Science

>Come up with some arbitrary opinion (“Hypothesis”)
>Do some weak statistics to provide “evidence” of my “hypothesis”
>Write an overly long and complicated explanation of this process. Use a lot of big words to make sure I sound smart.
>Publish in “academic” “journal”
Is this what “science” is?

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

Homeless People Are Sexy Shirt $21.68

Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14

  1. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    You can verify your hypothesis by using the scientific method. Let us know how it works out and publish your results.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Let us know how it works out
      The way it works out is that you use the scientific method like a good goy and shit out your result, then someone else does a little different procedure and shits out contradictory results. Then 100 other academoids do the same and you get 100 different and mutually contradicting results, meanwhile everyone is using the scientific method just as instructed. It's almost like the scientific method is inadequate for answering any complex question.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >OP is too stupid to follow the recipe in a cooking book.
        >Argues that recipes are terrible and useless for cooking on IQfy.
        >Wonders why nobody takes him seriously.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          Ok. OP stupid and bad. What about your actual scientists doing le actual science and it going exactly as I just described?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >Ok. OP stupid and bad
            Yep, you're stupid OP.
            You are stupid.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Take your meds.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            That's not a valid argument idiot OP.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            What arguments do I need when you're having a psychotic episode?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            OP has no argument for anything.
            Sad...

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            He didn't but I did. I rubbed your nose in some empirical facts that clearly BTFO your ideology, since your only recourse is to pretend it never happened.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            >He didn't but I did.
            Lol, you're the OP samegayging dumbfrick.

            >I rubbed your nose in some empirical facts that clearly BTFO your ideology, since your only recourse is to pretend it never happened.
            Like what OP?
            Where did that happen?

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Thanks for demonstrating my point. Imagine being so invested in a failed ideology that you go into psychosis every time someone mentions its faults.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I’m the OP and you have provided no argument to my fellow anons very valid point about the “scientific method” producing contradictory results. This is very common in medicine, psychology and social “”””sciences””””.

            Lol samegayging autistic psychopath OP.
            Still no valid argument.
            Too stupid to even elaborate on anything.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            I’m the OP and you have provided no argument to my fellow anons very valid point about the “scientific method” producing contradictory results. This is very common in medicine, psychology and social “”””sciences””””.

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          >thinks science is about following simple algorithms or recipes

          You have a simplistic and normie tier understanding of science. There isa no fixed "scientific method". Scientists are the people who create the recipes, so to speak. Engineers and doctors are the people who follow them.

          The job of the scientist is not simply to "follow" the scientific method, as if this were some unchanging Platonic form handed down to humans by some omniscient being. The scientific method is a process that was made up by humans - in particular, by scientists themselves. There is no fixed scientific method. The methods and tools differ from one subject to another, and even from one research paper to another.

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        So why are you asking if you've already done your research?

        • 4 weeks ago
          Anonymous

          I'm not asking anything, though.

          • 4 weeks ago
            Anonymous

            Then don't put question marks at the end of posts.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Come up with 20 completely wrong “hypotheses”
      >test each of them using p-value < 0.05
      >one of them is now likely to be “””verified””” thanks to the nature of randomness
      I heckin LOVE science!

      • 4 weeks ago
        Anonymous

        >>Come up with 20 completely wrong “hypotheses”
        >>test each of them using p-value < 0.05
        >>one of them is now likely to be “””verified””” thanks to the nature of randomness
        >I heckin LOVE science!

        Haha, you need a way higher P value for that you dumb frick.

  2. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Come up with some arbitrary physical activities ( "exercise routine" )
    >Do some exercise to make it seem like you're following the "routine"
    >Write an overly long and complicated explanation of your "progress". Use big words to make sure you sound smart.
    >Post it with updates simultaneously on IQfy, reddit and your "microblog".
    >Why is the OP still obese?

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >muh unique brand of the totally real scientific method has never been tried

  3. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Dumb frogposter

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous

      >Dumb frogposter

  4. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    Wait until you find out that mathematics is just unfolding the implications of a postulate.

  5. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >Is this what “science” is?
    No, that's only part of the process.

    • 4 weeks ago
      Anonymous
  6. 4 weeks ago
    Anonymous

    >dumb as frick
    >pretends to know shit
    >fails
    >posts frogs
    Checks out

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *