Roald Dahl is a fricking moron

Roald Dahl is a fricking moron

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

UFOs Are A Psyop Shirt $21.68

It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    even gays like him are based by today's standards

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      https://i.imgur.com/nQDJbqt.jpeg

      Stopped clocks are right twice a day. Dahl embodies the worst of the English character, snotty classicism, a hatred directed towards all upward striving, sadistic glee in seeing anyone who disagrees with you punished.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        All that is based wdym

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          All of this is the "morality" of the liberal shopkeeper who despises everything that doesn't benefit his priggish milleau. It resents natural aristocracy because it is unfair and while despising the proles because they might take their place. Family, community and the notion of forgiveness and virtue is hogwash to Dahl, because his only values are the kind of trite, bourgeois morality that led Englishmen to accept a Paki as their PM because he plays the part of the snobby "good sort."
          If you think there's anything admirable in any of the inhuman garbage he's written you are a bugman. You are all liberals.
          I will read my children Beatrice Potter and James Gurney.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Imagine being this assblasted by someone who wrote children's books where the overriding theme was "be kind and don't hate yourself"
            >I will read my children
            Best of luck to them they're gonna need it

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            The only theme to Dahl's entire life was moneygrubbing.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Sometimes people hide their true motives in conversation because they're ashamed of them. But when they're writing, you can see them.

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >It resents natural aristocracy

            How does the natural aristocrat feel about being outfought, outthought, and outmaneuvered by a shoe keeper? What exactly is the "natural elite" elite in?

          • 3 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Well, I imagine they don't spend a lot of times thinking about things that didn't happen.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        True, it's also why his writing is so good, same with Rowling. Hate filled people who managed to make kino literature that seemingly make fun of certain stereotypes and ideas until you realise the authors are more sincere about it than you thought.
        If Dahl were alive today and had a Twitter account he would be hated 1000x more than Rowling or any other British celebrity.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          True. The thing with Rowling though is that her class views are implicit and tacticly show through the way she wrights 'sufficiently magical' races, vs variations of humans.

          For example, she's very clear that discriminating against 'mudbloods' is a very bad thing that only evil, arrogant and disreputable people do, and this is the kind of view she wants to present herself as having and promoting.

          On the other hand, she has no issue whatsoever creating magical made up races, which have clearly innate characteristics that are undeniably distinct from normal humans, and actively mocks characters who refuse to respect these obvious distinctions as being completely natural and moreover justifying the most blatant discrimination and class divisions thought this (of course House Elves are born natural slaves silly).

          For most of her life she seems to have been easily swayed by the 'vibe' of the environment she lived as as so what felt right or wrong, but recently seems to have gained a backbone and developed a much more deliberate worldview that she actively defends and I respect her for seemingly developing out of her previous unreflective naivety.

        • 3 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          True. The thing with Rowling though is that her class views are implicit and tacticly show through the way she wrights 'sufficiently magical' races, vs variations of humans.

          For example, she's very clear that discriminating against 'mudbloods' is a very bad thing that only evil, arrogant and disreputable people do, and this is the kind of view she wants to present herself as having and promoting.

          On the other hand, she has no issue whatsoever creating magical made up races, which have clearly innate characteristics that are undeniably distinct from normal humans, and actively mocks characters who refuse to respect these obvious distinctions as being completely natural and moreover justifying the most blatant discrimination and class divisions thought this (of course House Elves are born natural slaves silly).

          For most of her life she seems to have been easily swayed by the 'vibe' of the environment she lived as as so what felt right or wrong, but recently seems to have gained a backbone and developed a much more deliberate worldview that she actively defends and I respect her for seemingly developing out of her previous unreflective naivety.

          >when pseudy libtards get BTFO by children's literature

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >sadistic glee in seeing anyone who disagrees with you punished.
        Uhh im thinking... based?

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >English character
        he was welsh & norwegian you stupid Black person

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ugly cope

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >t. Ugly Thoughts haver

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    bottom is a 10/10 in bongland

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He's right. You just have ugly thoughts

  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      Disgusting

  7. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    racist

  8. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You type like an ugly person anon, better clean up those thoughts.

  9. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Cope

  10. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    hes right. ugly people are ugly because they lack charisma and walk around with a dick on their shoulder all the time

  11. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    physiognomy is real but we call it by different names

  12. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    OP here, I misspelt moron as "extremely correct individual"

  13. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Congratulations OP, you successfully debunked a quote written by a children's book author made to promote positive thoughts to children. Truly a masterwork of intellect.
    What's next, are you going to disprove the existence of Santa Claus?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I have it on good authority that Santa "Fat Bags" Claus was present in Dealey Plaza on that fateful day

  14. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's true no matter how much you cope, bad thought haver.
    >All that we are is the result of what we have thought: it is founded on our thoughts, it is made up of our thoughts.

  15. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    That image is literally true. Enjoy getting even more ugly as the years role on.

  16. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous
    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >a stinker like Hitler
      You know, the more I learn about this Hitler character, the less I care for him!

  17. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    What book is this from? I've never read anything by Dahl, so I'm wondering where to start.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      The Twits.
      > I'm wondering where to start.
      I don't think it matters. Maybe Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. I remember really liking his autobiographies when I was in 5th grade, so you could check those out. They probably hold up a lot better than his children's books, but I haven't read anything by Dahl since 5th grade so I couldn't really tell you.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        Thank you Anon, I'll check what's available to me.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      BFG and Witches were awesome when I was in 5th grade

  18. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    I don't care about being "lovely", I only want the kind of look that makes women want to sleep with me, anything else is pointless.

  19. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Nah that's true. You just can't understand because you are an ugly thought pleb

  20. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Completely wrong.
    Ugliness comes from bad oral posture. Widen your palate, fix your bite, keep your fricking mouth shut properly and breathe through your nose.

    Then you can have whatever thoughts you want.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      You can be ugly even with a good jaw and chin.

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        No you can't. You don't know what a "good jaw and chin" are.

  21. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >it's another israelite hating Dahl thread
    Be gone, israelite

  22. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's true. Althoughever, people don't deserve my sunbeamy face, so I reserve my good thoughts for when I'm by myself.

  23. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Quick: buy physical copies of his books before they're all burned by leftists.

  24. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Roald Dahl is a fricking moron

  25. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    ugly hands typed this

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      me in the lower half 🙂

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        🙂

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      me on the upper half >:[

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        D:<

      • 3 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        that squirrel is NUTS

  26. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Beautiful people are morally better than ugly people, this is a fact. Read Rígsþula.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      k homo

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      chad hominem

  27. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Thanks for proving his point anon.

    • 3 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      I'm literally a 8/10

  28. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    bottom unironically looks like my grandmother

  29. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    It's true in the sense that people will like being around you and perceive you as a positive vibe and therefore categorize you as "attractive" in a way. He's of course not saying that staying positive will turn you into Henry Cavill.

    Ah, responding to bait.

  30. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    prove it

  31. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Read Schopenhauer's On Physiognomy.

  32. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >ITT: Ugly people exemplify their ugliness by expressing their thoughts
    Pottery.

  33. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >he was filtered by a children’s book
    Oh nonononononono

  34. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    No, this is actually true. Physiognomy is real, you can tell that people are evil by looking at them, and it isn't just ugliness.

    >duhh buh
    No really explain to me how this is NOT true. The human brain evolved for how long to do facial recognition? Some Harvard guys built a computer program that can look at a person's face and, controlling for race and gender, guess that person's political proclivities at a rate of nearly 70%. But the average human's ability is still well above random, meaning that you can do this too. Your instincts are more accurate than any gay rational process you could undergo to try and figure out someone's character, and it's had millions of years of testing where the penalty for failure is rape and death.

  35. 3 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    He was right

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *