, not the only.
            Oh damn, you're an ESL too. You think the word 'only' implies singularly! And furthermore, you somehow confused the penis physically connected to the prostate, as seen in a diagram, with someone else's penis. Do you do this when analyzing the relation between any other organs in the body? Nevertheless, you're fundamentally wrong to think penile stimulation is causing an equivalent stimulation in the prostate.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            > What the prostate does in sex is an activation, it shouldn't be called a sexual stimulation
            Stimulation is the effect of activation. When your prostate is touched your dick gets hard. Coincidence?
            >that you are a homo
            Let's be real, the only reason you're this fricking dense is because you're afraid of being gay, maybe because you actually are. Imagine being secure with your sexuality for one second and then think about the topic.
            >And what exactly is the nature of this relation
            Semenal fluid gets pumped out when a threshold is reached.
            > Isn't that rather important for this entire discussion
            No, because the discussion is stuck on your inability to openly admit the connection between the two why the frick would I complicate it further without getting past the first step?
            >You think the word 'only' implies singularly!
            lmao
            > you somehow confused the penis physically connected to the prostate
            What? You want me to go double check on my own wiener just to make sure they're not lying to me?
            >you're fundamentally wrong
            I am fundamentally correct you perpetually seething dipshit. .

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Even if you are right why do you seemingly embrace this like it’s good instead of fighting against it?
            Because I'm older than you and have mellowed out and learned how to be reasonably content with the world. Give it a few more years and the idea that everything that doesn't fit with your image of an ideal world has to be 'fought against' will seem foreign to you, it's just a stage of life.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >we can just configure reality however we want
            troony mindset. Your nature will forever determine you.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Antiprogress mindset. No one is asking you to call a 5ft weakling an Amazonian, this isn't elon asking you to call his exploding rocket a mars mission.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Are you a woman?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >progress
            Once again troony mindset. So hateful of life you have to imagine a complete transformation of your essential nature, which of course only amounts to an imaginary poeticism or fantasy.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I would be the exact same person, are you anti phone too? Anti electricity?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            People aren't a discovery or an invention. Evolution takes a long ass time. We're still biologically the same as humans who lived 10,000 years ago.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Wow you sound pretty smart bro

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I get it now. You take the identity of the opposite gender to feel less ashamed of your shortcomings.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What? Are you okay? You seem to burst into writing gay fanfic. Did I say something to trigger you?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Just marry a dude
            If I found them attractive I probably would

          • 1 month ago
            Barkon

            I've almost made a language of 2s and 3s that is so powerful it can tell me the truth of a moment, whether it's true or false, yes or no, that is coming in the future. This would be by acting and telling jokes per se, and thus a 2 would pop up with this effect. Soon, this will topple over and I will have the ability to understand what it's saying. I am also an expert of judging myself in periphery for reasons of the same caliber as just said.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Barkon would you frick a giant woman, you might not realize it currently but the answer to this question is essential to validating your theory

          • 1 month ago
            Barkon

            One day women will be made to be tall and super fecund. And men, tiny and athletic. This is the future.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            The prophet has spoken

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I've literally read trannies say that you should take it slow and not expect to be successful the first time. If they're saying that, then I imagine your ass literally getting torn apart wouldn't help.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      sounds like bullshit unless you're getting a reach around or something. i know the gays on the anal gen struggle for months or even years to achieve the fabled anal orgasm.

  3. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Sex and Character by Weininger

  4. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    To the Lighthouse by Virginia Woolf, unironically

  5. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This caption is fake btw

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it's real

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      it's what she was thinking

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It confirms what I want to believe so that makes it real

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >they just stood there, menacingly, and yet didn't move an inch to rape me! I felt so dehumanized and violated!!!
      This is the real quote.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Seems like almost exactly the same sentiment and all the concern trolling about how this quote is fake was unwarranted.

  6. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    No such thing. Every woman is unique.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      LOL

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        "Being" sexualized as if it's an attack is one of the most fundamentally damaging mindsets you can have. You ARE sexual, intrinsically. You have sex organs and your sex is apparent. It is not a secret that you have a vegana, it simply is. That doesn't mean a guy can't be aggressive, creepy, inappropriate, or gross. Of course they can. However, simply being hit on in and of itself is not an attack on the very fibre of your being. If you think it is, you will permanently have a victim mindset that will set you back in every single aspect of your life until you get over it.
        Also, yes, the blatantly stupid thing women do when complaining about being sexualized then also spend a third of their day making themselves look sexy.

  7. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Genesis
    Justine
    Discipline and Punish
    Twilight

  8. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This graph explains a lot

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >woah im shakespeare wearing cool sunglasses

      https://i.imgur.com/rOgFbOA.png

      LOL

      >woah im an anime side character
      21st century has no culture kinda

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        why even bother to post, if your arguments are so weak? you're embarrassing yourself. typical incel NEET shutin with a room-temperature IQ

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >noooo bro putting a statue of a philospher as my profile picture isn't larping!!!

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            not my profile picture, dumbass. not even my image. i downloaded it from here.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          he's right though. We have no culture

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      90% of women ON DATING APPS. This plebeian homosexual doesn't deserve to use Shakespeare as his avatar.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Lol I see that image shared so much and yet its so moronic. I bet most guys on dating apps would prefer a blonde bimbo with D cup breasts, yet most will settle for who is actually interested in them. Pretty sure the same applies for girls and height

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Based. Most men shouldn't reproduce

      Lol I see that image shared so much and yet its so moronic. I bet most guys on dating apps would prefer a blonde bimbo with D cup breasts, yet most will settle for who is actually interested in them. Pretty sure the same applies for girls and height

      There is a chart on sexlessness and roughly 30% of women are incels. Femcels, although volcels
      So about 30% of women don't like average men
      As they grow older this % goes up because they are entitled and don't want a 60yo man, but younger men don't want walled expired women. So it's relative. Not 90% but more like 60% want the 30%. Also ugly old women on dating apps have extremely high standards as a cope.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Lmao I barely even understand that with all the -cel speak. This whole height phenomenon is overplayed. Women want a guy with cash or really just any feature that signals social status

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >Women want a guy with cash or really just any feature that signals social status
          This is also overplayed, and it's not an intrinsic quality of women. The masses in general are materialistic hedonists conditioned by commercial indoctrination. Both men and women objectify and treat each other as dopamine boosters and virtue signals.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Height is stronger than cash especially for girls aged 17-28 but it's not like they go for 7' HGH basketballers. They find 6' and up more attractive but they can settle for 5'9 just fine
          The issue is that now they don't have to settle down. They just sleep around

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They do have to settle though as there are barely any attractive men left in this country lmao. If you are an American and need a confidence boost, just look around at how many “men” are either obese, dress like children, terrible grooming, etc. Are there really that many 6’ chads for the woman population to sleep with?

            So I think a lot of average looking women do need to settle to some extent or I guess just become celibate.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            They do become celibate. And most just settle after 40. A few fatties might settle earlier
            But they end up with a dead bedroom anyway

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >social status
          Not social status but status, great mental strength,sharpness, yet tenderness. Ability has nothing to do with society. Women hate sheep.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >roughly 30% of women are incels.
        That's because their personalities are rotten. Karens are getting more and more common and no man will deal with them.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Women on dating apps are getting approached by a disproportionate amount of men. They are turning on filters because they literally can't respond to everyone. Have you even talked to a girl about why they do this? Once you go outside of that world and talk to a girl that isn't flooded with that kind of attention, she is far more interested in talking to men because she doesn't have 1000 messages a week. Even as a man, if you opened up your DMs to women across the world, you might get 1000s of messages too.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >Even as a man, if you opened up your DMs to women across the world, you might get 1000s of messages too.
        naive
        t. expat

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          what's been your experience

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >90% of women are looking for 6% of the men
      >citation: his ass
      Dumb Black person can't even read his own chart, which specifically says females on "Bumble", not females anywhere in the world. And it's not even all Bumble users. You have to pay to use the advanced filters. So it's paying, female users on Bumble, who choose to set a height filter.

      How can you take such a specialized demographic and generalize to all women unless you're a literal moron?

      This is the kind of dumb frick who probably uses the IQfy dating app and has an autistic meltdown when women inundated by 20 other guys' messages don't reply to him within 10 minutes. Then he spends the next several days writing angry posts on the internet about how all women are hypergamous prostitutes.

      No wonder morons like that are single. I’m personally thankful that women will be filtering him from the gene pool.

  9. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    I'll repeat this for the 100th time here: talk to women. Really talk to them. Don't talk to what you've read or heard through women. Talk TO THEM.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Where

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Join a hobby class. Gym. Bars. At work. Just talk. No goal but to talk.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >MISS COME BACK I JUST WANNA TAAAALLLKKKKK

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Typed by a man who rarely if ever talks to women.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Make me israelite

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Join a hobby class. Gym. Bars. At work. Just talk. No goal but to talk.

      Yes, because superficial chit-cat will lead to one learning about the depths of their psychological profile. Just how dumb are you???

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        you are assuming a psychological profile. what if it really is just thr NPC sex?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Post breasts.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Join a hobby class. Gym. Bars. At work. Just talk. No goal but to talk.

      This kind of bullshit shows more than just a knee-jerk reaction to throw annoying quips at men in order to feel better about your own lack of status and success, it inherently reflects a desperate desire to convince yourself that there is still a "real world" out there that makes the internet the irrelevant exception. There isn't one, the internet is the most real and relevant thing in the human experience right now, and it's people who try to pretend like small talk between strangers on the street is actually what matters who are coping and trying to escape reality.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Have sex

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        What do you think is the actual percentage of extremely online people? I think most people see other people and go out to do stuff regularly, people who live on message boards are still a minority but they consume a lot of content so stories about their plight are mass produced

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          People go out outside but what they do and talk about is profoundly influenced by the internet. I don't even know where to start explaining this if the concept doesn't click for you.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            And that's the real world, they are out there making friends, making connections, having sex. Who cares that they bring up some memes when they are talking that's not really the point

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            It really seems like you don't actually have any firsthand experience in the "real world"

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Alright keep coping, the best way to learn about women is to talk to anonymous incels over the weekend on IQfy

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I've already learned what I need from all kinds of sources, I have a girlfriend and we're getting married later this year lmao

            She's sitting next to me and we're both ignoring each other and goofing around on the internet, as is the norm

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >we're both ignoring each other
            well that just follows naturally since you said don't talk to women

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So you're using the Internet as a meaningless way to pass the time while chilling with a real women and you're telling people they shouldn't go outside and talk to women but should instead take the internet more seriously. That makes no sense

            I said none of these things, you teenagers only heard it that way because you can't think beyond the 'self-improvement to finally get a taste of pussy' meme, it's a cultural discussion. If you want to understand the sort of thing I'm talking about I'd suggest reading Simulacra and Simulation by Baudrillard, unironically.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            You read it first

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Explain why you think this made sense to say as an annoying quip, please.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >bro i didn't say don't go outside and talk to women just read this french philosphy book to understand
            I'm gonna lick your girlfriend

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            That was a must better structured annoying quip. B+, shows improvement.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            So you're using the Internet as a meaningless way to pass the time while chilling with a real women and you're telling people they shouldn't go outside and talk to women but should instead take the internet more seriously. That makes no sense

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          I think a high percentage of people are extremely online while also not being total shut ins

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          >What do you think is the actual percentage of extremely online people?
          How old are you? That's relevant in these matters.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Even though I agree to an extent that the internet is becoming more real and having an impact on our lives, it still doesn't replace reality. If you're on the internet you're still engaging with everything in a divorced way. Like even talking to anons here, like I know you guys are real people behind the screen but it doesn't replace actually interacting with people in real life. It seems like cope to say the internet is just as real and valid as the real world when nobody actually thinks that.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Obviously when someone says something like that they mean it somewhat poetically, it really doesn't warrant a thorough deboonk on the grounds that the outside world is literally real. What I'm saying is the internet and the "real world" are now closely intertwined so much that attempts to put the internet in a little box and treat it as some completely mutable thing that 'doesn't count' is naive.

          Everyone gets the obvious ways they are intertwined: you use your phone to physically accomplish things, you gain real life connections through the internet, people talk about things from the internet in real life. The less obvious is that the internet is so prevalent that people in "real life" are aware that real life is not the only option, they often see "going outside" and talking to strangers as a specific thing to do, in the way that someone might 'try' veganism or finger painting or something. Socialization and 'outside' used to just be immutable facts of life, you didn't have to consciously do them, they just happened. Now they're recognized as 'things' or even products that you pay for and possess. (Again, read Baudrillard) People's behavior outside is becoming less and less natural and more and more influenced by this abstract school of thought (from the internet) about what outside is 'supposed' to be.

          Imagine the sorts of self-hating internet dwelling teenagers you see here following their own advice and trying to go to a bar or a club and meeting people for the first time. They wouldn't be acting naturally are genuine parts of the 'outside' ecosystem like people did back when everyone lived that way without another option, they would essentially be trying to imitate the image they have in their heads of how people in that situation should be acting (an image with a lot of influence from movies, memes, annoying posts here, etc.) When there are enough people outside doing this, you hit a critical mass and it's a totally different situation that's far removed from the original, natural situation.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Okay sensei now tell us how to get pussy

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            B.E. entirely yourself

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Well I know you're just speaking figuratively and I did say I agree about the extent of the internet's influence on our lives. It just becomes an issue when people try to substitute the internet for reality. You can't just be a basement dweller who rots on forums all day yet make bold statements about dating, socialization, and the way people work without you even going outside. I can't lie and say that the internet hasn't changed people a lot because it did and now socializing with others and being in the "real world" is an option so to speak. I guess in the past it was all second nature to do all of this since nobody had any other option but now people have to essentially "preform" to act normal and be comfortable around others. But to go back on my point, that's why I can't help but laugh at the incels here who are parroting all of these statistics from a single dating app or something and that somehow that translates to the way everyone is. They aren't even the only ones doing this and I can say this about many other types of people online.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah a lot of that stuff is absolute bullshit and should be disavowed, of course. Still, internet dating is very common and is starting to become more common than real life dating, I met my gf online, so did a lot of my friends.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Yeah online dating is basically like real dating at this point and I don't really have any problems with it. I guess I just laugh at certain losers online who act like they know everything and from the way they talk you would think they experienced all of this firsthand but in actuality, they just looked at twitter screenshots posted here.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I think you should at least accept that there is a good chance they've had a tinder profile and experienced some of this firsthand, albeit online. However 'fake' you may see the situation, they dealt with it.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I can believe that they did of course, but like how is having a few tinder interactions and being rejected suddenly mean you mastered female psychology? I'm not saying all of the anons here are doing this but it's an annoying thing I always see.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I mean yeah, of course.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Ok glad to see you understand what I was getting at

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          Obviously when someone says something like that they mean it somewhat poetically, it really doesn't warrant a thorough deboonk on the grounds that the outside world is literally real. What I'm saying is the internet and the "real world" are now closely intertwined so much that attempts to put the internet in a little box and treat it as some completely mutable thing that 'doesn't count' is naive.

          Everyone gets the obvious ways they are intertwined: you use your phone to physically accomplish things, you gain real life connections through the internet, people talk about things from the internet in real life. The less obvious is that the internet is so prevalent that people in "real life" are aware that real life is not the only option, they often see "going outside" and talking to strangers as a specific thing to do, in the way that someone might 'try' veganism or finger painting or something. Socialization and 'outside' used to just be immutable facts of life, you didn't have to consciously do them, they just happened. Now they're recognized as 'things' or even products that you pay for and possess. (Again, read Baudrillard) People's behavior outside is becoming less and less natural and more and more influenced by this abstract school of thought (from the internet) about what outside is 'supposed' to be.

          Imagine the sorts of self-hating internet dwelling teenagers you see here following their own advice and trying to go to a bar or a club and meeting people for the first time. They wouldn't be acting naturally are genuine parts of the 'outside' ecosystem like people did back when everyone lived that way without another option, they would essentially be trying to imitate the image they have in their heads of how people in that situation should be acting (an image with a lot of influence from movies, memes, annoying posts here, etc.) When there are enough people outside doing this, you hit a critical mass and it's a totally different situation that's far removed from the original, natural situation.

          There's a movement to get kids to learn how to live without screens, so that they don't turn into unaccomplished stunted putzes like you:
          https://time.com/6207134/how-i-got-my-students-to-stop-staring-at-screens/

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            What does that have to do with what I said?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Because the screens are the connection to the Internet, dumbass.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >posted using the internet

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Actually schizo and sad. Go outside lil homie. You say small talk and shit is trash and even though it is it’s still more real then the net. Like

        Even though I agree to an extent that the internet is becoming more real and having an impact on our lives, it still doesn't replace reality. If you're on the internet you're still engaging with everything in a divorced way. Like even talking to anons here, like I know you guys are real people behind the screen but it doesn't replace actually interacting with people in real life. It seems like cope to say the internet is just as real and valid as the real world when nobody actually thinks that.

        said no matter what when your on the net there’s ALWAYS a disconnect. Seeing real flesh isn’t vs a screen isn’t just superficial it changes your reactions. It’s why a person can act confident online then turn into a bumbling mess irl. All their spaghetti falling out their pocket and everything. Terrible terrible day.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      It will only get you so far because they're not completely honest and they frequently lie by omission if not outright.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This, and there's no reason you can't learn about them both ways anyway. This idea that you have to choose between being an internet-dwelling incel and a totally naive "normal person" in the "real world" is just weird cope from insecure teenagers trying to convince themselves they are the second category.

    • 1 month ago
      I ignore women

      Join a hobby class. Gym. Bars. At work. Just talk. No goal but to talk.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      No thanks.

  10. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Wuthering Heights does a good job of showcasing the moronation of a typical woman

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >HEATHCLIFF

  11. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  12. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Book written by an absolute pseud that moron incels on IQfy have been praising as the holy grail for far too long. There are a few gems of good advice sprinkled through a smorgasbord of fetid shit.

  13. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Burmese Days

    Orwell understood the female mind perfectly

  14. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    So fricking what? It's not like the 1% of women who do not use dating apps have an overwhelming, burning desire to frick manlets or something. That image shows that women on dating apps all prefer men who are taller than the average, and in case you forgot, some 95% of women between the ages of 12-40 use dating apps.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >some 95% of women between the ages of 12-40 use dating apps
      I remember seeing it around 60%

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/02/key-findings-about-online-dating-in-the-u-s/

      >Three-in-ten U.S. adults say they have ever used a dating site or app, identical to the share who said this in 2019

      27% specifically for women. This percentage is probably higher for women 40 and under, but it's definitely 95% — and another thing you have to consider is that many people who use dating apps only use them until they find a partner or until they have a bad experience, at which point they delete their profiles and never go back to the apps again. A lot of these statistics in regards to user preferences are only applying to "serial" app users, and what kind of people do you think are serial app users? For the most part, just people who are into hookup culture, or losers who keep picking bad partners / getting dumped. Bottom line, what you think dating apps prove about a certain sex's preferences, they really don't prove.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm aware that most women prefer taller guys, but the idea that "90% of women only want 6% of men" is completely unfounded nonsense. Actually talk to women, both married and unmarried ones; women date and marry all kinds of men, all the fricking time.

  15. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Not a book but an article:
    https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016328719303507
    >Will we be too stupid to be hunter-gatherers?
    >The human brain has been shrinking rapidly since agriculture, (from 1500cc to 1350cc). This fact is well-documented and is independent of race, gender and geographical location. For example, Henneberg (1988, p. 395) writes of the decline in cranial capacity in Europe and North Africa during the Holocene:
    >For both males and females the decrease through time is smooth, statistically significant and inversely exponential. A decrease of 157 cc (9.9% of the larger value) in males and of 261 cc (17.4%) in females is a considerable one, of the order of magnitude comparable to the difference between averages for H. erectus and H. sapiens sapiens.
    >261 cc (17.4%) in females
    Women have literally been artificially selected to be moronic and hypersexual brood mares

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >The human brain has been shrinking rapidly
      Computers too. Used to be the size of a fricking house, and now you can put them is a pocket...

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        This is the stupidest cope. Anyone with a basic observational capability can see that people are getting dumber year by year.

  16. 1 month ago
    Anonymous
  17. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >OMG FAKE QUOTE MADE BY BLACKPILLED INCELS?!?! WHY ARE WOMEN SUCH EVIL prostituteS

    What’s crazy is that you guys know it’s not real, you know I know it’s not real, you know I know you know it’s not real yet you STILL engage in this absurd vaudevillian farce where you pretend this is real and an ironclad representation of women’s innate degenerated psychology even though it’s obviously not real.

    Like take a moment to step back and consider the absurdity of this for a moment. Actual mass psychosis

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Like take a moment to step back and consider the absurdity of this for a moment. Actual mass psychosis
      We call that "woman"

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      1. Prove its fake
      2. The thread is not actually about the picture and is about female psychology, presumably using the picture as a humorous example of a woman saying something psychologically strange

  18. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Imagine if sex wasn't an issue and you were physically weak and no one takes you seriously while a portion of the population hates you for existing. Now navigate the world.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >Now navigate the world.
      Extremely easy with orbiters and nanny state that caters exclusively to you

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Navigate the world as an invisible being for a month then get back to us.
      Empathetic sex my ass, you're self centered beyond any measure.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Been doing it for 3 decades. What about it?

  19. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Madame Bovary. The protagonist is a scummy piece of human garbage that somehow convinced herself she was in the right, and that her husband, a poor innocent bastard was at fault for every last one of her mistakes.

  20. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Are there any books written by women who don't embody an alien female mind but seem relatable in some way?
    Perhaps a virtuous woman who values art for art's sake

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Btw I've heard that George Eliot might have been like this
      She liked to think of herself as a man sometimes, does she fit what I'm looking for?

  21. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    This woman gave away the game back in 1971. She received a lot of death threats for her insolence.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      This shit is as stupid as the drivel feminists put out. Women can't think at an abstract level.

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        You never even tried to read it. You are an arrogant ass.

        • 1 month ago
          Anonymous

          The conclusions are obviously just as biased as what feminists claim. Neither men nor women are mass manipulating, exploiting, oppressing, or abusing each other in post-industrial society.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Esther Vilar is a woman talking about how women manipulate men, dumbass.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            I'm aware. My point still stands, the conclusions are overblown.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Women don't manipulate men?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Women are not mass manipulating men or manipulating them to the extent she asserts. Everyone is ultimately being led by the chemicals in their brains and the conditioning set upon them by family, doctors, and schools.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Okay, but women on average are more emotionally attuned because they were socialized to be and lean on that as leverage, no? Is that not manipulation? Just because they're not aware of it doesn't mean it's not happening, right? How many anons are porn addicted is that not a slave to pussy?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >women on average are more emotionally attuned
            I see no evidence or reason to believe that. Women are irrational and easily misled by their emotions.

            >How many anons are porn addicted is that not a slave to pussy?
            Men create porn, not women, so you should be blaming men here.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >I see no evidence or reason to believe that
            What? GIrls are encouraged to socialize from an early age so they learn how the social game is played ahead of boys. For example, It's appropriate to practice kissing with each other for girls not guys. Girls spend their time playing house which builds understanding of relationships while we spent our early development whacking each other with sticks and going "Pew" , "Pew" Women are encouraged to cry and express their emotions while men are told to stfu and push that shit down, it's unbecoming of a man to be emotional. Of course the people who practice the shit are going to be better at it. What do you mean no evidence?
            >Men create porn
            Okay. What do men look at in porn is it wieners? How many moronic anons come in here day in and day out screeching about how pussy is what makes them worth something? If pussy is not in control what's up with all the incels seething? What are they seething about? They're seething because they feel entitled to pussy that's what's on their mind.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >It's appropriate to practice kissing with each other for girls not guys. Girls spend their time playing house which builds understanding of relationships while we spent our early development whacking each other with sticks and going "Pew" , "Pew" Women are encouraged to cry and express their emotions while men are told to stfu and push that shit down, it's unbecoming of a man to be emotional.
            All this shit means is that girls get a head start on it, it doesn't mean that as a whole women are more socially intelligent and manipulative. Also, vast majority of this shit is enforced not only by women, but by men as well.

            >What do men look at in porn is it wieners?
            Are you saying women are responsible for the chemicals in men's brains? What the frick, anon. This shit makes no sense. Men create the porn, so whatever porn causes is on them. Men are just following the chemicals in their brains, they aren't being manipulated by anyone, so it's on them to discipline themselves and each other to have some self-control. That's what growing up is all about. Women have to learn self-control too.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Not him but I definitely think women are inherently more in touch with their emotions, which manifests paradoxically as BOTH a total inability to control them (overall), and the ability to wield them to manipulate

            I think they do the latter half-consciously, it's like a "knack." Schopenhauer says somewhere they have cunning, not intelligence. They are also amoral and very self-serving, a woman can justify doing absolutely sociopathic evil shit based on self-interest or by convincing herself she's a victim. And they're not like men, for whom convincing oneself takes time and energy. A woman can convince herself of whatever would be most convenient for her to believe in about 30 seconds. Women rewrite their own memories and speak total falsehoods that in theory they should "know" are falsehoods, but they believe them while saying them. Again I think cunning comes into it, it's like an on unconscious instinct level they know "This is true in a deeper sense, it's true because it needs to be" even when they theoretically know in their rational mind that it isn't true. The rational mind of a woman is like a little boat on top of a vast ocean of feeling.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >All this shit means is that girls get a head start on it
            Right, which means they're better at it. Is that not an advantage that can be used as leverage?
            > it doesn't mean that as a whole women are more socially intelligent
            Of course they are. They get more practice.
            >and manipulative
            What human doesn't press an advantage they have?
            >Also, vast majority of this shit is enforced not only by women, but by men as well.
            Okay, and? A moron can't play against his self interest if he thinks there's pussy at the end for him? Also, what idiot is going to ostracize himself from the group, for what?
            >Are you saying women are responsible for the chemicals in men's brains?
            No, I am saying women are driven towards something women have and they're aware of it. How many stories do we hear of women using sex as a strategy of control? Does the term whipped not mean anything to you?
            >whatever porn causes is on them
            There are other means of getting dopamine hits. Men want pussy so they go to the place where it's in 4k if they can't get it in real life.
            >so it's on them to discipline themselves
            How many men are aware they're puppets?
            >Women have to learn self-control too.
            How many of women are aware they're puppets?
            All this autonomy shit is neat and all, but what percentage of the population is lucid enough to even attempt it?

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >No, I am saying women are driven towards something women have
            *men are

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            >Of course they are. They get more practice.
            Men can easily catch up and often surpass them on this eventually.

            >What human doesn't press an advantage they have?
            The thing is that not all women have this advantage over all men, like Vilar seems to claim. It's not even majority of women over majority of men.

            >A moron can't play against his self interest if he thinks there's pussy at the end for him? Also, what idiot is going to ostracize himself from the group, for what?
            You're making up bizarre excuses just to blame women for something they're not at all responsible for. They don't make porn, so they are not accountable for the effects of porn, end of discussion.

            >No, I am saying women are driven towards something women have and they're aware of it.
            So is everyone, and women don't have this special oppressive power over men, just like how men don't have such a power over women either.

            >All this autonomy shit is neat and all, but what percentage of the population is lucid enough to even attempt it?
            How is this part of your defense of Vilar's book? At this point, you're just looking to poke holes in everything I'm saying to appear right.

          • 1 month ago
            Anonymous

            Esther Vilar is a woman talking about how women manipulate men, dumbass.

            Men and women are in an eternal war.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      >She received a lot of death threats for her insolence.

      This shit is as stupid as the drivel feminists put out. Women can't think at an abstract level.

      >This shit is as stupid
      lol

  22. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    OP's pic comes from a Hamas hostage. She reminds me of pic rel.

  23. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Go outside and stop using the internet, it's terrible!
    >*posted using the internet*
    I feel like this is a valuable and untapped source of soijak material

  24. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    good morning

  25. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >Join a hobby class. Gym. Bars. At work. Just talk. No goal but to talk.
    choose a fricking big television, choose washing machines, choose compact disc players

  26. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    muslims lie like second nature.

  27. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Lmao these kids are just gonna get worse and worse every gen aren't they

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      [...]
      Reported for confessing to a crime.

      [...]
      how weak are your punches? this story makes no sense

      [...]
      >I can't believe my wife killed herself she had everything taken care of

      >Replying to a pasta that's probably older than you are

      Zoom zoom zoom

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        >I-I'm just pretending to be moronic
        Why was it deleted then?

  28. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    Reported for confessing to a crime.

  29. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    how weak are your punches? this story makes no sense

  30. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    [...]

    >I can't believe my wife killed herself she had everything taken care of

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      Yah is that some yummy bait?

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Wbat like go on the internet and tell lies? No one does that.

  31. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    don't blame all women for what is clearly a israeli problem

  32. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    She didn’t say that

    ?si=uXZlA0nzJejqud-W
    But she still seemed strangely obsessed with being raped by Hamas even though nothing seems to imply she was going to be.

  33. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    How do I find a woman who is worthy of pursuit?
    Not just any girl but one who is right for me, I've talked to lots but the character and conversation is always the same, sometimes layered with tons of traps for me in forms of common interests and other superficial qualities, don't tell me i'll have to talk to hundreds if not thousands and thats the only way?
    FRICKING RNG

  34. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    >215 posts
    >less than 10% actually mention books
    >80% of posts is emotional bickering and variations of "you will never put your dick in a vegana"
    This board really is full of feminized men

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      That's right. Anime website. Chud.

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      MY EFFORTPOSTS ARE FUELED BY MISOGYNY POSTS, I BURN HATRED OF WOMEN TO FUEL MY QUEST FOR KNOWLEDGE, I AM SUSTAINED BY THE KNOWLEDGE THAT OTHER MEN ON THE INTERNET HATE WOMEN AS MUCH AS I DO

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        Post books then, stop arguing with these r*ddittoids and answer the OP

      • 1 month ago
        Anonymous

        That was the old internet, the nu-internet is all about competing to see who can be the most unskeptical of women.

  35. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Is it a particular middle eastern phenotype that has these dark eye circles even in youth or a diet issue?

    • 1 month ago
      Anonymous

      I know a few palestinians and it is endemic in the women with lighter skin. I'm guessing the darker ones still have them but it blends to their skin color

  36. 1 month ago
    Anonymous

    Effi Briest - Theodor Fontane
    Effi is bored and wants a huge wiener and does not even think about the consequences of her actions upon her family, she just acts based on feelings, she is pure emotion, no rationality is to be found in her. (Fontane was a cuck though)

Comments are closed.